TGT » Topics » TARGET REJECTED PERSHING SQUARES PROPOSED REAL ESTATE TRANSACTION AS SPECULATIVE AND RISKY

This excerpt taken from the TGT DEFA14A filed Apr 8, 2009.

TARGET REJECTED PERSHING SQUARE’S PROPOSED REAL ESTATE TRANSACTION AS SPECULATIVE AND RISKY

 

In its real estate proposal, Pershing Square asked Target to consider the IPO and subsequent spin-off of a separate publicly-traded real estate investment trust (REIT) that would own substantially all of the land currently owned by Target.

 

In November 2008, Target announced that after a comprehensive evaluation of various real estate structuring ideas outlined by Pershing Square, our Board had concluded that the potential value created, if any, was highly speculative and insufficient to merit pursuit of a transaction given the significant costs, strategic and operating risks, and loss of financial flexibility involved. The following factors were important in reaching this conclusion:

 

·    By continuing to own substantially all of its real estate, Target enjoys meaningful financial and operating benefits, which the company is unwilling to lose without a demonstrably superior alternative.

·    Ownership of the land under our stores and distribution centers allows Target to benefit from the value that we create on those sites, and provides necessary flexibility to make significant improvements to our stores to drive our strategy and protect our brand.

 



 

·    From a financial perspective, ownership is cost-effective and assists Target in making favorable real estate acquisitions while also providing long-term stability, a necessary buffer for economic downturns.

·    Pershing Square’s real estate proposal would reduce Target’s financial flexibility due to the conveyance of valuable assets to the REIT and the obligation to make annual lease payments of $1.4 billion, increasing every year for 75 years at the rate of inflation.

 

We believe that Pershing Square’s real estate proposal is essentially a leveraged recapitalization that would expose Target to large and increasing lease payments, undermine its competitive position and jeopardize its long-term strategy. In our view, Pershing Square’s proposal would decrease Target’s operating and financial flexibility as well as expose Target to significant cost and risks.

 

Wikinvest © 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012. Use of this site is subject to express Terms of Service, Privacy Policy, and Disclaimer. By continuing past this page, you agree to abide by these terms. Any information provided by Wikinvest, including but not limited to company data, competitors, business analysis, market share, sales revenues and other operating metrics, earnings call analysis, conference call transcripts, industry information, or price targets should not be construed as research, trading tips or recommendations, or investment advice and is provided with no warrants as to its accuracy. Stock market data, including US and International equity symbols, stock quotes, share prices, earnings ratios, and other fundamental data is provided by data partners. Stock market quotes delayed at least 15 minutes for NASDAQ, 20 mins for NYSE and AMEX. Market data by Xignite. See data providers for more details. Company names, products, services and branding cited herein may be trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective owners. The use of trademarks or service marks of another is not a representation that the other is affiliated with, sponsors, is sponsored by, endorses, or is endorsed by Wikinvest.
Powered by MediaWiki