|
|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| |||||||||
These excerpts taken from the SIRI 10-K filed Mar 10, 2009. Stock-Based Compensation We account for equity instruments granted to employees in accordance with SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment (SFAS No. 123R). SFAS No. 123R requires all share-based compensation payments to be recognized in the financial statements based on fair value using an option pricing model. SFAS No. 123R requires forfeitures to be estimated at the time of grant and revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from initial estimates. We use the Black-Scholes-Merton option-pricing model to value stock option awards and have elected to treat awards with graded vesting as a single award. Fair value is determined using Black-Scholes-Merton model varies based on assumptions used for the expected life, expected stock price volatility and risk-free interest rates. We estimate the fair value of awards granted using the implied volatility of actively traded options on our common stock. The expected life assumption represents the weighted-average period stock-based awards are expected to remain outstanding. These expected life assumptions are established through a review of historical exercise behavior of stock-based award grants with similar vesting periods. Where historical patterns do not exist, contractual terms are used. The risk-free interest rate represents the daily treasury yield curve rate at the grant date based on the closing market bid yields on actively traded U.S. treasury securities in the over-the-counter market for the expected term. Our assumptions may change in future periods. Equity instruments granted to non-employees are accounted for in accordance with SFAS No. 123R, as interpreted by EITF No. 96-18, Accounting for Equity Instruments That are Issued to Other Than Employees for Acquiring, or in Conjunction with Selling, Goods or Services. The final measurement date for the fair value of equity instruments with performance criteria is the date that each performance commitment for such equity instrument is satisfied or there is a significant disincentive for non-performance. Stock-based awards granted to employees, non-employees and members of our board of directors generally include warrants, stock options, restricted stock and restricted stock units. The share-based payment expense recognized includes compensation cost for all stock-based awards granted to employees and members of our board of directors (i) prior to, but not vested as of January 1, 2006, based on the grant date fair value originally estimated in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, and (ii) subsequent to December 31, 2005, based on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 123R. Stock-Based Compensation STYLE="margin-top:6px;margin-bottom:0px; text-indent:4%">We account for equity instruments granted to employees in accordance with SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment (SFASNo. 123R). SFAS No. 123R requires all share-based compensation payments to be recognized in the financial statements based on fair value using an option pricing model. SFAS No. 123R requires forfeitures to be estimated at the time of grant and revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from initial estimates. We use the Black-Scholes-Merton option-pricing model to value stock option awards and have elected to treat awards with graded vesting as a single award. Fair value is determined using Black-Scholes-Merton model varies based on assumptions used for the expected Equity instruments granted to non-employees and restricted stock units. The share-based payment expense recognized includes compensation cost for all stock-based awards granted to employees and members of our board of directors (i) prior to, but not vested as of January 1, 2006, based on the grant date fair value originally estimated in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, and (ii) subsequent to December 31, 2005, based on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 123R. This excerpt taken from the SIRI 10-Q filed Nov 12, 2008. Stock-Based Compensation We account for equity instruments granted to employees in accordance with SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment (SFAS No. 123R). SFAS No. 123R requires all share-based compensation payments to be recognized in the financial statements based on their fair value using an option pricing model. SFAS No. 123R requires forfeitures to be estimated at the time of grant and revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from initial estimates. We use the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to value stock option awards and have elected to treat awards with graded vesting as a single award.
