Unifirst (UNF)

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

 

FORM 10-Q

 

 

Commission file number: 1-8504

 

UNIFIRST CORPORATION

(Exact name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

 

 

(978) 658-8888

(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

 

Yes x       No o

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

 

Yes o       No o

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

 

Yes o    No x

 

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

 

The number of outstanding shares of UniFirst Corporation Common Stock and Class B Common Stock at July 2, 2009 were 14,411,529 and 4,933,369, respectively.

 

UniFirst Corporation

Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q

For the Quarter ended May 30, 2009

 

Table of Contents

 

 

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

UniFirst Corporation and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Income

(Unaudited)

 

(1) Exclusive of depreciation on the Company’s property and equipment and amortization of its intangible assets.

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these

Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

UniFirst Corporation and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(Unaudited)

 

 

(a) Balances as of fiscal 2008 year-end, derived from fiscal 2008 audited financial statements

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these

Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

UniFirst Corporation and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(Unaudited)

 

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these

Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

UniFirst Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

 

1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

 

Business Description

 

UniFirst Corporation (the “Company”) is one of the largest providers of workplace uniforms and protective clothing in the United States. The Company designs, manufactures, personalizes, rents, cleans, delivers, and sells a wide range of uniforms and protective clothing, including shirts, pants, jackets, coveralls, lab coats, smocks, aprons and specialized protective wear, such as flame resistant and high visibility garments. The Company also rents industrial wiping products, floor mats, facility service products and other non-garment items, and provides first aid cabinet services and other safety supplies, to a variety of manufacturers, retailers and service companies.

 

The Company serves businesses of all sizes in numerous industry categories. Typical customers include automobile service centers and dealers, delivery services, food and general merchandise retailers, food processors and service operations, light manufacturers, maintenance facilities, restaurants, service companies, soft and durable goods wholesalers, transportation companies, and others who require employee clothing for image, identification, protection or utility purposes. The Company also provides its customers with restroom supplies, including air fresheners, paper products and hand soaps.

 

At certain specialized facilities, the Company also decontaminates and cleans work clothes that may have been exposed to radioactive materials and services special clean room protective wear. Typical customers for these specialized services include government agencies, research and development laboratories, high technology companies and utilities operating nuclear reactors.

 

As discussed and described in Note 12 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, the Company has five reporting segments: US and Canadian Rental and Cleaning, Manufacturing (“MFG”), Specialty Garments Rental and Cleaning (“Specialty Garments”), First Aid and Corporate. The operations of the US and Canadian Rental and Cleaning reporting segment are referred to by the Company as its “industrial laundry operations” and the locations related to this reporting segment are referred to as “industrial laundries”. The Company refers to its US and Canadian Rental and Cleaning, MFG, and Corporate segments combined as its “core laundry operations”.

 

Interim Financial Information

These Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared by the Company without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“US GAAP”) have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations; however, the Company believes that the information furnished reflects all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair statement of results for the interim period. It is suggested that these Consolidated Financial Statements be read in conjunction with the financial statements and the notes, thereto, included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 30, 2008. Results for an interim period are not indicative of any future interim periods or for an entire fiscal year.

 

Principles of Consolidation

 

The Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of the Company and its subsidiaries, all of which are wholly-owned. Intercompany balances and transactions are eliminated in consolidation.

 

Use of Estimates

 

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with US GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts in the financial statements and accompanying notes. These estimates are based on historical information, current trends, and information available from other sources. Actual results could differ from these estimates.

 

Fiscal Year

 

The Company’s fiscal year ends on the last Saturday in August. For financial reporting purposes, fiscal 2009 will consist of 52 weeks, whereas fiscal 2008 consisted of 53 weeks. The additional week was included in the second quarter of fiscal 2008. As a result, the quarterly periods ended May 30, 2009 and May 31, 2008 both consisted of 13 weeks, as compared to the nine-month periods ended May 30, 2009 and May 31, 2008 which consisted of 39 weeks and 40 weeks, respectively.

 

Cash and Cash Equivalents

 

Cash and cash equivalents include cash in banks and bank short-term investments with maturities of less than ninety days.

 

Financial Instruments

 

The Company’s financial instruments, which may expose the Company to concentrations of credit risk, include cash and cash equivalents, receivables, accounts payable, notes payable and long-term obligations. Each of these financial instruments is recorded at cost, which approximates its fair value.

 

Revenue Recognition and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

 

The Company recognizes revenue from rental operations in the period in which the services are provided. Direct sales revenue is recognized in the period in which the services are performed or when the product is shipped. Management judgments and estimates are used in determining the collectability of accounts receivable and evaluating the adequacy of the allowance for doubtful accounts. The Company considers specific accounts receivable and historical bad debt experience, customer credit worthiness, current economic trends and the age of outstanding balances as part of its evaluation. Changes in estimates are reflected in the period they become known. If the financial condition of the Company’s customers were to deteriorate, resulting in an impairment of their ability to make payments, additional allowances may be required. Material changes in its estimates may result in significant differences in the amount and timing of bad debt expense recognition for any given period.

