|
|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
This excerpt taken from the SMG DEF 14A filed Dec 19, 2008. Approval
of Retention Awards to NEOs
On October 8, 2008, the Compensation Committee approved an
amendment to the ERP to authorize grants of discretionary
retention awards under the ERP. Following its approval of this
amendment, the Compensation Committee approved the granting of
retention awards to certain key management employees of the
Company, including Mr. Evans, Mr. Sanders and
Ms. Stump. Consistent with the terms of the ERP, each
executive officer who was granted a retention award has the
right to elect an investment fund, including a Company stock
fund, against which the retention award will be benchmarked.
Mr. Evans, Mr. Sanders and
Table of Contents
Ms. Stump elected the Company stock fund as the investment
fund against which their respective retention awards will be
benchmarked.
The retention awards approved by the Compensation Committee with
respect to the executive officers identified above, as well as
the retention award approved with respect to Mr. Lopez
(described below), were each in the amount of $1.0 million.
These awards reflected the Compensation Committees belief
that retaining the institutional knowledge and overall talent
possessed by the Companys key executive officers puts the
Company in the best position to ensure that it continues to
successfully achieve both its short-term and long-term goals
during challenging economic times. The retention awards serve to
further the Companys stated objective to retain the
necessary leadership talent to sustain and expand upon its
unique competencies and capabilities.
Each retention award was granted subject to the terms of a
retention award agreement, a form of which the Compensation
Committee approved prior to its approval of the individual
retention awards. The retention award agreement provides that
each executive officers interest in the retention award
vests as follows:
Each retention award is subject to forfeiture if the executive
officer is terminated for cause at any time or the executive
officer engages in certain actions prohibited by the retention
award agreement within 180 days before or 730 days
after the executive officers employment is terminated for
any reason. In the event of forfeiture, the executive officer
must repay any amount previously distributed from the executive
officers retention award account under the ERP.
Each retention award agreement provides for distribution of the
retention award, to the extent vested, to the executive officer
as follows:
Distributions will be paid in cash to the extent the vested
retention award account is benchmarked against an investment
fund other than the Company stock fund. To the extent the vested
retention award account is
Table of Contents
benchmarked against the Company stock fund, distributions will
be made in whole Common Shares, plus cash for any fractional
share.
On November 4, 2008, the Compensation Committee granted a
restricted stock unit award to Mr. Lopez. Because
Mr. Lopez is a French citizen and therefore not eligible to
participate in the ERP, the restricted stock unit award is not
subject to the terms of the ERP, and is instead governed by the
terms of the Companys 2006 Plan. The restricted stock unit
award was granted pursuant to an award agreement that contains
terms and conditions substantially similar to those approved by
the Compensation Committee in the form of retention award
agreement, including terms and conditions relating to vesting,
forfeiture and distribution.
On November 4, 2008, the Compensation Committee approved a
one-time payment of $125,000 to Mr. Sanders in recognition
of his continuing service in light of the recent organizational
changes.
|
| |||||||