|
|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| |||||||||
This excerpt taken from the SIRI 10-Q filed May 11, 2009. Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates For a discussion of our Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates refer to Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations within our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 and Note 3 to the unaudited consolidated financial statements in Item 1 of this Form 10-Q.
49
This excerpt taken from the SIRI 10-Q filed May 9, 2006. Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, which require management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the periods. We have identified the following policies, which were discussed with the audit committee of our board of directors, as critical to our business and understanding our results of operations. Subscriber Revenue Recognition. Revenue from subscribers consists of subscription fees, including revenues associated with prepaid subscriptions included in the sale or lease price of a new vehicle; revenue derived from our agreement with Hertz; non-refundable activation fees; and the effects of mail-in rebates. We recognize subscription fees as our service is provided to a subscriber. We record deferred revenue for prepaid subscription fees and amortize these prepayments to revenue ratably over the term of the respective subscription plan. At the time of sale, vehicle owners purchasing or leasing a vehicle with a subscription to our service typically receive between a six month and one year prepaid subscription. We receive payment from automakers for these subscriptions in advance of our service being activated. Such prepayments are recorded to deferred revenue and amortized to revenue ratably over the service period upon activation. We also reimburse the automakers for certain costs associated with the SIRIUS radio installed in the applicable vehicle at the time the vehicle is manufactured. The associated payments to the automakers are included in subscriber acquisition costs. Although we receive payments from the automakers, they do not resell our service; rather, automakers facilitate the sale of our service to our customers, acting similar to an agent. We believe this is the appropriate characterization of our relationship since we are responsible for providing service to our customers including being obligated to the customer if there was interruption of service. Activation fees are recognized ratably over the estimated term of a subscriber relationship, currently estimated to be 3.5 years. The estimated term of a subscriber relationship is based on market research and managements judgment and, if necessary, will be refined in the future as historical data becomes available. As required by Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) No. 01-09, Accounting for Consideration Given by a Vendor to a Customer (Including a Reseller of the Vendors Products), an estimate of mail-in rebates that are paid by us directly to subscribers is recorded as a reduction to subscriber revenue in the period the subscriber activates our service. We estimate the effects of mail-in rebates based on actual take-rates for rebate incentives offered in prior periods, adjusted based on any current take-rate data available at the time. In subsequent periods, estimates are adjusted when necessary. Stock-Based Compensation. Effective January 1, 2006, we adopted the provisions of Statement of Financial Account Statement (SFAS) No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment (SFAS No. 123R), using the modified prospective transition method. Prior periods are not restated under this transition method. The stock-based compensation cost recognized beginning January 1, 2006 includes compensation cost for (i) all stock-based awards granted to employees and members of our board of directors prior to, but not vested as of January 1, 2006, based on the grant date fair value originally estimated in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, and (ii) all stock-based awards granted to employees and members of our board of directors subsequent to December 31, 2005, based on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 123R. Compensation cost under SFAS No. 123R is recognized ratably using the straight-line attribution method over the expected vesting period. SFAS No. 123R requires forfeitures to be estimated on the grant date and revised in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates. Prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 123R we accounted for forfeitures as they occurred. For pro forma disclosure purposes in accordance with SFAS No. 123, we estimated forfeitures. As of January 1, 2006, the cumulative effect of adopting the estimated forfeiture method was not significant. Prior to January 1, 2006, we used the intrinsic value method to measure the compensation cost of stock-based awards granted to employees and members of our board of directors in accordance with Accounting Principles Board 19 Opinion (APB) No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees. Accordingly, we recorded compensation expense for stock-based awards granted to employees and members of our board of directors over the vesting period equal to the excess of the market price of the underlying common stock at the date of grant over the exercise price of the stock-based award. The intrinsic value of restricted stock units as of the date of grant was amortized to expense over the vesting period. We accounted for modifications to stock-based awards in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation (FIN) No. 44, Accounting for Certain Transactions Involving Stock Compensation. FIN No. 44 provided that when the modification of a stock-based award occured, a new measurement date resulted because the modification allowed an employee to vest in an award that would have otherwise been forfeited pursuant to the original terms. In accordance with FIN No. 44, we also recorded compensation charges or benefits related to repriced stock options based on the market value of our common stock until the repriced stock options were exercised, forfeited or expired. Prior to January 1, 2006, we accounted for stock-based awards granted to non-employees, other than non-employee members of our board of directors, at fair value in accordance with SFAS No. 123. Beginning January 1, 2006, we account for such awards at fair value in accordance with SFAS No. 123R and SEC guidance contained in Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 107. The fair value of equity instruments granted to non-employees is measured in accordance with EITF No. 96-18, Accounting for Equity Instruments That are Issued to Other Than Employees for Acquiring, or in Conjunction with Selling, Goods or Services. The final measurement date of equity instruments with performance criteria is the date that each performance commitment for such equity instrument is satisfied. Stock-based awards granted to employees, non-employees and members of our board of directors generally include warrants, stock options, restricted stock and restricted stock units. Charges associated with such stock-based awards are referred to by us as equity granted to third parties and employees. Upon adoption of SFAS No. 123R, we continued to estimate the fair value of stock-based awards using the Black-Scholes option valuation model (Black-Scholes). Black-Scholes was developed to estimate the fair market value of traded options, which have no vesting restrictions and are fully transferable. Option valuation models require the input of highly subjective assumptions. Because our stock-based awards have characteristics significantly different from those of traded options and because changes in the subjective assumptions can materially affect the fair market value estimate, the existing option valuation models do not necessarily provide a reliable single measure of the fair value of our stock-based awards. Fair value determined using Black-Scholes varies based on assumptions used for the expected life, expected stock price volatility and risk-free interest rates. During the three months ended March 31, 2005, we used historical volatility of our stock over a period equal to the expected life of the warrants and options to estimate their fair value. In light of SAB No. 107, which favors using a market value of volatility to historical volatility, we estimated the fair value of awards granted during the three months ended March 31, 2006 using the implied volatility of actively traded options on our stock. We believe that implied volatility is more representative of future stock price trends than historical volatility. The expected life assumption represents the weighted-average period stock-based awards are expected to remain outstanding. These expected life assumptions are established through the review of historical exercise behavior of stock-based award grants with similar vesting periods. Where historical patterns do not exist, contractual terms are used. The risk-free interest rate represents the daily treasury yield curve rate at the reporting date based on the closing market bid yields on actively traded U.S. treasury securities in the over-the-counter market for the expected term. Our assumptions may change in future periods. For the three months ended March 31, 2006, a change in volatility of 10% would have resulted in approximately a 1% change in expense for stock-based awards granted to employees and third parties. SFAS No. 123R changes the presentation of realized excess tax benefits associated with the exercise of stock options in the statements of cash flows. Excess tax benefits are realized tax benefits from tax deductions for the exercise of stock options in excess of the deferred tax asset attributable to stock compensation expense for such options. Prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 123R, such realized tax benefits were required to be presented as operating cash flows. SFAS No. 123R requires such realized tax benefits to be presented as part of cash flows from financing activities. No income tax benefits have been realized from stock option exercises during the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005 because a valuation allowance was maintained for all net deferred tax assets. 