 

Inventories and Rental Merchandise in Service

 

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market value, net of any reserve for excess and obsolete inventory. Judgments and estimates are used in determining the likelihood that new goods on hand can be sold to customers or used in rental operations. Historical inventory usage and current revenue trends are considered in estimating both excess and obsolete inventories. If actual product demand and market conditions are less favorable than those projected by management, additional inventory write-downs may be required. The Company uses the first-in, first-out (“FIFO”) method to value its inventories, which primarily consist of finished goods.

 

Rental merchandise in service is amortized, primarily on a straight-line basis, over the estimated service lives of the merchandise, which range from 6 to 36 months. In establishing estimated lives for merchandise in service, management considers historical experience and the intended use of the merchandise. Material differences may result in the amount and timing of operating profit for any period if management makes significant changes to these estimates.

 

Property and Equipment

 

Property and equipment are recorded at cost. Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred, while expenditures for renewals and betterments are capitalized. The Company provides for depreciation on the straight-line method based on the following estimated useful lives:

 

 

In accordance with Statements of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, long-lived assets, including property and equipment, are evaluated for impairment whenever events or circumstances indicate an asset may be impaired. There were no material impairments of long-lived assets in the thirty-nine weeks ended May 30, 2009 or the year ended August 30, 2008.

 

Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

 

In accordance with SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, goodwill is not amortized. SFAS No. 142 requires that companies test goodwill for impairment on an annual basis. Management completes its annual impairment test in the fourth quarter of each fiscal year. In addition, SFAS No. 142 also requires that companies test goodwill if events occur or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit to which goodwill is assigned below its carrying amount. The Company’s evaluation considers changes in the operating environment, competitive information, market trends, operating performance and cash flow modeling.

 

During the thirteen weeks ended February 28, 2009, there was a decline in the market value of the Company’s stock as well as significant deterioration in general economic conditions. The decline in the Company’s market capitalization prompted the Company's management to conduct a goodwill analysis, in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 142, to determine if an impairment of goodwill existed. Based on the outcome of the Company’s analysis, it concluded that no impairment existed as of February 28, 2009. The Company did not perform a similar impairment analysis during the thirteen weeks ended May 30, 2009 because the Company concluded that there were no impairment indicators present during the quarter.

 

The Company cannot predict future economic conditions or the future market value of the Company's stock or their impact on the Company. A continued decline in the Company’s market capitalization and/or deterioration in general economic conditions could negatively and materially impact the Company's assumptions and assessment of the fair value of the Company's business. If general economic conditions or the Company's financial performance deteriorate, the Company may be required to record a goodwill impairment charge in the future which could have a material impact on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.

 

Definite-lived intangible assets are amortized over their useful lives, which are based on management’s estimates of the period that the assets will generate revenue. Definite-lived intangible assets are evaluated for impairment in accordance with SFAS No. 144. There were no impairments of goodwill or definite-lived intangible assets in the thirty-nine weeks ended May 30, 2009 or the year ended August 30, 2008.

 

Environmental and Other Contingencies

 

The Company is subject to legal proceedings and claims arising from the conduct of its business operations, including environmental matters, personal injury, customer contract matters and employment claims. Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States require that a liability for contingencies be recorded when it is probable that a liability has occurred and the amount of the liability can be reasonably estimated. Significant judgment is required to determine the existence of a liability, as well as the amount to be recorded. The Company regularly consults with attorneys and outside consultants, in its consideration of the relevant facts and circumstances, before recording a contingent liability. The Company records accruals for environmental and other contingencies based on enacted laws, regulatory orders or decrees, the Company’s estimates of costs, insurance proceeds, participation by other parties, the timing of payments, and the input of outside consultants and attorneys.

 

The estimated liability for environmental contingencies has been discounted using risk-free interest rates ranging from 3.5% to 4.3% over periods ranging from ten to thirty years. The estimated current costs, net of legal settlements with insurance carriers, have been adjusted for the estimated impact of inflation at 3% per year. Changes in enacted laws, regulatory orders or decrees, management’s estimates of costs, risk-free interest rates, insurance proceeds, participation by other parties, the timing of payments and the input of outside consultants and attorneys based on changing legal or factual circumstances could have a material impact on the amounts recorded for environmental and other contingent liabilities. Refer to Note 7 of the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional discussion and analysis.

 

Asset Retirement Obligations

 

The Company follows the provisions of SFAS No. 143, Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations, which generally applies to legal obligations associated with the retirement of long-lived assets that result from the acquisition, construction, development and/or the normal operation of a long-lived asset. Under this accounting method, the Company recognizes asset retirement obligations in the period in which they are incurred if a reasonable estimate of fair value can be made. The associated asset retirement costs are capitalized as part of the carrying amount of the long-lived asset.

 

The Company has recognized as a liability the present value of the estimated future costs to decommission its nuclear laundry facilities in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 143. The Company depreciates, on a straight-line basis, the amount added to property and equipment and recognizes accretion expense in connection with the discounted liability over the various remaining lives which range from approximately one to twenty-two years.

