|
|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| |||||||||
Service Corporation International 10-K 2007 Documents found in this filing:Table of Contents
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
Commission file number 1-6402-1
Registrants telephone number, including area code:
713/522-5141
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the
Act:
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the
Act:
None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known
seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities
Act. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file
reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the
Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No
o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers
pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K
is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best
of registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or
information statements incorporated by reference in
Part III of this
Form 10-K
or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer or a non-accelerated
filer. See definition of accelerated filer and
large accelerated filer in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act (check one).
Large Accelerated
Filer þ Accelerated
Filer o Non-accelerated
Filer o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Rule 12b-2). Yes o No þ
The aggregate market value of the common stock held by
non-affiliates of the registrant (assuming that the
registrants only affiliates are its officers and
directors) was $2,236,208,053 based upon a closing market price
of $8.14 on June 30, 2006 of a share of common stock as
reported on the New York Stock Exchange Composite
Transactions Tape.
The number of shares outstanding of the registrants common
stock as of February 20, 2007 was 293,476,937 (net of
treasury shares)
Portions of the registrants Proxy Statement in connection
with its 2007 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (Part III)
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
Table of Contents
The following terms are common to the deathcare industry, are
used throughout this report, and have the following meanings:
Atneed Funeral and cemetery arrangements
after the death has occurred.
Burial Vaults A reinforced outer burial
container intended to protect the casket against the weight of
the earth.
Cash Overrides Funds received based on
achieving certain dollar volume targets of life insurance
policies.
Cremation The reduction of human remains to
bone fragments by intense heat.
General Agency (GA) Revenues Commissions paid
to the General Agency (GA) for life insurance policies or
annuities sold to preneed customers for the purpose of funding
preneed funeral arrangements. The commission rate paid is
determined based on the product type sold, the length of payment
terms, and the age of the insured/annuitant. The commission rate
is applied to the face amount of the policy purchased to
determine the commission amount payable to the GA.
GA revenues are recognized as funeral revenues when the
insurance purchase transaction between the customer and third
party insurance provider is completed.
Interment The burial or final placement of
human remains in the ground.
Lawn Crypt An outer burial receptacle
constructed of concrete and reinforced steel, which is usually
pre-installed in predetermined designated areas.
Marker A method of identifying the remains in
a particular burial space, crypt, or niche. Permanent burial
markers are usually made of bronze, granite, or stone.
Maturity At the time of death. This is the
point at which preneed contracts are converted to atneed
contracts.
Mausoleum An above ground structure that is
designed to house caskets and cremation urns.
Perpetual Care or Endowment Care Fund A trust
fund used for the maintenance and upkeep of burial spaces within
a cemetery.
Preneed Funeral and cemetery arrangements
made prior to the time of death.
Preneed Backlog Future revenues from
unfulfilled preneed funeral and cemetery contractual
arrangements.
Production Sales of preneed funeral and
preneed or atneed cemetery contracts.
Table of Contents
PART I
Service Corporation International (SCI) is North Americas
leading provider of deathcare products and services, with a
network of funeral homes and cemeteries unequalled in geographic
scale and reach. At December 31, 2006, we operated 1,613
funeral service locations and 452 cemeteries, (including 232
combination locations) in North America, which are
geographically diversified across 45 states, eight Canadian
provinces, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico. Our
funeral segment also includes the operations of Kenyon
International Emergency Services, a subsidiary that specializes
in providing disaster management services in mass fatality
incidents as well as training, planning, and Crisis
Communications consulting services, and the operations of 14
funeral homes in Germany that we intend to exit when economic
values and conditions are conducive to a sale. As part of the
Alderwoods Group, Inc. (Alderwoods) transaction, we acquired an
insurance business for which we have commenced a plan to divest.
The operations of this business are presented as discontinued
operations in our consolidated statement of operations and as
assets and liabilities of discontinued operations in on our
consolidated balance sheet. In addition, we own a minority
interest in AKH Luxco, S.C.A., more commonly known as Pompes
Funebres Génerales (PFG), Frances leading provider of
funeral services.
We were incorporated in Texas in July of 1962. Prior to 1999, we
focused on the acquisition and consolidation of independent
funeral homes and cemeteries in the fragmented deathcare
industry in North America. During the 1990s, we also expanded
our operations through acquisitions in Europe, Australia, South
America; and the Pacific Rim. During the mid to late 1990s,
acquisitions of deathcare facilities became extremely
competitive resulting in increased prices for acquisitions and
substantially reduced returns on invested capital. In 1999, we
significantly reduced our level of acquisition activity and
began to focus on identifying and addressing non-strategic or
underperforming businesses.
This focus resulted in the divestiture of several North America
and international operations beginning in 2001. During 2001 and
2002, we completed joint ventures of operations in Australia,
the United Kingdom, Spain, and Portugal. In 2003, we sold our
equity investment in our operations in Australia, Spain, and
Portugal. During 2004, we sold our funeral operations in France
and obtained a minority interest in the acquiring entity. We
also sold our minority interest equity investment in the United
Kingdom. During 2005, we divested of all of our operations in
Argentina, Uruguay, and Chile. During 2006, we sold our funeral
service location in Singapore, leaving our operations in Germany
as our sole remaining funeral service locations outside of North
America. We may pursue discussions with various third parties
concerning the sale or joint venture of our operations in
Germany.
In 2006, as part of our strategy to enhance our position as
North Americas premier funeral and cemetery provider, we
acquired Alderwoods for $20.00 per share in cash. The
purchase price of $1.2 billion includes the refinancing of
$357.7 million and the assumption of $2.2 million of
Alderwoods debt. Alderwoods properties, which include 578
funeral service locations, 70 cemeteries, and 63 combination
locations, have been substantially integrated into our
operations at December 31, 2006. These properties are
operated in the same manner as our incumbent properties, under
our leadership, and are reported in the appropriate reporting
segment (funeral or cemetery) in our consolidated financial
statements.
Funeral
and Cemetery Operations
Worldwide, we have 1,627 funeral service locations and 452
cemeteries (including 232 combination locations) covering
45 states, eight Canadian provinces, the District of
Columbia, Puerto Rico, and Germany. See Note 18 to the
consolidated financial statements in Item 8 of this
Form 10-K
for financial information about our business segments and
geographic areas.
Our funeral service and cemetery operations consist of funeral
service locations, cemeteries, funeral service/cemetery
combination locations, crematoria and related businesses. We
provide all professional services relating to funerals and
cremations, including the use of funeral facilities and motor
vehicles, and preparation and embalming
Table of Contents
services. Funeral related merchandise, including caskets, burial
vaults, cremation receptacles, flowers and other ancillary
products and services, is sold at funeral service locations. Our
cemeteries provide cemetery property interment rights, including
mausoleum spaces, lots, and lawn crypts, and sell cemetery
related merchandise and services, including stone and bronze
memorials, burial vaults, casket and cremation memorialization
products, merchandise installations, and burial openings and
closings. We also sell preneed funeral and cemetery preneed
products and services whereby a customer contractually agrees to
the terms of certain products and services to be delivered and
performed in the future.
Funeral service/cemetery combination locations are those
businesses in which a funeral service location is physically
located within or adjoining a cemetery that we own. Certain
combination locations consist of multiple cemeteries combined
with one funeral home. Combination locations allow certain
facility, personnel, and equipment costs to be shared between
the funeral service location and cemetery. Such combination
facilities typically can be cost competitive and have higher
gross margins than if the funeral and cemetery operations were
operated separately. Combination locations also create synergies
between funeral and cemetery sales force personnel and give
families added convenience to purchase both funeral and cemetery
products and services at a single location. With the acquisition
of Alderwoods, we acquired Rose Hills, which is the largest
combination operation in the United States, performing
approximately 5,000 calls and 9,000 interments per year.
Our operations in the United States and Canada are organized
into 37 major markets and 45 middle markets (including eight
Hispana markets). Each market is led by a market director with
responsibility for funeral
and/or
cemetery operations and preneed sales. Within each market, the
funeral homes and cemeteries share common resources such as
personnel, preparation services, and vehicles. There are four
market support centers in North America to assist market
directors with financial, administrative, pricing, and human
resource needs. These support centers are located in Houston,
Miami, New York, and Los Angeles. The primary functions of the
support centers are to help facilitate the execution of
corporate strategies, coordinate communication between the field
and corporate offices, and serve as liaisons for the
implementation of policies and procedures.
The following table (which includes businesses
held-for-sale
at December 31, 2006) provides the number of our
funeral homes, cemeteries, and combination locations by country,
and by state, territory, or province:
Table of Contents
We believe we have satisfactory title to the properties owned
and used in our business, subject to various liens, encumbrances
and easements, which are incidental to ownership rights and uses
and do not materially detract from
6
Table of Contents
the value of the property. We also lease a number of facilities
that we use in our business under both capital and operating
leases.
At December 31, 2006, we owned approximately 88% of the
real estate and buildings used at our facilities and the
remainder of the facilities were leased. At December 31,
2006, our 452 cemeteries contained a total of approximately
32,366 acres, of which approximately 62% was developed.
A map of our locations in North America is presented below:
Although there are several public companies that own funeral
homes and cemeteries, the majority of deathcare businesses are
locally-owned, independent operations. We estimate that our
funeral and cemetery market share (including a full year of
Alderwoods operations) is approximately 14% based on industry
revenue for 2005. The position of a single funeral home or
cemetery in any community is a function of the name, reputation,
and location of that funeral home or cemetery, although
competitive pricing, professional service and attention, and
well-maintained locations are also important.
We believe we have an unparalleled network of funeral service
locations and cemeteries that offer high quality products and
services at prices that are competitive with local competing
funeral homes, cemeteries, and retail locations. Within this
network, the funeral service locations and cemeteries operate
under various names as most operations were acquired as existing
businesses. We have branded our funeral operations in North
America under the name Dignity
Memorial®.
We believe our national branding strategy gives us a strategic
advantage and identity in the industry. While this branding
process is intended to emphasize our seamless national network
of funeral service locations and cemeteries, the original names
associated with acquired operations, and their inherent goodwill
and heritage, generally remain the same. For example, Geo. H.
Lewis & Sons Funeral Directors is now Geo. H.
Lewis & Sons Funeral Directors, a Dignity
Memorial®
provider.
At December 31, 2006, we employed 14,454 (14,411 in North
America) individuals on a full time basis and 8,169 (8,165 in
North America) individuals on a part time basis. Of the full
time employees, 13,873 were employed in the funeral and cemetery
operations and 581 were employed in corporate or other overhead
activities and services. All eligible employees in the United
States who so elect are covered by our group health and life
insurance
Table of Contents
plans. Eligible employees in the United States are participants
in retirement plans of SCI or various subsidiaries, while
international employees are covered by other SCI (or SCI
subsidiary) defined or government mandated benefit plans.
Approximately 3.5% of our employees in North America are
represented by unions. Although labor disputes are experienced
from time to time, relations with employees are generally
considered favorable.
Our operations are subject to regulations, supervision and
licensing under numerous foreign, federal, state and local laws,
ordinances and regulations, including extensive regulations
concerning trust funds, preneed sales of funeral and cemetery
products and services and various other aspects of our business.
We strive to comply in all material respects with the provisions
of these laws, ordinances and regulations. Since 1984, we have
operated in the United States under the Federal Trade Commission
(FTC) comprehensive trade regulation rule for the funeral
industry. The rule contains requirements for funeral industry
practices, including extensive price and other affirmative
disclosures and imposes mandatory itemization of funeral goods
and services.
