




Suggest other news sources for this topic

WIKI ANALYSIS
|
TD Ameritrade (NYSE: AMTD) is an online stock brokerage, and it executes more than 253,000 transactions on an average day.[1] Both individuals and institutional investors use TD Ameritrade's service, trading stock, bonds, and options.[2]
TD Ameritrade's traditional revenue base comes from the transaction-based fees it charges to clients for brokerage and clearing services. This business model has been successful for online brokers because operating costs are so low in this industry. In fiscal 2007, TD Ameritrade made $1.02 billion in operating income, recording an operating margin of 39.08%.[3]
TD Ameritrade also makes money on the cash in its clients' accounts, by lending out this money to other clients through margin accounts, and to third-party borrowers through affiliate banks. 2006 was the first year in which this revenue was greater than TD's earnings from transaction fees.
BackgroundToronto-Dominion Ameritrade, or more simply TD Ameritrade, grew out of the union of two discount brokers. In 1971, Ameritrade was originally created as a local investment bank in the state of Delaware. [4] However, Ameritrade took its first steps to become one of the leading brokers in 1974 by initiating its brokerage services. In 1994, Ameritrade took its first steps towards addressing the rapidly expanding Internet market by purchasing Aufhauser and Company, a company with a platform for the first Internet security trading service. [5] Most recently in 2005, Ameritrade bought TD Waterhouse, another online brokerage firm and network of Registered Investment Advisors, for 192 million shares of Ameritrade and $20,000 dollars in cash. [6]
Company Overview
Cost StructurePart of what keeps TD Ameritrade so competitive within the online brokerage services industry is its uniquely constructed cost structure. Operating for the most part as an online brokerage, maintaining only around 100 brokerage firm locations throughout the United States, TD Ameritrade’s fixed cost infrastructure has allowed for greater financial flexibility and has resulted in one of the lowest operating expense per trade figure out of all the publicly traded brokerage firms. [7] For FY 2007, TD Ameritrade spent $79.7 million in clearing and execution costs and $83.4 million in occupancy and equipment costs. [8]TD Ameritrade’s highest fixed cost for FY 2007 was $413 million in employee compensation and benefits. [9]
Revenue SourcesThere are two different ways in which TD Ameritrade makes its money. The first is directly through the transaction fees that it charges to its clients. The second is asset-based revenues.
Over the past five years, TD Ameritrade’s growth in asset-based revenue has outpaced its growth in transaction-based revenue. For FY 2007, transaction fees earned $813 million in revenue whereas asset-based revenues were $1.32 billion; this was the second year in which TD Ameritrade earned more from asset-based revenues than from transactions.[10] For the most part, the amount of revenue brought in via transaction fees is directly tied to the performance of the overall economic environment. For this reason, many brokerages have turned to revenue sources that don't directly depend on trading volumes in order to diversify and protect themselves against downside risk.
| Revenues (millions): [11] | 9M08 | FY2007 | FY2006 | FY2005 |
| Transaction-based revenues: | ||||
| Transaction fees | 754.0 | 813.8 | 738.4 | 533.9 |
| Asset-based revenues: | ||||
| Interest revenue | 635.9 | 1,013.60 | 1,032.00 | 540.3 |
| Brokerage interest expense | (217.1) | (455.5) | (335.8) | (141.4) |
| Net interest revenue | 418.9 | 558.1 | 696.2 | 398.9 |
| Money market account fees | 467.6 | 535.4 | 185 | — |
| Investment product fees | 223.2 | 232.2 | 140.7 | 25.2 |
| Total asset-based revenues | 1,109.8 | 1,325.70 | 1,021.90 | 424.1 |
| Other revenues | 24.3 | 37.5 | 43.3 | 45.1 |
| Net revenues | 1,888.1 | 2,176.90 | 1,803.50 | 1,003.20 |
| Net Income | 631.9 | 645.9 | 526.8 | 339.8 |
Asset-Based RevenueThe first way in which TD Ameritrade earns asset-based revenue is through loans to clients who elect to purchase securities on margin. In margin loans, TD Ameritrade facilitates a loan to the client and charges an interest rate based on the type and terms of the loan to the client. The client pays down the interest and the capital within the period specified. The second way in which TD Ameritrade earns asset-based revenue is through opt-in money management services that it provides to its clients and account holders. Money from these accounts is loaned out to banks (in this case, TD Bank USA). The bank, in turn, makes long term loans on the cash and pays short term rates to the account holder, making a profit on the interest rate spread.
