|
|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| |||||||||
These excerpts taken from the SLAB 10-K filed Feb 11, 2009. Continuing Involvement In connection with the closing of the sale, the Company entered into certain ancillary agreements with NXP, including a Transition Services Agreement ("TSA") and an Intellectual Property License Agreement ("IPLA"). Through the TSA, the Company subleased certain premises to NXP and provided various temporary support services, such as IT support services. Such services were provided for approximately six months from the closing date and are no longer being provided. The fees for these services were generally equivalent to the Company's cost and were approximately $3.9 million in fiscal 2007. Through the IPLA, the Company granted NXP a license with respect to retained intellectual property and NXP granted a license to the Company with respect to transferred intellectual property. However, these cross-license agreements do not involve the receipt or payment of any royalties and therefore are not considered to be a component of continuing involvement. F-13
Continuing Involvement In connection with the closing of the sale, the Company entered into certain ancillary agreements with NXP, including a Transition F-13 NAME="page_fm41801_1_14"> These excerpts taken from the SLAB 10-K filed Feb 7, 2008. Continuing Involvement In connection with the closing of the sale, the Company entered into certain ancillary agreements with NXP, including a Transition Services Agreement ("TSA") and an Intellectual Property License Agreement ("IPLA"). Through the TSA, the Company subleased certain premises to NXP and provided various temporary support services, such as IT support services. Such services were provided for approximately six months from the closing date and are no longer being provided. The fees for these services were generally equivalent to the Company's cost. The TSA fees were approximately $3.9 million in fiscal 2007. Through the IPLA, the Company granted NXP a license with respect to retained intellectual property and NXP granted a license to the Company with respect to transferred intellectual property. However, these cross-license agreements do not involve the receipt or payment of any royalties and therefore are not considered to be a component of continuing involvement. F-12 Silicon Laboratories Inc. 3. Discontinued Operation (Continued) Although the services provided under the TSA generated continuing cash flows between the Company and NXP, the amounts were not considered to be significant to the ongoing operations of either entity. In addition, the Company has no contractual ability through the TSA or any other agreement to significantly influence the operating or financial policies of NXP. Under the provisions of Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue No. 03-13, "Applying the Conditions of Paragraph 42 of FASB Statement No. 144 in Determining Whether to Report Discontinued Operations," the Company therefore has no significant continuing involvement in the operations of the former product lines sold to NXP and has classified such operating results as discontinued operations. Continuing Involvement In connection with the closing of the sale, the Company entered into certain ancillary agreements with NXP, including a Transition Services Agreement ("TSA") and F-12 Silicon Laboratories Inc. 3. Discontinued Operation (Continued) Although This excerpt taken from the SLAB 10-Q filed Oct 24, 2007. Continuing Involvement In connection with the closing of the sale, the Company entered into certain ancillary agreements with NXP, including a Transition Services Agreement (TSA) and an Intellectual Property License Agreement (IPLA). Through the TSA, the Company subleased certain premises to NXP and provided various temporary support services, such as IT support services. Such services were provided for approximately six months from the closing date and are no longer being provided. The fees for these services were generally equivalent to the Companys cost. The TSA fees were approximately $1.9 million and $3.9 million for the three and nine months ended September 29, 2007, respectively. Through the IPLA, the Company granted NXP a license with respect to retained intellectual property and NXP granted a license to the Company with respect to transferred intellectual property. However, these cross-license agreements do not involve the receipt or payment of any royalties and therefore are not considered to be a component of continuing involvement.
Although the services provided under the TSA generated continuing cash flows between the Company and NXP, the amounts were not considered to be significant to the ongoing operations of either entity. In addition, the Company has no contractual ability through the TSA or any other agreement to significantly influence the operating or financial policies of NXP. Under the provisions of EITF Issue No. 03-13, Applying the Conditions of Paragraph 42 of FASB Statement No. 144 in Determining Whether to Report Discontinued Operations, the Company therefore has no significant continuing involvement in the operations of the former product lines sold to NXP and has classified such operating results as discontinued operations.
This excerpt taken from the SLAB 10-Q filed Jul 25, 2007. Continuing Involvement In connection with the closing of the sale, the Company entered into certain ancillary agreements with NXP, including a Transition Services Agreement (TSA) and an Intellectual Property License Agreement (IPLA). Through the TSA, the Company agreed to sublease certain premises to NXP and to provide various temporary support services, such as IT support services. Such services are expected to be provided for approximately six months from the closing date. The fees for these services will be generally equivalent to the Companys cost. The TSA fees were approximately $2.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2007. Through the IPLA, the Company granted NXP a license with respect to retained intellectual property and NXP granted a license to the Company with respect to transferred intellectual property. However, these cross-license agreements do not involve the receipt or payment of any royalties and therefore are not considered to be a component of continuing involvement. 8 Silicon Laboratories Inc. Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued) (Unaudited) Although the services provided under the TSA generate continuing cash flows between the Company and NXP, the amounts are not considered to be significant to the ongoing operations of either entity. In addition, the Company has no contractual ability through the TSA or any other agreement to significantly influence the operating or financial policies of NXP. Under the provisions of EITF Issue No. 03-13, Applying the Conditions of Paragraph 42 of FASB Statement No. 144 in Determining Whether to Report Discontinued Operations, the Company therefore has no significant continuing involvement in the operations of the former product lines sold to NXP and has classified such operating results as discontinued operations. This excerpt taken from the SLAB 10-Q filed May 3, 2007. Continuing Involvement In connection with the closing of the sale, the Company entered into certain ancillary agreements with NXP, including a Transition Services Agreement (TSA) and an Intellectual Property License Agreement (IPLA). Through the TSA, the Company agreed to sublease certain premises to NXP and to provide various temporary support services, such as IT support services. Such services are expected to be provided for approximately three to six months from the closing date. The fees for these services will be generally equivalent to the Companys cost. Through the IPLA, the Company granted NXP a license with respect to retained intellectual property and NXP granted a license to the Company with respect to transferred intellectual property. However, these cross-license agreements do not involve the receipt or payment of any royalties and therefore are not considered to be a component of continuing involvement. Although the services provided under the TSA generate continuing cash flows between the Company and NXP, the amounts are not considered to be significant to the ongoing operations of either entity. In addition, the Company has no contractual ability through the TSA or any other agreement to significantly influence the operating or financial policies of NXP. Under the provisions of EITF Issue No. 03-13, Applying the Conditions of Paragraph 42 of FASB Statement No. 144 in Determining Whether to Report Discontinued Operations, the Company therefore has no significant continuing involvement in the operations of the former product lines sold to NXP and has classified such operating results as discontinued operations. 8 Silicon
Laboratories Inc. | EXCERPTS ON THIS PAGE:
RELATED TOPICS for SLAB: |
| |||||||