11
Table of ContentsSIRIUS XM RADIO INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued) (Dollar amounts in thousands, unless otherwise stated)
Fair value determined using Black-Scholes varies based on assumptions used for the expected life, expected stock price volatility and risk-free interest rates. We estimate the fair value of awards granted using the implied volatility of actively traded options on our common stock. The expected life assumption represents the weighted-average period stock-based awards are expected to remain outstanding. These expected life assumptions are established through a review of historical exercise behavior of stock-based award grants with similar vesting periods. Where historical patterns do not exist, contractual terms are used. The risk-free interest rate represents the daily treasury yield curve rate at the reporting date based on the closing market bid yields on actively traded U.S. treasury securities in the over-the-counter market for the expected term. Our assumptions may change in future periods. The fair value of equity instruments granted to non-employees is measured in accordance with EITF No. 96-18, Accounting for Equity Instruments That are Issued to Other Than Employees for Acquiring, or in Conjunction with Selling, Goods or Services. The final measurement date of equity instruments with performance criteria is the date that each performance commitment for such equity instrument is satisfied or there is a significant disincentive for non-performance. Stock-based awards granted to employees, non-employees and members of our board of directors generally include warrants, stock options, restricted stock and restricted stock units. The stock-based compensation cost recognized includes compensation cost for all stock-based awards granted to employees and members of our board of directors (i) prior to, but not vested as of, January 1, 2006, based on the grant date fair value originally estimated in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, and (ii) subsequent to December 31, 2005, based on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 123R. This excerpt taken from the SIRI 10-Q filed Nov 1, 2007. Stock-Based Compensation
Effective January 1, 2006, we adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment (SFAS No. 123R), using the modified prospective transition method. The stock-based compensation cost recognized beginning January 1, 2006 includes compensation cost for all stock-based awards granted to employees and members of our board of directors (i) prior to, but not vested as of, 7
SIRIUS SATELLITE RADIO INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES January 1, 2006 based on the grant date fair value originally estimated in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, and (ii) subsequent to December 31, 2005 based on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 123R. Compensation cost under SFAS No. 123R is recognized ratably using the straight-line attribution method over the expected vesting period. SFAS No. 123R requires forfeitures to be estimated on the grant date and revised in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates. Prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 123R we accounted for forfeitures as they occurred. Pursuant to SFAS No. 123R, we recognized $15,382 and $48,157, and $16,254 and $56,525 of compensation cost for stock-based awards granted to employees and members of our board of directors for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Total unrecognized compensation related to unvested stock-based awards granted to employees and members of our board of directors at September 30, 2007, net of estimated forfeitures, is $92,336 and is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of three years. Effective January 1, 2006, we account for stock-based awards granted to non-employees, other than non-employee members of our board of directors, at fair value in accordance with SFAS No. 123R and SEC guidance contained in Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 107. The fair value of equity instruments granted to non-employees is measured in accordance with EITF No. 96-18, Accounting for Equity Instruments That are Issued to Other Than Employees for Acquiring, or in Conjunction with Selling, Goods or Services. The final measurement date of equity instruments with performance criteria is the date that each performance commitment for such equity instrument is satisfied or there is a significant disincentive for non-performance. Stock-based awards granted to employees, non-employees and members of our board of directors generally include warrants, stock options, restricted stock and restricted stock units. We estimate the fair value of stock-based awards using the Black-Scholes option valuation model (Black-Scholes). Black-Scholes was developed to estimate the fair market value of traded options, which have no vesting restrictions and are fully transferable. Option valuation models require the input of highly subjective assumptions. Because our stock-based awards have characteristics significantly different from those of traded options and because changes in the subjective assumptions can materially affect the fair market value estimate, existing option valuation models do not necessarily provide a reliable single measure of the fair value of our stock-based awards. Fair value determined using Black-Scholes varies based on assumptions used for the expected life, expected stock price volatility and risk-free interest rates. For stock-based awards granted prior to 2006, we used historical volatility of our stock over a period equal to the expected life of such awards to estimate their fair value. We estimated the fair value of awards granted since January 1, 2006 using the implied volatility of actively traded options on our stock. We believe that implied volatility is more representative of future stock price trends than historical volatility. The expected life assumption represents the weighted-average period stock-based awards are expected to remain outstanding. These expected life assumptions are established through a review of historical exercise behavior of stock-based award grants with similar vesting periods. Where historical patterns do not exist contractual terms are used. The risk-free interest rate represents the daily treasury yield curve rate at the reporting date based on the closing market bid yields on actively traded U.S. treasury securities in the over-the-counter market for the expected term. Our assumptions may change in future periods. The following table summarizes the weighted-average assumptions used to compute reported stock-based compensation to employees and members of our board of directors for the periods set forth below: 8
SIRIUS SATELLITE RADIO INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
The following table summarizes the range of assumptions used to compute reported stock-based compensation to third parties, other than non-employee members of our board of directors, for the periods set forth below:
SFAS No. 123R changes the presentation of realized excess tax benefits associated with the exercise of stock options in the statements of cash flows. Excess tax benefits are realized tax benefits from tax deductions for the exercise of stock options in excess of the deferred tax asset attributable to stock-based compensation expense for such options. Prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 123R, such realized tax benefits were required to be presented as operating cash flows. SFAS No. 123R requires such realized tax benefits to be presented as part of cash flows from financing activities. No income tax benefits have been realized from stock option exercises during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006 because a valuation allowance was maintained for all net deferred tax assets.
