|
|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| |||||||||
STJ » Topics » Our product liability insurers may refuse to cover certain losses on the grounds that such losses are outside the scope of our product liability insurance policies or may agree that such losses are covered losses, but may not be able to meet their currentThis excerpt taken from the STJ 10-Q filed May 12, 2009. Our product liability insurers may refuse to cover certain losses on the grounds that such losses are outside the scope of our product liability insurance policies or may agree that such losses are covered losses, but may not be able to meet their current or future payment obligations to us.
One of our product liability insurers has filed suits seeking court orders declaring that they are not required to provide coverage for some of the costs we have incurred or may incur in the future in the Silzone® litigation described above. This insurer, as well as other insurers from whom we have purchased product liability insurance, may deny coverage of these and other past and/or future losses relating to our products on the grounds that such losses are outside the scope of coverage of our insurance policies. To the extent that we suffer losses that are outside of the scope of coverage of our product liability insurance policies, those losses may have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
Our remaining product liability insurance for Silzone® claims consists of a number of layers, each of which is covered by one or more insurance companies. Part of our final layer of insurance is covered by a unit of the Kemper Insurance Companies (Kemper), which is currently in run off and not issuing new policies or generating any new revenue that could be used to cover claims made under previously-issued policies such as ours. In the event that Kemper is unable to pay part or all of the claims directed to it, we believe that the other insurance carriers in Kempers layer will take the position that we will be directly liable for any claims and costs that Kemper is unable to pay and that the other insurance carriers in that layer will not provide coverage for Kempers portion. If Kemper or any other insurance companies are unable to meet their respective obligations to us, we could incur substantial losses which could have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
These excerpts taken from the STJ 10-K filed Feb 27, 2009. Our product liability insurers may refuse to cover certain losses on the grounds that such losses are outside the scope of our product liability insurance policies or may agree that such losses are covered losses, but may not be able to meet their current or future payment obligations to us. One of our product liability insurers has filed suits seeking court orders declaring that they are not required to provide coverage for some of the costs we have incurred or may incur in the future in the Silzone® litigation described above. This insurer, as well as other insurers from whom we have purchased product liability insurance, may deny coverage of these and other past and/or future losses relating to our products on the grounds that such losses are outside the scope of coverage of our insurance policies. To the extent that we suffer losses that are outside of the scope of coverage of our product liability insurance policies, those losses may have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. 16 Our remaining product liability insurance for Silzone® claims consists of a number of layers, each of which is covered by one or more insurance companies. Part of our final layer of insurance is covered by a unit of the Kemper Insurance Companies (Kemper), which is currently in run off and not issuing new policies or generating any new revenue that could be used to cover claims made under previously-issued policies such as ours. In the event that Kemper is unable to pay part or all of the claims directed to it, we believe that the other insurance carriers in Kempers layer will take the position that we will be directly liable for any claims and costs that Kemper is unable to pay and that the other insurance carriers in that layer will not provide coverage for Kempers portion. If Kemper or any other insurance companies are unable to meet their respective obligations to us, we could incur substantial losses which could have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. Our product One of our 16 | ||||||||||
Our remaining These excerpts taken from the STJ 10-K filed Feb 27, 2008. Our product liability insurers may refuse to cover certain losses on the grounds that such losses are outside the scope of our product liability insurance policies or may agree that such losses are covered losses, but may not be able to meet their current or future payment obligations to us.
Certain of our insurers have filed suits seeking court orders declaring that they are not required to provide coverage for some of the costs we have incurred in the Silzone® litigation described above. These same insurers, as well as other insurers from whom we have purchased product liability insurance, may deny coverage of these and other past and/or future losses relating to our products on the grounds that such losses are outside the scope of coverage of our insurance policies. To the extent that we suffer losses that are outside of the scope of coverage of our product liability insurance policies, those losses may have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. Our remaining product liability insurance for Silzone® claims consists of a number of layers, each of which is covered by one or more insurance companies. Part of our final layer of insurance is covered by a unit of the Kemper Insurance Companies (Kemper), which is currently in run off and not issuing new policies or generating any new revenue that could be used to cover claims made under previously-issued policies such as ours. In the event that Kemper is unable to pay part or all of the claims directed to it, we believe that the other insurance carriers in Kempers layer will take the position that we will be directly liable for any claims and costs that Kemper is unable to pay and that the other insurance carriers in that layer will not provide coverage for Kempers portion. If Kemper or any other insurance companies are unable to meet their respective obligations to us, we could incur substantial losses which could have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. Our product liability insurers may refuse to cover certain losses on the grounds that such losses are outside the scope of our product liability insurance policies or may agree that such losses are covered losses, but may not be able to meet their current or future payment obligations to us. Certain of our insurers have filed suits seeking court Our remaining product liability insurance for Silzone® claims consists of a number of layers, each of which is covered by one or more insurance companies. Part of our final layer of insurance is covered by a unit of the Kemper Insurance Companies (Kemper), which is currently in run off and not issuing new policies or generating any new revenue that could be used to cover claims made under previously-issued policies such as ours. In the event that Kemper is unable to pay part or all of the claims directed to it, we believe that the other insurance carriers in Kempers layer will take the position that we will be directly liable for any claims and costs that Kemper is unable to pay and that the other insurance carriers in that layer will not provide coverage for Kempers portion. If Kemper or any other insurance companies are unable to meet their respective obligations to us, we could | EXCERPTS ON THIS PAGE:
|
| |||||||