Add a New Bears Reason

Company: United Parcel Service (UPS)
Current price:
Headline: (100 character max)
Analysis:
Cancel
89%
agree
59 votes

edit UPS HAS POOR, WEAK AND INEPT MANAGEMENT

Ever since the teamsters strike in 1997 when management thought they could break the teamsters union, but instead got crushed and ran home like puppies with their tails between their legs, UPS management has continually made one bad decision after another. They eventually will own the teamsters pension fund and just like GM and Chrysler need the U.S. tax payers to bail them out. Managers at UPS have very little common sense and worry more about their pay checks and bonuses than their customers. So many times I toured their so called "hubs" and could not believe what I saw. I visited one in Hartford, CT and witnessed hundreds of packages destroyed or crushed in a four hour shift. I also saw many packages stepped on, thrown and drop kicked. I brought this to several managers attention and they tried to tell me this was an "industrial engineering" problem and I would have to speak with those managers. I can't beleive OSHA has not shut this place down because I also many employees injured on the job and these supervisors just ignored them and continued to try to get the "last package" done. UPS has many law suits for racial and sexual discrimination and is even being sued by its own store--the UPS Store for unfair business practices. UPS is the perfect example of corporate greed, incompetence and unaccountability and will soon join GM, AIG, and Lehman Brothers on the corporated dung heap.

(100 character max) Cancel
79%
agree
81 votes

edit UPS faces risk of management flight

For decades UPS management has enjoyed better compensation packages than its competitors--or even management in other industries--but after the 1999 IPO, management has increasingly lost the "culture of ownership" that dominated the company since its founding: after the Enron collapse many in management are reluctant to hold their UPS stock to retirement, as the company encourages. With fewer incentives to stay with UPS, management will bleed to other industries, leaving the remaining management of the company weakened.

(100 character max) Cancel
90%
agree
54 votes

edit UPS warns about lower than expected 2nd quarter in 2009

United Parcel Service Inc (UPS) warned that its second-quarter outlook would likely fall below analysts’ expectations and reported lower-than-expected profit as fewer packages shipped amid the global economic downturn, sending its shares down as much as 7.5% yesterday (Thursday), Reuters reported. The U.S. economic bellwether and said that while the economic recovery could begin as soon as the end of this year, it would more likely come in 2010.

(100 character max) Cancel
0%
agree
0 votes

edit UPS HAS POOR CUSTOMER SERVICE AND CARES LITTLE ABOUT ITS CUSTOMERS AND EMPLOYEES

UPS is by far the most uncustomer friendly, rudest, arrogant, unethical, dishonest, greedy, irrational, uneducated and ignorant shiiping company in the shipping busniness. I have never been so disrespected and insulted by any company or its employees in my life. Phone calls and complaints rarely get answered and when they do there is no resolution to the problem. Many times I have been sitting at home waiting for a package to be delivered and witnessed drivers just dropping their pakcages without ringing or knocking on my door. Other times they claim to have made delivery attempts when they really haven't. Management seems afraid of their employees and is afraid of disciplining them yet they always blame them and refuse to accept accountability or responsibility for anything. Do yourself and your customers a favor ship Fedex or the USPS.

(100 character max) Cancel
25%
agree
20 votes

edit Too much cost cutting will hurt customers and employes

lots of cost cutting means more packages will not get to the customer when they are suppose to. Lots of cost cutting means even more of a work load on remaining employes not to mention faded uniforms and even dirtier trucks

(100 character max) Cancel
13%
agree
15 votes

edit Labor and fuel costs continue to hamper the company's bottom line

Labor and fuel costs continue to hamper the company's bottom line (fuel costs represent only 5-7% of operating expenses each year, too little to be a driver of growth or share price). There is a bright side: UPS is a large investor in alternative fuel vehicle research, and problems with Teamster mismanagement of pensions has left the union with few chips at the bargaining table. Despite this, UPS's fleet will remain gasoline-powered for the foreseeable future and the Teamster union will continue to push labor costs upward.

UPS hasn't made a public pronouncement yet about lower quarterly profit expectations (as opposed to FedEx, which did make an announcement like that on May 12th) and the average quarterly earnings estimate of analysts that follow the company is presently in the range of $0.96 to $1.05 per share this quarter. On an annual basis, UPS is expected to earn around $4.07 per share this year (2008 average estimate of 18 analysts) although this number has been reduced lately from a target of $4.44 per share ninety days ago. Next year's estimates (2009's) have also been cut from a level of nearly $5.00 per share to a standing $4.64 average expectation now. We think there's more downside to these estimates.

Y-O-Y growth in top line sales estimates appears to be around 6% to 7% on UPS current revenue run rate of approximately $52 billion in sales per year. Like FDX, we think that while showing an increase over 2008's fiscal year results, UPS will struggle to maintain its profits or even show profit growth in an environment of such sharply rising fuel costs. We are convinced that margins are going to be compressed in this industry, even if UPS or its competitors try to pass on the costs to consumers with fuel surcharges.

(100 character max) Cancel
7%
agree
13 votes

edit UPS faces increased competition from DHL

UPS faces increased competition in its core U.S. market and emerging European market from DHL. While diversifying the company through acquisitions gives it leverage in the expanding global market, it has frequently come at the expense of the quality of the U.S. market that drives its profits.

(100 character max) Cancel
 
Worried about pump and dump?
We review changes
for stock spam
Want to make Wikinvest better?
We need your help,
contribute today
Do you write software?
We are recruiting
the best engineers
Like Wikinvest?
Spread the word —
Tell your friends!
Wikinvest © 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009. Use of this site is subject to express Terms of Service, Privacy Policy, and Disclaimer. By continuing past this page, you agree to abide by these terms. Any information provided by Wikinvest, including but not limited to company data, competitors, business analysis, market share, sales revenues and other operating metrics, earnings call analysis, conference call transcripts, industry information, or price targets should not be construed as research, trading tips or recommendations, or investment advice and is provided with no warrants as to its accuracy. Stock market data, including US and International equity symbols, stock quotes, share prices, earnings ratios, and other fundamental data is provided by data partners. Stock market quotes delayed at least 15 minutes for NASDAQ, 20 mins for NYSE and AMEX. See data providers for more details. Company names, products, services and branding cited herein may be trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective owners. The use of trademarks or service marks of another is not a representation that the other is affiliated with, sponsors, is sponsored by, endorses, or is endorsed by Wikinvest.
Powered by MediaWiki