 

The estimated liability has been based on historical experience in decommissioning nuclear laundry facilities, estimated useful lives of the underlying assets, external vendor estimates as to the cost to decommission these assets in the future, and federal and state regulatory requirements. The estimated current costs have been adjusted for the estimated impact of inflation at 3% per year. The liability has been discounted using credit-adjusted risk-free rates that range from approximately 5.7% to 7.0%. Revisions to the liability could occur due to changes in the Company’s estimated useful lives of the underlying assets, estimated dates of decommissioning, changes in decommissioning costs, changes in federal or state regulatory guidance on the decommissioning of such facilities, or other changes in estimates. Changes due to revised estimates will be recognized by adjusting the carrying amount of the liability and the related long-lived asset if the assets are still in service, or charged to expense in the period if the assets are no longer in service.

 

Derivative Financial Instruments

 

The Company accounts for its derivative instruments in accordance with SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, and related authoritative guidance. All derivative instruments are recorded as other assets or other liabilities at fair value, in accordance with SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements. All subsequent changes in a derivative’s fair value are recognized in income, unless specific hedge accounting criteria are met. Cash flows associated with derivatives are classified in the same category as the cash flows hedged in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.

 

Derivative instruments that qualify for hedge accounting are classified as a hedge of the variability of cash flows to be paid related to a recognized liability or a forecasted transaction. Changes in the fair value of a derivative that is highly effective and designated as a cash flow hedge are recognized in accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income in the Consolidated Balance Sheet until expenses from the cash flows of the hedged items are recognized. The Company performs an assessment at the inception of the hedge and on a quarterly basis thereafter, to determine whether its derivatives are highly effective in offsetting changes in the value of the hedged items. Any change in the fair value resulting from hedge ineffectiveness is immediately recognized as income or expense in the Consolidated Statements of Income.

 

The Company’s hedging activities are transacted only with highly rated institutions, which reduces the exposure to credit risk in the event of nonperformance. Refer to Note 4 of the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional discussion and analysis.

 

Insurance

 

The Company is self-insured for certain obligations related to health, workers’ compensation, vehicles and general liability programs. The Company also purchases stop-loss insurance policies to protect itself from catastrophic losses. Judgments and estimates are used in determining the potential value associated with reported claims and for events that have occurred, but have not been reported. The Company’s estimates consider historical claims experience and other factors. The Company’s liabilities are based on estimates, and, while the Company believes that its accruals are adequate, the ultimate liability may be significantly different from the amounts recorded. Changes in claims experience, the Company’s ability to settle claims or other estimates and judgments used by management could have a material impact on the amount and timing of expense for any period.

 

Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan and other Pension Plans

 

The Company accounts for its Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan and other pension plans in accordance with SFAS No. 87, Employers’ Accounting for Pensions, as amended by SFAS No. 158, Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans. Under SFAS No. 87, pension expense is recognized on an accrual basis over employees’ estimated service periods. Pension expense calculated under SFAS No. 87 is generally independent of funding decisions or requirements.

 

The calculation of pension expense and the corresponding liability requires the use of a number of critical assumptions, including the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets and the assumed discount rate. Changes in these assumptions can result in different expense and liability amounts, and future actual experience can differ from these assumptions. Pension expense increases as the expected rate of return on pension plan assets decreases. Future changes in plan asset returns, assumed discount rates and various other factors related to the participants in the Company’s pension plans will impact the Company’s future pension expense and liabilities. The Company cannot predict with certainty what these factors will be in the future.

 

Income Taxes

 

The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. Deferred income taxes are provided for temporary differences between the amounts recognized for income tax and financial reporting purposes at currently enacted tax rates. The Company computes income tax expense by jurisdiction based on its operations in each jurisdiction.

 

The Company is periodically reviewed by U.S. domestic and foreign tax authorities regarding the amount of taxes due. These reviews typically include inquiries regarding the timing and amount of deductions and the allocation of income among various tax jurisdictions. In evaluating the exposure associated with various filing positions, the Company records estimated reserves for probable exposures, in accordance with FASB Interpretation (“FIN”) No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes – an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109.

 

Net Income Per Share

 

The Company computes net income per share under the provisions of SFAS No. 128, Earnings per Share, and Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) Issue No. 03-6, Participating Securities and Two — Class Method under FASB Statement No. 128, ‘Earnings per Share’. EITF Issue No. 03-6 requires that income per share for each class of common stock be calculated assuming 100% of the Company’s earnings are distributed as dividends to each class of common stock based on their respective dividend rights, even though the Company does not anticipate distributing 100% of its earnings as dividends. The Common Stock of the Company has a 25% dividend preference to the Class B Common Stock. The effective result is that the basic earnings per share for the Common Stock will be 25% greater than the basic earnings per share of the Class B Common Stock.

 

The Class B Common Stock may be converted at any time on a one-for-one basis into Common Stock at the option of the holder of the Class B Common Stock. Diluted earnings per share for the Company’s Common Stock assumes the conversion of all of the Company’s Class B Common Stock into Common Stock, full vesting of outstanding restricted stock, and the exercise of outstanding stock options under the Company’s stock based employee compensation plans.

