 | |
- close
- close
Suggest other news sources for this topic
WIKI ANALYSIS
The United States Steel Corporation (NYSE: X) is the largest integrated steel manufacturer in North America. The economic downturn broke the durable market along with demand for steel in the first two quarters of 2009, which interrupted U.S. Steel's record 2008 performance.
The company has three primary operating segments: flat rolled; tubular products (which make up the primary domestic operations of the company); and U.S. Steel Europe. The domestic operations of U.S. Steel are vertically integrated, meaning that iron ore and coke, which are the primary raw materials used to create steel, are supplied by the company itself. Currently, there are over 850 million tons of iron ore at the company’s Minnesota reserve, enough to supply domestic operations for 30 years.[1] Integration helps to insulate the company from the price volatility of iron ore and coke and therefore enables the company to operate at lower costs than non-integrated producers. U.S. Steel is hoping to begin integrating its services in Europe as well, although currently US Steel Europe purchases most of its raw materials from independent suppliers.
While US Steel was founded as a steel producer, it expanded and acquired several different business sectors over the 20th century. By the 1980's, U.S. Steel had a very diversified business structure that included involvement in the steel, energy, agri-chemical, domestic transportation and raw materials industries. Since then, however, the company has restructured itself and returned to its roots as a company dedicated to the production of steel products.In a currently consolidating steel industry, U.S. Steel has maintained discipline in its business approach in recent years, focusing on increasing the production of its current business sectors and improving its product quality. This conservative business approach is aimed to keep the company from suffering losses in times of industry setbacks or economic downturns. On the other hand, U.S. Steel may be missing opportunities to expand its business through acquisitions similar to the strategies employed by U.S. market leaders Arcelor Mittal (MT) and Nucor (NUE).
U.S. Steel still remains dependent on key industries and regions in spite of its vertical integration efforts. In particular, U.S. Steel is dependent on the petroleum and auto industries and is highly affected by activities in China, which affect most steelmakers worldwide.
- Oil and gas companies purchase nearly all of its tubular steel products for use on pipelines and oil rigs. The company is the market leader in this type of steel production and sources a third of its revenue from this sector.
- Automobile manufacturers consume 20% of all steel shipments to build cars and trucks. U.S. Steel is highly tied to the Big Three automakers (GM, Ford, Daimler Chrysler) which have suffered poor performance recently.
- While China is driving a large portion of the increase in demand for steel, the country is also ramping up its own steel production capabilities. China's becoming a net exporter of steel could flood the market and drive down prices.
Company Description
Despite record profits in 2008 (up 140% from 2007), U.S. Steel has seen reveresed fortunes in Q1-Q2 2009, with negative net income and net sales down 80% or more in each of its operating segments relative to the prior year. The collapse of the durables market ranging from the U.S. Housing Market Losses have been exacerbated by write-downs in the company's sizeable pension plan due to lower expected future equity returns. Losses have been mitigated 2-3% by the weakening of the US dollar, which makes U.S. Steel more competitive.[2]
Annual and Quarterly Earnings
Q4 FY 2009 and Annual Earnings Summary
US Steel posted a net loss of $267 million for the quarter, marking a $1.86 decrease per share.[3] US Steel posted gains for the quarter in net sales, ending at $3.4 billion and marking a 19% increase from the previous quarter.[3] Increases in sales were driven by a 12% increase in fourth quarter shipments, culminating at 4.7 million tons.[3]
For the full-year, US Steel posted a net loss of $1.4 billion as compared with a net income of $2.1 billion for the FY2008.[3] Shares posted at $10.42 per diluted share for FY2009 as compared to $17.96 per diluted share in FY2008.[3] Driving these losses were losses in income across all business segments, with the most pronounced losses being in the Flat-rolled and Tubular segments.[3] Flat-rolled income was $1.4 billion for 2008 but was a loss of $1.4 billion for 2009; similarly, Tubular income dropped from $1.2 billion in 2008 to 57 million in 2009.[3]
Q3 FY 2009 Summary
US Steel posted a net loss of $2.11 per share, or $303 milion.[4] US Steel lost $392 million the quarter before and had a net income of $919 million in Q3 FY2008.[4] Driving these declines were losses from operations of $412 million, a slight improvement from a loss of $465 million the quarter before.[4] Income from operations in Q3 FY2008, however, was $1,327 million.[4]
