SPG » Topics » Competition

These excerpts taken from the SPG 10-K filed Feb 26, 2009.

Competition

            Our principal competitors are nine other major United States or internationally publicly-held companies that own or operate regional malls, outlet centers, and other shopping centers in the United States and abroad. We also compete with many commercial developers, real estate companies and other owners of retail real estate that operate in our trade areas. Some of our properties and investments are of the same type and are within the same market area as competitor properties. The existence of competitive properties could have a material adverse effect on our ability to lease space and on the level of rents we can obtain. This results in competition for both the acquisition of prime sites (including land for development and operating properties) and for tenants to occupy the space that we and our competitors develop and manage. In addition, our properties compete against other forms of retailing, such as catalog and e-commerce websites, that offer retail products and services.

            We believe that we have a competitive advantage in the retail real estate business as a result of:

    the size, quality and diversity of our properties;
    our management and operational expertise;
    our extensive experience and relationships with retailers and lenders;
    our mall marketing initiatives and consumer focused strategic corporate alliances; and

5


Table of Contents

    our ability to use our size to reduce the total occupancy cost of our tenants.

            Our size reduces our dependence upon individual retail tenants. Approximately 4,300 different retailers occupy more than 28,600 stores in our properties and no retail tenant represents more than 2.0% of our properties' total minimum rents.

Competition



            Our principal competitors are nine other major United States or internationally publicly-held companies that own or operate
regional malls, outlet centers, and other shopping centers in the United States and abroad. We also compete with many commercial developers, real estate companies and other owners of retail real
estate that operate in our trade areas. Some of our properties and investments are of the same type and are within the same market area as competitor properties. The existence of competitive
properties could have a material adverse effect on our ability to lease space and on the level of rents
we can obtain. This results in competition for both the acquisition of prime sites (including land for development and operating properties) and for tenants to occupy the space that we and our
competitors develop and manage. In addition, our properties compete against other forms of retailing, such as catalog and e-commerce websites, that offer retail products and services.




            We
believe that we have a competitive advantage in the retail real estate business as a result of:





    the size, quality and diversity of our properties;
    our management and operational expertise;
    SIZE=2>•
    our extensive experience and relationships with retailers and lenders;
    our mall marketing initiatives and consumer focused strategic corporate
    alliances; and


5









HREF="#bG72101A_main_toc">Table of Contents







    our ability to use our size to reduce the total occupancy cost of our tenants.



            Our
size reduces our dependence upon individual retail tenants. Approximately 4,300 different retailers occupy more than 28,600 stores in our properties and no retail tenant represents
more than 2.0% of our properties' total minimum rents.



These excerpts taken from the SPG 10-K filed Feb 26, 2008.

Competition

            Our principal competitors are nine other major United States or internationally publicly-held companies that own or operate regional malls, outlet centers, and other shopping centers in the United States and abroad. We also compete with many commercial developers, real estate companies and other owners of retail real estate that operate in our trade areas. Some of our properties and investments are of the same type and are within the same market area as competitor properties. The existence of competitive properties could have a material adverse effect on our ability to lease space and on the level of rents we can obtain. This results in competition for both the acquisition of prime sites (including land for development and operating properties) and for tenants to occupy the space that we and our competitors develop and manage. In addition, our properties compete against other forms of retailing, such as catalog and e-commerce websites, that offer retail products and services.

            We believe that we have a competitive advantage in the retail real estate business as a result of:

the size, quality and diversity of our properties;
our management and operational expertise;
our extensive experience and relationships with retailers and lenders;
our mall marketing initiatives and consumer focused strategic corporate alliances; and
our ability to use our size to reduce the total occupancy cost of our tenants.

            Our size reduces our dependence upon individual retail tenants. Approximately 5,100 different retailers occupy more than 28,600 stores in our properties and no retail tenant represents more than 2.1% of our properties' total minimum rents.

5


Competition



            Our principal competitors are nine other major United States or internationally publicly-held companies that own or operate regional malls, outlet
centers, and other shopping centers in the United States and abroad. We also compete with many commercial developers, real estate companies and other owners of retail real estate that operate in our
trade areas. Some of our properties and investments are of the same type and are within the same market area as competitor properties. The existence of competitive properties could have a material
adverse effect on our ability to lease space and on the level of rents we can obtain. This results in competition for both the acquisition of prime sites (including land for development and operating
properties) and for tenants to occupy the space that we and our competitors develop and manage. In addition, our properties compete against other forms of retailing, such as catalog and
e-commerce websites, that offer retail products and services.



            We
believe that we have a competitive advantage in the retail real estate business as a result of:




the
size, quality and diversity of our properties;
our
management and operational expertise;
our
extensive experience and relationships with retailers and lenders;
our
mall marketing initiatives and consumer focused strategic corporate alliances; and
our
ability to use our size to reduce the total occupancy cost of our tenants.


            Our
size reduces our dependence upon individual retail tenants. Approximately 5,100 different retailers occupy more than 28,600 stores in our properties and no retail tenant represents
more than 2.1% of our properties' total minimum rents.



5










This excerpt taken from the SPG 10-K filed Feb 28, 2007.