20 Subscriber Acquisition Costs. Subscriber acquisition costs include hardware subsidies paid to radio manufacturers, distributors and automakers, including subsidies paid to automakers who include a SIRIUS radio and a prepaid subscription to our service in the sale or lease price of a new vehicle; subsidies paid to chip set manufacturers; commissions paid to retailers and automakers as incentives to purchase, install and activate SIRIUS radios; and compensation costs associated with stock-based awards granted in connection with certain distribution agreements. The majority of subscriber acquisition costs are incurred in advance of acquiring a subscriber. Subscriber acquisition costs do not include advertising, loyalty payments to distributors and dealers of SIRIUS radios and revenue share payments to automakers and retailers of SIRIUS radios which are included in sales and marketing expense. Subscriber acquisition costs also do not include amounts capitalized in connection with our agreement with Hertz, as we retain ownership of certain SIRIUS radios used by Hertz. Subsidies paid to radio manufacturers and automakers are expensed upon shipment or installation. Commissions paid to retailers and automakers are expensed either upon activation or sale of the SIRIUS radio. Chip sets that are shipped to radio manufacturers and held on consignment are recorded as inventory and expensed as subscriber acquisition costs when placed into production by radio manufacturers. Costs for chip sets not held on consignment are expensed as subscriber acquisition costs when the chip sets are shipped to radio manufacturers. Long-Lived Assets. We carry our long-lived assets at cost less accumulated depreciation. In accordance with SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, we review our long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset is not recoverable. At the time an impairment in value of a long-lived asset is identified, the impairment will be measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of a long-lived asset exceeds its fair value. To determine fair value, we would employ an expected present value technique, which utilizes multiple cash flow scenarios that reflect the range of possible outcomes and an appropriate discount rate. Useful Life of Satellite System. Our satellite system includes the costs of our satellite construction, launch vehicles, launch insurance, capitalized interest, spare satellite, terrestrial repeater network and satellite uplink facility. In accordance with SFAS No. 144, we monitor our satellites for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the asset is not recoverable. The expected useful lives of our in-orbit satellites are 15 years from the date they were placed into orbit. We are depreciating our three in-orbit satellites over their respective remaining useful lives beginning February 2002 or, in the case of our spare satellite, from the date it was delivered to ground storage in April 2002. Our spare satellite is expected to operate effectively for 15 years from the date of launch. Our satellites have experienced circuit failures on their solar arrays. We continue to monitor these failures, which we believe have not affected the expected useful lives of our satellites. If events or circumstances indicate that the useful lives of our satellites have changed, we will modify the depreciable life accordingly. FCC License. In October 1997 the FCC granted us a license to operate a commercial satellite radio service in the United States. While the FCC license has a renewable eight-year term, we expect to renew our license as there are no legal, regulatory, contractual, competitive, economic or other factors that limit its useful life. As a result, we treat the FCC license as an indefinite-lived intangible asset under the provisions of SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. We re-evaluate the useful life determination for our FCC license each reporting period to determine whether events and circumstances continue to support an indefinite useful life. To date, we have not recorded any amortization expense related to our FCC license. We test our FCC license for impairment at least annually unless indicators of impairment exist. We use a direct approach in performing our annual impairment test for this asset, which requires estimates of future cash flows and other factors. If these estimates or projections change in the future, we may be required to record an impairment charge related to this asset. We began using the direct approach in 2005. Use of the direct approach is in accordance with a September 29, 2004 Staff Announcement from the staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission, Use of the Residual Method to Value Acquired Assets Other Than Goodwill. Under the direct method, if the fair value of our license was less than the aggregate carrying amount of the license, an impairment loss would have been recognized. Income Taxes. We account for income taxes in accordance with SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. Our operating losses have generated significant state and federal tax net operating losses, or NOL carryforwards. We are required to record a valuation allowance against the deferred tax asset associated with these NOL carryforwards if it is more likely than not that we will not be able to utilize it to offset future taxes. Due to our 21 history of unprofitable operations and our expected future losses, we have recorded a valuation allowance equal to 100% of these deferred tax assets. We could be profitable in the future at levels which would cause management to conclude that it is more likely than not that we will realize all or a portion of these NOL carryforwards. Upon reaching such a conclusion, we would record the estimated net realizable value of the deferred tax asset at that time and would then provide for income taxes at a rate equal to our combined federal and state effective tax rates. Subsequent revisions to the estimated net realizable value of the deferred tax asset could cause our provision for income taxes to vary significantly from period to period, although our cash tax payments would remain unaffected until the benefit of these NOL carryforwards is utilized. This excerpt taken from the SIRI 10-K filed Mar 13, 2006. Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, which require management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the periods. We have disclosed all significant accounting policies in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements included in this report. We have identified the following policies, which were discussed with the audit committee of our board of directors, as critical to our business and understanding our results of operations. Subscriber Revenue Recognition. Revenue from subscribers consists of subscription fees, including revenues associated with prepaid subscriptions included in the sale or lease price of a new vehicle; revenue derived from our agreement with Hertz; non-refundable activation fees; and the effects of mail-in rebates. We recognize subscription fees as our service is provided to a subscriber. We record deferred revenue for prepaid subscription fees and amortize these prepayments to revenue ratably over the term of the respective subscription plan. At the time of sale, vehicle owners purchasing or leasing a vehicle with a subscription to our service typically receive between a six month and one year prepaid subscription. We receive payment from automakers for these subscriptions in advance of our service being activated. Such prepayments are recorded to deferred revenue and amortized to revenue ratably over the term 29
upon activation. We also reimburse the automakers for certain costs associated with the SIRIUS radio installed in the applicable vehicle at the time the vehicle is manufactured. The associated payments to the automakers are included in subscriber acquisition costs. Although we receive payments from the automakers, they do not resell our service; rather, automakers facilitate the sale of our service to our customers, acting similar to an agent. We believe this is the appropriate characterization of our relationship since we are responsible for providing service to our customers including being obligated to the customer if there was interruption of service. Activation fees are recognized ratably over the estimated term of a subscriber relationship, currently estimated to be 3.5 years. The estimated term of a subscriber relationship is based on market research and management’s judgment and, if necessary, will be refined in the future as historical data becomes available. As required by Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) No. 01-09, “Accounting for Consideration Given by a Vendor to a Customer (Including a Reseller of the Vendor’s Products),” an estimate of mail-in rebates that are paid by us directly to subscribers is recorded as a reduction to subscriber revenue in the period the subscriber activates our service. We estimate the effects of mail-in rebates based on actual take-rates for rebate incentives offered in prior periods, adjusted as deemed necessary based on any current take-rate data available at the time. In subsequent periods, estimates are adjusted when necessary. Stock-Based Compensation. In accordance with Accounting Principles Board Opinion (“APB”) No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” we use the intrinsic value method to measure the compensation costs of stock-based awards granted to employees and members of our board of directors. Accordingly, we record compensation expense for stock-based awards granted to employees and members of our board of directors over the vesting period equal to the excess of the market price of the underlying common stock at the date of grant over the exercise price of the stock-based award. The intrinsic value of restricted stock units as of the date of grant is amortized to expense over the vesting period. These charges are recorded as a component of equity granted to third parties
