|
|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
This excerpt taken from the VRSN 10-Q filed May 8, 2009. Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the three months ended March 31, 2009, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting. This excerpt taken from the VRSN 10-K filed Mar 3, 2009. c. Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the three months ended December 31, 2008 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
This excerpt taken from the VRSN 10-Q filed Nov 7, 2008. Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting During our last fiscal quarter, there has not occurred any change in our internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
53
Table of ContentsThis excerpt taken from the VRSN 10-Q filed Aug 8, 2008. Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting During our last fiscal quarter, there has not occurred any change in our internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. This excerpt taken from the VRSN 10-Q filed May 12, 2008. Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting Subsequent to December 31, 2007, our Board of Directors approved additional internal control policies and procedures intended to remediate the material weakness described in our 2007 Form 10-K. As of the date of this filing, management is in the process of implementing, or has implemented, the following corrective actions:
There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the three months ended March 31, 2008, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting, other than those noted above. This excerpt taken from the VRSN 10-Q filed Nov 5, 2007. Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting Subsequent to December 31, 2006, our Board of Directors approved additional internal control policies and procedures intended to remediate the material weakness. As of the date of this filing, we have implemented and are in the process of testing the implementation of the following corrective actions:
Additionally, we are investing in ongoing efforts to continuously improve our internal control over financial reporting and have committed considerable resources to the improvement of the design, implementation, documentation, testing and monitoring of our internal controls. As of the date of this filing, we have completed the implementation of the corrective actions noted above and are in the process of testing the effectiveness of these new internal control policies and procedures. We believe we have made substantial progress toward remediation of the material weakness disclosed in Item 9A, Controls and Procedures, of our 2006 Form 10-K. There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the three months ended September 30, 2007, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. Because of its inherent limitations, our internal control over financial reporting may not prevent material errors or fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. The continued effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting is subject to risks, including that the controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or that the degree of compliance with our policies or procedures may deteriorate.
40
Table of ContentsThis excerpt taken from the VRSN 10-Q filed Aug 9, 2007. Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting Subsequent to December 31, 2006 our Board of Directors approved additional internal control policies and procedures intended to remediate the material weakness. As of the date of this filing, we have implemented or are in the process of implementing the following corrective actions:
Additionally, we are investing in ongoing efforts to continuously improve our internal control over financial reporting and have committed considerable resources to the improvement of the design, implementation, documentation, testing and monitoring of our internal controls.
34
Table of ContentsAs of the date of this filing, we believe that we have made substantial progress in the implementation of the corrective actions noted above and toward remediation of the material weakness disclosed in Item 9A, Controls and Procedures, of our 2006 Form 10-K. There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the three months ended June 30, 2007 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. Because of its inherent limitations, our internal control over financial reporting may not prevent material errors or fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. The continued effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting is subject to risks, including that the controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or that the degree of compliance with our policies or procedures may deteriorate.
35
Table of ContentsThis excerpt taken from the VRSN 10-Q filed Jul 16, 2007. Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting Subsequent to March 31, 2007, our Board of Directors approved additional internal control policies and procedures intended to remediate the material weakness. As of the date of this filing, we have implemented or are in the process of implementing the following corrective actions:
40
Table of Contents
Additionally, we are investing in ongoing efforts to continuously improve our internal control over financial reporting and have committed considerable resources to the improvement of the design, implementation, documentation, testing and monitoring of our internal controls. As of the date of this filing, we believe that we have made substantial progress in the implementation of the corrective actions noted above and toward remediation of the material weakness. There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the three months ended March 31, 2007 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. Because of its inherent limitations, our internal control over financial reporting may not prevent material errors or fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. The continued effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting is subject to risks, including that the controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or that the degree of compliance with our policies or procedures may deteriorate.
41
Table of ContentsThis excerpt taken from the VRSN 10-K filed Jul 12, 2007. c. Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Subsequent to December 31, 2006, our Board of Directors approved additional internal control policies and procedures intended to remediate the material weakness described above. As of the date of this filing, we have implemented or are in the process of implementing the following corrective actions:
106
Table of Contents
Additionally, we are investing in ongoing efforts to continuously improve the Companys internal control over financial reporting and have committed considerable resources to the improvement of the design, implementation, documentation, testing and monitoring of our internal controls.
As of the date of this filing, we believe that we have made substantial progress in the implementation of the corrective actions noted above and toward remediation of the material weakness.
There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the three months ended December 31, 2006 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
Because of its inherent limitations, our internal control over financial reporting may not prevent material errors or fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. The continued effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting is subject to risks, including that the controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or that the degree of compliance with our policies or procedures may deteriorate.
On July 10, 2007, Dana L. Evan our then-current Executive Vice President, Finance and Administration and Chief Financial Officer resigned from her position with VeriSign.
