|
|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
These excerpts taken from the SYMC 10-K filed Jun 1, 2009. Income
Taxes
We account for income taxes in accordance with
SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. The
provision for income taxes is computed using the asset and
liability method, under which deferred tax assets and
liabilities are recognized for the expected future tax
consequences of temporary differences between the financial
reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities, and for
operating loss and tax credit carryforwards in each jurisdiction
in which we operate. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are
measured using the currently enacted tax rates that apply to
taxable
Table of Contents
income in effect for the years in which those tax assets are
expected to be realized or settled. We record a valuation
allowance to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount that is
believed more likely than not to be realized.
We are required to compute our income taxes in each federal,
state, and international jurisdiction in which we operate. This
process requires that we estimate the current tax exposure as
well as assess temporary differences between the accounting and
tax treatment of assets and liabilities, including items such as
accruals and allowances not currently deductible for tax
purposes. The income tax effects of the differences we identify
are classified as current or long-term deferred tax assets and
liabilities in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. Our judgments,
assumptions, and estimates relative to the current provision for
income tax take into account current tax laws, our
interpretation of current tax laws, and possible outcomes of
current and future audits conducted by foreign and domestic tax
authorities. Changes in tax laws or our interpretation of tax
laws and the resolution of current and future tax audits could
significantly impact the amounts provided for income taxes in
our Consolidated Balance Sheets and Consolidated Statements of
Operations. We must also assess the likelihood that deferred tax
assets will be realized from future taxable income and, based on
this assessment, establish a valuation allowance, if required.
Our determination of our valuation allowance is based upon a
number of assumptions, judgments, and estimates, including
forecasted earnings, future taxable income, and the relative
proportions of revenue and income before taxes in the various
domestic and international jurisdictions in which we operate. To
the extent we establish a valuation allowance or change the
valuation allowance in a period, we reflect the change with a
corresponding increase or decrease to our tax provision in our
Consolidated Statements of Operations, or to goodwill to the
extent that the valuation allowance related to tax attributes of
the acquired entities.
In July 2008, we reached an agreement with the Internal Revenue
Service (IRS) concerning our eligibility to claim a
lower tax rate on a distribution made from a Veritas foreign
subsidiary prior to the July 2005 acquisition. The distribution
was intended to be made pursuant to the American Jobs Creation
Act of 2004, and therefore eligible for a 5.25% effective
U.S. federal rate of tax, in lieu of the 35% statutory
rate. The final impact of this agreement is not yet known since
this relates to the taxability of earnings that are otherwise
the subject of the tax years
2000-2001
transfer pricing dispute which in turn is being addressed in the
U.S. Tax Court. To the extent that we owe taxes as a result
of the transfer pricing dispute, we anticipate that the
incremental tax due from this negotiated agreement will
decrease. We currently estimate that the most probable outcome
from this negotiated agreement will be $13 million or less,
for which an accrual has already been made. We made a payment of
$130 million to the IRS for this matter in May 2006. We
applied $110 million of this payment as a deposit on the
outstanding transfer pricing matter for the tax years
2000-2001.
Income
Taxes
We account for income taxes in accordance with
SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. The
provision for income taxes is computed using the asset and
liability method, under which deferred tax assets and
liabilities are recognized for the expected future tax
consequences of temporary differences between the financial
reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities, and for
operating loss and tax credit carryforwards in each jurisdiction
in which we operate. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are
measured using the currently enacted tax rates that apply to
taxable income in effect for the years in which those tax assets
are expected to be realized or settled. We record a valuation
allowance to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount that is
believed more likely than not to be realized.
We are required to compute our income taxes in each federal,
state, and international jurisdiction in which we operate. This
process requires that we estimate the current tax exposure as
well as assess temporary differences between the accounting and
tax treatment of assets and liabilities, including items such as
accruals and allowances not currently deductible for tax
purposes. The income tax effects of the differences we identify
are classified as
Table of Contents
SYMANTEC
CORPORATION
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
current or long-term deferred tax assets and liabilities in our
Consolidated Balance Sheets. Our judgments, assumptions, and
estimates relative to the current provision for income tax take
into account current tax laws, our interpretation of current tax
laws, and possible outcomes of current and future audits
conducted by foreign and domestic tax authorities. Changes in
tax laws or our interpretation of tax laws and the resolution of
current and future tax audits could significantly impact the
amounts provided for income taxes in our Consolidated Balance
Sheets and Consolidated Statements of Operations. We must also
assess the likelihood that deferred tax assets will be realized
from future taxable income and, based on this assessment,
establish a valuation allowance, if required. Our determination
of our valuation allowance is based upon a number of
assumptions, judgments, and estimates, including forecasted
earnings, future taxable income, and the relative proportions of
revenue and income before taxes in the various domestic and
international jurisdictions in which we operate. To the extent
we establish a valuation allowance or change the valuation
allowance in a period, we reflect the change with a
corresponding increase or decrease to our tax provision in our
Consolidated Statements of Operations, or to goodwill to the
extent that the valuation allowance related to tax attributes of
the acquired entities.