Our corporate headquarters are located at 1929 Allen Parkway,
Houston, Texas 77019. The property consists of approximately
127,000 square feet of office space and 185,000 square
feet of parking space. We own and utilize three buildings
located in Houston, Texas for corporate activities containing a
total of approximately 238,000 square feet of office space.
As a result of the acquisition of Alderwoods, we also lease
approximately 71,000 square feet of office space located in
Burnaby, British Columbia, which we expect to sublease during
2007.
We make available free of charge, on or through our website, our
annual, quarterly and current reports and any amendments to
those reports, as soon as reasonably practicable after
electronically filing such reports with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (SEC). Our website is
http://www.sci-corp.com and our telephone number is
(713) 522-5141.
The SEC also maintains an internet site at http://www.sec.gov
that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and
other information regarding issuers that file electronically.
The public may read and copy any materials we file with the SEC
at the SECs Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, N.E.,
Washington, DC 20549. Information on the operation of the Public
Reference Room may be obtained by calling the SEC at
1-800-SEC-0330.
Each of our Board of Directors standing committee
charters, our Corporate Governance Guidelines, our Code of
Ethics for Board Members, and our Code of Conduct for Officers
and Employees are available, free of charge, through our website
or, upon request, in print. We will post on our internet website
all waivers to or amendments of our Code of Conduct for Officers
and Employees, which are required to be disclosed by applicable
law and rules of the New York Stock Exchange listing standards.
Information contained on our website is not part of this report.
The statements in this
Form 10-K
that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements
made in reliance on the safe harbor protections provided under
the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These
statements may be accompanied by words such as
believe, estimate, project,
expect, anticipate, or
predict that convey the uncertainty of future events
or outcomes. These statements are based on assumptions that we
believe are reasonable; however, many important factors could
cause our actual consolidated results in the future to differ
materially from the forward-looking statements made herein and
in any other documents or oral presentations made by, or on
behalf of, the Company. These factors are discussed below. We
assume no obligation to publicly update or revise any
forward-looking statements made herein or any other
forward-looking statements made by the Company, whether as a
result of new information, future events or otherwise.
Table of Contents
Our strategic plan is focused on cost management and the
development of key revenue initiatives designed to generate
future internal growth in our core funeral and cemetery
operations. Many of the factors necessary for the execution of
our strategic plan, such as the number of deaths, are beyond our
control. We cannot give assurance that we will be able to
execute any or all of our strategic plan. Failure to execute any
or all of the strategic plan could have a material adverse
effect on our financial condition, results of operations, or
cash flows.
The success of the acquisition of Alderwoods will depend, in
part, on our ability to realize the anticipated cost savings
from shared corporate and administrative areas, the
rationalization of duplicative expenses, and the realization of
revenue growth opportunities. However, to realize the
anticipated benefits from the acquisition, we must successfully
combine the businesses in a manner that permits those costs
savings and revenue increases to be realized. If we are not able
to successfully achieve these objectives, the anticipated
benefits of the acquisition may not be realized fully or at all
or may take longer or cost more to realize than expected. It is
possible that the integration process could result in the loss
of valuable employees, the disruption of ongoing businesses or
inconsistencies in standards, controls, procedures, practices,
and policies that could adversely impact our operations.
The process of integrating the operations of Alderwoods may
require a disproportionate amount of resources and management
attention. Our future operations and cash flow will depend
largely upon our ability to operate the former Alderwoods
locations efficiently, achieve the strategic operating
objectives for our business and realize significant cost savings
and synergies. Our management team may encounter unforeseen
difficulties in managing the integration. In order to
successfully combine and operate our businesses, our management
team will need to focus on realizing anticipated synergies,
revenue increases, and cost savings on a timely basis while
maintaining the efficiency of our operations. Any substantial
diversion of management attention or difficulties in operating
the combined business could affect our revenues and ability to
achieve operational, financial, and strategic objectives.
Our credit agreements and debt securities contain, among other
things, various affirmative and negative covenants that may
prevent us from engaging in certain transactions that might
otherwise be considered beneficial to us. These covenants limit,
among other things, our and our subsidiaries ability to:
Table of Contents
Our bank credit facility also requires us to maintain certain
leverage and interest coverage ratios. See Note 12 to the
consolidated financial statements in Item 8 of this
Form 10-K
for further information related to our bank credit facility.
We have entered into arrangements with certain surety companies
whereby such companies agree to issue surety bonds on our behalf
as financial assurance or as required by existing state and
local regulations. The surety bonds are used for various
business purposes; however, the majority of the surety bonds
issued and outstanding have been issued to support our preneed
funeral and cemetery activities. In the event all of the surety
companies cancelled or did not renew our surety bonds, which are
generally renewed for twelve-month periods, we would be required
to either obtain replacement coverage or fund approximately
$278.6 million as of December 31, 2006 into
state-mandated trust accounts.
In North America, the funeral and cemetery industry is
characterized by a large number of locally owned, independent
operations. To compete successfully, our funeral service
locations and cemeteries must maintain good reputations and high
professional standards in the industry, as well as offer
attractive products and services at competitive prices. In
addition, we must market the Company in such a manner as to
distinguish us from our competitors. We have historically
experienced price competition from independent funeral home and
cemetery operators, monument dealers, casket retailers, low-cost
funeral providers, and other non-traditional providers of
services and merchandise. If we are unable to successfully
compete, our financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows could be materially adversely affected.
In connection with our preneed funeral and preneed cemetery
merchandise and service sales, most affiliated funeral and
cemetery trust funds own investments in equity securities and
mutual funds. Our earnings and investment gains and losses on
these equity securities and mutual funds are affected by
financial market conditions that are beyond our control.
As of December 31, 2006, net unrealized appreciation in the
preneed funeral and cemetery merchandise and services trust
funds amounted to $24.0 million and $62.8 million,
respectively. Our perpetual care trust funds had net unrealized
appreciation of $39.6 million as of December 31, 2006.
The following table summarizes the investment returns excluding
fees on our trust funds for the last three years.
If earnings from our trust funds decline, we would likely
experience a decline in future revenues. In addition, if the
trust funds experienced significant investment losses, there
could be insufficient funds in the trusts to cover the costs of
delivering services and merchandise or maintaining cemeteries in
the future. We would have to cover any such shortfall with cash
flows from operations, which could have a material adverse
effect on our financial condition, results of operations, or
cash flows.
Table of Contents
We sell price-guaranteed preneed funeral contracts through
various programs providing for future funeral services at prices
prevailing when the agreements are signed. For preneed funeral
contracts funded through life insurance or annuity contracts, we
receive in cash a general agency commission that typically
averages approximately 16% of the total sale from the third
party insurance company. Additionally, there is an increasing
death benefit associated with the contract of approximately
1% per year to be received in cash at the time the funeral
is performed. There is no guarantee that the increasing death
benefit will cover future increases in the cost of providing a
price-guaranteed funeral service, which could materially
adversely affect our future cash flows, revenues, and operating
margins.
As discussed in Note 15 to the consolidated financial
statements in Item 8 of this
Form 10-K,
we are subject to a variety of claims and lawsuits in the
ordinary course of our business. Adverse outcomes in some or all
of the pending cases may result in significant monetary damages
or injunctive relief against us. While management currently
believes that resolving all of these matters, individually or in
the aggregate, will not have a material adverse impact on our
financial position or results of operations, litigation and
other claims are subject to inherent uncertainties and
managements view of these matters may change in the
future. There exists the possibility of a material adverse
impact on our financial position and the results of operations
for the period in which the effect of an unfavorable final
outcome becomes probable and reasonably estimable.
If the number of deaths declines, the number of funeral services
and interments performed by us could decrease and our financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows could be
materially adversely affected.
There is a continuing upward trend in the number of cremations
performed in North America as an alternative to traditional
funeral service dispositions. However, we have seen a recent
reversal in the upward trend in our businesses as our strategic
pricing initiative and discounting policies have resulted in a
decline in highly-discounted, low-service cremation customers.
In our operations in North America during 2006 and 2005, 40.9%
of the comparable funeral services we performed were cremation
cases compared to 39.6% performed in 2004, respectively. We
expect this trend to continue in the near term. We also continue
to expand our cremation memorialization products and services
which has resulted in higher average sales for cremation
services. If we are unable to successfully expand our cremation
memorialization products and services, and cremations continue
to be a significant percentage of our funeral services, our
financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows could
be materially adversely affected.
The majority of our operations are managed in groups called
markets. Markets are geographical groups of funeral
service locations and cemeteries that share common resources
such as operating personnel, preparation services, clerical
staff, motor vehicles and preneed sales personnel. Personnel
costs, the largest of our operating expenses, are the cost
components most beneficially affected by this grouping. We must
incur many of these costs regardless of the number of funeral
services or interments performed. Because we cannot necessarily
decrease these costs when we experience lower sales volumes, a
sales decline may cause margin percentages to decline at a
greater rate than the decline in revenues.
Our operations are subject to regulation, supervision, and
licensing under numerous foreign, federal, state, and local
laws, ordinances and regulations, including extensive
regulations concerning trust funds, preneed sales of
Table of Contents
funeral and cemetery products and services, and various other
aspects of our business. The impact of such regulations varies
depending on the location of our funeral and cemetery
operations. Violations of applicable laws could result in fines
or sanctions to us.
In addition, from time to time, governments and agencies propose
to amend or add regulations, which would increase costs and
decrease cash flows. For example, foreign, federal, state, local
and other regulatory agencies have considered and may enact
additional legislation or regulations that could affect the
deathcare industry, such as regulations that require more
liberal refund and cancellation policies for preneed sales of
products and services, limit or eliminate our ability to use
surety bonding, increase trust requirements,
and/or
prohibit the common ownership of funeral homes and cemeteries in
the same market. If adopted by the regulatory authorities of the
jurisdictions in which we operate, these and other possible
proposals could have a material adverse effect on our financial
condition, results of operations, and cash flows.
Compliance with laws, regulations, industry standards, and
customs concerning burial procedures and the handling and care
of human remains is critical to our continued success.
Litigation and regulatory proceedings regarding these issues
could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition,
results of operations, and cash flows. We are continually
monitoring and reviewing our operations in an effort to insure
that we are in compliance with these laws, regulations, and
standards and, where appropriate, taking appropriate corrective
action.
The number of tax years with open tax audits varies depending on
the tax jurisdiction. In the United States, the Internal Revenue
Service is currently examining our tax returns for 1999 through
2004 and various state jurisdictions are auditing years through
2005. While it is often difficult to predict the final outcome
or the timing of resolution of any particular tax matter, we
believe that our accruals reflect the probable outcome of known
tax contingencies. Unfavorable settlement of any particular
issue would reduce a deferred tax asset or require the use of
cash. Favorable resolution could result in reduced income tax
expense reported in the financial statements in the future.
None.
Information regarding properties is set forth in Item 1.
Business of this
Form 10-K.
Information regarding legal proceedings is set forth in
Part II, Item 8. Financial Statements and
Supplementary Data, Note 15.
None.
Table of Contents
EXECUTIVE
OFFICERS OF THE COMPANY
The following table sets forth as of February 28, 2007 the
name and age of each executive officer of the Company, the
office held, and the year first elected an officer.
Unless otherwise indicated below, the persons listed above have
been executive officers or employees for more than five years.