and employees in our accompanying consolidated statements of operations. Effective January 1, 2006 we will adopt Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 123R “Share-Based Payment.” SFAS No. 123R requires all share-based payments to employees to be recognized in the financial statements based on fair value. We account for modifications to stock-based awards in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation (“FIN”) No. 44, “Accounting for Certain Transactions Involving Stock Compensation.” FIN No. 44 provides that when the modification of a stock-based award occurs, a new measurement date results because the modification may allow an employee to vest in an award that would have otherwise been forfeited pursuant to the original terms. A new measurement of potential compensation is measured as of the date of the modification. While measurement of the potential compensation is made as of that date, the recognition of the compensation expense depends on whether the employee ultimately retains the stock-based award that otherwise would have been forfeited under the award’s original
vesting terms. We have granted stock-based awards which vest on a specific date with acceleration to earlier time periods as performance targets for fiscal periods are met. The performance targets are established annually and may be modified by our board of directors. As these targets are established or modified new measurement dates result. We recognize expense resulting from a new measurement date only if such employees voluntarily resign or are terminated for cause and exercise such stock-based awards during the period of the accelerated vest date through the original vest date. Under these conditions, employees are deemed to benefit from the accelerated vest date. Stock compensation expense associated with stock options for the year ended December 31, 2005 included a charge of $479 for an employee that was deemed to have benefited from the modification of a stock-based award resulting
in a new measurement date. No additional expense will be recognized for employees deemed to benefit from accelerated vest dates as modifications to stock-based awards effective January 1, 2006 will be accounted for in accordance with SFAS No. 123R. 30
In accordance with FIN No. 44, we record compensation charges or benefits related to repriced stock options based on the market value of our common stock until the repriced stock options are exercised, forfeited or expire. We account for stock-based awards granted to non-employees, other than non-employee members of our board of directors, at fair value in accordance with SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation.” The fair value of equity instruments granted to non-employees is measured in accordance with EITF No. 96-18, “Accounting for Equity Instruments That are Issued to Other Than Employees for Acquiring, or in Conjunction with Selling, Goods or Services.” The final measurement date of equity instruments with performance criteria is the date that each performance commitment for such equity instrument is satisfied. These charges are recorded as a component of equity granted to third parties and employees in our accompanying consolidated statements of operations. The measure of fair value most often employed under SFAS No. 123 is the Black-Scholes option valuation model (“Black-Scholes”). Black-Scholes was developed to estimate the fair market value of traded options, which have no vesting restrictions and are fully transferable. Option valuation models require the input of highly subjective assumptions, including the expected stock price volatility. Because our stock-based awards have characteristics significantly different from those of traded options and because changes in the subjective assumptions can materially affect the fair market value estimate, the existing option valuation models do not necessarily provide a reliable single measure of the fair value of our stock-based awards. Fair value determined using Black-Scholes varies based on assumptions used
for the expected life, expected stock price volatility and risk-free interest rates. During 2005, we continued to refine the assumptions used in estimating fair value in response to changing market conditions and the issuance of additional accounting guidance, including SFAS No. 123R. Our assumptions may change in future periods. For the year ended December 31, 2005, a change in volatility of 10% would have resulted in aproximately a 2% change in expense for stock-based awards granted to third parties. Subscriber Acquisition Costs. Subscriber acquisition costs include hardware subsidies paid to radio manufacturers, distributors and automakers, including subsidies paid to automakers who include a SIRIUS radio and a prepaid subscription to our service in the sale or lease price of a new vehicle; subsidies paid to chip set manufacturers; and commissions paid to retailers and automakers as incentives to purchase, install and activate SIRIUS radios. The majority of subscriber acquisition costs are incurred in advance of acquiring a subscriber. Subscriber acquisition costs do not include advertising, loyalty payments to distributors and dealers of SIRIUS radios and revenue share payments to automakers and retailers of SIRIUS radios which are included in sales and marketing expense. Subscriber
acquisition costs also do not include amounts capitalized in connection with our agreement with Hertz, as we retain ownership of certain SIRIUS radios used by Hertz. Subsidies paid to radio manufacturers and automakers are expensed upon shipment or installation. Commissions paid to retailers and automakers are expensed either upon activation or sale of the SIRIUS radio. Chip sets that are shipped to radio manufacturers and held on consignment are recorded as inventory and expensed as subscriber acquisition costs when placed into production by radio manufacturers. Costs for chip sets not held on consignment are expensed as subscriber acquisition costs when the chip sets are shipped to radio manufacturers. Long-Lived Assets. We carry our long-lived assets at cost less accumulated depreciation. In accordance with SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets,” we review our long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset is not recoverable. At the time an impairment in value of a long-lived asset is identified, the impairment will be measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of a long-lived asset exceeds its fair value. To determine fair value, we would employ an expected present value technique, which utilizes multiple cash flow scenarios that reflect the range of possible outcomes and an appropriate discount rate. Useful Life of Satellite System. Our satellite system includes the costs of our satellite construction, launch vehicles, launch insurance, capitalized interest, spare satellite, terrestrial 31
repeater network and satellite uplink facility. In accordance with SFAS No. 144, we monitor our satellites for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the asset is not recoverable. The expected useful lives of our in-orbit satellites are 15 years from the date they were placed into orbit. We are depreciating our three in-orbit satellites over their respective remaining useful lives beginning February 2002 or, in the case of our spare satellite, from the date it was delivered to ground storage in April 2002. Our spare satellite is expected to operate effectively for 15 years from the date of launch. Our satellites have experienced circuit failures on their solar arrays. We continue to monitor these failures, which we believe have not affected the expected useful lives of our satellites. If events or circumstances indicate that the useful lives of our satellites have changed, we will modify the depreciable life accordingly. FCC License. In October 1997 the FCC granted us a license to operate a commercial satellite radio service in the United States. While the FCC license has a renewable eight-year term, we expect to renew our license as there are no legal, regulatory, contractual, competitive, economic or other factors that limit its useful life. As a result, we treat the FCC license as an indefinite-lived intangible asset under the provisions of SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.” We re-evaluate the useful life determination for our FCC license each reporting period to determine whether events and circumstances continue to support an indefinite useful life. To date, we have not recorded any amortization expense related to our FCC license. We test our FCC license for impairment at least annually unless indicators of impairment exist. We use a direct approach in performing our annual impairment test for this asset which requires estimates of future cash flows and other factors. If these estimates or projections change in the future, we may be required to record an impairment charge related to this asset. We began using the direct approach in 2005. Prior to 2005, we used the residual method in estimating the fair value of our FCC license. Use of the direct approach is in accordance with a September 29, 2004 Staff Announcement from the staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission, “Use of the Residual Method to Value Acquired Assets Other Than Goodwill.” Under either the direct method or the residual method, if the fair value of our license was
less than the aggregated carrying amount of the license, an impairment would have been recognized. Income Taxes. We account for income taxes in accordance with SFAS No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes.” Our operating losses have generated significant state and federal tax net operating losses, or NOL carryforwards. We are required to record a valuation allowance against the deferred tax asset associated with these NOL carryforwards if it is “more likely than not” that we will not be able to utilize it to offset future taxes. Due to our history of unprofitable operations and our expected future losses, we have recorded a valuation allowance equal to 100% of these deferred tax assets. We could be profitable in the future at levels which would cause management to conclude that it is more likely than not that we will realize all or a portion of these NOL carryforwards.