We adopted the provisions of FASB FIN 48, effective
March 31, 2007. FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for
income taxes, by prescribing a minimum recognition threshold a
tax position is required to meet before being recognized in the
financial statements. FIN 48 also provides guidance on
derecognition, measurement, classification, interest and
penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and
transition.
FIN 48 prescribes a two-step process to determine the
amount of tax benefit to be recognized. The first step is to
evaluate the tax position for recognition by determining if the
weight of available evidence indicates that it is more likely
than not that the position will be sustained on audit, including
resolution of related appeals or litigation processes, if any.
The second step requires us to estimate and measure the tax
benefit as the largest amount that is more than 50% likely of
being realized upon ultimate settlement. It is inherently
difficult and subjective to estimate such amounts, as this
requires us to determine the probability of various possible
outcomes. We reevaluate these uncertain tax positions on a
quarterly basis. This evaluation is based on factors including,
but not limited to, changes in facts or circumstances, changes
in tax law, effectively settled issues under audit, and new
audit activity. Such a change in recognition or measurement
would result in the recognition of a tax benefit or an
additional charge to the tax provision in the period.
This excerpt taken from the SYMC 10-Q filed Feb 9, 2009. Income
Taxes
In July 2008, we reached an agreement with the Internal Revenue
Service (IRS) concerning our eligibility to claim a
lower tax rate on a distribution made from a Veritas foreign
subsidiary prior to the July 2005 acquisition. The distribution
was intended to be made pursuant to the American Jobs Creation
Act of 2004, and therefore eligible for a 5.25% effective
U.S. federal rate of tax, in lieu of the 35% statutory
rate. The final impact of this agreement is not yet known since
this relates to the taxability of earnings that are otherwise
the subject of the tax years
2000-2001
transfer pricing dispute which in turn is being addressed in the
U.S. Tax Court. To the extent that we owe taxes as a result
of the transfer pricing dispute, we anticipate that the
incremental tax due from this negotiated agreement will
decrease. We currently estimate that the most probable outcome
from this negotiated agreement will be $13 million or less,
for which an accrual has already been made. As previously
disclosed in
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended March 28, 2008, we made a payment
of $130 million to the IRS for this matter in May 2006. We
applied $110 million of this payment as a deposit on the
outstanding transfer pricing matter for the tax years
2000-2001.
This excerpt taken from the SYMC 10-Q filed Nov 7, 2008. Income
Taxes
The section entitled Income Taxes in our Critical
Accounting Estimates section of our
Form 10-K
for fiscal year 2008 is hereby updated as follows:
In July 2008, we reached an agreement with the Internal Revenue
Service (IRS) concerning our eligibility to claim a
lower tax rate on a distribution made from a Veritas foreign
subsidiary prior to the July 2005 acquisition. The distribution
was intended to be made pursuant to the American Jobs Creation
Act of 2004, and therefore eligible for a 5.25% effective
U.S. federal rate of tax, in lieu of the 35% statutory
rate. The final impact of this agreement is not yet known since
this relates to the taxability of earnings that are otherwise
the subject of the tax years
2000-2001
transfer pricing dispute which in turn is being addressed in the
U.S. Tax Court. To the extent that we owe taxes as a result
of the transfer pricing dispute, we anticipate that the
incremental tax due from this negotiated agreement will
decrease. We currently estimate that the most probable outcome
from this negotiated agreement will be $13 million or less,
for which an accrual has already been made. As previously
disclosed in
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended March 28, 2008, we made a payment
of $130 million to the IRS for this matter in May 2006. We
applied $110 million of this payment as a deposit on the
outstanding transfer pricing matter for the tax years
2000-2001.
This excerpt taken from the SYMC 10-K filed May 21, 2008. Income
Taxes
We account for income taxes in accordance with
SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. The
provision for income taxes is computed using the asset and
liability method, under which deferred tax assets and
liabilities are recognized for the expected future tax
consequences of temporary differences between the financial
reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities, and for
operating loss and tax credit carryforwards in each jurisdiction
in which we operate. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are
measured using the currently enacted tax rates that apply to
taxable income in effect for the years in which those tax assets
are expected to be realized or settled. We record a valuation
allowance to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount that is
believed more likely than not to be realized.