This excerpt taken from the SIRI 10-Q filed Aug 9, 2007. Stock-Based Compensation
Effective January 1, 2006, we adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment (SFAS No. 123R), using the modified prospective transition method. The stock-based compensation cost recognized beginning January 1, 2006 includes compensation cost for all stock-based awards granted to 7
SIRIUS SATELLITE RADIO INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES employees and members of our board of directors (i) prior to, but not vested as of, January 1, 2006 based on the grant date fair value originally estimated in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, and (ii) subsequent to December 31, 2005 based on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 123R. Compensation cost under SFAS No. 123R is recognized ratably using the straight-line attribution method over the expected vesting period. SFAS No. 123R requires forfeitures to be estimated on the grant date and revised in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates. Prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 123R we accounted for forfeitures as they occurred. As of January 1, 2006, the cumulative effect of adopting the estimated forfeiture method was not significant. Pursuant to SFAS No. 123R, we recognized $15,840 and $32,775, and $18,321 and $40,271 of compensation cost for stock-based awards granted to employees and members of our board of directors for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Total unrecognized compensation related to unvested stock-based awards granted to employees and members of our board of directors at June 30, 2007, net of estimated forfeitures, is $104,056 and is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of three years. Effective January 1, 2006, we account for stock-based awards granted to non-employees, other than non-employee members of our board of directors, at fair value in accordance with SFAS No. 123R and SEC guidance contained in Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 107. The fair value of equity instruments granted to non-employees is measured in accordance with EITF No. 96-18, Accounting for Equity Instruments That are Issued to Other Than Employees for Acquiring, or in Conjunction with Selling, Goods or Services. The final measurement date of equity instruments with performance criteria is the date that each performance commitment for such equity instrument is satisfied or there is a significant disincentive for non-performance. Stock-based awards granted to employees, non-employees and members of our board of directors generally include warrants, stock options, restricted stock and restricted stock units. We estimate the fair value of stock-based awards using the Black-Scholes option valuation model (Black-Scholes). Black-Scholes was developed to estimate the fair market value of traded options, which have no vesting restrictions and are fully transferable. Option valuation models require the input of highly subjective assumptions. Because our stock-based awards have characteristics significantly different from those of traded options and because changes in the subjective assumptions can materially affect the fair market value estimate, existing option valuation models do not necessarily provide a reliable single measure of the fair value of our stock-based awards. Fair value determined using Black-Scholes varies based on assumptions used for the expected life, expected stock price volatility and risk-free interest rates. For stock-based awards granted prior to 2006, we used historical volatility of our stock over a period equal to the expected life of such awards to estimate their fair value. We estimated the fair value of awards granted since January 1, 2006 using the implied volatility of actively traded options on our stock. We believe that implied volatility is more representative of future stock price trends than historical volatility. The expected life assumption represents the weighted-average period stock-based awards are expected to remain outstanding. These expected life assumptions are established through a review of historical exercise behavior of stock-based award grants with similar vesting periods. Where historical patterns do not exist contractual terms are used. The risk-free interest rate represents the daily treasury yield curve rate at the reporting date based on the closing market bid yields on actively traded U.S. treasury securities in the over-the-counter market for the expected term. Our assumptions may change in future periods. The following table summarizes the weighted-average assumptions used to compute reported stock-based compensation to employees and members of our board of directors for the periods set forth below: 8
SIRIUS SATELLITE RADIO INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
The following table summarizes the range of assumptions used to compute reported stock-based compensation to third parties, other than non-employee members of our board of directors, for the periods set forth below:
SFAS No. 123R changes the presentation of realized excess tax benefits associated with the exercise of stock options in the statements of cash flows. Excess tax benefits are realized tax benefits from tax deductions for the exercise of stock options in excess of the deferred tax asset attributable to stock-based compensation expense for such options. Prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 123R, such realized tax benefits were required to be presented as operating cash flows. SFAS No. 123R requires such realized tax benefits to be presented as part of cash flows from financing activities. No income tax benefits have been realized from stock option exercises during the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 because a valuation allowance was maintained for all net deferred tax assets.