Upon reaching such a conclusion, we would record the estimated net realizable value of the deferred tax asset at that time and would then provide for income taxes at a rate equal to our combined federal and state effective tax rates. Subsequent revisions to the estimated net realizable value of the deferred tax asset could cause our provision for income taxes to vary significantly from period to period, although our cash tax payments would remain unaffected until the benefit of these NOL carryforwards is utilized. This excerpt taken from the SIRI 10-Q filed Nov 8, 2005. Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, which require management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the periods. We have disclosed all significant accounting policies in Note 3 to the unaudited consolidated financial statements included in this report. We have identified the following policies, which were discussed with the audit committee of our board of directors, as critical to our business and understanding our results of operations. Subscriber Revenue Recognition. Revenue from subscribers consists of subscription fees, including revenues associated with prepaid subscriptions included in the sale or lease price of a new vehicle; revenue derived from our agreement with Hertz; and non-refundable activation fees. We recognize subscription fees as our service is provided to a subscriber. We record deferred revenue for prepaid subscription fees and amortize these prepayments to revenue ratably over the term of the respective subscription plan. At the time of sale, vehicle owners purchasing or leasing a vehicle with a subscription typically receive between a six-month and one-year prepaid subscription. We receive payment from automakers for these subscriptions in advance of our service being activated. We also reimburse the automakers for certain costs associated with the SIRIUS radio installed in the applicable vehicle at the time the vehicle is manufactured. The 29 associated payments to the automakers are included in subscriber acquisition costs. Although we receive
payments from the automakers, they do not resell our service; rather, automakers facilitate the sale
of our service to our customers similar to an agent. We believe this is the appropriate characterization
of our relationship since we are responsible for providing services to our customers including being
obligated to the customer if there were interruption of service. Activation fees are recognized ratably over the estimated term of a subscriber relationship, currently
estimated to be 3.5 years. The estimated term of a subscriber relationship is based on market research
and managements judgment and, if necessary, will be refined in the future as historical data
becomes available. As required by Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) No. 01-09, Accounting for Consideration
Given by a Vendor to a Customer (Including a Reseller of the Vendors Products), an estimate
of mail-in rebates that are paid by us directly to subscribers is recorded as a reduction to subscriber
revenue in the period the subscriber activates our service. We estimate the effects of mail-in rebates
based on actual take-rates for rebate incentives offered in prior periods. In subsequent periods,
estimates are adjusted when necessary. Stock-Based Compensation. In accordance with Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued
to Employees, we use the intrinsic value method to measure the compensation costs of stock-based
awards granted to employees and members of our board of directors. Accordingly, we record compensation
expense for stock-based awards granted to employees and members of our board of directors over the
vesting period equal to the excess of the market price of the underlying common stock at the date
of grant over the exercise price of the stock-based award. The intrinsic value of restricted stock
units as of the date of grant is amortized to expense over the vesting period. These charges are
recorded as a component of equity granted to third parties and employees in our accompanying unaudited
consolidated statements of operations. We account for modifications to stock-based awards in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards
Board (FASB) Interpretation No. 44, Accounting for Certain Transactions Involving
Stock Compensation (FIN No. 44). FIN No. 44 provides that when the modification
of a stock-based award occurs, a new measurement date results because the modification may allow
an employee to vest in an award that would have otherwise been forfeited pursuant to the original
terms. A new measurement of potential compensation is measured as of the date of the modification.
While measurement of the potential compensation is made as of that date, the recognition of the compensation
expense depends on whether the employee ultimately retains the stock-based award that otherwise would
have been forfeited under the awards original vesting terms. We
granted stock-based awards which vest July 1, 2008 with acceleration to earlier
time periods as performance targets for fiscal periods are met. The performance
targets are established annually and may be modified by our board of directors.
As these targets are set new measurement dates result. We recognize expense
resulting from a new measurement date only if such employees voluntarily resign
or are terminated for cause and had exercised or exercise such stock-based awards
during the period of the accelerated vest date through July 1, 2008, the
original vest date. Under these conditions, employees are deemed to benefit
from the accelerated vest date. Stock-based awards with new measurement dates
could result in the recognition of additional stock compensation expense of
up to $23,372 through July 1, 2008 if during such period all of the affected
employees were to voluntarily resign or were terminated for cause and had exercised
or exercise such awards. Stock compensation expense associated with stock options
for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 includes a charge of $479
for an employee that was deemed to benefit from the modification of a stock-based
award resulting in a new measurement date. In accordance with FIN No. 44, we record compensation charges or benefits related to repriced stock
options based on the market value of our common stock until the repriced stock options are exercised,
forfeited or expire. We account for stock-based awards granted to non-employees at fair value in accordance with Statement
of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation.
In accordance with EITF No. 96-18, Accounting for Equity Instruments That are Issued to Other
Than Employees for Acquiring, or in Conjunction with Selling, Goods or Services, we record
expense based upon performance using the fair value of equity instruments issued to non-employees,
other than non-employee members of our board of directors, at each reporting date. The final measurement
date of equity instruments with performance criteria is the date that each performance commitment
for such equity instrument is satisfied. Fair value is determined using the Black-Scholes option
valuation model and varies based on assumptions used for the expected life, expected stock price
volatility and risk-free interest rates. Since we do not have sufficient historical information regarding
the life expectancy of stock-based awards granted to non-employees, we currently use an expected
life based on the term of the stock- 30 based award as specified in each agreement. Expected stock price volatility is calculated over a period
equal to the expected life and the risk-free interest rate represents the daily treasury yield curve
rate at the reporting date based on the closing market bid yields on actively traded U.S. treasury
securities in the over-the-counter market for the expected term. Our assumptions may change in future
periods as the life expectancy of the stock-based awards may shorten based on exercise activity.
In addition, expected stock price volatility is subject to change based on fluctuations in our stock
price. These costs are classified in our accompanying unaudited consolidated statements of operations
as a component of equity granted to third parties and employees. Subscriber Acquisition Costs. Subscriber acquisition costs include hardware subsidies paid to radio manufacturers and automakers,
including subsidies paid to automakers who include a SIRIUS radio and a prepaid subscription to our
service in the sale or lease price of a new vehicle; subsidies paid to chip set manufacturers; and
commissions paid to retailers and automakers as incentives to purchase, install and activate SIRIUS
radios. The majority of subscriber acquisition costs are incurred in advance of acquiring a subscriber.
Subscriber acquisition costs do not include advertising, loyalty payments to distributors and dealers
of SIRIUS radios and revenue share payments to automakers and retailers of SIRIUS radios which are
included in sales and marketing expense. Subscriber acquisition costs also do not include amounts
capitalized in connection with our agreement with Hertz, as we retain ownership of the SIRIUS radios
used by Hertz. Subsidies paid to radio manufacturers and automakers are expensed upon shipment or installation. Commissions
paid to retailers and automakers are expensed either upon activation or sale of the SIRIUS radio.
Chip sets that are shipped to radio manufacturers and held on consignment are recorded as inventory
and expensed as subscriber acquisition costs when placed into production by radio manufacturers.
Costs for chip sets not held on consignment are expensed as subscriber acquisition costs when the
chip sets are shipped to radio manufacturers. Long-Lived Assets. We carry our long-lived assets at cost less accumulated depreciation. In accordance with SFAS No.