Despite these losses, US Steel has seen improvement in both shipments and net sales as year to date cash flow from operations equaled $118 million.[4] Shipments increased by 41% from Q2 and stood at 4.2 million tons.[4] Net sales similarly increased, reaching $2.8 billion, a 32% improvement over the last quarter.[4]
Q2 FY 2009 Summary
US Steel posted a net loss of $392 million for the quarter, driven by a 9% decrease in shipments from Q1 FY 2009.[5] Sales similarly fell, decreasing by 23% from the previous quarter to $2.1 billion.[5] US Steel posted losses in each of its segments, recording $362 million, $53 million, $88 million, and $7 million losses in its Flat-rolled, U.S. Steel Europe, Tubular, and Other Businesses segments respectively.[5] US Steel saw a $465 million loss in income from operations, a repeat loss from last semester which posted a $478 million drop for operating income.[5]
Q1 FY 2009 Summary
US Steel posted a net loss of $478 million for the quarter, driven by decreasing demand for flat-rolled product as compared to the last quarter of FY 2008.[6] Sales similarly fell, decreasing by 39% from the previous quarter to $2.7 billion.[6] US Steel posted losses in three of its four segments, recording $422 million, $159 million, and $3 million losses in its Flat-rolled, U.S. Steel Europe, and Other Businesses segments respectively-- Tubular income generated $127 million for the quarter, a 78% drop from the previous quarter.[6]
FY 2008 Annual Summary
US Steel posted net sales of $23.7 billion for the year, with an operating income of $3.1 billion, grossing a net income of $2.1 billion[7] Net Sales were driven by a 114% increase in Tubular sales from FY 2007, generating $4.3 billion.[7] US Steel's Flat-rolled and USSE segments similarly reported growth, posting 38% and 18% sales increases respectively.[7]
FY 2007 Annual Summary
US Steel posted net sales of $16.9 billion for the year, with an operating income of $1.2 billion, grossing a net income of $879 million[8] With the exception of net sales that increased by 7% from the previous year, these markers reflect losses across the board for US Steel.[8] In FY 2006, US Steel posted an operating income of $1.8 billion and a net income of $1.4 billion, indicating 32% and 36% decreases.[8]
Sales by segment increased across the board for FY 2007, marking a 3%, 18%, and 10% increased in Flat-rolled, USSE, and Tubular segments respectively.[8] Sales from Other Businesses, however, fell from $342 million in FY 2006 to $337 million in FY 2007. With these postings, net sales increased by 7% for the year from $15.7 billion the year before.[8]
The Steel Industry
Business Approach
The Steel Industry has entered into a consolidating phase since 2001. The 5 largest steel companies in the world have grown through acquisitions to represent a combined 20%+ global market share for steel products. U.S. Steel has taken a conservative approach to growth, instead focusing on improving its current product quality instead of trying to expand the breadth of its operations. In a reflection of this strategy, on March 29, 2007, U.S. Steel announced the $2.1 billion acquisition of Lone Star Technologies (LSS), a company whose principal operations are in the tubular sector. This acquisition is aimed to expand and improve U.S. Steel’s top market share on tubular products in the U.S. (21%).
Vertical integration has become a major strategy employed by U.S. Steel. The company has undertaken projects such as the construction of new blast furnaces and the upgrade of existing steelmaking shops in an effort to improve its domestic operational infrastructure and improve its product quality. In pursuit of this goal, to assure a reliable supply of coke to fire the blast furnaces of the company's domestic mills, US Steel is currently constructing three coke processing facilities.[9]
A primary goal of vertical expansion in the company’s European operations is to integrate the company’s current steelmaking operations by acquiring a raw materials base. Such vertical integration limits the effects of exchange rate induced price increases in raw materials procured outside the U.S., a growing challenge for many manufacturing firms. Doing this would insulate its European operations from fluctuating market prices, as the company does in its domestic operations.
Steel Demand: Customers and End Markets
Steel consumption levels correlate with economic growth and expansion. When the global economy is expanding, there is a rise in demand for steel, putting upward pressure on steel prices. When economic growth slows down, steel prices tend to fall. Economic expansion usually means that the primary end markets of the steel industry are performing well. These end markets represent the customers to whom companies such as U.S. Steel sell their products. When steel end markets are performing well, they will buy more steel to make more of their own product. In recent years, China has contributed to a resurgence in the demand for steel. Alongside this, the rest of the global economy’s steady growth has provided a stable environment for the steel industry.
