|
|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
This excerpt taken from the SMG DEF 14A filed Dec 20, 2007. Compensation
Peer Group
For the 2007 fiscal year, the Company utilized the same
compensation peer group as had been utilized in the 2006 fiscal
year. This peer group consisted of approximately 60
consumer-oriented companies as a reference for determining
competitive total compensation packages for the CEO and other
key management employees. The compensation benchmark data for
the 2007 fiscal year peer group was determined by applying a 4%
annual growth rate assumption to the survey data that was
initially compiled in the 2005 fiscal year. To account for the
wide range of companies included in the 2005 survey, the data
was statistically adjusted by an
outside survey company to more closely reflect the size and
complexity of the Company. The 2007 fiscal year compensation
peer group was comprised of the following companies:
At the direction of the Compensation and Organization Committee
and in conjunction with the Companys compensation
consultants, a new, more focused compensation peer group was
developed in the 2007 fiscal year with the goal of enabling the
Company to more closely benchmark the total compensation
packages of the CEO and other NEOs with the types of companies
that the Company typically competes with to attract and retain
executive talent. This new peer group, which has been approved
by the Compensation and Organization Committee and which will be
utilized by management and the Compensation and Organization
Committee for the 2008 fiscal year and beyond, consists of the
following companies:
The Compensation and Organization Committee believes this peer
group of highly regarded consumer oriented companies reflects
the pay practices of the broader consumer products industry, and
is more reflective of the size and complexity of the Company. In
general, the new 2008 fiscal year peer group reflects companies
that range between $1.0 billion and $6.5 billion of
annual revenues. The annual revenues for the Company are
slightly below the median revenues of the new peer group.
|
| |||||||