Competition

            We consider our principal competitors to be ten other major United States or internationally publicly-held companies that own or operate regional malls, outlet centers, and other shopping centers in the United States and abroad. We also compete with many commercial developers, real estate companies and other owners of retail real estate that operate in our trade areas. Some of our Properties and investments are of the same type and are within the same market area as competitor properties. The existence of competitive properties could have a material adverse effect on our ability to lease space and on the level of rents we can obtain. This results in competition for both the acquisition of prime sites (including land for development and operating properties) and for tenants to occupy the space that we and our competitors develop and manage. In addition, our Properties compete against other forms of retailing, such as catalog and e-commerce websites, that offer retail products and services.

            We believe that our Portfolio is the largest, as measured by gross leasable area ("GLA"), of any publicly-traded retail REIT. In addition, we own or have an interest in more regional malls than any other publicly-traded REIT. We believe that we have a competitive advantage in the retail real estate business as a result of:

    the size, quality and diversity of our Properties;
    our management and operational expertise;
    our extensive experience and relationships with retailers and lenders;
    our mall marketing initiatives and consumer focused strategic corporate alliances, including those developed by Simon Brand and Simon Business; and
    our ability to use our size to reduce the total occupancy cost of our tenants.

7


            Our size reduces our dependence upon individual retail tenants. Approximately 4,200 different retailers occupy more than 24,000 stores in our Properties and no retail tenant represents more than 3.8% of our Properties' total minimum rents.

This excerpt taken from the SPG 10-K filed Mar 8, 2006.

Competition

            We consider our principal competitors to be seven other major United States or internationally publicly-held companies that own or operate regional malls, outlet centers, and other shopping centers in the United States and abroad. We also compete with many commercial developers, real estate companies and other owners of retail real estate that operate in our trade areas. Some of our Properties and investments are of the same type and are within the same market area as competitor properties. The existence of competitive properties could have a material adverse effect on our ability to lease space and on the level of rents we can obtain. This results in competition for both the acquisition of prime sites (including land for development and operating properties) and for tenants to occupy the space that we and our competitors develop and manage. In addition, our Properties compete against other forms of retailing, such as catalog and e-commerce websites, that offer retail products and services.

            We believe that our Portfolio is the largest, as measured by gross leasable area ("GLA"), of any publicly-traded retail REIT. In addition, we own or have an interest in more regional malls than any other publicly-traded REIT. We believe that we have a competitive advantage in the retail real estate business as a result of:

    the size, quality and diversity of our Properties;

7


    our management and operational expertise;
    our extensive experience and relationships with retailers and lenders;
    our mall marketing initiatives and consumer focused strategic corporate alliances; including those developed by Simon Brand and Simon Business; and
    our ability to use our size to reduce the total occupancy cost of our tenants.

            Our size reduces our dependence upon individual retail tenants. Approximately 4,200 different retailers occupy more than 24,000 stores in our Properties and no retail tenant represents more than 4.0% of our Properties' total minimum rents.

This excerpt taken from the SPG 10-K filed Mar 16, 2005.

Competition

            We consider our principal competitors to be seven other major United States or internationally publicly-held companies that own or operate regional malls, outlet centers, and other shopping centers in the United States and abroad. We also compete with many commercial developers, real estate companies and other owners of retail real estate that operate in our trade areas. Some of our Properties are of the same type and are within the same market area as other competitive properties. The existence of competitive properties could have a material adverse effect on our ability to lease space and on the level of rents we can obtain. This results in competition for both the acquisition of prime sites (including land for development and operating properties) and for tenants to occupy the space that we and our competitors develop and manage. In addition, our Properties compete against non-physical based forms of retailing such as catalog companies and e-commerce websites that offer retail products.

            We believe that our Portfolio is the largest, as measured by gross leasable area ("GLA"), of any publicly-traded retail REIT. In addition, we own or have an interest in more regional malls than any other publicly-traded REIT. We believe that we have a competitive advantage in the retail real estate business as a result of:

    the size, quality and diversity of our Properties;
    our management and operational expertise;
    our extensive experience and relationships with retailers and lenders;
    our mall marketing initiatives and consumer focused strategic corporate alliances; including those developed by Simon Brand and Simon Business; and
    our ability to use our size to reduce the total occupancy cost of our tenants.

            Our size reduces our dependence upon individual retail tenants. Approximately 3,800 different retailers occupy more than 24,400 stores in our Properties and no retail tenant represents more than 4.0% of our Properties' total minimum rents.

Wikinvest © 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012. Use of this site is subject to express Terms of Service, Privacy Policy, and Disclaimer. By continuing past this page, you agree to abide by these terms. Any information provided by Wikinvest, including but not limited to company data, competitors, business analysis, market share, sales revenues and other operating metrics, earnings call analysis, conference call transcripts, industry information, or price targets should not be construed as research, trading tips or recommendations, or investment advice and is provided with no warrants as to its accuracy. Stock market data, including US and International equity symbols, stock quotes, share prices, earnings ratios, and other fundamental data is provided by data partners. Stock market quotes delayed at least 15 minutes for NASDAQ, 20 mins for NYSE and AMEX. Market data by Xignite. See data providers for more details. Company names, products, services and branding cited herein may be trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective owners. The use of trademarks or service marks of another is not a representation that the other is affiliated with, sponsors, is sponsored by, endorses, or is endorsed by Wikinvest.
Powered by MediaWiki