144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, we review our long-lived
assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount
of an asset is not recoverable. At the time an impairment in value of a long-lived asset is identified,
the impairment will be measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of a long-lived asset
exceeds its fair value. To determine fair value, we would employ an expected present value technique,
which utilizes multiple cash flow scenarios that reflect the range of possible outcomes and an appropriate
discount rate. Useful Life of Satellite System. Our satellite system includes the cost of satellite construction, launch vehicles, launch insurance,
capitalized interest, our spare satellite and our terrestrial repeater network. In accordance with
SFAS No. 144, we monitor our satellites for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances
indicate that the carrying amount of the asset is not recoverable. The expected useful lives of our
in-orbit satellites are 15 years from the date they were placed into orbit. We are depreciating our
three in-orbit satellites over their respective remaining useful lives beginning February 14, 2002
or, in the case of our spare satellite, from the date it was delivered to ground storage in April
2002. Our spare satellite is expected to operate effectively for 15 years from the date of launch.
Space Systems/Loral, the manufacturer of our satellites, has identified circuit failures in solar
arrays on satellites since 1997, including our satellites. We continue to monitor these failures,
which we believe have not affected the expected useful lives of our satellites. If events or circumstances
indicate that the useful lives of our satellites have changed, we will modify the depreciable life accordingly. FCC License. We carry our FCC license at cost. Our FCC license has an indefinite life and is evaluated for impairment
on an annual basis or more frequently if there are indicators of impairment. In accordance with SFAS
No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, we completed an impairment analysis of
our FCC license as of December 31, 2004, and determined that there was no impairment. We use
projections regarding estimated future cash flows and other factors in assessing the fair value of
our FCC license. If these estimates or projections change in the future, we may be required to record
an impairment charge related to our FCC license. Income Taxes. We account for income taxes in accordance with SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes.
Operating losses in prior periods have generated significant state and federal tax net operating
losses, or NOL carryforwards. We are required to record a valuation allowance against the deferred
tax asset associated with these NOL carryforwards if it is more likely than not that
we will not be able to utilize it to offset future taxes. Due to our history of unprofitable operations
and our expected future losses, we have recorded a valuation allowance equal to 100% of these deferred
tax assets. We could be profitable in the future at levels which would cause management to conclude
that it is more likely than not that we will realize all or a portion of these NOL 31 carryforwards. Upon reaching such a conclusion, we would record the estimated net realizable value
of the deferred tax asset at that time and would then provide for income taxes at a rate equal to
our combined federal and state effective rates. Subsequent revisions to the estimated net realizable
value of the deferred tax asset could cause our provision for income taxes to vary significantly
from period to period, although our cash tax payments would remain unaffected until the benefit of
these NOL carryforwards is utilized. This excerpt taken from the SIRI 10-Q filed Aug 3, 2005. Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, which require management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the periods. We have disclosed all significant accounting policies in Note 3 to the unaudited consolidated financial statements included in this report. We have identified the following policies, which were discussed with the audit committee of our board of directors, as critical to our business and understanding our results of operations. Subscriber Revenue Recognition. Revenue from subscribers consists of subscription fees, including revenues associated with prepaid subscriptions included in the sale or lease price of a new vehicle; revenue derived from our agreement with Hertz; and non-refundable activation fees. We recognize subscription fees as our service is provided to a subscriber. We record deferred revenue for prepaid subscription fees and amortize these prepayments to revenue ratably over the term of the respective subscription plan. At the time of sale, vehicle owners purchasing or leasing a vehicle with a subscription typically receive between a six-month and one-year prepaid subscription. We receive payment from automakers for these subscriptions in advance of our service being activated. We also reimburse the automakers for certain costs associated with the SIRIUS radio installed in the applicable vehicle at the time the vehicle is manufactured. The associated payments to the automakers are included in subscriber acquisition costs. Although we receive payments from the automakers, they do not resell our service; rather, automakers facilitate the sale of our service to our customers similar to an agent. We believe this is the appropriate characterization of our relationship since we are responsible for providing services to our customers including being obligated to the customer if there were interruption of service. Activation fees are recognized ratably over the estimated term of a subscriber relationship, currently estimated to be 3.5 years. The estimated term of a subscriber relationship is based on market research and management's judgment and, if necessary, will be refined in the future as historical data becomes available. As required by Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) No. 01-09, “Accounting for Consideration Given by a Vendor to a Customer (Including a Reseller of the Vendor's Products),” an estimate of mail-in rebates that are paid by us directly to subscribers is recorded as a reduction to subscriber revenue in the period the subscriber activates our service. We estimate the effects of mail-in rebates based on actual take-rates for rebate incentives offered in prior periods. In subsequent periods, estimates are adjusted when necessary. Stock-Based Compensation. In accordance with Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” we use the intrinsic value method to measure the compensation costs of stock-based awards granted to employees and members of our board of directors. Accordingly, we record compensation expense for stock-based awards granted to employees and members of our board of directors over the vesting period equal to the excess of the market price of the underlying common stock at the date of grant over the exercise price of the stock-based award. The intrinsic value of restricted stock units as of the date of grant is amortized to expense over the vesting period. These charges are recorded as a component of equity granted to third parties and employees in our accompanying unaudited consolidated statements of operations. 30
We account for modifications to stock-based awards in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Interpretation No. 44, “Accounting for Certain Transactions Involving Stock Compensation” (“FIN No. 44”). FIN No. 44 provides that when the modification of a stock-based award occurs, a new measurement date results because the modification may allow an employee to vest in an award that would have otherwise been forfeited pursuant to the original terms. A new measurement of potential compensation is measured as of the date of the modification. While measurement of the potential compensation is made as of that date, the recognition of the compensation expense depends on whether the employee ultimately retains the stock-based award that otherwise would have been
forfeited under the award's original vesting terms. We granted stock-based awards which vest July 1, 2008 with acceleration to earlier time periods as performance targets for fiscal periods are met. The performance targets are established annually and may be modified by our board of directors. As these targets are set new measurement dates result. We recognize expense resulting from a new measurement date only if such employees voluntarily resign or are terminated for cause and had exercised or exercise such stock-based awards during the period of the accelerated vest date through July 1, 2008, the original vest date. Under these conditions, employees are deemed to benefit from the accelerated vest date. Stock-based awards with new measurement dates could result in the recognition of stock compensation expense of up to $23,372 through July 1, 2008 if during such
period all of the affected employees were to voluntarily resign or were terminated for cause and had exercised or exercise such awards. Stock compensation expense associated with stock options for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 includes a charge of $479 for an employee that was deemed to benefit from the modification of a stock-based award resulting in a new measurement date. In accordance with FIN No. 44, we record compensation charges or benefits related to repriced stock options based on the market value of our common stock until the repriced stock options are exercised, forfeited or expire. We account for stock-based awards granted to non-employees at fair value in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation.” In accordance with EITF No. 96-18, “Accounting for Equity Instruments That are Issued to Other Than Employees for Acquiring, or in Conjunction with Selling, Goods or Services,” we record expense based upon performance using the fair value of equity instruments issued to non-employees, other than non-employee members of our board of directors, at each reporting date. The final measurement date of equity instruments with performance criteria is the date that each performance commitment for such equity instrument is satisfied. Fair value is determined using the Black-Scholes option valuation