Mr. Waltrip is the founder, Chairman of the Company, and a
licensed funeral director. He grew up in his familys
funeral business and assumed management of the firm in the 1950s
after earning a Bachelors degree in Business
Administration from the University of Houston. He began buying
additional funeral homes in the 1960s, achieving cost
efficiencies by pooling their resources. At the end of 2006, the
network he began had grown to include more than 2,000 funeral
service locations and cemeteries. Mr. Waltrip took the
Company public in 1969. He has provided leadership to the
Company for over 40 years. In 2005, Mr. Waltrip
resigned as Chief Executive Officer, but he continues to serve
as Chairman of the Board.
Mr. Ryan joined the Company in June 1996 and served in a
variety of financial management roles within the Company. In
February 1999, Mr. Ryan was promoted to Vice President
International Finance. In November 2000, he was promoted to
Chief Executive Officer of European Operations based in Paris,
France. In July 2002, Mr. Ryan was appointed President and
Chief Operating Officer. In February 2005, he was promoted to
Chief Executive Officer. Prior to joining the Company,
Mr. Ryan was a Certified Public Accountant with
Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P. for more than five years.
Mr. Ryan is a Certified Public Accountant and holds a
Bachelor of Business Administration degree from the University
of Texas-Austin.
Mr. Webb joined the Company in 1991 when it acquired
Arlington Corporation, a regional funeral and cemetery
consolidator, where he was then Chief Financial Officer. Prior
to joining Arlington Corporation, Mr. Webb held various
executive financial and development roles at Days Inns of
America and Telemundo Group, Inc. In 1993, Mr. Webb joined
the Companys corporate development group, which he later
led on a global basis before accepting operational
responsibility for the Companys Australian and Hispanic
businesses. Mr. Webb was
Table of Contents
promoted to Vice President International Corporate Development
in February 1998 and was named Executive Vice President in July
2002. In February 2005, he was promoted to Chief Operating
Officer. He is a graduate of the University of Georgia, where he
earned a Bachelor of Business Administration degree.
Mr. Garrison joined the Company in 1978 and worked in a
series of management positions until he was promoted to
President of the Southeastern Region in 1992. In 1998,
Mr. Garrison was promoted to Vice President International
Operations. In 2000, Mr. Garrison became Vice President
North American Cemetery Operations and was promoted to Vice
President Operations Services in August 2002. He assumed his
current position as Senior Vice President Operations Support in
February 2005. Mr. Garrison has a Bachelor of Science
degree in Administrative Management from Clemson University.
Mr. Jacobs joined SCI in 2007 as Senior Vice President and
Chief Marketing Officer. Prior to joining the Company,
Mr. Jacobs was employed by CompUSA as Chief Marketing
Officer and held other management roles over the past
23 years at several of the nations top advertising
agencies, as well as client-side positions. Mr. Jacobs
holds a Bachelor of Science degree from the University of
Tennessee and a Masters degree from Vanderbilt University.
Mr. Mack joined the Company in 1973 as a resident director
after graduating from Farmingdale State University of New York.
He became Vice President of the Eastern Region in 1987 and in
February 1998 Mr. Mack was appointed Vice President North
American Funeral Operations. Mr. Mack was promoted to
Senior Vice President Eastern Operations in August 2002 and
assumed the office of Senior Vice President Middle Market
Operations, his current position, in May 2004.
Mr. Shelger joined the Company in 1981 when it acquired IFS
Industries, a regional funeral and cemetery consolidator, where
he was then General Counsel. Mr. Shelger subsequently
served as counsel for SCIs cemetery division until 1991,
when he was appointed General Counsel. Mr. Shelger
currently serves as Senior Vice President, General Counsel and
Secretary of the Company. Mr. Shelger earned a Bachelor of
Science degree in Business Administration from the University of
Southern California in Los Angeles and a Juris Doctor from the
California Western School of Law in San Diego.
Mr. Tanzberger joined the Company in August 1996 as Manager
of Budgets & Financial Analysis. He was promoted to
Vice President Investor Relations and Assistant Corporate
Controller in January 2000 and to Corporate Controller in August
2002. In 2006, Mr. Tanzberger was promoted to the position
of Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Prior to
joining the Company, Mr. Tanzberger was Assistant Corporate
Controller at Kirby Marine Transportation Corporation, an inland
waterway barge and tanker company, from January through August
1996. Prior thereto, he was a Certified Public Accountant with
Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P. for more than five years.
Mr. Tanzberger is a Certified Public Accountant and a
graduate of the University of Notre Dame, where he earned a
Bachelor of Business Administration degree.
Mr. Waring, a licensed funeral director, joined the Company
as an Area Vice President in 1996 when the Company merged with
his familys funeral business. Mr. Waring was
appointed Regional President of the Northeast Region in 1999 and
was promoted to Regional President of the Pacific Region in
September 2001. Mr. Waring was promoted to Vice President
Western Operations in August 2002 and assumed the office of Vice
President Major Market Operations in November 2003. In February
2006, Mr. Waring was promoted to Senior Vice President
Major Market Operations. Mr. Waring holds a Bachelor of
Science degree in Business Administration from Stetson
University in Deland, Florida, a degree in Mortuary Science from
Mt. Ida College and a Masters of Business Administration degree
from the University of Massachusetts Dartmouth.
Mr. Beason joined SCI in July 2006 as Vice President and
Corporate Controller. Prior to joining SCI, he was an employee
of El Paso Corporation, a natural gas transmission and
production company. Mr. Beason joined El Paso in 1978
and held various accounting and reporting roles until 1993. From
1993 to 1996, he held the position of Sr. Vice President
Administration of Mojave Pipeline Operating Company, a wholly
owned subsidiary of El Paso Corporation. From 1996 to
November 2005, Mr. Beason was Senior Vice President
Controller and Chief Accounting Officer of El Paso
Corporation. He is a Certified Public Accountant and holds a
Bachelor of Business Administration in Accounting degree from
Texas Tech University.
Table of Contents
Mr. Cruger oversees Corporate Development, real estate, and
the Dignity
Memorial®
affiliate network of independent funeral homes. He initially
served the Company as a financial analyst in the corporate
development department from 1996 until 1999, when he left to
become Manager of Financial Analysis for R. H. Donnelley
Corporation. During 2000, he returned to SCI to focus on
international divestitures. From 2003 to February 2005, he
served as Managing Director of Corporate Development. In
February 2005, he was promoted to Vice President of Business
Development. Mr. Cruger graduated from Lehigh University
with a Bachelor of Science in Finance.
Mrs. Jones joined SCI in 2003 from Dynegy, Inc., where she
served as Vice President of Total Rewards. She oversees human
resources, training and education, and payroll and commission
services activities that assist approximately 20,000
employees in North America. Mrs. Jones was promoted to Vice
President Human Resources in February 2005. She holds a Bachelor
of Business Administration degree in Accounting with a minor in
Finance from Southern Methodist University. She is a Certified
Compensation Professional and is active in professional
organizations that include World at Work and the Society for
Human Resources Management.
Mr. Lohse joined SCI in 2000 as Managing Director of
Litigation and has since been involved in the resolution of
major litigation issues for the Company. In 2004, Mr. Lohse
was promoted to Vice President Corporate Governance. Before
joining the Company, Mr. Lohse was Managing Partner at
McDade, Fogler, Maines & Lohse where he conducted a
general civil trial practice. Prior to that, he practiced tort
and commercial litigation at Fulbright & Jaworski.
Mr. Lohse received a Bachelor of Business Administration
degree from the University of Texas and a Juris Doctor from the
University of Houston Law Center.
Mr. Loring joined the Company in March 2000 as the Managing
Director, Tax and was promoted to Assistant Treasurer in May
2004. Before joining the Company, Mr. Loring was Director,
Tax at Stone & Webster, Inc. and held various corporate
tax and treasury positions in other companies over a twenty-five
year period. In February 2006, Mr. Loring was promoted to
Vice President and Treasurer. Mr. Loring is a Certified
Public Accountant and holds a Bachelor of Business
Administration from Bryant College in North Smithfield, Rhode
Island and a Master of Science in Taxation from Bentley College,
Waltham, Massachusetts.
Ms. Nash joined SCI in 2002 as Managing Director of
Strategic Planning and Process Improvement. Prior to joining
SCI, Ms. Nash worked for the Pennzoil Corporation and held
various senior management accounting and financial positions. In
2004, Ms. Nash was promoted to Vice President Continuous
Process Improvement. Her primary responsibilities include
improving operating systems, reducing overhead costs, and
identifying and assisting in the implementation of initiatives
to improve operating profit margins and cash flow. She is a
graduate of Texas A&M University where she received a
Bachelor of Business Administration degree in Accounting.
Mr. Robinson joined SCI in 1996 as Director of Procurement.
Prior to joining the Company Mr. Robinson was employed by
Marathon Oil Company, where he spent 16 years in a variety
of procurement, logistics, and information technology positions.
In February 2005, he was promoted to Vice President Supply Chain
Management. Prior to this promotion, he was Managing Director of
Business Support Services, a position in which he oversaw fleet
management and office services; voice, travel, and shipping
services; and supply chain and purchasing activities.
Mr. Robinson holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Business
Administration with a minor in Computer Service from Taylor
University in Upland, Indiana.
Each officer of the Company is elected by the Board of Directors
and holds their office until a successor is elected and
qualified or until earlier death, resignation, or removal in the
manner prescribed in the Bylaws of the Company. Each officer of
a subsidiary of the Company is elected by the subsidiarys
board of directors and holds their office until a successor is
elected and qualified or until earlier death, resignation, or
removal in the manner prescribed in the Bylaws of the Subsidiary.
Table of Contents
Our common stock has been traded on the New York Stock Exchange
since May 14, 1974. On December 31, 2006, there were
5,345 holders of record of our common stock. In calculating the
number of shareholders, we consider clearing agencies and
security position listings as one shareholder for each agency or
listing. At December 31, 2006, we had
293,222,114 shares outstanding, net of 10,000 treasury
shares.
During 2006, we paid cash dividends totaling $29.4 million
and accrued $8.8 million for dividends paid on
January 31, 2007. While we intend to pay regular quarterly
cash dividends for the foreseeable future, all subsequent
dividends are subject to final determination by our Board of
Directors each quarter after its review of our financial
performance.
The table below shows our quarterly high and low closing common
stock prices for the two years ended December 31, 2006:
Options in our common stock are traded on the Philadelphia Stock
Exchange. Our common stock is traded on the New York Stock
Exchange under the symbol SCI.
For equity compensation plan information, see Part III of
this
Form 10-K.
On October 31, 2006, we issued 348 deferred common stock
equivalents or units pursuant to provisions regarding the
receipt of dividends under the Amended and Restated Director Fee
Plan to four non-employee directors. These issuances were
unregistered as they did not constitute a sale
within the meaning of Section 2(3) of the Securities Act of
1933, as amended.
Since 2004, we have repurchased a total of $363.3 million
of common stock at an average cost per share of $7.11. We did
not repurchase any of our common stock during the three months
ended December 31, 2006. At December 31, 2006, we had
$36.0 million authorized for share repurchases. In February
2007, our Board of Directors approved an increase in our share
repurchase program authorizing the investment of up to an
additional $164 million to repurchase our common stock. We
now have $200 million authorized by our Board of Directors
for share repurchases. As discussed in Item 1A, our new
credit agreement and debt securities contain covenants that
restrict our ability to repurchase our common stock.
Table of Contents
The table below contains selected consolidated financial data
for the years ended December 31, 2002 through
December 31, 2006. The statement of operations data
includes reclassifications of certain items to conform to
current period presentations with no impact on net income or
financial position.