We are required to compute our income taxes in each federal,
state, and international jurisdiction in which we operate. This
process requires that we estimate the current tax exposure as
well as assess temporary differences between the accounting and
tax treatment of assets and liabilities, including items such as
accruals and allowances not currently deductible for tax
purposes. The income tax effects of the differences we identify
are classified as current or long-term deferred tax assets and
liabilities in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. Our judgments,
assumptions, and estimates relative to the current provision for
income tax take into account current tax laws, our
interpretation of current tax laws, and possible outcomes of
current and future audits conducted by foreign and domestic tax
authorities. Changes in tax laws or our interpretation of tax
laws and the resolution of current and future tax audits could
significantly impact the amounts provided for income taxes in
our Consolidated Balance Sheets and Consolidated Statements of
Income. We must also assess the likelihood that deferred tax
assets will be realized from future taxable income and, based on
this assessment, establish a valuation allowance, if required.
Our determination of our valuation allowance is based upon a
number of assumptions, judgments, and estimates, including
forecasted earnings, future taxable income, and the relative
proportions of revenue and income before taxes in the various
domestic and international jurisdictions in which we operate. To
the extent we establish a
Table of Contents
SYMANTEC
CORPORATION
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
valuation allowance or change the valuation allowance in a
period, we reflect the change with a corresponding increase or
decrease to our tax provision in our Consolidated Statements of
Income, or to goodwill to the extent that the valuation
allowance related to tax attributes of the acquired entities.
We adopted the provisions of FASB Interpretation No. 48, or
FIN 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes,
effective March 31, 2007. FIN 48 clarifies the
accounting for income taxes, by prescribing a minimum
recognition threshold a tax position is required to meet before
being recognized in the financial statements. FIN 48 also
provides guidance on derecognition, measurement, classification,
interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods,
disclosure and transition.
FIN 48 prescribes a two-step process to determine the
amount of tax benefit to be recognized. The first step is to
evaluate the tax position for recognition by determining if the
weight of available evidence indicates that it is more likely
than not that the position will be sustained on audit, including
resolution of related appeals or litigation processes, if any.
The second step requires us to estimate and measure the tax
benefit as the largest amount that is more than 50% likely of
being realized upon ultimate settlement. It is inherently
difficult and subjective to estimate such amounts, as this
requires us to determine the probability of various possible
outcomes. We reevaluate these uncertain tax positions on a
quarterly basis. This evaluation is based on factors including,
but not limited to, changes in facts or circumstances, changes
in tax law, effectively settled issues under audit, and new
audit activity. Such a change in recognition or measurement
would result in the recognition of a tax benefit or an
additional charge to the tax provision in the period.
This excerpt taken from the SYMC 10-Q filed Feb 4, 2008. Income
taxes
We adopted the provisions of FIN 48 effective April 1,
2007. FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for income taxes, by
prescribing a minimum recognition threshold a tax position is
required to meet before being recognized in the financial
statements. FIN 48 also provides guidance on derecognition,
measurement, classification, interest and penalties, accounting
in interim periods, disclosure and transition.
FIN 48 prescribes a two-step process to determine the
amount of tax benefit to be recognized. The first step is to
evaluate the tax position for recognition by determining if the
weight of available evidence indicates that it is more likely
than not that the position will be sustained on audit, including
resolution of related appeals or litigation processes, if any.
The second step requires us to estimate and measure the tax
benefit as the largest amount that is more than 50% likely of
being realized upon ultimate settlement. It is inherently
difficult and subjective to estimate such amounts, as this
requires us to determine the probability of various possible
outcomes. We reevaluate these uncertain tax positions on a
quarterly basis. This evaluation is based on factors including,
but not limited to, changes in facts or circumstances, changes
in tax law, effectively settled issues under audit, and new
audit activity. Such a change in recognition or measurement
would result in the recognition of a tax benefit or an
additional charge to the tax provision in the period.
Table of Contents
SYMANTEC
CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
This excerpt taken from the SYMC 10-Q filed Nov 5, 2007. Income
Taxes
We adopted the provisions of FIN 48 effective April 1,
2007. FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for income taxes, by
prescribing a minimum recognition threshold a tax position is
required to meet before being recognized in the financial
statements. FIN 48 also provides guidance on derecognition,
measurement, classification, interest and penalties, accounting
in interim periods, disclosure and transition.