model and varies based on assumptions used for the expected life, expected stock price volatility and risk-free interest rates. Since we do not have sufficient historical information regarding the life expectancy of stock-based awards granted to non-employees, we currently use an expected life based on the term of the stock-based award as specified in each agreement. Expected stock price volatility is calculated over a period equal to the expected life and the risk-free interest rate represents the daily treasury yield curve rate at the reporting date based on the closing market bid yields on actively traded U.S. treasury securities in the over-the-counter market for the expected term. Our assumptions may change in future periods as the life expectancy of the stock-based awards may shorten based on exercise activity. In addition, expected stock price volatility is subject to change based
on fluctuations in our stock price. These costs are classified in our accompanying unaudited consolidated statements of operations as a component of equity granted to third parties and employees. Subscriber Acquisition Costs. Subscriber acquisition costs include hardware subsidies paid to radio manufacturers and automakers, including subsidies paid to automakers who have agreed to include a SIRIUS radio and a prepaid subscription to our service in the sale or lease price of a new vehicle; subsidies paid to chip set manufacturers; and commissions paid to retailers and automakers as incentives to purchase, install and activate SIRIUS radios. The majority of subscriber acquisition costs are incurred in advance of acquiring a subscriber. Subscriber acquisition costs do not include advertising, loyalty payments to distributors and dealers of SIRIUS radios and 31
revenue share payments to automakers and manufacturers of SIRIUS radios. Subscriber acquisition costs also do not include amounts capitalized in connection with our agreement with Hertz, as we retain ownership of the SIRIUS radios used by Hertz. Subsidies paid to radio manufacturers and automakers are expensed upon shipment or installation. Commissions paid to retailers and automakers are expensed either upon activation or sale of the SIRIUS radio. Chip sets that are shipped to radio manufacturers and held on consignment are recorded as inventory and expensed as subscriber acquisition costs when placed into production by radio manufacturers. Costs for chip sets not held on consignment are expensed as subscriber acquisition costs when the chip sets are shipped to radio manufacturers. Long-Lived Assets. We carry our long-lived assets at cost less accumulated depreciation. In accordance with SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets,” we review our long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset is not recoverable. At the time an impairment in value of a long-lived asset is identified, the impairment will be measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of a long-lived asset exceeds its fair value. To determine fair value, we would employ an expected present value technique, which utilizes multiple cash flow scenarios that reflect the range of possible outcomes and an appropriate discount rate. Useful Life of Satellite System. Our satellite system includes the cost of satellite construction, launch vehicles, launch insurance, capitalized interest, our spare satellite and our terrestrial repeater network. In accordance with SFAS No. 144, we monitor our satellites for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the asset is not recoverable. The expected useful lives of our in-orbit satellites are 15 years from the date they were placed into orbit. We are depreciating our three in-orbit satellites over their respective remaining useful lives beginning February 14, 2002 or, in the case of our spare satellite, from the date it was delivered to ground storage in April 2002. If placed into orbit, our spare satellite is expected to
operate effectively for 15 years. Space Systems/Loral, the manufacturer of our satellites, has identified circuit failures in solar arrays on satellites since 1997, including our satellites. We continue to monitor these failures, which we believe have not affected the expected useful lives of our satellites. If events or circumstances indicate that the useful lives of our satellites have changed, we will modify the depreciable life accordingly. FCC License. We carry our FCC license at cost. Our FCC license has an indefinite life and is evaluated for impairment on an annual basis or more frequently if there are indicators of impairment. In accordance with SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets,” we completed an impairment analysis of our FCC license as of December 31, 2004, and determined that there was no impairment. We use projections regarding estimated future cash flows and other factors in assessing the fair value of our FCC license. If these estimates or projections change in the future, we may be required to record an impairment charge related to our FCC license. Income Taxes. We account for income taxes in accordance with SFAS No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes.” Operating losses in prior periods have generated significant state and federal tax net operating losses, or NOL carryforwards. We are required to record a valuation allowance against the deferred tax asset associated with these NOL carryforwards if it is “more likely than not” that we will not be able to utilize it to offset future taxes. Due to our history of unprofitable operations and our expected future losses, we have recorded a valuation allowance equal to 100% of these deferred tax assets. It is possible, however, that we could be profitable in the future at levels which would cause management to conclude that it is more likely than not that we will
realize all or a portion of these NOL carryforwards. Upon reaching such a conclusion, we would record the estimated net realizable value of the deferred tax asset at that time and would then provide for income taxes at a rate equal to our combined federal and state effective rates. Subsequent revisions to the estimated net realizable value of the deferred tax asset could cause our provision for income taxes to vary significantly from period to period, although our cash tax payments would remain unaffected until the benefit of these NOL carryforwards is utilized. 32
This excerpt taken from the SIRI 10-Q filed May 9, 2005. Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, which require management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the periods. We have disclosed all significant accounting policies in Note 3 to the unaudited consolidated financial statements included in this report. We have identified the following policies, which were discussed with the audit committee of our board of directors, as critical to our business and understanding our results of operations. Subscription Revenue Recognition. Revenue from subscribers consists of subscription fees, including revenues associated with prepaid subscriptions included in the sale or lease price of a new vehicle; revenue derived from our agreement with Hertz; and non-refundable activation fees. We recognize subscription fees as our service is provided to a subscriber. We record deferred revenue for prepaid subscription fees and amortize these prepayments to revenue ratably over the term of the respective subscription plan. At the time of sale, vehicle owners purchasing or leasing a vehicle with a subscription typically receive between a six-month and one-year prepaid subscription. We receive payment from automakers for these subscriptions in advance of our service being activated. We also reimburse the automakers for certain costs associated with the SIRIUS radio installed in the applicable vehicle at the time the vehicle is manufactured. The associated payments to the automakers are included in subscriber acquisition costs. Although we receive payments from the automakers, we believe that they do not resell our service; rather, they facilitate the sale of our service to our customers similar to an agent. We believe this is the appropriate characterization of our relationship since we are responsible for providing services to our customers including being obligated to the customer if there were interruption of service. Activation fees are recognized ratably over the estimated term of a subscriber relationship, currently estimated to be 3.5 years. The estimated term of a subscriber relationship is based on market research and managements judgment and, if necessary, will be refined in the future as historical data becomes available. As required by Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) No. 01-09, Accounting for Consideration Given by a Vendor to a Customer (Including a Reseller of the Vendors Products), an estimate of mail-in rebates that are paid by us directly to subscribers is recorded as a reduction to subscriber revenue in the period the subscriber activates our service. We estimate the effects of mail-in rebates based on actual take-rates for rebate incentives offered in prior periods. In subsequent periods, estimates are adjusted when necessary. Stock-Based Compensation. In accordance with Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, we use the intrinsic value method to measure the compensation costs of stock-based awards granted to employees and members of our board of directors. Accordingly, we record compensation expense for stock-based awards granted to employees and members of our board of directors over the vesting period equal to the excess of the market price of the underlying common stock at the date of grant over the exercise price of the stock-based award. The intrinsic value of restricted stock units as of the date of grant is amortized to expense over the vesting period. These charges are recorded as a component of equity granted to third parties and employees in our accompanying unaudited consolidated statements of operations.