 

The following table shows how net income is allocated using this method (in thousands):

 

 

The diluted earnings per share calculation assumes the conversion of all the Company’s Class B Common Stock into Common Stock, so no allocation of earnings to Class B Common Stock is required.

 

The following table illustrates the weighted average number of shares of Common Stock and Class B Common Stock shares outstanding during the thirteen and thirty-nine weeks ended May 30, 2009 and the thirteen and forty weeks ended May 31, 2008 and is utilized in the calculation of earnings per share (in thousands):

 

 

Stock options to purchase 274,100 shares of Common Stock were excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share for both the thirteen and thirty-nine weeks ended May 30, 2009, respectively, because they were anti-dilutive. Stock options to purchase 82,500 and 144,500 shares of Common Stock were excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share for the thirteen and forty weeks ended May 31, 2008, respectively, because they were anti-dilutive.

 

Share-Based Compensation

 

The Company adopted a stock incentive plan (the “Plan”) in November 1996 and has reserved 800,000 shares of Common Stock for issuance under the Plan. All options issued to management under the Plan are recommended to the Board of Directors by the Compensation Committee and approved by the Board of Directors. All awards issued to the Company’s non-employee members of the Board of Directors under the Plan are recommended to the Board of Directors by the Compensation Committee and approved by the Board of Directors. Stock options granted to non-employee directors are granted on the third business day following the annual shareholders' meeting. All options are exercisable at a price equal to the fair market value of the Company’s Common Stock on the date of grant.

 

Options granted prior to fiscal 2003 were subject to a proportional four-year vesting schedule and expire eight years from the grant date. Beginning in fiscal 2003, option grants are subject to a five-year cliff-vesting schedule under which options become vested or exercisable after five years from the date of grant and expire ten years after the grant date. Options granted to the Company’s non-employee directors are fully vested as of the date of grant. Prior to fiscal 2008, non-employee director grants expired ten years from the grant date. Beginning in fiscal 2008, non-employee director grants expire eight years after the grant date.

 

The Company accounts for its share-based compensation under the provisions of SFAS No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment. The fair value recognition provisions of this statement require that the share-based compensation cost be measured at the grant date based on the value of the award and be recognized as expense over the requisite service period, which is generally the vesting period. Determining the fair value of share-based awards at the grant date requires judgment, including estimating expected dividends, share price volatility and the amount of share-based awards that are expected to be forfeited. The fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model.

 

Compensation expense for all option grants is recognized ratably over the related vesting period. Certain options were granted during the thirty-nine weeks ended May 30, 2009 and the forty weeks ended May 31, 2008, respectively, to non-employee members of the Board of Directors of the Company, which were fully vested upon grant and expire eight years after the grant date. Accordingly, compensation expense related to these option grants in fiscal 2009 and 2008 were recognized on the date of grant. In January 2009, 12,000 shares of restricted stock were granted to the Company’s non-employee directors subject to vesting in full one year from the date of grant. In January 2008, 6,000 shares of restricted stock were granted to the Company's non-employee directors which became fully vested in January 2009. Share-based compensation, which includes stock option grants and restricted stock grants, has been recorded in the Consolidated Statements of Income in selling and administrative expenses.

 

For the thirteen and thirty-nine weeks ended May 30, 2009, there were 3,500 and 6,450 shares of Common Stock issued as a result of the exercise of Common Stock options, respectively. For the thirteen and forty weeks ended May 31, 2008, there were 17,275 and 23,775 shares of Common Stock issued as a result of the exercise of Common Stock options, respectively.

 

Foreign Currency Translation

 

The functional currency of our foreign operations is the local country’s currency. Transaction gains and losses, including gains and losses on our intercompany transactions, are included in other expense (income), in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Income. Assets and liabilities of operations outside the United States are translated into U.S. dollars using period-end exchange rates. Revenues and expenses are translated at the average exchange rates in effect during each month of the fiscal year. The effects of foreign currency translation adjustments are included in shareholders’ equity as a component of accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets.

 

Reclassifications

 

Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to current year presentation. These reclassifications did not impact current or historical net income or shareholders’ equity.

 

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

 

In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value under US GAAP and expands disclosure requirements about fair value measurements.  In February 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (“FSP”) No. 157-2 which delayed the effective date of SFAS No. 157 for all nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, except those that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis. The Company partially adopted SFAS No. 157 on August 31, 2008, as required.  The adoption of SFAS No. 157 for the Company’s financial assets and liabilities did not have a material impact on its results of operations or financial condition.  The Company is currently evaluating the impact, if any, the adoption of the delayed portion of SFAS No. 157 will have on its Consolidated Financial Statements. See Note 3, “Fair Value Measurements”, for further discussion on the Company’s adoption of SFAS No. 157.

 

In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. SFAS No. 161 amends SFAS No. 133 requiring enhanced disclosures about an entity’s derivative and hedging activities thereby improving the transparency of financial reporting. SFAS No. 161’s disclosures provide additional information on how and why derivative instruments are being used. SFAS No. 161 was effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008, with early application encouraged. The Company adopted SFAS No. 161 on March 1, 2009, and the adoption did not have a material impact on its financial statements. The adoption of SFAS No. 161 resulted in enhanced disclosure regarding the Company’s outstanding derivatives.