This excerpt taken from the SIRI 10-Q filed May 10, 2007. Stock-Based Compensation
Effective January 1, 2006, we adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment (SFAS No. 123R), using the modified prospective transition method. The stock-based compensation cost recognized beginning January 1, 2006 includes compensation cost for all stock-based awards granted to employees and members of our board of directors (i) prior to, but not vested as of, January 1, 2006 based on the grant date fair value originally estimated in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, and (ii) subsequent to December 31, 2005 based on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 123R. Compensation cost under SFAS No. 123R is recognized ratably using the straight-line attribution method over the expected vesting period. SFAS No. 123R requires forfeitures to be estimated on the grant date and revised in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates. Prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 123R we accounted for forfeitures as they occurred. As of January 1, 2006, the cumulative effect of adopting the estimated forfeiture method was not significant. Pursuant to SFAS No. 123R, we recognized $16,935 and $21,950 of compensation cost for stock-based awards granted to employees and members of our board of directors for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Total unrecognized compensation related to unvested stock-based awards granted to employees and members of our board of directors at March 31, 2007, net of estimated forfeitures, is $114,259 and is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of three years. Effective January 1, 2006, we account for stock-based awards granted to non-employees, other than non-employee members of our board of directors, at fair value in accordance with SFAS No. 123R and SEC guidance contained in Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 107. The fair value of equity instruments granted to non-employees is measured in accordance with EITF No. 96-18, Accounting for Equity Instruments That are Issued to Other Than Employees for Acquiring, or in Conjunction with Selling, Goods or Services. The final measurement date of equity instruments with performance criteria is the date that each performance commitment for such equity instrument is satisfied or there is a significant disincentive for non-performance. Stock-based awards granted to employees, non-employees and members of our board of directors generally include warrants, stock options, restricted stock and restricted stock units. We estimate the fair value of stock-based awards using the Black-Scholes option valuation model (Black-Scholes). Black-Scholes was developed to estimate the fair market value of traded options, which have no vesting restrictions and are fully transferable. Option valuation models require the input of highly subjective assumptions. Because our stock-based awards have characteristics significantly different from those of traded options and because changes in the subjective assumptions can materially affect the fair market value estimate, the existing option valuation models do not necessarily provide a reliable single measure of the fair value of our stock-based awards. Fair value determined using Black-Scholes varies based on assumptions used for the expected life, expected stock price volatility and risk-free interest rates. For stock-based awards granted prior to 2006, we used historical volatility of our stock over a period equal to the expected life of such awards to estimate their fair value. We estimated the fair value of awards granted since January 1, 2006 using the implied volatility of actively traded options on our stock. We believe that implied volatility is more representative of future stock price trends than historical volatility. The expected life assumption represents the weighted-average period stock-based awards are expected to remain outstanding. These expected life assumptions are established through a review of historical exercise behavior of stock-based award grants with similar vesting periods. Where historical patterns do not exist contractual terms are used. The risk-free interest rate represents the daily treasury yield curve rate at the reporting date based on the closing market bid yields on actively traded U.S. treasury securities in the over-the-counter market for the expected term. Our assumptions may change in future periods. The following table summarizes the weighted-average assumptions used to compute reported stock-based compensation to employees and members of our board of directors for the periods set forth below: 8
SIRIUS SATELLITE RADIO INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
The following table summarizes the range of assumptions used to compute reported stock-based compensation to third parties, other than non-employee members of our board of directors, for the periods set forth below:
SFAS No. 123R changes the presentation of realized excess tax benefits associated with the exercise of stock options in the statements of cash flows. Excess tax benefits are realized tax benefits from tax deductions for the exercise of stock options in excess of the deferred tax asset attributable to stock-based compensation expense for such options. Prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 123R, such realized tax benefits were required to be presented as operating cash flows. SFAS No. 123R requires such realized tax benefits to be presented as part of cash flows from financing activities. No income tax benefits have been realized from stock option exercises during the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 because a valuation allowance was maintained for all net deferred tax assets.