The data set forth below should be read in conjunction with our
consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes to the
consolidated financial statements included in this
Form 10-K.
This historical information is not necessarily indicative of
future results.
Selected
Consolidated Financial Information
Table of Contents
The
Company
We are North Americas leading provider of deathcare
products and services, with a network of funeral homes and
cemeteries unequalled in geographic scale and reach. During
2006, we accomplished several key goals that we believe will
position us for continued growth in 2007.
In November 2006, we acquired Alderwoods for $20.00 per
share in cash, resulting in a purchase price of
$1.2 billion, which includes the refinancing of
$357.7 million and the assumption of $2.2 million of
Alderwoods debt. The following table sets forth the sources and
uses of funds related to the Alderwoods acquisition:
The acquisition of Alderwoods allows us to serve a number of
new, complementary areas, while enabling us to capitalize on
significant synergies and operating efficiencies. The
acquisition provides, among other things:
Table of Contents
Since August 2004, we have invested more than $360 million
in repurchasing our stock, and we have paid a quarterly cash
dividend since early 2005. We currently have over
$200 million authorized to repurchase our common stock. Our
financial stability is further enhanced by our $6.5 billion
backlog of future revenues at December 31, 2006, which is
the result of preneed funeral and cemetery sales. We have the
financial strength and flexibility to reward shareholders
through dividends while maintaining a prudent capital structure
and pursuing new opportunities for profitable growth.
In recent years, we have strengthened our balance sheet, lowered
our cost structure, introduced more efficient systems and
processes and strengthened our management team. We believe these
improvements, together with our acquisition of Alderwoods,
present us with significant opportunities to achieve future
growth. Our principal strategies are as follows:
We believe customer attitudes and preferences are essential to
our business. We are replacing the industrys traditional
one-size-fits-all service approach with a flexible operating and
marketing strategy that categorizes customers according to
personal needs and preferences. Using this new approach, we are
tailoring our product and service offerings based on four
variables:
By identifying customers based on these variables, we can focus
our resources on the most profitable customer categories and
improve our marketing effectiveness. We continue to refine our
pricing, product and marketing strategies to support this
approach.
Consistent with this strategy, we have begun to analyze existing
business relationships to determine whether they align with our
strategic goals. As a result, we made certain local business
decisions to exit unprofitable business relationships and
activities in 2005 and 2006, which resulted in an initial
decrease in the number of total funeral services performed.
However, we also experienced significant improvements in both
average revenue per funeral service and gross margins. We expect
these improvements to continue into the future as we redeploy
resources to more profitable areas. We continue to analyze our
existing operations, including those newly acquired in the
Alderwoods acquisition, and may exit certain business
relationships or activities that do not fit our customer
segmentation strategy.
We, along with our competitors in the deathcare industry, have
historically generated most of our profits from the sale of
traditional products (including caskets, vaults, and markers),
while placing less emphasis on the services involved in funeral
and burial preparation. However, due to increased customer
preference for comprehensive and personalized deathcare
services, as well as increased competition from retail outlets
(including on-line retailers) for the sale of traditional
products, we have realigned our pricing strategy from product to
service offerings in order to
Table of Contents
focus on services that are most valued by customers. Our initial
results from the realignment strategy have been favorable based
on increases in the overall average revenue per funeral service
performed. We are currently evaluating the pricing of those
locations acquired from Alderwoods and expect to make
adjustments in the future to similarly align the pricing
strategy for these locations as well.
Although we have already made substantial improvements in our
infrastructure, we believe we can continue to achieve operating
improvements through centralization and standardization of
processes for staffing, central care, fleet management and
cemetery maintenance. The acquisition of Alderwoods provides
further opportunities for synergies and operating efficiencies,
which will allow us to utilize our scale and increase
profitability. We are developing clear, yet flexible, operating
standards that will be used as benchmarks for productivity in
these areas. In conjunction with these standards, we will
develop and track shared best practices to support higher
productivity. We also intend to continue to capitalize on our
nationwide network of properties by pursuing strategic affinity
partnerships. Over the longer term, we believe these
relationships can be important to potential customers in their
funeral home selection process.
We are beginning to manage our network of business locations by
positioning each business location to support the preferences of
its local customer base while monitoring each market for
changing demographics and competitive dynamics. We will
primarily target customers who value quality and prestige or
adhere to specific religious or ethnic customs. In addition, we
expect to pursue selective business expansion through
construction or targeted acquisitions of cemeteries and funeral
homes with a focus on the highest return customer categories. In
particular, we will focus cemetery expansion efforts on large
cemeteries that are or may be combined with funeral home
operations, which would allow facility, personnel, and equipment
costs to be shared between the funeral service location and the
cemetery.
Table of Contents
Financial
Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources
Since 1999, we have gained significant financial flexibility by
reducing debt and improving our cash flow. We rely on cash flow
from operations as a significant source of liquidity. Our cash
flow from operating activities provided $324 million in
2006 and we expect our operating cash flow in 2007 to range from
$306 million to $346 million. Our current cash balance is
$63 million as of February 23, 2007. In 2007, we
expect to generate between $150 million and
$170 million in proceeds from divestitures of FTC-mandated
properties and other SCI properties already identified for
disposal. In addition, we have approximately $240 million
in borrowing capacity under our
5-year
revolving credit facility (which is currently supporting
$61.1 million of letters of credit). We have no significant
scheduled debt maturities due in 2007. We believe these sources
of liquidity can be supplemented by our ability to access the
capital markets for additional debt or equity securities.
In order to finance the Alderwoods acquisition, we significantly
increased our indebtedness in the fourth quarter of 2006. In
addition to using $608 million of cash on hand, we issued
$500 million in Senior Notes, $200 million in
privately placed debt securities, and took out a
$150 million term loan for up to three years under our new
credit facility. We prepaid $50 million of our term loan
indebtedness in December 2006 and prepaid an additional
$60 million in January 2007. At December 31, 2006, our
current liabilities exceeded our current assets as a result of
using $608 million of available cash in the Alderwoods
transaction. We believe our future operating cash flows and the
available capacity under our new credit facility described above
will be adequate to meet our working capital needs.
During 2006, and as of February 23, 2007, we had the
following issuances and repayments of our debt:
We will continue to focus on funding growth initiatives that
generate increased profitability, revenue, and cash flows. These
capital investments include the construction of high-end
cemetery property (such as private family estates) and the
construction of funeral home facilities at existing cemeteries.
We will also consider the acquisition of additional deathcare
operations that fit our long-term customer-focused strategy, if
the expected returns will exceed our cost of capital.
Table of Contents
Since early 2005, we have paid shareholders a quarterly cash
dividend of $0.025 per common share. In November 2006, we
increased our dividend to $0.03 per common share. While we
intend to pay regular quarterly cash dividends for the
foreseeable future, all future dividends are subject to final
determination by our Board of Directors each quarter after its
review of our financial performance.
We currently have approximately $200 million authorized
under our share repurchase program. Once we achieve our internal
capital structure and bank covenant targets, we intend to make
purchases from time to time in the open market or through
privately negotiated transactions, subject to market conditions,
debt covenants and normal trading restrictions. Our credit
agreement and privately-placed debt securities contain covenants
that limit our ability to repurchase our common stock. There can
be no assurance that we will buy our common stock under our
share repurchase program in the future.
We believe our ability to generate strong operating cash flow is
one of our fundamental financial strengths and provides us with
substantial flexibility in meeting operating and investing
needs. Highlights of cash flow for the year ended
December 31, 2006 compared to 2005 and 2004 are as follows:
Operating Activities Cash flows from
operating activities was $324.2 million in 2006 compared to
$312.9 million in 2005. The 2005 cash flows from operating
activities increased by $218.7 million as compared to the
operating cash flows in 2004. Included in 2006 are transition
costs related to the Alderwoods acquisition of $3.2 million
and legal payments of $5.7 million. Included in 2005 was a
federal income tax refund of $29.0 million. Included in
2004 was the payment of $131.1 million related to the
resolution of certain litigation matters, a $20.0 million
voluntary cash contribution to our pension plan, and the payment
of $11.4 million to retire life insurance policy loans
related to our SERP and Senior SERP retirement programs.
Excluding the above items, cash flow from operations in 2006
increased approximately $50.0 million compared to 2005.
This increase is primarily due to $21.2 million of rent
payments that were classified in operating cash flows in 2005,
but which are classified as principal payments on capital leases
in cash flows from financing activities in 2006 due to our
revised lease terms. The remaining increase is a result of
$10.9 million in proceeds from the redemption of
convertible preferred equity certificates received in connection
with our disposition of our operations in France, the receipt of
$7.9 million of endowment care proceeds as a result of the
resolution of disputes over ownership rights, and a source of
approximately $10.0 million from working capital. This
working capital source resulted from an increase in preneed and
atneed cash receipts, and increases in cash interest income,
which were partially offset by an increase in bonus and
long-term incentive compensation payments in 2006 related to a
2003 compensation program.
In addition to the items discussed above, the increase in
operating cash flows in 2005 as compared to 2004 is the result
of an extra bi-weekly cash payroll payment of approximately
$19.0 million in 2004, approximately $13.0 million
decrease in bonus payments, an increase in net trust
withdrawals, and a $16.7 million decrease in cash interest
paid. These net sources of cash were partially offset by cash
outflows of $16.0 million associated with our cash funding
of our 401(k) matches in 2005 (compared with funding through the
use of stock in 2004) and a $10.2 million increase in
cash outflows to improve internal controls in order to comply
with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Cash receipts
from Kenyon increased $15.0 million (offset by an
$18.8 million increase in Kenyon expenses) in 2005 compared
to the same period in 2004 due to Kenyons involvement with
the incidents in Asia, Greece and the U.S. gulf coast.
Additionally, cash flows from operating activities provided by
our former operations in France decreased $18.3 million in
2005 as a result of the sale of our French operations in March
2004.
We did not pay federal income taxes in 2006, 2005 or 2004.
Because of our net operating loss carryforwards we do not expect
to pay federal income taxes until the second half of 2007.
Foreign, state and local income tax payments increased
$9.0 million to $15.6 million in 2006 as compared to
$6.6 million in 2005 and $10.8 million in 2004
primarily as a result of lower foreign taxes paid due to the
disposition of some of our operations in 2004.
Investing Activities Cash flows from
investing activities declined $1.5 billion in 2006 compared
to 2005 due to $1.3 billion in cash outflows for
acquisitions (primarily Alderwoods) and a $180.0 million
decrease in proceeds from divestitures. The 2005 cash flows from
investing activities of $171.0 million decreased by
Table of Contents
$118.5 million primarily due to Alderwoods, as compared to
the investing cash flows in 2004. This decline was driven by a
decrease in proceeds from divestitures and a decrease in net
withdrawals from restricted funds primarily related to various
commercial commitments.
In 2006, we acquired Alderwoods for $1.2 billion, including
refinancing of $357.7 million of Alderwoods debt. We also
received $11.0 million of proceeds held as an income tax
receivable related to the 2005 sale of our operations in Chile
and $10.6 million in cash proceeds from the fourth quarter
2006 sale of our operations in Singapore.
In 2005, we received $90.4 million from the disposition of
our cemetery operations in Chile, $42.7 million related to
the collection of the EUR 10 million note receivable
and the redemption of preferred equity certificates related to
our equity investment in our former French operations (of which
$39.7 million is reported as an investing activity), and
$21.6 million from the disposition of our Argentina and
Uruguay businesses.
