|
|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
This excerpt taken from the VFC DEF 14A filed Mar 20, 2009. Competitive
Compensation Targets
The Committee used information provided by Towers Perrin from
its executive compensation database, which includes executive
compensation data for over 800
U.S.-based
companies (the Comparison Data), to establish
compensation targets for 2008. The Comparison Data was provided
by Towers Perrin on an aggregated basis. Due to significant
variance in size among the companies in the Comparison Data,
Towers Perrin used regression analysis to size-adjust the
compensation data to VFs approximate annual revenue range.
Towers Perrin presents the size-adjusted data to the Committee.
The Committee does not receive or
use information on any subset of the database and the Committee
is not aware of the identities of the individual companies in
the database. The Committee utilizes that data to establish
compensation targets. In addition, the Committee evaluated
compensation data regarding an industry group of publicly traded
apparel/retail companies (collectively, the Industry
Group) to assure the Committee that the compensation
targets were reasonable as compared to companies representative
of those most likely to compete with VF for executive talent.
The companies that comprised VFs Industry Group in 2008
were Columbia Sportswear Company, The Gap, Inc., Guess, Inc.,
Jones Apparel Group, Inc., Kellwood Company, Limited Brands,
Inc., Liz Claiborne, Inc., NIKE, Inc., Polo Ralph Lauren
Corporation, The Talbots, Inc., The Timberland Company and
Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation. In setting target levels of
compensation, the Committee uses the aggregate Comparison Data
provided by Towers Perrin as its principal tool because it is
both broader and more specific than available data for the
narrower Industry Group.
The Compensation Committee sets total direct compensation (base
salary, target annual cash incentive awards and target long-term
equity incentive award values) for senior executives generally
between the 50th and 75th percentile of the Comparison
Data. For 2008, the target compensation was not above this range
for any named executive officer for whom the Committee
established a target. The Committee considers the scope of the
executives duties, the executives experience in his
or her role and individual performance relative to his or her
peers to establish the appropriate point within that range of
percentiles. The Committee believes that it should set total
direct compensation targets for VFs senior executives
within this range to appropriately motivate and reward strong
performance and retain top talent at a reasonable cost to VF as
indicated by the available data. The Committee targets total
direct compensation for each VF executive officer to be
competitive with compensation paid to executives in comparable
positions according to the Comparison Data based on targeted
performance goals established by the Committee. Based on the
Committee members evaluation of VFs Chief Executive
Officer and other executive officers, and on their assessment of
the value to VF of each individual and the risks to VF of losing
individuals viewed as key to VFs short-term and long-term
success, the Committee may position each executives total
direct compensation above, within or below the targeted range.
Benefits are set at levels intended to be competitive but are
not included in the Committees evaluation of total direct
compensation.
The components of the target total direct compensation
opportunity for each executive set by the Committee annually are
short-term cash compensation (annual base salary and target
non-equity incentives) and long-term equity compensation (stock
options and RSUs). The Committee generally allocates between
total cash compensation and equity compensation based on the
analysis provided by its compensation consultants to be
competitive with the Comparison Data and the Industry Group. The
Committee also considers historical compensation levels,
relative compensation levels among VFs senior executives,
and VFs corporate performance as compared to performance
of companies in VFs Industry Group.
This excerpt taken from the VFC DEF 14A filed Mar 17, 2008. Competitive
Compensation Targets
The Committee used information provided by its outside
compensation consultant regarding the consultants
executive compensation database, which includes executive
compensation data for over 800
U.S.-based
companies (the Comparison Group), to establish
compensation targets for 2007. The Comparison Group data was
provided on an aggregated basis. Due to significant variance in
size among the companies in the Comparison Group, the
compensation consultant used regression analysis to adjust the
compensation data for differences in revenues among the
companies. In addition, the Committee evaluated compensation
data regarding an industry group of publicly traded
apparel/retail companies (collectively, the Industry
Group) to assure the Committee that the compensation
targets were reasonable as compared to companies identified by
management as representative of those most likely to compete
with VF for executive talent. The companies that comprised
VFs Industry Group in 2007 were The Gap, Inc., Jones
Apparel Group, Inc., Kellwood Company, Limited Brands, Inc., Liz
Claiborne, Inc., NIKE, Inc., Polo Ralph Lauren Corporation,
Quiksilver, Inc., The Talbots, Inc., The Timberland Company,
Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation and Russell Corporation. Seven
of the 16 companies within the S&P Apparel,
Accessories and Luxury Goods Index for 2007 (including VF) are
also in the Industry Group. In setting target levels of
compensation, the Committee uses the Comparison Group as its
principal benchmarking tool
because it is both broader and more detailed than available data
for the narrower and more disparate Industry Group.
The Compensation Committee sets total direct compensation (base
salary, target annual cash incentive awards and target long-term
equity incentive award values) for senior executives generally
between the 50th and 75th percentile of VFs
Comparison Group. The Committee considers the scope of the
executives duties, the executives experience in his
or her role and individual performance relative to his or her
peers to establish the appropriate point within that range of
percentiles. The Committee believes that it should set total
direct compensation targets for VFs senior executives
within this range to appropriately motivate and reward strong
performance and retain top talent at a reasonable cost to VF as
indicated by the available data. The Committee targets total
direct compensation for each VF executive officer to be
competitive with compensation paid to executives in comparable
positions within VFs Comparison Group based on targeted
performance goals established by the Committee. Based on the
Committee members experience with VFs Chief
Executive Officer and other executive officers, and on their
assessment of the value to VF of each individual and the risks
to VF of losing individuals viewed as key to VFs
short-term and long-term success, the Committee may position
each executives total compensation above, within or below
the targeted range. Benefits are set at levels intended to be
competitive but are not included in the Committees
evaluation of total direct compensation.
The components of the target total direct compensation
opportunity for each executive set by the Committee annually are
short-term cash compensation (annual base salary and target
non-equity incentives) and long-term equity compensation (stock
options and RSUs). The Committee generally allocates between
total cash compensation and equity compensation based on the
analysis provided by the compensation consultant to be
competitive with VFs Comparison Group and Industry Group.
The Committee also considers historical compensation levels,
relative compensation levels among VFs senior executives,
and VFs corporate performance as compared to performance
of companies in VFs Industry Group.
| EXCERPTS ON THIS PAGE:
|
| |||||||