The Auto Industry
About 20% of the steel industry’s shipments are to Auto Makers. Several different types of steel products are used for automobiles including flat rolled sheet for auto bodies, bar products for suspension, drive shafts and axles as well as steel alloys for wheels and engine blocks. As time has gone by, the demand for steel has increased as the size of cars and trucks has increased. A shift to smaller, lighter, and more fuel efficient cars could reduce the demand for steel in the future. U.S. Steel has a lot of exposure to the auto industry, especially the Big Three automakers. Poor performance by these three companies could hurt U.S. Steel's revenues.
Construction
Construction projects represent about 15-20% of steel consumption. Steel is used in framing for building structures, bridges, metal building systems and pipes. Construction projects tend to rise when the economy is in an upswing. The continued infrastructure and construction boom in the developing world, especially China, has continued to drive strong demand for steel in spite of a sharp downturn in the US building industry during 2008.
Containers and Packaging
Steel is used to make cans for food, chemicals and aerosol spray. The packaging industry has begun to scale back its usage of steel by replacing packaging materials with plastics and other more flexible materials and by shrinking the amount of steel used to make cans.
Oil, Gas and Petrochemicals
Tubular steel products are used to build pipelines and rigs. Rising oil prices have spurred exploration and the construction of oil rigs which has helped to maintain demand for steel from this industry. A strong hurricane season that causes a lot of damage to the oil industry's infrastructure also increases the demand for the steel parts that are needed for repairs. Average North American oil rig counts have a strong correlation with U.S. Steel's tubular product shipments.
The company's leading 21% market share in tubular products makes performance in this sector vital; nearly one-third of revenues come from this business unit.
Foreign Imports
Foreign imports of steel can have adverse effects for domestic steel producing companies. If foreign steel imports increase, that means there is more domestic supply which puts downward pressure on steel prices. In the past few years, steel imports to the United States have risen to comprise 31% of the steel consumed in the country. Increasing foreign competition in the future could reduce market prices and demand in the U.S. However, throughout 2008 ocean freight rates increased considerably effectively making imported steel products more expensive.[11] In 2006, U.S. Steel only exported about 5% of its domestically produced steel, so a weakening of the U.S. market is a potentially serious problem for the company.
China’s Impact
Robust economic growth in China has contributed to a great increase in the demand for steel. This demand has helped fuel the global rise in steel prices. There is concern, however, about whether or not growth in China can sustain at its current blistering pace. In 2003, Chinese demand for imported steel peaked at 43 million metric tons, that number fell to 16 million in 2005. A fall in Chinese demand for imported steel, coupled with the country’s own increase in steel production could turn China into a net exporter of steel. While U.S. Steel only exports 4% of its domestic production, China becoming a net exporter could potentially flood the steel market, leading to overcapacity and downward price pressure for the entire industry.
Environmental Concerns
The steel production industry is extremely energy intensive and is a heavy producer of greenhouse gases (GHG's). Facing increasing concern about global warming and simultaneous rising demands for energy worldwide, there has been significant legislation that now affects the steel industry.
The House or Representatives passed a bill to curb U.S. greenhouse-gas emissions on June 26, 2009. This bill, called Cap and Trade, will hurt integrated steel mills at US Steel (X), ArcelorMittal (MT) and Mechel Steel Group OAO (MTL) the most because they kick out the most carbon dioxide.
Nucor (NUE) and the Commercial Metals Company (CMC) primarily re-melt scrap, which emits about 2/3 less carbon than competitors. Even though Nucor and other mini-mill users might gain competitve advantage relative to integrated steel players like U.S. Steel, the net effect of the Cap and Trade Bill will hurt all domestic steel players because it will incentivize production in countries without emissions caps like Brazil.[12]
U.S. Steel is very entrenched in the United States, and as an integrated steel player will likely see its already dangerously low sub-5% profit margin decline.