In 2004, we sold our funeral operations in France and received
net cash proceeds of $281.7 million. Following a successful
public offering transaction of our former United Kingdom
affiliate during the second quarter of 2004, we liquidated our
debt and equity holdings in this affiliate and collected
$53.8 million in aggregate, of which $49.2 million is
reported as an investing activity.
Financing Activities Cash flows from
financing activities generated $565.2 million in 2006
compared to using $326.4 million in 2005. This
$891.6 million net increase in cash was driven by proceeds
from the issuance of long-term debt, a reduction in share
repurchases, and a reduction in debt payments. Cash used in
financing activities decreased $9.6 million in 2005
compared to 2004 primarily due to stock repurchases, partially
offset by debt extinguishments and dividend payments.
Proceeds from long-term debt (net of debt issuance costs) were
$825.3 million in 2006 due to the issuance of
$250.0 million of senior unsecured 7.625% notes due in
2018, $250.0 million of senior unsecured 7.375% notes
due 2014, $200 million of private placement offerings, and
$150 million term loan. Proceeds from the issuance of debt
were $291.5 million in 2005 due to the issuance of senior
unsecured 7.00% notes due in 2017. In 2004, proceeds of
$241.4 million were due to the issuance of 6.75% notes
due 2016.
Payments of debt in 2006 were $228.9 million due to the
acceptance of the tender of $139.0 million of our
7.70% senior notes due 2009, a $50.0 million repayment
of our new term loan, $26.1 million in scheduled debt
payments, and $21.3 million in payments on capital leases.
The $377.1 million of debt payments in 2005 were related to
early extinguishments of $291.3 million, the
$63.5 million final payment of 6.00% notes due
December 2005 and $14.5 million of other note payments. In
2004, payments of debt were $477.8 million due to the
$300.0 million early extinguishment, the repayment of
$111.2 million of the 7.375% notes due 2004 and
$50.8 million of 8.375% notes due in 2004.
We repurchased 3.4 million shares of common stock for
$27.9 million in 2006, compared to 31.0 million shares
for $225.1 million in 2005 and 16.7 million shares for
$110.3 million in 2004.
We paid $29.4 million of cash dividends during 2006 and
$22.6 million of cash dividends during 2005 related to the
quarterly cash dividend reinstated in 2005 by the Board of
Directors. There were no dividend payments in 2004.
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements, Contractual Obligations, and Commercial and
Contingent Commitments
We have assumed various financial obligations and commitments in
the ordinary course of conducting our business. We have
contractual obligations requiring future cash payments under
existing contractual arrangements, such as debt maturities,
interest on long-term debt, and employment, consulting and
non-competition agreements. We also have commercial and
contingent obligations that result in cash payments only if
certain events occur requiring our performance pursuant to a
funding commitment.
Table of Contents
The following table details our known future cash payments (on
an undiscounted basis) related to various contractual
obligations as of December 31, 2006.
The following table details our known potential or possible
future cash payments (on an undiscounted basis) related to
various commercial and contingent obligations as of
December 31, 2006.
Table of Contents
In support of our operations, we have entered into arrangements
with certain surety companies whereby such companies agree to
issue surety bonds on our behalf as financial assurance
and/or as
required by existing state and local regulations. The surety
bonds are used for various business purposes; however, the
majority of the surety bonds issued and outstanding have been
used to support our preneed funeral and cemetery sales
activities. The obligations underlying these surety bonds are
recorded on the consolidated balance sheet as Deferred
preneed funeral revenues and Deferred preneed cemetery
revenues. The breakdown of surety bonds between funeral and
cemetery preneed arrangements, as well as surety bonds for other
activities, are described below.
When selling preneed funeral and cemetery contracts, we may post
surety bonds where allowed by state law. We post the surety
bonds in lieu of trusting a certain amount of funds received
from the customer. The amount of the bond posted is generally
determined by the total amount of the preneed contract that
would otherwise be required to be trusted, in accordance with
applicable state law. For the years ended December 31, 2006
and 2005, we had $50.9 million and $64.0 million,
respectively, of cash receipts attributable to bonded sales.
These amounts do not consider reductions associated with taxes,
obtaining costs, or other costs.
Surety bond premiums are paid annually and are automatically
renewable until maturity of the underlying preneed contracts,
unless we are given prior notice of cancellation. Except for
cemetery pre-construction bonds (which are irrevocable), the
surety companies generally have the right to cancel the surety
bonds at any time with appropriate notice. In the event a surety
company was to cancel the surety bond, we are required to obtain
replacement surety assurance from another surety company or fund
a trust for an amount generally less than the
Table of Contents
posted bond amount. Management does not expect we will be
required to fund material future amounts related to these surety
bonds because of lack of surety capacity.
Preneed
Funeral and Cemetery Activities and Backlog of
Contracts
In addition to selling our products and services to client
families at the time of need, we sell price-guaranteed preneed
funeral and cemetery contracts, which provide for future funeral
or cemetery services and merchandise. Since preneed funeral and
cemetery services or merchandise will not be provided until some
time in the future, most states and provinces require that all
or a portion of the funds collected from customers on preneed
funeral and cemetery contracts be paid into merchandise and
service trusts until the merchandise is delivered or the service
is performed. In certain situations, as described above, where
permitted by state or provincial laws, we post a surety bond as
financial assurance for a certain amount of the preneed funeral
or cemetery contract in lieu of placing funds into trust
accounts. Our backlog of funeral and cemetery contracts shown
below represents the total amount of future revenues we have
under contract at the end of 2006 and 2005.
Trust-Funded Preneed Funeral and Cemetery
Contracts: The funds deposited into trust (in
accordance with various state and provincial laws) are invested
by independent trustees in accordance with the investment
guidelines established by statute or, where the prudent investor
rule is applicable, the guidelines established by the Investment
Committee of our Board of Directors. We retain any funds above
the amounts required to be deposited into trust accounts and use
them for working capital purposes, generally to offset the
selling and administrative costs of the preneed programs.
Investment earnings associated with the trust investments are
expected to mitigate the inflationary costs of providing the
preneed funeral and cemetery services and merchandise in the
future for the prices that were guaranteed at the time of sale.
The preneed funeral and cemetery trust assets are consolidated
and recorded in our consolidated balance sheet at market value.
Investment earnings on trust assets are generally accumulated in
the trust and distributed as the revenue associated with the
preneed funeral or cemetery contract is recognized or cancelled
by the customer. In certain states and provinces, the trusts are
allowed to distribute a portion of the investment earnings to us
prior to that date.
If a preneed funeral or cemetery contract is cancelled prior to
delivery, state or provincial law determines the amount of the
refund owed to the customer, if any, including the amount of the
attributed investment earnings. Upon cancellation, we receive
the amount of principal deposited to trust and previously
undistributed net investment earnings and, where required, issue
a refund to the customer. We retain excess funds, if any, and
recognize the attributed investment earnings (net of any
investment earnings payable to the customer) as revenue in our
consolidated statement of operations. In certain jurisdictions,
we may be obligated to fund any shortfall if the amounts
deposited by the customer exceed the funds in trust. Based on
our historical experience, we have included a cancellation
reserve for preneed funeral and cemetery contracts in our
consolidated balance sheet of $151.3 million and
$112.0 million as of December 31, 2006 and 2005,
respectively.
The cash flow activity over the life of a trust funded preneed
funeral or cemetery contract from the date of sale to its
recognition or cancellation is captured in the operating cash
flow line items (Increase) decrease in preneed receivables
and trust investments, Increase (decrease) in deferred preneed
revenue, Increase (decrease) in non-controlling interest and
Net income (loss) in the consolidated statement of cash
flows. While the contract is outstanding, cash flow is provided
by the amount retained from funds collected from the customer
and any distributed investment earnings. Prior to
January 1, 2005, this amount was reduced by the payment of
preneed deferred selling costs. The effect of amortizing preneed
deferred selling costs was reflected in Depreciation and
amortization in the consolidated statement of cash flows.
Effective January 1, 2005, the payment of direct selling
costs associated with trust funded preneed contracts is
reflected in the consolidated statement of cash flows as cash
flows from operating activities in the line item Net
income (loss), since such direct selling costs are expensed
as incurred. At the time of death maturity, we receive the
principal and undistributed investment earnings from the funeral
trust and any remaining receivable due from the customer. At the
time of delivery or storage of cemetery merchandise and service
items for which we were required to deposit funds to trust, we
receive the principal and undistributed investment earnings from
the cemetery trust. There is generally no remaining receivable
due from the customer, as our policy is to deliver preneed
cemetery merchandise and service items only upon payment of the
Table of Contents
contract balance in full. This cash flow at the time of service,
delivery or storage is generally less than the associated
revenue recognized, thus reducing cash flow from operating
activities.
The tables below detail our North America results of preneed
funeral and cemetery production and maturities, excluding
insurance contracts, for the years ended December 31, 2006
and 2005.
Insurance-Funded Preneed Funeral
Contracts: Where permitted by state or provincial
law, customers may arrange their preneed funeral contract by
purchasing a life insurance or annuity policy from third-party
insurance companies, for which we earn a commission as general
sales agent for the insurance company. These general agency
commissions (GA revenues) are based on a percentage per contract
sold and are recognized as funeral revenues when the insurance
purchase transaction between the customer and third-party
insurance provider is completed. Direct selling costs incurred
pursuant to the sale of insurance-funded preneed funeral
contracts are expensed as incurred. The policy amount of the
insurance contract between the customer and the third-party
insurance company generally equals the amount of the preneed
funeral contract. We do not reflect the unfulfilled
insurance-funded preneed funeral contract amounts in our
consolidated balance sheet. Approximately 60% of our North
America preneed funeral production in 2006 relates to
insurance-funded preneed funeral contracts.
The third-party insurance company collects funds related to the
insurance contract directly from the customer. The life
insurance contracts include a death benefit escalation
provision, which is expected to offset the inflationary costs of
providing the preneed funeral services and merchandise in the
future at the prices that were guaranteed at the time of the
preneed sale. The customer/policy holder assigns the policy
benefits to our funeral home to pay for the preneed funeral
contract at the time of need.
Table of Contents
Additionally, we may receive cash overrides based on achieving
certain dollar volume targets of life insurance policies sold as
a result of marketing agreements entered into in connection with
the sale of our insurance subsidiaries in 2000.
The table below details the North America results of
insurance-funded preneed funeral production and maturities for
the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the number
of contracts associated with those transactions.
North America Backlog of Preneed Funeral and Cemetery
Contracts: The following table reflects our
North America backlog of trust-funded deferred preneed
funeral and cemetery contract revenues including amounts related
to Non-controlling interest in funeral and cemetery
trusts at December 31, 2006 and 2005. Additionally, the
table reflects our North America backlog of unfulfilled
insurance-funded contracts (which was not included in our
consolidated balance sheet) at December 31, 2006 and 2005.
The backlog amounts presented are reduced by an amount that we
believe will cancel before maturity based on historical
experience.
Table of Contents
The table also reflects our North America preneed funeral and
cemetery receivables and trust investments (market and cost
bases) associated with the backlog of deferred preneed funeral
and cemetery contract revenues, net of the estimated
cancellation allowance. We believe that the table below is
meaningful because it sets forth the aggregate amount of future
revenues we expect to recognize as a result of preneed sales, as
well as the amount of assets associated with those revenues.
Because the future revenues exceed the asset amounts, future
revenues will exceed the cash distributions actually received
from the associated trusts.