FIN 48 prescribes a two-step process to determine the
amount of tax benefit to be recognized. The first step is to
evaluate the tax position for recognition by determining if the
weight of available evidence indicates that it is more likely
than not that the position will be sustained on audit, including
resolution of related appeals or litigation processes, if any.
The second step requires us to estimate and measure the tax
benefit as the largest amount that is more than 50% likely of
being realized upon ultimate settlement. It is inherently
difficult and subjective to estimate such amounts, as this
requires us to determine the probability of various possible
outcomes. We reevaluate these uncertain tax positions on a
quarterly basis. This evaluation is based on factors including,
but not limited to, changes in facts or circumstances, changes
in tax law, effectively settled issues under audit, and new
audit activity. Such a change in recognition or measurement
would result in the recognition of a tax benefit or an
additional charge to the tax provision in the period.
Table of Contents
SYMANTEC
CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
This excerpt taken from the SYMC 10-Q filed Aug 7, 2007. Income
Taxes
We adopted the provisions of FIN 48 effective April 1,
2007. FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for income taxes, by
prescribing a minimum recognition threshold a tax position is
required to meet before being recognized in the financial
statements. FIN 48 also provides guidance on derecognition,
measurement, classification, interest and penalties, accounting
in interim periods, disclosure and transition.
FIN 48 prescribes a two-step process to determine the
amount of tax benefit to be recognized. The first step is to
evaluate the tax position for recognition by determining if the
weight of available evidence indicates that it is more likely
than not that the position will be sustained on audit, including
resolution of related appeals or litigation processes, if any.
The second step requires us to estimate and measure the tax
benefit as the largest amount that is more than 50% likely of
being realized upon ultimate settlement. It is inherently
difficult and subjective to estimate such amounts, as this
requires us to determine the probability of various possible
outcomes. We reevaluate these uncertain tax positions on a
quarterly basis. This evaluation is based on factors including,
but not limited to, changes in facts or circumstances, changes
in tax law, effectively settled issues under audit, and new
audit activity. Such a change in recognition or measurement
would result in the recognition of a tax benefit or an
additional charge to the tax provision in the period.
Table of Contents
SYMANTEC
CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
This excerpt taken from the SYMC 10-K filed May 24, 2007. Income
Taxes
We account for income taxes in accordance with
SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. The
provision for income taxes is computed using the asset and
liability method, under which deferred tax assets and
liabilities are recognized for the expected future tax
consequences of temporary differences between the financial
reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities, and for
operating loss and tax credit carryforwards in each jurisdiction
in which we operate. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are
measured using the currently enacted tax rates that apply to
taxable income in effect for the years in which those tax assets
are expected to be realized or settled. We record a valuation
allowance to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount that is
believed more likely than not to be realized.
Table of Contents
We are required to compute our income taxes in each federal,
state, and international jurisdiction in which we operate. This
process requires that we estimate the current tax exposure as
well as assess temporary differences between the accounting and
tax treatment of assets and liabilities, including items such as
accruals and allowances not currently deductible for tax
purposes. The income tax effects of the differences we identify
are classified as current or long-term deferred tax assets and
liabilities in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. Our judgments,
assumptions, and estimates relative to the current provision for
income tax take into account current tax laws, our
interpretation of current tax laws, and possible outcomes of
current and future audits conducted by foreign and domestic tax
authorities. Changes in tax laws or our interpretation of tax
laws and the resolution of current and future tax audits could
significantly impact the amounts provided for income taxes in
our Consolidated Balance Sheets and Consolidated Statements of
Income. We must also assess the likelihood that deferred tax
assets will be realized from future taxable income and, based on
this assessment, establish a valuation allowance, if required.
Our determination of our valuation allowance is based upon a
number of assumptions, judgments, and estimates, including
forecasted earnings, future taxable income, and the relative
proportions of revenue and income before taxes in the various
domestic and international jurisdictions in which we operate.
The valuation allowance provided significantly relates to
acquired attributes and therefore any future benefit of the
realization of the deferred tax assets subject to this valuation
allowance will be credited to goodwill. To the extent we
establish a valuation allowance or change the valuation
allowance in a future period, we reflect the change with a
corresponding increase or decrease to our tax provision in our
Consolidated Statements of Income, or to goodwill to the extent
that the valuation allowance related to tax attributes of the
acquired entities.
| EXCERPTS ON THIS PAGE:
|
| |||||||