 

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007), Business Combinations, (“SFAS No. 141R”). SFAS No. 141R will change how business acquisitions are accounted for and will impact financial statements both on the acquisition date and in subsequent periods. SFAS No. 141R is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. Early adoption is not permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact, if any, SFAS No. 141R will have on its Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

In June 2008, the FASB issued a Staff Position on Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue No. 03-6-1, Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions are Participating Securities. EITF Issue No. 03-6-1 addresses whether instruments granted in share-based payment transactions are participating securities prior to vesting and therefore, need to be included in the earnings allocation in computing earnings per share. This consensus is effective for the Company’s fiscal year beginning August 30, 2009. The Company is currently evaluating the impact, if any, EITF Issue No. 03-6-1 will have on its Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

In April 2008, the FASB issued FSP No. 142-3, “Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets.” FSP No. 142-3 amends the factors that should be considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under SFAS No. 142. The intent of this FSP is to improve the consistency between the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under SFAS No. 142 and the period of expected cash flows used to measure the fair value of the asset under SFAS No. 141, and other U.S. GAAP. FSP No. 142-3 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and may not be adopted early. The Company is currently evaluating the impact, if any, that FSP No. 142-3 may have on its Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

2. Acquisitions

 

During the thirty-nine weeks ended May 30, 2009, the Company completed nine acquisitions with an aggregate purchase price of approximately $3.4 million. The results of operations of these acquisitions have been included in the Company’s consolidated financial results since their respective acquisition dates. None of these acquisitions was significant in relation to the Company’s consolidated financial results and, therefore, pro forma financial information has not been presented.

 

3. Fair Value Measurements

 

The Company adopted SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, on August 31, 2008. SFAS No. 157 defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.  SFAS No. 157 establishes a three-level fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value. This hierarchy requires entities to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. The three levels of inputs used to measure fair value are as follows:

 

 

 

 

All financial assets or liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis (at least annually) have been segregated into the most appropriate level within the fair value hierarchy based on the inputs used to determine the fair value at the measurement date.  These assets or liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized in the table below (in thousands):

 

 

4. Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities

 

The Company accounts for its derivative instruments in accordance with SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. In January 2008, the Company entered into an interest rate swap agreement to manage its exposure to interest rate movements and the related effect on its variable rate debt. The Company concluded that the interest rate swap met the criteria to qualify as a cash flow hedge under SFAS No. 133. Accordingly, the Company has reflected all changes in the fair value of the swap agreement in accrued liabilities and accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income, a component of shareholders’ equity. The swap agreement, with a notional amount of $100.0 million, matures on March 14, 2011. The Company pays a fixed rate of 3.51% and receives a variable rate tied to the three month LIBOR rate.

 

As of May 30, 2009, the Company had recorded the fair value of the interest rate swap of $3.9 million in accrued liabilities and a corresponding loss of $2.3 million in accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income, which was net of the associated tax benefit. As of August 30, 2008, the amounts recorded in accrued liabilities and other comprehensive income were $0.3 million and $0.2 million, respectively. Of the $2.3 million loss deferred in accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income as of May 30, 2009, a $1.6 million loss is expected to be reclassified to interest expense in the next twelve months.

 

The Company has recorded any realized gains or losses from its interest rate swap as an adjustment to interest expense in its Consolidated Statements of Income. For the thirteen weeks ended May 30, 2009 and May 31, 2008, the Company reclassified a loss from accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income into interest expense totaling $0.5 million and $0.3 million, respectively. For the thirty-nine weeks ended May 30, 2009 and the forty weeks ended May 31, 2008, the Company reclassified a loss from accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income into interest expense of $0.9 million and $0.3, respectively.

 

5. Employee Benefit Plans

 

Defined Contribution Retirement Savings Plan

 

The Company has a defined contribution retirement savings plan with a 401(k) feature for all eligible employees not under collective bargaining agreements. The Company matches a portion of the employee’s contribution and can make an additional contribution at its discretion. Contributions charged to expense under the plan for the thirteen weeks ended May 30, 2009 and May 31, 2008, were $4.6 million and $2.6 million, respectively. Contributions charged to expense under the plan for the thirty-nine weeks ended May 30, 2009 and the forty weeks ended May 31, 2008 were $10.3 million and $8.0 million, respectively.

 

Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan and Other Pension Plans

 

The Company maintains an unfunded Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan for certain eligible employees of the Company, a non-contributory defined benefit pension plan covering union employees at one of its locations, and a frozen pension plan the Company assumed in connection with its acquisition of Textilease Corporation in fiscal 2004. For both the thirteen weeks ended May 30, 2009 and May 31, 2008, the amount charged to expense related to these plans was $0.4 million. For the thirty-nine weeks ended May 30, 2009 and the forty weeks ended May 31, 2008, the amounts charged to expense related to these plans were $1.3 million and $1.1 million, respectively.

