VFC » Topics » Competitive Compensation Targets

This excerpt taken from the VFC DEF 14A filed Mar 20, 2009.
Competitive Compensation Targets
 
The Committee used information provided by Towers Perrin from its executive compensation database, which includes executive compensation data for over 800 U.S.-based companies (the “Comparison Data”), to establish compensation targets for 2008. The Comparison Data was provided by Towers Perrin on an aggregated basis. Due to significant variance in size among the companies in the Comparison Data, Towers Perrin used regression analysis to size-adjust the compensation data to VF’s approximate annual revenue range. Towers Perrin presents the size-adjusted data to the Committee. The Committee does not receive or


16


 

use information on any subset of the database and the Committee is not aware of the identities of the individual companies in the database. The Committee utilizes that data to establish compensation targets. In addition, the Committee evaluated compensation data regarding an industry group of publicly traded apparel/retail companies (collectively, the “Industry Group”) to assure the Committee that the compensation targets were reasonable as compared to companies representative of those most likely to compete with VF for executive talent. The companies that comprised VF’s Industry Group in 2008 were Columbia Sportswear Company, The Gap, Inc., Guess, Inc., Jones Apparel Group, Inc., Kellwood Company, Limited Brands, Inc., Liz Claiborne, Inc., NIKE, Inc., Polo Ralph Lauren Corporation, The Talbots, Inc., The Timberland Company and Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation. In setting target levels of compensation, the Committee uses the aggregate Comparison Data provided by Towers Perrin as its principal tool because it is both broader and more specific than available data for the narrower Industry Group.
 
The Compensation Committee sets total direct compensation (base salary, target annual cash incentive awards and target long-term equity incentive award values) for senior executives generally between the 50th and 75th percentile of the Comparison Data. For 2008, the target compensation was not above this range for any named executive officer for whom the Committee established a target. The Committee considers the scope of the executive’s duties, the executive’s experience in his or her role and individual performance relative to his or her peers to establish the appropriate point within that range of percentiles. The Committee believes that it should set total direct compensation targets for VF’s senior executives within this range to appropriately motivate and reward strong performance and retain top talent at a reasonable cost to VF as indicated by the available data. The Committee targets total direct compensation for each VF executive officer to be competitive with compensation paid to executives in comparable positions according to the Comparison Data based on targeted performance goals established by the Committee. Based on the Committee members’ evaluation of VF’s Chief Executive Officer and other executive officers, and on their assessment of the value to VF of each individual and the risks to VF of losing individuals viewed as key to VF’s short-term and long-term success, the Committee may position each executive’s total direct compensation above, within or below the targeted range. Benefits are set at levels intended to be competitive but are not included in the Committee’s evaluation of total direct compensation.
 
The components of the target total direct compensation opportunity for each executive set by the Committee annually are short-term cash compensation (annual base salary and target non-equity incentives) and long-term equity compensation (stock options and RSUs). The Committee generally allocates between total cash compensation and equity compensation based on the analysis provided by its compensation consultants to be competitive with the Comparison Data and the Industry Group. The Committee also considers historical compensation levels, relative compensation levels among VF’s senior executives, and VF’s corporate performance as compared to performance of companies in VF’s Industry Group.
 
This excerpt taken from the VFC DEF 14A filed Mar 17, 2008.
Competitive Compensation Targets
 
The Committee used information provided by its outside compensation consultant regarding the consultant’s executive compensation database, which includes executive compensation data for over 800 U.S.-based companies (the “Comparison Group”), to establish compensation targets for 2007. The Comparison Group data was provided on an aggregated basis. Due to significant variance in size among the companies in the Comparison Group, the compensation consultant used regression analysis to adjust the compensation data for differences in revenues among the companies. In addition, the Committee evaluated compensation data regarding an industry group of publicly traded apparel/retail companies (collectively, the “Industry Group”) to assure the Committee that the compensation targets were reasonable as compared to companies identified by management as representative of those most likely to compete with VF for executive talent. The companies that comprised VF’s Industry Group in 2007 were The Gap, Inc., Jones Apparel Group, Inc., Kellwood Company, Limited Brands, Inc., Liz Claiborne, Inc., NIKE, Inc., Polo Ralph Lauren Corporation, Quiksilver, Inc., The Talbots, Inc., The Timberland Company, Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation and Russell Corporation. Seven of the 16 companies within the S&P Apparel, Accessories and Luxury Goods Index for 2007 (including VF) are also in the Industry Group. In setting target levels of compensation, the Committee uses the Comparison Group as its principal benchmarking tool


17


 

because it is both broader and more detailed than available data for the narrower and more disparate Industry Group.
 
The Compensation Committee sets total direct compensation (base salary, target annual cash incentive awards and target long-term equity incentive award values) for senior executives generally between the 50th and 75th percentile of VF’s Comparison Group. The Committee considers the scope of the executive’s duties, the executive’s experience in his or her role and individual performance relative to his or her peers to establish the appropriate point within that range of percentiles. The Committee believes that it should set total direct compensation targets for VF’s senior executives within this range to appropriately motivate and reward strong performance and retain top talent at a reasonable cost to VF as indicated by the available data. The Committee targets total direct compensation for each VF executive officer to be competitive with compensation paid to executives in comparable positions within VF’s Comparison Group based on targeted performance goals established by the Committee. Based on the Committee members’ experience with VF’s Chief Executive Officer and other executive officers, and on their assessment of the value to VF of each individual and the risks to VF of losing individuals viewed as key to VF’s short-term and long-term success, the Committee may position each executive’s total compensation above, within or below the targeted range. Benefits are set at levels intended to be competitive but are not included in the Committee’s evaluation of total direct compensation.
 
The components of the target total direct compensation opportunity for each executive set by the Committee annually are short-term cash compensation (annual base salary and target non-equity incentives) and long-term equity compensation (stock options and RSUs). The Committee generally allocates between total cash compensation and equity compensation based on the analysis provided by the compensation consultant to be competitive with VF’s Comparison Group and Industry Group. The Committee also considers historical compensation levels, relative compensation levels among VF’s senior executives, and VF’s corporate performance as compared to performance of companies in VF’s Industry Group.
 
Wikinvest © 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012. Use of this site is subject to express Terms of Service, Privacy Policy, and Disclaimer. By continuing past this page, you agree to abide by these terms. Any information provided by Wikinvest, including but not limited to company data, competitors, business analysis, market share, sales revenues and other operating metrics, earnings call analysis, conference call transcripts, industry information, or price targets should not be construed as research, trading tips or recommendations, or investment advice and is provided with no warrants as to its accuracy. Stock market data, including US and International equity symbols, stock quotes, share prices, earnings ratios, and other fundamental data is provided by data partners. Stock market quotes delayed at least 15 minutes for NASDAQ, 20 mins for NYSE and AMEX. Market data by Xignite. See data providers for more details. Company names, products, services and branding cited herein may be trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective owners. The use of trademarks or service marks of another is not a representation that the other is affiliated with, sponsors, is sponsored by, endorses, or is endorsed by Wikinvest.
Powered by MediaWiki