This excerpt taken from the SIRI 10-Q filed Aug 9, 2006. Stock-Based Compensation Effective January 1, 2006, we adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment (SFAS No. 123R), using the modified prospective transition method. Prior periods are not restated under this transition method. The stock-based compensation cost recognized beginning January 1, 2006 includes 5 This excerpt taken from the SIRI 10-K filed Mar 13, 2006. Stock-Based Compensation. In accordance with Accounting Principles Board Opinion (“APB”) No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” we use the intrinsic value method to measure the compensation costs of stock-based awards granted to employees and members of our board of directors. Accordingly, we record compensation expense for stock-based awards granted to employees and members of our board of directors over the vesting period equal to the excess of the market price of the underlying common stock at the date of grant over the exercise price of the stock-based award. The intrinsic value of restricted stock units as of the date of grant is amortized to expense over the vesting period. These charges are recorded as a component of equity granted to third parties
and employees in our accompanying consolidated statements of operations. Effective January 1, 2006 we will adopt Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 123R “Share-Based Payment.” SFAS No. 123R requires all share-based payments to employees to be recognized in the financial statements based on fair value.
We account for modifications to stock-based awards in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation (“FIN”) No. 44, “Accounting for Certain Transactions Involving Stock Compensation.” FIN No. 44 provides that when the modification of a stock-based award occurs, a new measurement date results because the modification may allow an employee to vest in an award that would have otherwise been forfeited pursuant to the original terms. A new measurement of potential compensation is measured as of the date of the modification. While measurement of the potential compensation is made as of that date, the recognition of the compensation expense depends on whether the employee ultimately retains the stock-based award that otherwise would have been forfeited under the award’s original vesting terms. We have granted stock-based awards which vest on a specific date with acceleration to earlier time periods as performance targets for fiscal periods are met. The performance targets are established annually and may be modified by our board of directors. As these targets are established or modified new measurement dates result. We recognize expense resulting from a new measurement date only if such employees voluntarily resign or are terminated for cause and exercise such stock-based awards during the period of the accelerated vest date through the original vest date. Under these conditions, employees are deemed to benefit from the accelerated vest date. Stock compensation expense associated with stock options for the year ended December 31, 2005 included a charge of $479 for an employee that was deemed to have benefited from the modification of a stock-based award resulting in a new measurement date. No additional expense will be recognized for employees deemed to benefit from accelerated vest dates as modifications to stock-based awards effective January 1, 2006 will be accounted for in accordance with SFAS No. 123R. 30
In accordance with FIN No. 44, we record compensation charges or benefits related to repriced stock options based on the market value of our common stock until the repriced stock options are exercised, forfeited or expire. We account for stock-based awards granted to non-employees, other than non-employee members of our board of directors, at fair value in accordance with SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation.” The fair value of equity instruments granted to non-employees is measured in accordance with EITF No. 96-18, “Accounting for Equity Instruments That are Issued to Other Than Employees for Acquiring, or in Conjunction with Selling, Goods or Services.” The final measurement date of equity instruments with performance criteria is the date that each performance commitment for such equity instrument is satisfied. These charges are recorded as a component of equity granted to third parties and employees in our accompanying consolidated statements of operations. The measure of fair value most often employed under SFAS No. 123 is the Black-Scholes option valuation model (“Black-Scholes”). Black-Scholes was developed to estimate the fair market value of traded options, which have no vesting restrictions and are fully transferable. Option valuation models require the input of highly subjective assumptions, including the expected stock price volatility. Because our stock-based awards have characteristics significantly different from those of traded options and because changes in the subjective assumptions can materially affect the fair market value estimate, the existing option valuation models do not necessarily provide a reliable single measure of the fair value of our stock-based awards. Fair value determined using Black-Scholes varies based on assumptions used