 

6. Asset Retirement Obligations

 

The Company accounts for its asset retirement obligations under the provisions of SFAS No. 143, which generally applies to legal obligations associated with the retirement of long-lived assets that result from the acquisition, construction, development and/or the normal operation of a long-lived asset. Accordingly, the Company recognizes asset retirement obligations in the period in which they are incurred if a reasonable estimate of fair value can be made. The associated asset retirement costs are capitalized as part of the carrying amount of the long-lived asset. The Company continues to depreciate, on a straight-line basis, the amount added to property and equipment and recognizes accretion expense in connection with the discounted liability over the various remaining lives which range from approximately one to twenty-two years.

 

A reconciliation of the Company’s asset retirement liability is as follows (in thousands):

 

 

As of May 30, 2009, the $8.1 million asset retirement obligation is included in accrued liabilities in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheet.

 

7. Commitments and Contingencies

 

The Company and its operations are subject to various federal, state and local laws and regulations governing, among other things, the generation, handling, storage, transportation, treatment and disposal of hazardous waste and other substances. In particular, industrial laundries use and must dispose of detergent waste water and other residues, and, in the past used perchloroethylene and other dry cleaning solvents. The Company is attentive to the environmental concerns surrounding the disposal of these materials and has, through the years, taken measures to avoid their improper disposal. In the past, the Company has settled, or contributed to the settlement of, actions or claims brought against the Company relating to the disposal of hazardous materials and there can be no assurance that the Company will not have to expend material amounts to remediate the consequences of any such disposal in the future.

 

Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States require that a liability for contingencies be recorded when it is probable that a liability has occurred and the amount of the liability can be reasonably estimated. Significant judgment is required to determine the existence of a liability, as well as the amount to be recorded. The Company regularly consults with attorneys and outside consultants, in its consideration of the relevant facts and circumstances, before recording contingent liability. Changes in enacted laws, regulatory orders or decrees, management’s estimates of costs, insurance proceeds, participation by other parties, the timing of payments and the input of outside consultants and attorneys based on changing legal or factual circumstances could have a material impact on the amounts recorded for environmental and other contingent liabilities.

 

Under environmental laws, an owner or lessee of real estate may be liable for the costs of removal or remediation of certain hazardous or toxic substances located on, or in, or emanating from, such property, as well as related costs of investigation and property damage. Such laws often impose liability without regard to whether the owner or lessee knew of, or was responsible for the presence of such hazardous or toxic substances. There can be no assurances that acquired or leased locations have been operated in compliance with environmental laws and regulations or that future uses or conditions will not result in the imposition of liability upon the Company under such laws or expose the Company to third-party actions such as tort suits. The Company continues to address environmental conditions under terms of consent orders negotiated with the applicable environmental authorities or otherwise with respect to sites located in or related to Woburn, Massachusetts, Somerville, Massachusetts, Springfield, Massachusetts, Uvalde, Texas, Stockton, California, three sites related to former operations in Williamstown, Vermont, as well as a number of additional locations that it acquired as part of its acquisition of Textilease Corporation in September 2003.

 

The Company has accrued certain costs related to the sites described above as it has been determined that the costs are probable and can be reasonably estimated. The Company continues to implement mitigation measures and to monitor environmental conditions at the Somerville, Massachusetts site. The Company also has potential exposure related to an additional parcel of land (the “Central Area”) related to the Woburn, Massachusetts site discussed above. Currently, the consent order for the Woburn, Massachusetts site discussed above does not define or require any remediation work in the Central Area. The Company recently received written comments from the United States Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) requesting additional information and response actions with respect to both its property at the Woburn site and the Central Area. These comments are being reviewed with the EPA and other parties to the decree, and they are not yet final. The Company has accrued costs to perform certain work responsive to the EPA’s comments.

 

The Company routinely reviews and evaluates sites that may require remediation and monitoring and determines its estimated costs based on various estimates and assumptions. These estimates are developed using its internal sources or by third party environmental engineers or other service providers. Internally developed estimates are based on:

 

 

There is usually a range of reasonable estimates of the costs associated with each site. The Company’s accruals reflect the amount within the range that constitutes its best estimate. Where it believes that both the amount of a particular liability and the timing of the payments are reliably determinable, the Company adjusts the cost in current dollars using a rate of 3% for inflation until the time of expected payment and discounts the cost to present value using risk-free rates of interest ranging from 3.5% to 4.3%.

 

For environmental liabilities that have been discounted, the Company includes interest accretion, based on the effective interest method, in selling and administrative expenses on the Consolidated Statements of Income. The changes to the Company’s environmental liabilities for the thirty-nine weeks ended May 30, 2009 were as follows (in thousands):

 

 

For the thirty-nine weeks ended May 30, 2009 the Company increased its environmental accrual by approximately $3.2 million primarily due to adjustments to increase the Company's environmental reserves related to ongoing investigations at two of its environmental exposure sites. Anticipated payments and insurance proceeds of currently identified environmental remediation liabilities as of May 30, 2009, for the next five fiscal years and thereafter, as measured in current dollars, are reflected below (in thousands).