The market value of funeral and cemetery trust investments was
based primarily on quoted market prices at December 31,
2006 and 2005. The difference between the backlog and asset
amounts represents the contracts for which we have posted surety
bonds as financial assurance in lieu of trusting, the amounts
collected from customers that were not required to be deposited
into trust, and allowable cash distributions from trust assets.
The table also reflects the amounts expected to be received from
insurance companies through the assignment of policy proceeds
related to insurance-funded funeral contracts.
Our primary financial focus in 2006 was on funding disciplined
growth initiatives that generate increased profitability and
cash flow margins. The most significant of these initiatives was
the acquisition of Alderwoods in the fourth quarter of 2006.
Former Alderwoods businesses contributed $11 million of
income from continuing operations before income tax representing
their operations from November 28, 2006 (the acquisition
date) through December 31, 2006. Other key highlights in
2006 included:
Table of Contents
In 2006, we reported consolidated net income of
$56.5 million ($.19 per dilutive share) compared to a
net loss in 2005 of $127.9 million ($(.42) per dilutive
share) and net income in 2004 of $110.7 million
($.34 per dilutive share). These results were impacted by
large non-recurring items that decreased earnings, including:
Significant non-recurring items that increased earnings included:
Table of Contents
Consolidated
Versus Comparable Results Years Ended
December 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004
The table below reconciles our consolidated GAAP results to our
comparable, or same store, results for the years
ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004. We define
comparable operations (or same store operations) as those
funeral and cemetery locations that were owned for the entire
period beginning January 1, 2004 and ending
December 31, 2006. The following tables present operating
results for funeral and cemetery locations that were owned by us
for all three years. As implied by our definition of comparable
operations, these results specifically exclude any impact from
the Alderwoods acquisition.
Table of Contents
32
Table of Contents
The following table provides the data necessary to calculate our
comparable average revenue per funeral service in North America
for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004. We
calculate average revenue per funeral service by dividing
comparable North America funeral revenue, excluding General
Agency (GA) revenues and revenues from our Kenyon subsidiary in
order to avoid distorting our averages of normal funeral
services revenue, by the comparable number of funeral services
performed in North America during the period. The following data
specifically excludes any impact from the Alderwoods acquisition.
Funeral
Results
Consolidated revenues from funeral operations were
$1,156 million in the year ended December 31, 2006
compared to $1,151 million in the same period of 2005. An
increase of $36.5 million, representing the operations of
former Alderwoods businesses since the acquisition date,
combined with higher average revenue per funeral service and an
increase in floral revenues of approximately $10.7 million.
These increases were offset by a decline in funeral services
performed due to a decrease in funeral properties as a result of
our continuing efforts to dispose of non-strategic locations. We
also believe the decline reflects a decrease in the number of
deaths in the markets we serve. Additionally, Kenyons
revenue declined $19.3 million to $4.6 million, as
services related to incidents in Asia, Greece, and
U.S. gulf coast in 2005 were not replaced by similar
services in 2006.
Consolidated revenues from funeral operations declined by
$103.6 million in 2005 compared to 2004 primarily due to
the sale of funeral operations in France, which contributed
$127.3 million in revenues during 2004. The decrease in
revenues related to our former French operations was partially
offset by an increase in North America revenues of
$23.5 million. This increase was primarily due to an
increase in Kenyons revenues of $20.5 million over
the prior year, resulting from disaster management services
provided in Asia, Greece, and the U.S. gulf coast in 2005.
North America comparable funeral revenue increased
$11.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2006
compared to the year ended December 31, 2005. However,
Kenyon revenue decreased $19.3 million as described above.
Excluding the decrease in Kenyon, North America comparable
funeral revenue increased $31.0 million, reflecting higher
average revenue per funeral service and an increase in floral
revenue described above. General agency revenue also increased
$3.8 million, or 14.2% in 2006 compared to 2005 as a result
of a favorable mix shift in the types of preneed funeral
insurance contracts sold. These improvements were partially
offset by a decline in volume.
North America comparable funeral revenue in 2005 increased
$58.3 million over 2004. Increases in Kenyon revenue as
described above contributed $20.5 million of the increase.
The remaining increase was primarily a result of an increase in
comparable atneed revenue resulting from an increase in funeral
volume and a higher average revenue per funeral.
Table of Contents
The overall success of our strategic pricing initiative was
partially offset by a 5.8% decrease in comparable funeral volume
in 2006 compared to 2005. We believe this decline reflects a
decrease in the number of deaths within the markets where we
compete, due in part to an unusually warm winter season in the
first quarter of 2006. The decline in deaths was particularly
pronounced in the first quarter of 2006 in the Northeast United
States where we have a high concentration of operations. Also
impacting the decline in volume were certain local business
decisions to exit unprofitable business relationships and
activities. These decisions were made based on our customer
segmentation strategy, which focuses on higher market share
opportunities with certain customer segments. We will continue
to evaluate existing relationships and may ultimately choose to
exit other markets as we maintain focus on our strategy. Our
cremation rate of 40.9% in 2006 was flat compared to 2005. We
have seen the upward trend in our cremation rate flatten despite
the continued increase in the markets where we compete,
reflecting the impact of our decision to exit unprofitable
immediate cremation activities.
Our recent focus on strategic pricing, beginning in late 2005,
has resulted in a 9.0% increase in comparable average revenue
per funeral service or $394 per funeral service (7.9% or
$340 per service excluding a floral revenue increase) in
2006 over 2005, and an increase of 1.4% in 2005 compared to
2004. Pursuant to this strategy, we have realigned our pricing
focus away from our products to our service offerings,
reflecting our competitive advantage and concentration on those
service areas where our customers believe we add the most value.
This has resulted in a loss in volume from highly discounted,
low-service cremation customers. These initiatives, although
reducing our funeral services volume, have generated significant
improvements in average revenue per funeral service.
Consolidated funeral gross profit increased $21.3 million
in 2006, primarily due to decreases in costs and
$9.9 million contributed from former Alderwoods operations.
Significant cost decreases included a $10.7 million decline
in salary and fringe expense due to more centralization and
standardization in our organization as well as a decrease in
selling costs resulting from lower case volume. These gross
profit improvements were partially offset by a $4.6 million
decline in Kenyons gross profits, which resulted from
fixed costs incurred over a lower revenue base.
Consolidated funeral gross profits decreased $11.1 million
in 2005 as compared to 2004 reflecting the disposition of our
French operations in March 2004.
Comparable North America funeral gross profit increased
$17.2 million or 8.2% in 2006 versus 2005. The comparable
funeral gross margin percentage increased to 20.8% in 2006
compared to 19.5% in 2005. The comparable revenue increases
described above and continued cost improvements to our
infrastructure, including a decrease in salary and fringe
expense totaling $5.8 million, were partially offset by the
$4.6 million decrease in gross profit from Kenyons
operations.
Our comparable North America funeral gross profit improved
$5.2 million (2.5%) in 2005 versus 2004; however, the
comparable funeral gross margin percentage decreased to 19.5%
compared to 20.1% in 2004. Despite the improved comparable
revenues discussed above, margin percentages declined because of
increased costs, which included a $4.7 million effect from
our change in accounting for deferred selling costs as well as
inflationary increases in merchandise costs, increases in group
health and pension costs, and increased costs related to our
trust reconciliation projects and Sarbanes-Oxley compliance
activities.
Cemetery
Results
Consolidated revenues from our cemetery operations increased
$30.8 million in 2006 compared to 2005, reflecting higher
atneed revenues and increased delivery of preneed merchandise
combined with a $14.4 million
Table of Contents
increase from operations acquired from Alderwoods. Also
contributing to the increase was the receipt and recognition of
$7.9 million in endowment care income in 2006.
Consolidated cemetery revenues decreased $11.0 million in
2005 versus 2004 due to a $9.8 million decline in North
America operations. Approximately $11.3 million of the
decrease was due to a decrease in the number of SCIs North
American properties as a result of our continued effort to
dispose of non-strategic locations.
North America comparable cemetery revenue increased
$32.5 million or 6.1% in 2006 compared to 2005. The
increase primarily resulted from a $10 million increase in
cemetery atneed revenues as well as an increase in trust fund
income, partially offset by lower interest income on preneed
receivables.
North America comparable cemetery revenue decreased
$2.7 million or .5% in 2005 compared to 2004. This decrease
primarily resulted from declines associated with constructed
cemetery property and interest on trade receivables. Decreases
in interest on trade receivables resulted from an increase in
the number of contracts that were not financed, increased down
payments, and shorter financing terms.
Consolidated cemetery gross profit increased $26.4 million
or 3.7% in 2006 compared to 2005. Cemetery gross margin
percentages increased from 14.6% in 2005 to 18.3% in 2006,
reflecting $1.7 million from operations acquired from
Alderwoods, the endowment care income received and recognized in
2006 related to the resolution of a dispute over the funds, and
an increase in other trust fund income.
Consolidated cemetery gross profits decreased $20.2 million
in 2005 as compared to 2004. These declines were due to the
decrease in revenue discussed above, coupled with a
$9.5 million negative impact from our change in accounting
related to deferred selling costs.
North America comparable cemetery gross profits increased
$22.9 million in 2006 compared to 2005. The comparable
cemetery percentage increased to 19.1% in 2006 from 15.9% in
2005. These improvements were a result of the increases in
atneed cemetery revenues and in endowment care trust fund income
discussed above and cost improvements. Selling and salary
expenses decreased in 2006 due to increased centralization
within our organization. The decrease in these expenses was
partially offset by higher maintenance and utilities costs
primarily resulting from increased fuel costs.
North America comparable cemetery gross profits decreased
$21.9 million in 2005 compared to 2004 due to the decrease
in revenue and the change in accounting for deferred selling
costs described above. The comparable cemetery gross margin
percentage decreased to 15.9% in 2005 from 19.9% in 2004.
Other
Financial Statement Items
General and administrative expenses were $94.9 million in
2006 compared to $84.8 million in 2005 and
$130.9 million in 2004. For 2006 compared to 2005, general
and administrative costs increased $10.1 million primarily
due to $7.0 million in expenses related to our acquisition
of Alderwoods and $3.9 million of share-based compensation
costs related to stock options expensed under FAS 123(R).
These costs were partially offset by a decrease in salary
expense. Included in 2004 expenses were non-recurring litigation
expenses (net of insurance recoveries of $1.6 million) of
$61.1 million.
In 2006, we recognized a $58.7 million net pretax
impairment loss. This loss was primarily associated with the
disposition of underperforming funeral and cemetery businesses
in North America, including a $16.6 million impairment of
assets sold to StoneMor Partners LP and a $26.4 million
impairment of certain assets in Michigan for
Table of Contents
which we have commenced a plan to sell and which are classified
as assets held for sale at December 31, 2006. Additionally,
in connection with the Alderwoods acquisition, we have entered
into a consent agreement with the Federal Trade Commission to
divest certain of our non-Alderwoods properties, and we have
recorded an impairment charge of $12.9 million for these
properties which were owned by us and are classified as assets
held for sale at December 31, 2006.
In 2005, we recognized a $26.1 million net pretax loss from
impairments. This loss was primarily associated with the
disposition of underperforming funeral and cemetery businesses
in North America (including a $30.0 million impairment of
assets sold to StoneMor Partners LP). The net loss was partially
offset by the release of approximately $15.6 million in
indemnification liabilities previously recorded in connection
with the 2004 sales of our United Kingdom and French operations.