Business Costs
Labor Costs
Labor costs make up about 25% of U.S. Steel’s domestic costs. The majority of the 21,000 domestic employees of the company are covered by a collective bargaining agreement with the United Steel Workers of America. The current contract that exists between U.S. Steel and the USWA is due to expire in September of 2008. It is too early to tell how negotiations between the two will go, but labor costs over the past decade have risen along with the rise in average hourly wages over that same period of time.
Energy Costs
Coal is the primary energy source for the production of steel. U.S. Steel purchases all of the coal it uses from third party vendors. The company’s domestic operations require an estimated 10 million tons of coal alone at an estimated cost of $700 million. Because all of the coal purchased by U.S. Steel is at market price, the company is exposed to price fluctuations in coal due to mine accidents, transportation mishaps and other factors. U.S. Steel also requires natural gas for its production. The company has partially hedged its position on these gases to protect itself from price fluctuations. While increasing coal and natural gas prices raise company expenses, as of mid-2008 management's predictions that increases in steel prices would outpace the additional costs from these two inputs had proved correct.
Market Share
| Manufacturer | Crude Steel Production (Thousands of Tons) | Market Share[13] | YOY % Change in Production |
| US Steel[14] | 3,023 | .96% | -60% |
| Nucor[15] | 2,808 | .89% | -53% |
| SCHN[16] | 1,037 | .33% | -19% |
| Steel Dynamics[17] | 886 | 0.28% | -45% |
| AK Steel[18] | 740 | 0.23% | -57% |
| CMC[19] | 435 | 0.14% | -42% |
Competition
What separates U.S. Steel from domestic competition is its focus on maintaining an integrated business model and its exposure to the tubular products market. U.S. Steel's tubular production services the high performing oil and gas industry. While Nucor (NUE) and Arcelor Mittal (MT), the other two major steel producers in the United States, have been busy with several acquisitions for growth, U.S. Steel has maintained a conservative acquisition strategy. The integrated business model that U.S. Steel has maintained in the United States and is now striving to achieve in Europe will help protect the company from industry wide downturns that could devastate steel companies that are exposed to raw material price fluctuations.
Mittal Steel is the world's largest steel producer. Their growth through acquisitions over the years has made them into a company that will continue to impact the steel market.
| Total Global Steel Production | Total Sales | Cost of Sales | Operating Income | % Gross Margins | U.S. Steel Industry Market Share | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (mmt) | (bil) | (bil) | (bil) | ||||
| United States Steel | 19.3 | $14.0 | $11.6 | $2.4 | 17% | 16% | |
| Nucor (NUE) | 18.4 | $12.7 | $10.1 | $2.6 | 20% | 21% | |
| Arcelor Mittal (MT) | 63.0 | $28.1 | $21.5 | $6.6 | 23% | 25% | |
Source: 2006 Company Reports
References
- ↑ US Steel 2008 Annual Report, page 151
- ↑ 10Q-2 2009
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6 United States Steel Corporation Reports 2009 Fourth Quarter and Full-Year Results
- ↑ 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.5 4.6 United States Steel Corporation Reports 2009 Third Quarter Results
- ↑ 5.0 5.1 5.2 5.3 United States Steel Corporation Reports 2009 Second Quarter Results
- ↑ 6.0 6.1 6.2 United States Steel Corporation Reports 2009 First Quarter Results
- ↑ 7.0 7.1 7.2 United States Steel Corporation 2008 Annual Report and Form 10-K
- ↑ 8.0 8.1 8.2 8.3 8.4 United States Steel Corporation 2007 Annual Report and Form 10-K
- ↑ http://seekingalpha.com/article/87791-united-states-steel-corp-q2-2008-earnings-call?source=feed
- ↑ MEPS: Global Steel Prices
- ↑ http://seekingalpha.com/article/87791-united-states-steel-corp-q2-2008-earnings-call?source=feed
- ↑ of Reps Passes Cap and Trade
- ↑ Steel on the Net - World Steel Review, August 2009
- ↑ X, Q2 2009, 10-Q, Item 4, Page 58
- ↑ NUE, Q2 2009, 10-Q, Item 2, Page 19
- ↑ SCHN, Q3 2009, 10-Q, Item 2, Page 30
- ↑ AKS, Q2 2009, Quarterly Earnings Release
- ↑ AKS, Q2 2009, 10-Q, Item 2, Page 27
- ↑ CMC, Q2 2009, 10-Q, Item 2, Page 25
| ||||||
|
|