 

 

Estimated insurance proceeds are primarily received from an annuity received as part of a legal settlement with an insurance company. Annual proceeds of approximately $0.3 million are deposited into an escrow account which funds remediation and monitoring costs for three sites related to former operations in Williamstown, Vermont. Annual proceeds received but not expended in the current year accumulate in this account and may be used in future years for costs related to this site through the year 2027. As of May 30, 2009, the balance in this escrow account, which is held in a trust and is not recorded on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet, was approximately $2.8 million. Also included in estimated insurance proceeds are amounts the Company is entitled to receive pursuant to legal settlements as reimbursements from three insurance companies for estimated costs at the site in Uvalde, Texas.

 

The Company’s nuclear garment decontamination facilities are licensed by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (“NRC”), or, in certain cases, by the applicable state agency, and are subject to regulation by federal, state and local authorities. There can be no assurance that such regulation will not lead to material disruptions in the Company’s garment decontamination business.

 

From time to time, the Company is also subject to legal proceedings and claims arising from the conduct of its business operations, including litigation related to charges for certain ancillary services on invoices, personal injury claims, customer contract matters, employment claims and environmental matters as described above.

 

While it is impossible to ascertain the ultimate legal and financial liability with respect to contingent liabilities, including lawsuits and environmental contingencies, the Company believes that the aggregate amount of such liabilities, if any, in excess of amounts accrued or covered by insurance, will not have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial position and/or results of operations of the Company. It is possible, however, that future financial position or results of operations for any particular period could be materially affected by changes in the Company’s assumptions or strategies related to these contingencies or changes out of the Company’s control.

 

8. Income Taxes

 

The Company’s effective income tax rate was 39.3% and 40.5% for the thirteen and thirty-nine weeks ended May 30, 2009, respectively, as compared to 39.1% and 38.7% for the thirteen and forty weeks ended May 31, 2008, respectively. The increases were primarily due to changes in the Company’s reserves for income tax exposures as well as an increase in U.S. state income taxes compared to the prior year.

 

The Company has a significant portion of its operations in the United States and Canada.  It is required to file federal income tax returns as well as state income tax returns in a majority of the U.S. states and also in the Canadian provinces of Alberta, British Columbia, Ontario, Saskatchewan and Quebec.  At times, the Company is subject to audits in these jurisdictions, which typically are inherently complex and can require several years to resolve. The final resolution of any such tax audit could result in either a reduction in the Company’s accruals or an increase in its income tax provision, both of which could have a material impact on the consolidated results of operations in any given period.

 

All U.S. and Canadian federal income tax examinations have substantially concluded through fiscal years 2004 and 2001, respectively. With a few exceptions, the Company is no longer subject to state and local income tax examinations for periods prior to fiscal 2003. The Company is not aware of any tax positions for which it is reasonably possible that the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits will change significantly in the next 12 months.

 

As of May 30, 2009, there was $2.2 million in unrecognized tax benefits, which if recognized, would reduce the Company’s effective tax rate.  The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions as a component of income tax expense which is consistent with the recognition of these items in prior reporting periods. As of May 30, 2009, the Company had accrued a total of $1.7 million in interest and penalties in its current accrued liabilities.

 

9. Long-Term Obligations

 

The Company has a $225.0 million unsecured revolving credit agreement (“Credit Agreement”) with a syndicate of banks, which matures on September 13, 2011. Under the Credit Agreement, the Company is able to borrow funds at variable interest rates based on the Eurodollar rate or the bank’s prime rate, as selected by the Company. Availability of credit requires compliance with certain financial and other covenants, including a maximum funded debt ratio and minimum interest coverage as defined in the Credit Agreement. The Company generally tests its compliance with these financial covenants on a fiscal quarterly basis. At May 30, 2009, the interest rates applicable to the Company’s borrowings under the Credit Agreement were calculated as LIBOR plus 50 basis points at the time of the respective borrowings and ranged from 0.85% to 3.25%. As of May 30, 2009 the Company had outstanding borrowings of approximately $12.0 million, outstanding letters of credit amounting to $35.7 million and $177.3 million available for borrowing. Subsequent to the quarter ended May 30, 2009, the Company repaid the remaining $12.0 million on its line of credit under the Credit Agreement. As a result, the Company has classified this amount within current maturities of long-term obligations.

 

On June 14, 2004, the Company issued $75.0 million of fixed rate notes pursuant to a Note Purchase Agreement (“2004 Note Agreement”) with a seven year term (June 2011) and bearing interest at 5.27%. The Company also issued $90.0 million of floating rate notes which were repaid in September 2005 and September 2006.

 

On September 14, 2006, the Company issued $100.0 million of floating rates notes (“Floating Rate Notes”) pursuant to a Note Purchase Agreement (“2006 Note Agreement”). The Floating Rate Notes mature on September 14, 2013, bear interest at LIBOR plus 50 basis points and may be repaid at face value two years from the date of issuance. The proceeds from the issuance of the Floating Rate Notes were used to first repay the outstanding floating rate notes under the 2004 Note Agreement in the amount of $75.0 million and then to pay down outstanding amounts under the Credit Agreement.

 

As of May 30, 2009, the Company was in compliance with all covenants under the 2004 Note Agreement, 2006 Note Agreement and the Credit Agreement.