24 We account for modifications to stock-based awards in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Interpretation No. 44, Accounting for Certain Transactions Involving Stock Compensation (FIN No. 44). FIN No. 44 provides that when the modification of a stock-based award occurs, a new measurement date results because the modification may allow an employee to vest in an award that would have otherwise been forfeited pursuant to the original terms. A new measurement of potential compensation should be measured as of the date of the modification. While measurement of the potential compensation is made as of that date, the recognition of the compensation expense depends on whether the employee ultimately retains the stock-based award that otherwise would have been forfeited under the awards original vesting terms. We granted stock-based awards which vest July 1, 2008 with acceleration to earlier time periods as performance targets for fiscal periods are met. The performance targets are established in our annual planning process and may be modified from time to time by our board of directors. As these targets are set new measurement dates result. We recognize expense resulting from a new measurement date only if such employees voluntarily resign or are terminated for cause and had exercised or exercise such stock-based awards during the period of the accelerated vest date through July 1, 2008, the original vest date. Under these conditions, employees are deemed to benefit from the accelerated vest date. Stock-based awards with new measurement dates could result in the recognition of stock compensation expense of up to $24,196 through July 1, 2008 if during such period all of the affected employees were to voluntarily resign or were terminated for cause and had exercised or exercise such awards. For the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, we recognized no stock compensation expense associated with the modification of stock-based awards as a result of a new measurement date. In accordance with FIN No. 44, we record compensation charges or benefits related to repriced stock options based on the market value of our common stock until the repriced stock options are exercised, forfeited or expire. We account for stock-based awards granted to non-employees at fair value in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation. In accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force No. 96-18, Accounting for Equity Instruments That are Issued to Other Than Employees for Acquiring, or in Conjunction with Selling, Goods or Services, we record expense based upon performance using the fair value of equity instruments issued to non-employees, other than non-employee members of our board of directors, at each reporting date. The final measurement date of equity instruments with performance criteria is the date that each performance commitment for such equity instrument is satisfied. Fair value is determined using the Black-Scholes option valuation model and varies based on assumptions used for the expected life, expected stock price volatility and risk-free interest rates. Since we do not have sufficient historical information regarding the life expectancy of stock-based awards granted to non-employees, we currently use an expected life based on the term of the stock-based award as specified in each agreement. Expected stock price volatility is calculated over a period equal to the expected life and the risk-free interest rate represents the daily treasury yield curve rate at the reporting date based on the closing market bid yields on actively traded U.S. treasury securities in the over-the-counter market for the expected term. Our assumptions may change in future periods as the life expectancy of the stock-based awards may shorten based on exercise activity. In addition, expected stock price volatility is subject to change based on fluctuations in our stock price. These costs are classified in our accompanying unaudited consolidated statements of operations as a component of equity granted to third parties and employees. Subscriber Acquisition Costs. Subscriber acquisition costs include hardware subsidies paid to radio manufacturers and automakers, including subsidies paid to automakers who have agreed to include a SIRIUS radio and a prepaid subscription to our service in the sale or lease price of a new vehicle; subsidies paid to chip set manufacturers; and commissions paid to retailers and automakers as incentives to purchase, install and activate SIRIUS radios. The majority of subscriber acquisition costs are incurred in advance of acquiring a subscriber. Subscriber acquisition costs do not include advertising, loyalty payments to distributors and dealers of SIRIUS radios and revenue share payments to automakers and manufacturers of SIRIUS radios. Subscriber acquisition costs also do not include amounts capitalized in connection with our agreement with Hertz, as we retain ownership of the SIRIUS radios used by Hertz. Subsidies paid to radio manufacturers and automakers are expensed upon shipment or installation. Commissions paid to retailers and automakers are expensed either upon activation or sale of the SIRIUS radio. Chip
25 sets that are shipped to radio manufacturers and held on consignment are recorded as inventory and expensed as subscriber acquisition costs when placed into production by radio manufacturers. Costs for chip sets not held on consignment are expensed as subscriber acquisition costs when the chip sets are shipped to radio manufacturers. Long-Lived Assets. We carry our long-lived assets at cost less accumulated depreciation. In accordance with SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, we review our long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset is not recoverable. At the time an impairment in value of a long-lived asset is identified, the impairment will be measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of a long-lived asset exceeds its fair value. To determine fair value, we would employ an expected present value technique, which utilizes multiple cash flow scenarios that reflect the range of possible outcomes and an appropriate discount rate. Useful Life of Satellite System. Our satellite system includes the cost of satellite construction, launch vehicles, launch insurance, capitalized interest, our spare satellite and our terrestrial repeater network. In accordance with SFAS No. 144, we monitor our satellites for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the asset is not recoverable. The expected useful lives of our in-orbit satellites are 15 years from the date they were placed into orbit. We are depreciating our three in-orbit satellites over their respective remaining useful lives beginning February 14, 2002 or, in the case of our spare satellite, from the date it was delivered to ground storage in April 2002. If placed into orbit, our spare satellite is expected to operate effectively for 15 years. Space Systems/Loral, the manufacturer of our satellites, has identified circuit failures in solar arrays on satellites since 1997, including our satellites. We continue to monitor these failures, which we believe have not affected the expected useful lives of our satellites. If events or circumstances indicate that the useful lives of our satellites have changed, we will modify the depreciable life accordingly. FCC License. We carry our FCC license at cost. Our FCC license has an indefinite life and is evaluated for impairment on an annual basis or more frequently if there are indicators of impairment. In accordance with SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, we completed an impairment analysis of our FCC license as of December 31, 2004, and determined that there was no impairment. We use projections regarding estimated future cash flows and other factors in assessing the fair value of our FCC license. If these estimates or projections change in the future, we may be required to record an impairment charge related to our FCC license. Income Taxes. We account for income taxes in accordance with SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. Operating losses in prior periods have generated significant state and federal tax net operating losses, or NOL carryforwards. We are required to record a valuation allowance against the deferred tax asset associated with these NOL carryforwards if it is more likely than not that we will not be able to utilize it to offset future taxes. Due to our history of unprofitable operations and our expected future losses, we have recorded a valuation allowance equal to 100% of these deferred tax assets. It is possible, however, that we could be profitable in the future at levels which would cause management to conclude that it is more likely than not that we will realize all or a portion of these NOL carryforwards. Upon reaching such a conclusion, we would record the estimated net realizable value of the deferred tax asset at that time and would then provide for income taxes at a rate equal to our combined federal and state effective rates. Subsequent revisions to the estimated net realizable value of the deferred tax asset could cause our provision for income taxes to vary significantly from period to period, although our cash tax payments would remain unaffected until the benefit of these NOL carryforwards is utilized. This excerpt taken from the SIRI 10-K filed Mar 16, 2005. Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, which require management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the periods. We have disclosed all significant accounting policies in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements included in this report. We have identified the following policies, which were discussed with the audit committee of our board of directors, as critical to our business and understanding our results of operations. Subscription Revenue Recognition. Revenue from subscribers consists of subscription fees, including revenues associated with prepaid subscriptions included in the sale or lease of a new vehicle; revenue derived from our agreement with Hertz; and non-refundable activation fees. We recognize subscription fees as our service is provided to a subscriber. We record deferred revenue for prepaid subscription fees and amortize these prepayments to revenue ratably over the term of the respective subscription plan. At the time of sale, vehicle owners purchasing or leasing a vehicle with a subscription typically receive between a six-month and one-year prepaid subscription. These prepaid subscriptions include a SIRIUS radio and a subscription to our service. We receive payment from these automakers for such subscriptions in advance of the service being activated. In connection with these agreements, we also reimburse automakers for certain costs associated with the SIRIUS radio installed in the applicable vehicle at the time the vehicle is manufactured, including hardware costs, sale and promotional allowances, tooling, and non-recurring engineering expenses. The associated payments to the automakers were included in subscriber acquisition costs. Although we receive payments from