for the expected life, expected stock price volatility and risk-free interest rates. During 2005, we continued to refine the assumptions used in estimating fair value in response to changing market conditions and the issuance of additional accounting guidance, including SFAS No. 123R. Our assumptions may change in future periods. For the year ended December 31, 2005, a change in volatility of 10% would have resulted in aproximately a 2% change in expense for stock-based awards granted to third parties. This excerpt taken from the SIRI 10-Q filed Aug 3, 2005. Stock-Based Compensation. In accordance with Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” we use the intrinsic value method to measure the compensation costs of stock-based awards granted to employees and members of our board of directors. Accordingly, we record compensation expense for stock-based awards granted to employees and members of our board of directors over the vesting period equal to the excess of the market price of the underlying common stock at the date of grant over the exercise price of the stock-based award. The intrinsic value of restricted stock units as of the date of grant is amortized to expense over the vesting period. These charges are recorded as a component of equity granted to third parties and employees
in our accompanying unaudited consolidated statements of operations.
30
We account for modifications to stock-based awards in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Interpretation No. 44, “Accounting for Certain Transactions Involving Stock Compensation” (“FIN No. 44”). FIN No. 44 provides that when the modification of a stock-based award occurs, a new measurement date results because the modification may allow an employee to vest in an award that would have otherwise been forfeited pursuant to the original terms. A new measurement of potential compensation is measured as of the date of the modification. While measurement of the potential compensation is made as of that date, the recognition of the compensation expense depends on whether the employee ultimately retains the stock-based award that otherwise would have been
forfeited under the award's original vesting terms. We granted stock-based awards which vest July 1, 2008 with acceleration to earlier time periods as performance targets for fiscal periods are met. The performance targets are established annually and may be modified by our board of directors. As these targets are set new measurement dates result. We recognize expense resulting from a new measurement date only if such employees voluntarily resign or are terminated for cause and had exercised or exercise such stock-based awards during the period of the accelerated vest date through July 1, 2008, the original vest date. Under these conditions, employees are deemed to benefit from the accelerated vest date. Stock-based awards with new measurement dates could result in the recognition of stock compensation expense of up to $23,372 through July 1, 2008 if during such
period all of the affected employees were to voluntarily resign or were terminated for cause and had exercised or exercise such awards. Stock compensation expense associated with stock options for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 includes a charge of $479 for an employee that was deemed to benefit from the modification of a stock-based award resulting in a new measurement date. In accordance with FIN No. 44, we record compensation charges or benefits related to repriced stock options based on the market value of our common stock until the repriced stock options are exercised, forfeited or expire. We account for stock-based awards granted to non-employees at fair value in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation.” In accordance with EITF No. 96-18, “Accounting for Equity Instruments That are Issued to Other Than Employees for Acquiring, or in Conjunction with Selling, Goods or Services,” we record expense based upon performance using the fair value of equity instruments issued to non-employees, other than non-employee members of our board of directors, at each reporting date. The final measurement date of equity instruments with performance criteria is the date that each performance commitment for such equity instrument is satisfied. Fair value is determined using the Black-Scholes option valuation
model and varies based on assumptions used for the expected life, expected stock price volatility and risk-free interest rates. Since we do not have sufficient historical information regarding the life expectancy of stock-based awards granted to non-employees, we currently use an expected life based on the term of the stock-based award as specified in each agreement. Expected stock price volatility is calculated over a period equal to the expected life and the risk-free interest rate represents the daily treasury yield curve rate at the reporting date based on the closing market bid yields on actively traded U.S. treasury securities in the over-the-counter market for the expected term. Our assumptions may change in future periods as the life expectancy of the stock-based awards may shorten based on exercise activity. In addition, expected stock price volatility is subject to change based
on fluctuations in our stock price. These costs are classified in our accompanying unaudited consolidated statements of operations as a component of equity granted to third parties and employees. This excerpt taken from the SIRI 10-Q filed May 9, 2005. Stock-Based
Compensation. In accordance with Accounting Principles
Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,
we use the intrinsic value method to measure the compensation costs of stock-based
awards granted to employees and members of our board of directors. Accordingly,
we record compensation expense for stock-based awards granted to employees and
members of our board of directors over the vesting period equal to the excess
of the market price of the underlying common stock at the date of grant over
the exercise price of the stock-based award. The intrinsic value of restricted
stock units as of the date of grant is amortized to expense over the vesting
period. These charges are recorded as a component of equity granted to third
parties and employees in our accompanying unaudited consolidated statements
of operations.