In 2004, we recognized a $25.8 million net pretax gain from
our disposition activities, including a $41.2 million gain
from the sale of our equity and debt holdings in our former
United Kingdom operations and a $6.4 million gain from the
disposition of our French funeral operations. These gains were
partially offset by net losses associated with various
dispositions in North America. For further information regarding
gains (losses) on dispositions and impairment charges, net see
Note 21 to the consolidated financial statements in
Item 8 of this
Form 10-K.
Interest expense increased to $123.4 million in 2006,
compared to $103.7 million in 2005 and $119.3 million
in 2004. The increase of $19.7 million in interest expense
between 2006 and 2005 resulted primarily from $6.4 million
in bridge financing costs related to the Alderwoods acquisition
and an incremental $10.5 million of interest costs related
to our increased borrowings to finance the Alderwoods
acquisition in the fourth quarter of 2006.
Interest expense in 2005 was $36.3 million less than 2004
as a result of less outstanding debt in 2005.
Interest income of $31.2 million in 2006, a
$14.5 million increase over 2005, reflects the increase in
our cash balance for most of 2006 coupled with an increase in
interest rates.
Interest income of $16.7 million in 2005, compared to
$13.5 million in 2004, reflects the increase in our cash
balance invested in commercial paper, which contributed
$7.2 million. This increase was partially offset by
$4.5 million of reduced interest income related to a note
receivable from our former investment in a United Kingdom
company, which was collected in full in 2004.
During 2006, we repurchased $139.0 million aggregate
principal amount of our 7.7% notes due 2009 in a tender
offer in the fourth quarter and prepaid $50.0 million of
our term loan in December 2006. As a result of these
transactions, we recognized a loss of $17.5 million, which
is composed of the redemption premiums paid of $8.2 million
and the write-off of unamortized deferred loan costs of
$9.3 million.
During 2005, we repurchased $16.6 million aggregate
principal amount of our 7.70% notes due 2009 in the open
market, and $0.3 million aggregate principal amount of our
6.00% notes due 2005 in the open market. Also during 2005,
we redeemed $130.0 million aggregate principal amount of
our 6.875% notes due 2007 and $139.3 million aggregate
principal amount of our 7.20% notes due 2006, pursuant to a
tender offer for such notes. As a result of these transactions,
we recognized a loss of $14.3 million, which is comprised
of the redemption premiums paid of $12.2 million and the
write-off of unamortized debt issuance costs of
$2.1 million.
In 2004, we extinguished $200.0 million aggregate principal
amount of our 6.00% notes due 2005, pursuant to the Offer
to Purchase dated March 24, 2004. We also purchased
$8.7 million aggregate principal amount of our
6.00% notes due 2005 in the open market. The holders of
$221.6 million of our 6.75% convertible subordinated notes
due 2008 converted their holdings to equity in June 2004,
pursuant to the terms of the notes. Simultaneously,
Table of Contents
we exercised our option by redeeming the remaining outstanding
$91.1 million of the notes. As a result of these
transactions, we recognized a loss on the early extinguishment
of debt of $16.8 million.
Other income, net was $16.1 million in 2006, compared to
$2.3 million in 2005 and $8.7 million in 2004. Key
components of other income for the years presented are as
follows:
The consolidated effective tax rate in 2006 resulted in a
provision of 46.0%, compared to a provision of 36.8% in 2005 and
a benefit of 6.8% in 2004. The 2006 and 2005 tax rates were
negatively impacted by permanent differences between the book
and tax bases of North American asset dispositions and the 2005
tax rate was partially offset by state net operating loss
benefits. The 2004 tax rate was favorably impacted by tax
benefits resulting from the disposition of our operations in
France and the United Kingdom and from state net operating
losses realized in 2004. The tax benefits from dispositions
result from differences between book and tax bases and from the
reversal of tax liabilities that were then recorded as warranty
indemnification liabilities.
The weighted average number of shares outstanding was
297.4 million in 2006, compared to 306.7 million in
2005 and 344.7 million in 2004. The decrease in all years
was mainly due to our share repurchase program, which began in
the third quarter of 2004. Additionally, the decrease from 2004
to 2005 was related to the contribution of cash to our 401(k)
retirement plan. Effective January 1, 2005, we began
contributing cash to fund the Companys matching
contribution to our 401(k) retirement plan and discontinued
funding through the use of common stock.
Critical
Accounting Policies, Recent Accounting Pronouncements and
Accounting Changes
Our consolidated financial statements are impacted by the
accounting policies used and the estimates and assumptions made
by management during their preparation. See Note 2 to the
consolidated financial statements in Item 8 of this
Form 10-K.
Estimates and assumptions affect the carrying values of assets
and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and
liabilities at the balance sheet date. Actual results could
differ from such estimates due to uncertainties associated with
the methods and assumptions underlying our critical accounting
measurements. The following is a discussion of our critical
accounting policies pertaining to revenue recognition, business
combinations, the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets,
and the use of estimates.
Funeral revenue is recognized when funeral services are
performed. Our trade receivables primarily consist of amounts
due for funeral services already performed. Revenue associated
with cemetery merchandise and services is recognized when the
service is performed or merchandise is delivered. Revenue
associated with cemetery property interment rights is recognized
in accordance with the retail land sales provision of
SFAS No. 66, Accounting for the Sales of Real
Estate (SFAS 66). Under SFAS 66, revenue
from constructed cemetery property is not recognized until a
minimum percentage (10%) of the sales price has been collected.
Revenue related to the preneed sale of unconstructed cemetery
property is deferred until it is constructed and 10% of the
sales price is collected.
Table of Contents
When a customer enters into a preneed funeral trust contract,
the entire purchase price is deferred and the revenue is
recognized at the time of maturity. The revenues associated with
a preneed cemetery contract, however, may be recognized as
different contract events occur. Preneed sales of cemetery
interment rights (cemetery burial property) are recognized when
a minimum of 10% of the sales price has been collected and the
property has been constructed or is available for interment. For
personalized marker merchandise, with the customers
direction generally obtained at the time of sale, we can choose
to order, store, and transfer title to the customer. Upon the
earlier of vendor storage of these items or delivery in our
cemetery, we recognize the associated revenues and record the
cost of sale. For services and non-personalized merchandise
(such as vaults), we defer the revenues until the services are
performed and the merchandise is delivered.
We apply the principles provided in SFAS 141 when we
acquire businesses. Tangible and intangible assets and
liabilities assumed are recorded at their fair value and
goodwill recognized for any difference between the price of the
acquisition and our fair value determination. We customarily
estimate our purchase costs and other related transactions known
to us at closing of the acquisition. To the extent that
information not available to us at the closing date subsequently
becomes available during the allocation period, as defined in
SFAS 141, we may adjust our goodwill, assets, or
liabilities associated with the acquisition. These changes are
disclosed in future reports as they occur.
On November 28, 2006, we completed the acquisition of
Alderwoods for $20.00 per share in cash, resulting in a
purchase price of $1.2 billion, which includes the
refinancing of $357.7 million and the assumption of
$2.2 million of Alderwoods debt resulting in goodwill
of $183.0 million. Alderwoods properties have been
substantially integrated into our operations at
December 31, 2006. These properties are operated in the
same manner as our incumbent properties, under our leadership,
and are reported in the appropriate reporting unit (segment)
whether funeral or cemetery in our consolidated financial
statements. See Part II, Item 8. Financial Statements
and Supplementary Data, Note 5 for details related to this
acquisition.
We test for impairment of goodwill using a two-step approach as
prescribed in SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and
Other Intangible Assets (SFAS 142). The first
step of our goodwill impairment test compares the fair value of
a reporting unit with its carrying amount including goodwill.
Reporting units for SCI are the funeral and cemetery segments.
We do not record an impairment of goodwill in instances where
the fair value of a reporting unit exceeds its carrying amount.
If fair value is less than the carrying amount for a reporting
unit, we would perform the second step which is to compare the
implied fair value of goodwill (as defined in
SFAS 142) to the carrying amount of goodwill. If the
carrying amount of a reporting unit goodwill exceeds the implied
fair value of that goodwill, an impairment loss is recognized in
an amount equal to that excess. Fair market value of a reporting
unit is determined using a calculation based on multiples of
revenue and multiples of EBITDA, or earnings before interest,
taxes, depreciation, and amortization, of both SCI and its
competitors. Based on our impairment tests performed during the
fourth quarter using September 30th information, there was
no impairment of goodwill at December 31, 2006 or 2005.
We review our other non-goodwill long-lived assets for
impairment when changes in circumstances indicate that the
carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable, in
accordance with SFAS No. 144, Accounting for
the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets
(SFAS 144). SFAS 144 requires that long-lived
assets to be held and used are reported at the lower of their
carrying amount or fair value. Assets to be disposed of and
assets not expected to provide any future service potential are
recorded at the lower of their carrying amount or fair value
less estimated cost to sell.
In October 2006, we sold our remaining funeral businesses in
Singapore for proceeds of approximately $11.6 million of
which $1.0 million is due in the second quarter of 2007.
Other divestitures in 2006 and assets held for sale at
December 31, 2006 resulted in $58.7 million in net
losses on dispositions and impairment charges.
In November 2005, we sold 21 cemeteries and six funeral homes to
StoneMor Partners LP. In the third quarter of 2005, we committed
to a plan to sell these locations and classified these
properties as held for sale. Pursuant to
Table of Contents
our impairment policy under SFAS 144, we recorded an
impairment charge of $25.3 million in our cemetery segment
and $4.7 million in our funeral segment.
During the second quarter of 2004, we committed to a plan to
divest our funeral and cemetery operations in Argentina and
Uruguay. Upon this triggering event, we tested these operations
for impairment. As a result of this impairment test, we recorded
an impairment charge of $15.2 million in our 2004
consolidated financial statements.
Use of
Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
Generally Accepted Accounting Principles in the United States
(GAAP) requires management to make certain estimates and
assumptions. These estimates and assumptions affect the carrying
values of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent
assets and liabilities at the balance sheet date. Actual results
could differ from such estimates due to uncertainties associated
with the methods and assumptions underlying our critical
accounting measurements. Key estimates used by management, among
others, include:
Allowances We provide various allowances
and/or
cancellation reserves for our funeral and cemetery preneed and
at need receivables, as well as for our preneed funeral and
preneed cemetery deferred revenues. These allowances are based
on an analysis of historical trends and include, where
applicable, collection and cancellation activity. We also record
an estimate of general agency revenues that may be cancelled in
their first year, where the revenue would be charged back by the
insurance company. These estimates are impacted by a number of
factors, including changes in economy, relocation, and
demographic or competitive changes in our areas of operation.
Valuation of trust investments With the
implementation of revised FASB Interpretation No. 46,
Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, an
Interpretation of Accounting Research
Bulletin No. 51 (FIN 46R), as of
March 31, 2004, we removed the receivables due from trust
assets recorded at cost from our balance sheet and added the
actual trust investments recorded at market value. The trust
investments include marketable securities that are classified as
available-for-sale
in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 115, Accounting for Certain Investments in
Debt and Equity Securities. Where quoted market prices
are not available, we obtain estimates of fair value from the
managers of the private equity funds, which are based on the
market value of the underlying real estate and private equity
investments. These market values are based on contract offers
for the real estate or the managers appraisals of the
venture capital funds.
Legal liability reserves Contingent
liabilities, principally for legal liability matters, are
recorded when it is probable that a liability has been incurred
and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated in
accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 5, Accounting for Contingencies.
Liabilities accrued for legal matters require judgments
regarding projected outcomes and range of loss based on
historical experience and recommendations of legal counsel.