the automakers, we believe that they do not resell our service; rather, they facilitate the sale of our service to our customers similar to an agent. We believe this is the appropriate characterization of our relationship since we are responsible for providing services to our customers including being obligated to the customer if there were interruption of service. We record prepaid subscriptions as deferred revenue until our service is activated. Once activated, the revenue is recognized over the service period and is recorded as subscriber revenue in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations. Activation fees are recognized ratably over the term of the subscriber relationship, currently estimated to be 3.5 years. The estimated term of a subscriber relationship is based on market research and management's judgment and, if necessary, will be refined in the future as historical data becomes available. As required by Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) No. 01-09, “Accounting for Consideration Given by a Vendor to a Customer (Including a Reseller of the Vendor's Products),” an estimate of mail-in rebates deferred revenue for prepaid subscription fees and amortize these prepayments to revenue ratably over the term of the respective subscription plan. We estimate the effect of mail-in rebates based on actual take-rates for rebate incentives offered in prior periods. In subsequent periods, estimates are adjusted when necessary. Stock-Based Compensation. In accordance with Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” we use the intrinsic value method to measure the compensation costs of stock-based awards granted to employees and members of our board of directors. Accordingly, we record compensation expense for stock-based awards granted to employees and members of our board of directors over the vesting period equal to the excess of the market price of the underlying common stock at the date of grant over the exercise price of the stock-based award. The intrinsic value of restricted stock units as of the date of grant is amortized to expense over the vesting period. These charges are recorded as a component of equity granted to third parties and employees in our accompanying consolidated statements of operations. Certain stock-based awards to employees have accelerated vesting provisions in the event of satisfaction of performance criteria which are not specified in the original terms of the stock-based award. A new measurement date results when the performance criteria are established. In accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Interpretation No. 44, “Accounting for Certain Transactions Involving Stock Compensation” (“FIN No. 44”), a new measurement date results because the modification of the stock-based award may allow the employee to vest in an award that would have otherwise been forfeited pursuant to the original terms. While measurement of stock compensation expense is made at the date of the modification, the recognition of stock compensation expense depends on whether the employee ultimately retains the stock-based award that otherwise would have been forfeited under the award's original vesting terms. Stock-based awards subject to modification as a result of a new measurement date could result in stock compensation expense of up to $25,092 in future periods. For the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, we have recognized no stock compensation expense associated with modification of terms to the original stock-based award as a result of a new measurement date. To the extent any performance criteria are satisfied and the vesting of any stock options and/or restricted stock units accelerate, the unamortized stock compensation expense associated with these options or restricted stock units will also accelerate. We account for stock-based awards granted to non-employees at fair value in accordance with SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation.” In accordance with EITF No. 96-18, “Accounting for Equity Instruments That are Issued to Other Than Employees for Acquiring, or in Conjunction with Selling, Goods or Services,” we record expense based upon performance using the fair value of equity instruments issued to non-employees, other than non-employee members of our board of directors, at each reporting date. The final measurement date of equity instruments 42
with performance criteria is the date that each performance commitment for such equity instrument is satisfied. Fair value is determined using the Black-Scholes option valuation model and varies based on assumptions used for the expected life, expected stock price volatility and risk-free interest rates. Since we do not have sufficient historical information regarding the life expectancy of stock-based awards granted to non-employees, we currently use an expected life based on the term of the stock-based award as specified in each agreement. Expected stock price volatility is calculated over a period equal to the expected life and the risk-free interest rate represents the daily treasury yield curve rate at the reporting date based on the closing market bid yields on actively traded U.S. treasury securities in the over-the-counter market for the expected
term. Our assumptions may change in future periods as the life expectancy of the stock-based awards may shorten based on exercise activity. In addition, expected stock price volatility is subject to change based on fluctuations in our stock price. These costs are classified in our accompanying statements of operations as a component of equity granted to third parties and employees. In accordance with FIN No. 44, we record compensation charges or benefits related to repriced stock options based on the market value of our common stock until the repriced stock options are exercised, forfeited or expire. Subscriber
Acquisition Costs. Subscriber acquisition costs include subsidies paid to
radio manufacturers; automakers, including subsidies paid to automakers who
have agreed to include a SIRIUS radio and a prepaid subscription to our service
in the sale or lease of a new vehicle; and chip set manufacturers; and commissions
paid to retailers and automakers as incentives to purchase, install and activate
SIRIUS radios. The majority of subscriber acquisition costs are incurred in
advance of acquiring a subscriber. Subscriber acquisition costs do not include
advertising, loyalty payments to distributors and dealers of SIRIUS radios and
revenue share payments to automakers and manufacturers of SIRIUS radios. Subscriber
acquisition costs also do not include amounts capitalized in connection with
our agreement with Hertz, as we retain ownership of the SIRIUS radios used by
Hertz. Subsidies paid to radio manufacturers and automakers are expensed upon shipment or installation. Commissions paid to retailers and automakers are expensed either upon activation or sale of the SIRIUS radio. Chip sets that are shipped to radio manufacturers and held on consignment are recorded as inventory and expensed as subscriber acquisition costs when placed into production by radio manufacturers. Costs for chip sets not held on consignment are expensed as subscriber acquisition costs when the chip sets are shipped to radio manufacturers. Long-Lived Assets. We carry our long-lived assets at cost less accumulated depreciation. In accordance with SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets,” we review our long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset is not recoverable. At the time an impairment in value of a long-lived asset is identified, the impairment will be measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of a long-lived asset exceeds its fair value. To determine fair value, we would employ an expected present value technique, which utilizes multiple cash flow scenarios that reflect the range of possible outcomes and an appropriate discount rate. Useful Life of Satellite System. Our satellite system includes the cost of satellite construction, launch vehicles, launch insurance, capitalized interest, our spare satellite and our terrestrial repeater network. In accordance with SFAS No. 144, we monitor our satellites for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the asset is not recoverable. The expected useful lives of our in-orbit satellites are 15 years from the date they were placed into orbit. We are depreciating our three in-orbit satellites over their respective remaining useful lives beginning February 2002 or, in the case of our spare satellite, from the date it was delivered to ground storage in April 2002. If placed into orbit, our spare satellite is expected to operate
effectively for 15 years. Space Systems/Loral, the manufacturer of our satellites, has identified circuit failures in solar arrays on satellites since 1997, including our satellites. We continue to monitor these failures, which we believe have not affected the expected useful lives of our satellites. If events or circumstances indicate that the useful lives of our satellites have changed, we will modify the depreciable life accordingly. FCC License. We carry our FCC license at cost. Our FCC license has an indefinite life and is evaluated for impairment on an annual basis or more frequently if there are indicators of 43
impairment. In accordance with SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets,” we completed an impairment analysis of our FCC license for the year ended December 31, 2004, and determined that there was no impairment. We use projections regarding estimated future cash flows and other factors in assessing the fair value of our FCC license. If these estimates or projections change in the future, we may be required to record an impairment charge related to our FCC license. Income Taxes. We account for income taxes in accordance with SFAS No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes.” Operating losses in prior periods have generated significant state and federal tax net operating losses, or NOL carryforwards. We are required to record a valuation allowance against the deferred tax asset associated with these NOL carryforwards if it is “more likely than not” that we will not be able to utilize it to offset future taxes. Due to our history of unprofitable operations and our expected future losses, we have recorded a valuation allowance equal to 100% of these deferred tax assets. It is possible, however, that we could be profitable in the future at levels which would cause management to conclude that it is more likely than not that we will
realize all or a portion of these NOL carryforwards. Upon reaching such a conclusion, we would record the estimated net realizable value of the deferred tax asset at that time and would then provide for income taxes at a rate equal to our combined federal and state effective rates. Subsequent revisions to the estimated net realizable value of the deferred tax asset could cause our provision for income taxes to vary significantly from period to period, although our cash tax payments would remain unaffected until the benefit of these NOL carryforwards is utilized. | EXCERPTS ON THIS PAGE:
|
| |||||||