Transaction-Based RevenueTD Ameritrade offers and facilitates the transaction of corporate stock, fixed income securities, exchange traded funds, options trades, mutual funds, cash management services, and margin accounts. For most of the transaction-based services that TD Ameritrade provides, it charges a fee. Transaction revenue is dictated by the trading volume and the total fees that are collected based on those volumes. From 2006 to 2007, TD Ameritrade saw a 16% increase in the volume of trades executed on its platform, exhibiting a relatively small change in average commissions and transactions fees per trade of about -5%. [12]
| Transaction Metrics[13] | 9M08 | FY2007 | FY2006 | FY2005 |
| Total trades (in millions) | 58.4 | 63.11 | 54.24 | 39.94 |
| Average commissions and transaction fees per trade | $12.92 | $12.90 | $13.61 | $13.37 |
| Average client trades per day | 310,432 | 253,440 | 216,970 | 155,696 |
| Average client trades per account (annualized) | 11.8 | 10 | 10.1 | 11 |
| Trading days | 188 | 249 | 250 | 256.5 |
Trends and Forces
Trends and Forces Affecting Transaction-Based Revenue
Trends and Forces Affecting Asset-Based Revenue
CompetitionTD Ameritrade faces strong competition, most importantly from Charles Schwab (SCHW),E*TRADE Financial (ETFC) , Fidelity, and Scottrade. E*Trade and TD Ameritrade are very similar in structure: they both run a no-frills investing platform geared towards self-guided investors. Asset accumulation can be difficult for E*Trade and other no-frills online brokers as they're competing against firms that offer more advanced guidance for investors. However, ETrade and TD Ameritrade are divergent with respect to their platform development. TD Ameritrade is still digesting the acquisition of TD Waterhouse and is in the midst of fully integrating the newly acquired RIA network and brokerage locations with TD Ameritrade's technological platform. Further competition is provided by Charles Schwab--which has more comprehensive offerings-- which has been more successful in attaining a greater share of its clients' total assets through a larger, more cohesive network of associated RIAs.
Revenue Composition Comparison: The sources of revenue are different between the competing online broker-dealers. In particular, Charles Schwab is quite different because their main source of revenue is from asset management fees, a source of revenue that E*Trade and TD Ameritrade do not have. Below are the revenue compositions for TD Ameritrade, E*Trade and Charles Schwab. Notice the extent to which E*Trade has moved towards asset-based revenue streams: 58% Net Interest Income vs. 41% and 34% at TD Ameritrade and Charles Schwab, respectively. This shows E*Trade's aggressive move towards a new business model that is less reliant upon trading based revenue streams. By increasing its dependence on interest-based revenue streams, however, E*Trade has increased its exposure to market fluctuations; its investments are linked to market conditions and can be volatile. Schwab and TD Ameritrade are relatively less exposed to this risk.
Notice the difference in revenue composition. E*TRADE Financial (ETFC) generates more than half of its revenue from interest income, which would make it the most exposed to any collateralized debt obligations and/or mortgage backed securities that the brokerage would be responsible for fulfilling as a result of their sweep account operations. Relative to E*TRADE Financial (ETFC) , Charles Schwab (SCHW) generates a greater proportion of its revenue through asset management fees, which would make its balance sheet the most exposed to any reduction mass market brokerage transactions.
| Operating Metrics | E*Trade | Charles Schwab | TD Ameritrade | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Average Commission Per Trade | $11.73 | $14.01 | $12.90 | |
| Daily Average Revenue Trades (DARTs) | 187K | 245K | 253K | |
| Net Revenues (MM) | $3,570 | $4,994 | $2,177 | |
| Net Income (MM) | $-1,442 | $2,407 | $645.9 | |
| Client Assets Under Control (AUC) (bn) | $190 | $1,445 | $302.7 | |
References



| ||||||