However, litigation is inherently unpredictable, and excessive
verdicts do occur. As disclosed in Note 15 of the
consolidated financial statements, our legal exposures and the
ultimate outcome of these legal proceedings could be material to
operating results or cash flows in any given quarter or year.
Depreciation of long-lived assets We
depreciate our long-lived assets ratably over their estimated
useful lives. These estimates of useful lives may be affected by
such factors as changing market conditions or changes in
regulatory requirements.
Valuation of assets acquired and liabilities
assumed We apply the principles of SFAS 141
when we acquire businesses. Tangible and intangible assets and
liabilities assumed are recorded at their fair value and
goodwill recognized for any difference between the price of
acquisition and our fair value determination. We customarily
estimate our purchase costs and other related transactions known
to us at closing of the acquisition. To the extent that
information not available to us at the closing date subsequently
becomes available during the allocation period, as defined in
SFAS 141, we may adjust our goodwill, assets, or
liabilities associated with the acquisition.
Table of Contents
Income taxes Our ability to realize the
benefit of certain of our federal and state deferred tax assets
requires us to achieve certain future earnings levels. We have
established a valuation allowance against a portion of our
deferred tax assets and could be required to further adjust that
valuation allowance if market conditions change materially and
future earnings are, or are projected to be, significantly
different from our current estimates. We intend to permanently
reinvest the unremitted earnings of certain of our foreign
subsidiaries in those businesses outside the United States and,
therefore, have not provided for deferred federal income taxes
on such unremitted foreign earnings.
A number of years may elapse before particular tax matters, for
which we have established accruals, are audited and finally
resolved. The number of tax years with open tax audits varies
depending on the tax jurisdiction. In the United States, the
Internal Revenue Service is currently examining our tax returns
for 1999 through 2004 and various state jurisdictions are
auditing years through 2005. While it is often difficult to
predict the final outcome or the timing of resolution of any
particular tax matter, we believe that our accruals reflect the
probable outcome of known tax contingencies. Unfavorable
settlement of any particular issue would reduce a deferred tax
asset or require the use of cash. Favorable resolution could
result in reduced income tax expense reported in the financial
statements in the future. Our tax accruals are presented in the
balance sheet within Deferred income taxes and Other
liabilities.
Pension cost Our pension plans are frozen
with no benefits accruing to participants except interest.
Pension costs and liabilities are actuarially determined based
on certain assumptions, including the discount rate used to
compute future benefit obligations. On January 1, 2004, we
changed our method of accounting for gains and losses on pension
assets and obligations to recognize such gains and losses in our
consolidated statement of operations during the year in which
they occur. Therefore, the concept of an expected rate of return
on plan assets is not applicable.
Discount rates used to determine pension obligations for our
pension plans in 2006 were 5.75% for the SCI SERP, Senior SERP
and Directors Plans and 5.5% for all other plans. Discount rates
for all plans were 5.75% and 6.00% for the years ended 2005, and
2004, respectively. We determine the discount rate used to
compute future benefit obligations using an analysis of expected
future benefit payments. We verify the reasonableness of the
discount rate by comparing our rate to the rate earned on
high-quality fixed income investments, such as the Moodys
Aa index. At December 31, 2006, 63% of our plan assets were
held as cash and cash equivalents and the remaining 37% of plan
assets were invested in equity securities. As of
December 31, 2006, the equity securities were invested
approximately 56% in U.S. Large Cap
investments, 22% in international equities and 22% in
U.S. Small Cap investments. Our current
investment objective is to liquidate our plan assets as we have
begun the process to terminate these Plans and expect to
complete this termination by mid-2007.
A sensitivity analysis of the net periodic benefit cost was
modeled to assess the impact that changing discount rates could
have on pre-tax earnings. The sensitivity analysis assumes a
0.25% adverse change to the discount rate with all other
variables held constant. Using this model, our pre-tax earnings
would have decreased by less than $2.0 million, or less
than $.01 per diluted share, for the year ended
December 31, 2006. See Note 17 to the consolidated
financial statements in Item 8 of this
Form 10-K
for more information related to our pension plans.
Insurance loss reserves We purchase
comprehensive general liability, morticians and cemetery
professional liability, automobile liability, and workers
compensation insurance coverages structured with high
deductibles. This high deductible insurance program means we are
primarily self-insured for claims and associated costs and
losses covered by these policies. Historical insurance industry
experience indicates a high degree of inherent variability in
assessing the ultimate amount of losses associated with casualty
insurance claims. This is especially true with respect to
liability and workers compensation exposures due to the
extended period of time that transpires between when the claim
might occur and the full settlement of such claim, often many
years. We continually evaluate loss estimates associated with
claims and losses related to these insurance coverages and
falling within the deductible of each coverage through the use
of qualified and independent actuaries. Assumptions based on
factors such as claim settlement patterns, claim development
trends, claim frequency and severity patterns, inflationary
trends and data reasonableness will generally effect
Table of Contents
the analysis and determination of the best estimate
of the projected ultimate claim losses. The results of these
actuarial evaluations are used to both analyze and adjust our
insurance loss reserves.
As of December 31, 2006, reported losses within our
retention for workers compensation, general liability and
auto liability incurred during the period May 1, 1987
through December 31, 2006 were approximately
$254.1 million over the 19.5 years. The selected fully
developed ultimate settlement value estimated by our independent
actuary was $304.1 million for the same period. Paid losses
were $236.4 million indicating a reserve requirement of
$67.7 million. After considering matters discussed with our
independent actuary related to this calculation, we estimated
the reserve to be $67.7 million as of December 31,
2006.
At December 31, 2006 and 2005, the balances in the reserve
for workers compensation, general, and auto liability and
the related activity were as follows:
For discussion of recent accounting pronouncements and
accounting changes, see Part II, Item 8. Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data, Note 3.
The information presented below should be read in conjunction
with Notes 13 and 14 to the consolidated financial
statements in Item 8 of this
Form 10-K.
We have historically used derivatives primarily in the form of
interest rate swaps, cross-currency interest rate swaps, and
forward exchange contracts in combination with local currency
borrowings in order to manage our mix of fixed and floating rate
debt and to hedge our net investment in foreign assets. We do
not participate in derivative transactions that are leveraged or
considered speculative in nature. None of our market risk
sensitive instruments are entered into for trading purposes. All
of the instruments described below were entered into for other
than trading purposes.
We did not enter into any derivatives during 2006 and do not
have any derivatives outstanding at December 31, 2006.
At December 31, 2006 and 2005, 82% and 99%, respectively,
of our total debt consisted of fixed rate debt at a weighted
average rate of 7.30% and 7.11%, respectively.
At December 31, 2006, approximately 11% of our
stockholders equity and 7% of our operating income were
denominated in foreign currencies, primarily the Canadian
dollar. Approximately 4% of our stockholders equity and 8%
of our operating income were denominated in foreign currencies,
primarily the Canadian dollar, at December 31, 2005. We do
not have a significant investment in foreign operations that are
in highly inflationary economies.
In connection with our preneed funeral operations and preneed
cemetery merchandise and service sales, the related funeral and
cemetery trust funds own investments in equity and debt
securities and mutual funds, which are
Table of Contents
sensitive to current market prices. Cost and market values as of
December 31, 2006 are presented in Notes 6, 7,
and 8 to the consolidated financial statements in Item 8 of
this
Form 10-K.
We perform a sensitivity analysis to assess the impact of
interest rate and exchange rate risks on earnings. This analysis
determines the effect of a hypothetical 10% adverse change in
market rates. In actuality, market rate volatility is dependent
on many factors that are impossible to forecast. Therefore, the
adverse changes described below could differ substantially from
the hypothetical 10% change.
We are currently not subject to significant interest rate risk
on our outstanding debt as 82% of such debt has fixed rate
interest terms. The fair market value of our debt was
approximately $43.8 million more than its carrying value at
December 31, 2006. A fifty basis point increase in our
floating rate risk would increase interest expense by
$2 million.
A similar model was used to assess the impact of changes in
exchange rates for foreign currencies on the Companys
consolidated statement of operations. At December 31, 2006
and 2005, our foreign currency exposure was primarily associated
with the Canadian dollar, the Chilean pesos and the euro. A 10%
adverse change in the strength of the U.S. dollar relative
to the foreign currency instruments would have negatively
affected our income from our continuing operations on an annual
basis, by less than $0.7 million for the year ended
December 31, 2006 and less than $0.5 million for the
year ended December 31, 2005.
Table of Contents
Item 8. Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data.
All other schedules have been omitted because the required
information is not applicable or is not present in amounts
sufficient to require submission or because the information
required is included in the consolidated financial statements or
the related notes thereto.
Table of Contents
To the Stockholders and Board of Directors of
Service Corporation International:
We have completed integrated audits of Service Corporation
Internationals consolidated financial statements and of
its internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2006, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Our
opinions, based on our audits, are presented below.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements listed in
the accompanying index present fairly in all material respects,
the financial position of Service Corporation International and
its subsidiaries at December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the
results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the
three years in the period ended December 31, 2006 in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America. In addition, in our opinion, the
financial statement schedule listed in the accompanying index
presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set
forth therein when read in conjunction with the related
consolidated financial statements. These financial statements
and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the
Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these financial statements and financial statement
schedule based on our audits. We conducted our audits of these
statements in accordance with the standards of the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit of financial statements
includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the
amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing
the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, and evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable
basis for our opinion.
As discussed in Note 4 to the consolidated financial
statements, the Company changed its method of accounting for
share-based compensation effective January 1, 2006. As
discussed in Note 3 to the consolidated financial
statements, the Company changed its method of accounting for
deferred selling costs related to preneed funeral and cemetery
contracts effective January 1, 2005, and its method of
accounting for variable interest entities effective
March 31, 2004.
Also, in our opinion, managements assessment, included in
Managements Report on Internal Control over Financial
Reporting appearing under Item 9A, that the Company
maintained effective internal control over financial reporting
as of December 31, 2006 based on criteria established in
Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission
(COSO), is fairly stated, in all material respects, based on
those criteria. Furthermore, in our opinion, the Company
maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control
over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, based on
criteria established in Internal Control
Integrated Framework issued by the COSO. The Companys
management is responsible for maintaining effective internal
control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Our
responsibility is to express opinions on managements
assessment and on the effectiveness of the Companys
internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We
conducted our audit of internal control over financial reporting
in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards
require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable
assurance about whether effective internal control over
financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. An
audit of internal control over financial reporting includes
obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial
reporting, evaluating managements assessment, testing and
evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal
control, and performing such other procedures as we consider
necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit
provides a reasonable basis for our opinions.
Table of Contents
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a
process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. A companys
internal control over financial reporting includes those
policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance
of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that
transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of
financial statements in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the
company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of
management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
As described in Managements Report on Internal Control
Over Financial Reporting appearing under Item 9A,
management has excluded Alderwoods Group, Inc. (Alderwoods) from
its assessment of internal control over financial reporting as
of December 31, 2006 because it was acquired by the Company
in a purchase business combination during the fourth quarter of
2006. We have also excluded Alderwoods from our audit of
internal control over financial reporting. The total assets and
total revenues of Alderwoods represent approximately 13% and 3%,
respectively, of the related consolidated financial statement
amounts as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006.
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Houston, Texas
February 28, 2007
Table of Contents
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
(See notes to consolidated financial statements)
Table of Contents
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEET
(See notes to consolidated financial statements)
Table of Contents
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
(See notes to consolidated financial statements)
Table of Contents
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
Table of Contents
SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS
EQUITY (Continued)
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||