24 We account for modifications to stock-based awards in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Interpretation No. 44, Accounting for Certain Transactions Involving Stock Compensation (FIN No. 44). FIN No. 44 provides that when the modification of a stock-based award occurs, a new measurement date results because the modification may allow an employee to vest in an award that would have otherwise been forfeited pursuant to the original terms. A new measurement of potential compensation should be measured as of the date of the modification. While measurement of the potential compensation is made as of that date, the recognition of the compensation expense depends on whether the employee ultimately retains the stock-based award that otherwise would have been forfeited under the awards original vesting terms. We granted stock-based awards which vest July 1, 2008 with acceleration to earlier time periods as performance targets for fiscal periods are met. The performance targets are established in our annual planning process and may be modified from time to time by our board of directors. As these targets are set new measurement dates result. We recognize expense resulting from a new measurement date only if such employees voluntarily resign or are terminated for cause and had exercised or exercise such stock-based awards during the period of the accelerated vest date through July 1, 2008, the original vest date. Under these conditions, employees are deemed to benefit from the accelerated vest date. Stock-based awards with new measurement dates could result in the recognition of stock compensation expense of up to $24,196 through July 1, 2008 if during such period all of the affected employees were to voluntarily resign or were terminated for cause and had exercised or exercise such awards. For the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, we recognized no stock compensation expense associated with the modification of stock-based awards as a result of a new measurement date. In accordance with FIN No. 44, we record compensation charges or benefits related to repriced stock options based on the market value of our common stock until the repriced stock options are exercised, forfeited or expire. We account for stock-based awards granted to non-employees at fair value in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation. In accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force No. 96-18, Accounting for Equity Instruments That are Issued to Other Than Employees for Acquiring, or in Conjunction with Selling, Goods or Services, we record expense based upon performance using the fair value of equity instruments issued to non-employees, other than non-employee members of our board of directors, at each reporting date. The final measurement date of equity instruments with performance criteria is the date that each performance commitment for such equity instrument is satisfied. Fair value is determined using the Black-Scholes option valuation model and varies based on assumptions used for the expected life, expected stock price volatility and risk-free interest rates. Since we do not have sufficient historical information regarding the life expectancy of stock-based awards granted to non-employees, we currently use an expected life based on the term of the stock-based award as specified in each agreement. Expected stock price volatility is calculated over a period equal to the expected life and the risk-free interest rate represents the daily treasury yield curve rate at the reporting date based on the closing market bid yields on actively traded U.S. treasury securities in the over-the-counter market for the expected term. Our assumptions may change in future periods as the life expectancy of the stock-based awards may shorten based on exercise activity. In addition, expected stock price volatility is subject to change based on fluctuations in our stock price. These costs are classified in our accompanying unaudited consolidated statements of operations as a component of equity granted to third parties and employees. This excerpt taken from the SIRI 10-K filed Mar 16, 2005. Stock-Based Compensation. In accordance with Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” we use the intrinsic value method to measure the compensation costs of stock-based awards granted to employees and members of our board of directors. Accordingly, we record compensation expense for stock-based awards granted to employees and members of our board of directors over the vesting period equal to the excess of the market price of the underlying common stock at the date of grant over the exercise price of the stock-based award. The intrinsic value of restricted stock units as of the date of grant is amortized to expense over the vesting period. These charges are recorded as a component of equity granted to third parties and employees
in our accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