On July 9, 2007, VeriSign entered into a Consulting and Separation Agreement with Mr. Sclavos in connection with his resignation on May 27, 2007. Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, Mr. Sclavos will provide consulting services to the Company for a one-year period at the rate of $5,000 per month and is prohibited from engaging in certain competitive activities or soliciting customers of the Company during such period. The Company will pay Mr. Sclavos severance of $1,969,380 within twenty-one (21) days of the effective date of the agreement and $1,969,380 on June 15, 2008, subject to his compliance with the terms of the agreement. In the event of a change-in-control of the Company, all severance payments will accelerate and become immediately due and payable.
The Company accelerated all of Mr. Sclavos outstanding options to purchase shares of the Companys common stock and restricted stock units that are scheduled to vest within twenty-four (24) months after Mr. Sclavos resignation. Accordingly, vesting for restricted stock units with respect to approximately 156,000 shares of the Companys common stock and the following stock options were accelerated:
On May 31, 2007, in anticipation of entering into this agreement, the Company paid Mr. Sclavos severance in the amount of $1,031,580 and $115,422 for all unpaid wages and unused paid time off accrued through his resignation date.
The Company will also pay Mr. Sclavos $5,459,430 within twenty-one (21) days of the effective date of the agreement in connection with an option to purchase 300,000 shares of the Companys common stock that was previously granted to Mr. Sclavos but was erroneously deleted from the Companys records as more fully described in the Explanatory Note appearing at the beginning of this report.
107
Table of ContentsWith respect to an option to purchase 600,000 shares of the Companys common stock with an exercise price of $10.08 that was previously granted to Mr. Sclavos, if the Board of Directors determines in good faith that the exercise price of such option should be increased, then the exercise price of the unexercised portion of such option will be increased and with respect to the portion of such option that may have been exercised, Mr. Sclavos agrees to repay the Company the difference between the increased exercise price and the original exercise price.
On July 5, 2007 and July 12, 2007, the Board of Directors appointed Albert E. Clement as Chief Accounting Officer and Executive Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer, respectively of the Company. Mr. Clement served as Senior Vice President, Finance, and Controller since January 2001. From January to December 2000, he served as Controller of Network Solutions, which was acquired by VeriSign in June 2000. Prior to joining Network Solutions, Mr. Clement held senior financial positions at BroadPoint Communications and MCI from 1996 to 2000. Prior to that, Mr. Clement spent twelve years in various capacities at PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. He is a certified public accountant and holds a Bachelor of Accountancy from George Washington University.
108
Table of Contents
This excerpt taken from the VRSN 10-Q filed Jul 12, 2007. Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting Subsequent to September 30, 2006, our Board of Directors approved additional internal control policies and procedures intended to remediate the material weakness. As of the date of this filing, we have implemented or are in the process of implementing the following corrective actions:
80
Table of Contents
Additionally, we are investing in ongoing efforts to continuously improve the Companys internal control over financial reporting and have committed considerable resources to the improvement of the design, implementation, documentation, testing and monitoring of our internal controls. As of the date of this filing, we believe that we have made substantial progress in the implementation of the corrective actions noted above and toward remediation of the material weakness. There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the three months ended June 30, 2006 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting. Because of its inherent limitations, our internal control over financial reporting may not prevent material errors or fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. The continued effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting is subject to risks, including that the controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or that the degree of compliance with our policies or procedures may deteriorate.
81
Table of ContentsThis excerpt taken from the VRSN 10-Q filed Jul 12, 2007. Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting Subsequent to June 30, 2006, our Board of Directors approved additional internal control policies and procedures intended to remediate the material weakness. As of the date of this filing, we have implemented or are in the process of implementing the following corrective actions:
77
Table of Contents
Additionally, we are investing in ongoing efforts to continuously improve the Companys internal control over financial reporting and have committed considerable resources to the improvement of the design, implementation, documentation, testing and monitoring of our internal controls. As of the date of this filing, we believe that we have made substantial progress in the implementation of the corrective actions noted above and toward remediation of the material weakness. There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the three months ended June 30, 2006 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting. Because of its inherent limitations, our internal control over financial reporting may not prevent material errors or fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. The continued effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting is subject to risks, including that the controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or that the degree of compliance with our policies or procedures may deteriorate.
78
Table of ContentsThis excerpt taken from the VRSN 10-K filed Mar 13, 2006. Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting during the period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
65
Table of ContentsOur management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, does not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures or our internal controls will prevent all error and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within VeriSign have been detected.
This excerpt taken from the VRSN 10-K filed Mar 16, 2005. Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting during the period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, does not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures or our internal controls will prevent all error and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within VeriSign have been detected.
None.
62
Table of Contents | EXCERPTS ON THIS PAGE:RELATED TOPICS for VRSN:
|
| |||||||