 

10. Shareholders’ Equity

 

The Company has two classes of common stock: Common Stock and Class B Common Stock. Each share of Common Stock is entitled to one vote, is freely transferable, and is entitled to a cash dividend equal to 125% of any cash dividend paid on each share of Class B Common Stock. Each share of Class B Common Stock is entitled to ten votes and can be converted to Common Stock on a share-for-share basis. However, until converted to Common Stock shares of Class B Common Stock are not freely transferable.

 

For the thirty-nine weeks ended May 30, 2009, there were 2,000 shares of Class B Common Stock converted to Common Stock. For the forty weeks ended May 31, 2008, there were 80 shares of Class B Common Stock converted to Common Stock.

 

11. Comprehensive Income

 

The components of comprehensive income are as follows (in thousands):

 

 

12. Segment Reporting

 

SFAS No. 131, Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information, establishes standards for reporting information regarding operating segments in annual financial statements and requires selected information of those segments to be presented in interim financial reports issued to shareholders. Operating segments are identified as components of an enterprise for which separate discrete financial information is available for evaluation by the chief operating decision-maker, or decision-making group, in making decisions on how to allocate resources and assess performance. The Company’s chief operating decision maker, as defined under SFAS No. 131, is the Company’s chief executive officer. The Company has six operating segments based on the information reviewed by its chief executive officer; US Rental and Cleaning, Canadian Rental and Cleaning, Manufacturing (MFG), Corporate, Specialty Garments Rental and Cleaning (Specialty Garments) and First Aid. The US Rental and Cleaning and Canadian Rental and Cleaning operating segments have been combined to form the US and Canadian Rental and Cleaning reporting segment, and as a result, the Company has five reporting segments.

 

The US and Canadian Rental and Cleaning reporting segment purchases, rents, cleans, delivers and sells, uniforms and protective clothing and non-garment items in the United States and Canada. The laundry locations of the US and Canadian Rental and Cleaning reporting segment are referred to by the Company as “industrial laundries” or “industrial laundry locations.”

 

The MFG operating segment designs and manufactures uniforms and non-garment items solely for the purpose of providing these goods to the US and Canadian Rental and Cleaning reporting segment. MFG revenues are generated when goods are shipped from the Company’s manufacturing facilities to other Company locations. These revenues are recorded at a transfer price which is typically in excess of the actual manufacturing cost. The transfer price is determined by management and may not necessarily represent the fair value of the products manufactured. Products are carried in inventory and subsequently placed in service and amortized at this transfer price. On a consolidated basis, intercompany revenues and income are eliminated and the carrying value of inventories and rental merchandise in service is reduced to the manufacturing cost. Income before income taxes from MFG net of the intercompany MFG elimination offsets the merchandise amortization costs incurred by the US and Canadian Rental and Cleaning reporting segment as the merchandise costs of this reporting segment are amortized and recognized based on inventories purchased from MFG at the transfer price which is above the Company’s manufacturing cost.

 

The Corporate operating segment consists of costs associated with the Company’s distribution center, sales and marketing, information systems, engineering, materials management, manufacturing planning, finance, budgeting, human resources, other general and administrative costs and interest expense. The revenues generated from the Corporate operating segment represent certain direct sales made by the Company directly from its distribution center. The products sold by this operating segment are the same products rented and sold by the US and Canadian Rental and Cleaning reporting segment. In the table below, no assets or capital expenditures are presented for the Corporate operating segment because no assets are allocated to this operating segment in the information reviewed by the chief executive officer. However, depreciation and amortization expense related to certain assets are reflected in income from operations and income before income taxes for the Corporate operating segment. The assets that give rise to this depreciation and amortization are included in the total assets of the US and Canadian Rental and Cleaning reporting segment as this is how they are tracked and reviewed by the Company. The majority of expenses accounted for within the Corporate segment relate to costs of the US and Canadian Rental and Cleaning segment, with the remainder of the costs relating to the Specialty Garment and First Aid segments.

 

The Specialty Garments operating segment purchases, rents, cleans, delivers and sells, specialty garments and non-garment items primarily for nuclear and clean room applications. The First Aid operating segment sells first aid cabinet services and other safety supplies.

 

The Company refers to the US and Canadian Rental and Cleaning, MFG, and Corporate reporting segments combined as its “core laundry operations,” which is included as a subtotal in the following table (in thousands):

 

Interest (income)  expense, net	$	(558	)	$	—		$	—		$	2,550		$	1,992		$	—		$	—		$	1,992
Income (loss) before taxes	$	34,704		$	8,175		$	(902	)	$	(16,170	)	$	25,807		$	1,946		$	45		$	27,798

 

 

The Company’s long-lived assets as of May 30, 2009 and August 30, 2008, the Company’s revenues and income before income taxes for the thirteen weeks ended May 30, 2009 and May 31, 2008, as well as the Company’s revenues and income before income taxes for the thirty-nine and forty weeks ended May 30, 2009 and May 31, 2008, respectively, were attributed to the following countries (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

 

SAFE HARBOR FOR FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS

 

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and any documents incorporated by reference may contain forward looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws. Forward looking statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and any documents