Certain stock-based awards to employees have accelerated vesting provisions in the event of satisfaction of performance criteria which are not specified in the original terms of the stock-based award. A new measurement date results when the performance criteria are established. In accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Interpretation No. 44, “Accounting for Certain Transactions Involving Stock Compensation” (“FIN No. 44”), a new measurement date results because the modification of the stock-based award may allow the employee to vest in an award that would have otherwise been forfeited pursuant to the original terms. While measurement of stock compensation expense is made at the date of the modification, the recognition of stock compensation expense depends on whether the employee ultimately retains the stock-based award that otherwise would have been forfeited under the award's original vesting terms. Stock-based awards subject to modification as a result of a new measurement date could result in stock compensation expense of up to $25,092 in future periods. For the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, we have recognized no stock compensation expense associated with modification of terms to the original stock-based award as a result of a new measurement date. To the extent any performance criteria are satisfied and the vesting of any stock options and/or restricted stock units accelerate, the unamortized stock compensation expense associated with these options or restricted stock units will also accelerate. We account for stock-based awards granted to non-employees at fair value in accordance with SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation.” In accordance with EITF No. 96-18, “Accounting for Equity Instruments That are Issued to Other Than Employees for Acquiring, or in Conjunction with Selling, Goods or Services,” we record expense based upon performance using the fair value of equity instruments issued to non-employees, other than non-employee members of our board of directors, at each reporting date. The final measurement date of equity instruments 42
with performance criteria is the date that each performance commitment for such equity instrument is satisfied. Fair value is determined using the Black-Scholes option valuation model and varies based on assumptions used for the expected life, expected stock price volatility and risk-free interest rates. Since we do not have sufficient historical information regarding the life expectancy of stock-based awards granted to non-employees, we currently use an expected life based on the term of the stock-based award as specified in each agreement. Expected stock price volatility is calculated over a period equal to the expected life and the risk-free interest rate represents the daily treasury yield curve rate at the reporting date based on the closing market bid yields on actively traded U.S. treasury securities in the over-the-counter market for the expected
term. Our assumptions may change in future periods as the life expectancy of the stock-based awards may shorten based on exercise activity. In addition, expected stock price volatility is subject to change based on fluctuations in our stock price. These costs are classified in our accompanying statements of operations as a component of equity granted to third parties and employees. In accordance with FIN No. 44, we record compensation charges or benefits related to repriced stock options based on the market value of our common stock until the repriced stock options are exercised, forfeited or expire. Subscriber
Acquisition Costs. Subscriber acquisition costs include subsidies paid to
radio manufacturers; automakers, including subsidies paid to automakers who
have agreed to include a SIRIUS radio and a prepaid subscription to our service
in the sale or lease of a new vehicle; and chip set manufacturers; and commissions
paid to retailers and automakers as incentives to purchase, install and activate
SIRIUS radios. The majority of subscriber acquisition costs are incurred in
advance of acquiring a subscriber. Subscriber acquisition costs do not include
advertising, loyalty payments to distributors and dealers of SIRIUS radios and
revenue share payments to automakers and manufacturers of SIRIUS radios. Subscriber
acquisition costs also do not include amounts capitalized in connection with
our agreement with Hertz, as we retain ownership of the SIRIUS radios used by
Hertz. Subsidies paid to radio manufacturers and automakers are expensed upon shipment or installation. Commissions paid to retailers and automakers are expensed either upon activation or sale of the SIRIUS radio. Chip sets that are shipped to radio manufacturers and held on consignment are recorded as inventory and expensed as subscriber acquisition costs when placed into production by radio manufacturers. Costs for chip sets not held on consignment are expensed as subscriber acquisition costs when the chip sets are shipped to radio manufacturers. | EXCERPTS ON THIS PAGE:
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||