This excerpt taken from the VLKAY 10-K filed Mar 22, 2010.
Management believes that no litigation is threatened or pending in which the Company faces a reasonable possibility of loss or exposure which will materially affect the Companys consolidated financial position or consolidated results of operations. Since the Companys subsidiaries act as depositories of funds, trustee and escrow agents, they occasionally are named as defendants in lawsuits involving claims to the ownership of funds in particular accounts. The Bank is also subject to counterclaims from defendants in connection with collection actions brought by the Bank. This and other litigation is incidental to the Companys business.
As a member of the VISA, Inc. organization (VISA), the Company had previously accrued a $338,000 liability as of December 31, 2008 for its proportionate share of various claims against VISA. Recent additional funding of a litigation escrow account established by VISA has reduced the Companys proportionate share of its liability to $292,000.
This excerpt taken from the VLKAY 10-K filed Mar 19, 2010.
As indicated in Note 11, on September 23, 2009, the Company entered into a separation agreement with two of its then executive officers. Pursuant to one of these separation agreements, a former executive may receive contingent payments of up to $500,000 in the aggregate, based on the achievement by the Company over the next 4 years of certain net income targets set forth in the agreement. For the fiscal year ended January 2, 2010, no accrual was recorded for this earn-out provision. The previous agreement with this former executive, provided for contingent payments of up to $5.5 million based on certain performance targets. Under the terms of the separation agreement, the Company is released from the previous contingent obligation entirely.
The Company is exposed to a number of asserted and unasserted potential claims. Management does not believe it is reasonably possible that resolution of these matters will result in a material loss. The Company had no guarantees, subleases or assigned lease obligations as of January 2, 2010 and December 27, 2008.
This excerpt taken from the VLKAY 10-K filed Mar 19, 2010.
Contingencies. As discussed in Part I, Item 3 (“Legal Proceedings”) and in Part II, Note 6 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements of this report, InsWeb is a defendant in: i) a class action lawsuit that alleges InsWeb violated certain federal securities laws at the time of its initial public offering; ii) a securities lawsuit alleging certain officers and directors and significant shareholders violated the short swing trading prohibition of Section 16(b) of the Securities Exchange Act. InsWeb cannot accurately predict the ultimate outcome of these matters at this time and therefore, cannot estimate the range of probable loss, if any, due to the inherent uncertainties of litigation. InsWeb believes it has meritorious defenses; however InsWeb cannot assure that it will prevail in any of these actions. An unfavorable outcome could have a material adverse effect on InsWeb’s financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
This excerpt taken from the VLKAY 6-K filed Feb 26, 2010.
From time to time, the Company is involved in litigation, investigations, or proceedings related to claims arising out of its operations in the ordinary course of business. In the opinion of the Company's management, these claims and lawsuits in the aggregate, even if adversely settled, will not have a material effect on the Company's consolidated financial statements.
This excerpt taken from the VLKAY 20-F filed Feb 12, 2010.
NOTE 23: CONTINGENCIES
ArcelorMittal may be involved in litigation, arbitration or other legal proceedings. Provisions related to legal and arbitral proceedings are recorded in accordance with the principles described in note 2.
Most of these claims involve highly complex issues, actual damages and other matters. Often these issues are subject to substantial uncertainties and, therefore, the probability of loss and an estimation of damages are difficult to ascertain. Consequently, for a large number of these claims, the Company is unable to make a reasonable estimate of the expected financial effect that will result from ultimate resolution of the proceeding. In those cases, the Company has disclosed information with respect to the nature of the contingency. The Company has not accrued a reserve for the potential outcome of these cases.
In the cases in which quantifiable fines and penalties have been assessed, the Company has indicated the amount of such fine or penalty or the amount of provision accrued that is the estimate of the probable loss.
In a limited number of ongoing cases, the Company is able to make a reasonable estimate of the expected loss or range of possible loss and have accrued a provision for such loss, but believe that publication of this information on a case-by-case basis would seriously prejudice the Companys position in the ongoing legal proceedings or in any related settlement discussions. Accordingly, in these cases, the Company has disclosed information with respect to the nature of the contingency, but has not disclosed our estimate of the range of potential loss.
ARCELORMITTAL AND SUBSIDIARIES
(millions of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data)
These assessments can involve a series of complex judgments about future events and can rely heavily on estimates and assumptions. These assessments are based on estimates and assumptions that have been deemed reasonable by management. The Company believes that the aggregate provisions recorded for the above matters are adequate based upon currently available information. However, given the inherent uncertainties related to these cases and in estimating contingent liabilities, the Company could, in the future, incur judgments that could have a material adverse effect on its results of operations in any particular period.
This excerpt taken from the VLKAY 6-K filed Dec 14, 2009.
In June 2008, the Company and others entered into a dispute with BT in relation to BTs adherence with its regulatory pricing obligations for wholesale leased lines (PPCs), during the period since June 2004, and this dispute was filed with Ofcom. In April 2009, Ofcom issued its preliminary findings in this matter which found that BT had been overcharging for certain PPC products and proposed that a substantial repayment would be required. Ofcom has consulted on these preliminary findings and, in October 2009, issued its Final Determination on the matter which confirmed that BT had indeed overcharged the Company and others during the period April 2005 to Sept 2008 inclusive and ordered BT to settle financially with the Company. Our cost of access expense in the three months ended September 30, 2009 benefited from a £3.7 million reduction as a result of favorable regulatory ruling by Ofcom in respect of partial private circuits.
From time to time, the Company has been a party to various legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. In the opinion of the Company, there are currently no proceedings in respect of which there exists a reasonable possibility of adverse outcome that would have a material effect on the Companys unaudited condensed consolidated statements of comprehensive income, unaudited condensed consolidated statements of financial position or unaudited condensed consolidated statements of cash flows.
Global Crossing (UK) Telecommunications Limited
Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)(continued)
This excerpt taken from the VLKAY 8-K filed Dec 14, 2009.
From time to time, the Company becomes involved in various investigations, claims and legal proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of business. These matters may relate to product liability, employment, intellectual property, tax, regulation, contract or other matters. The resolution of these matters as they arise will be subject to various uncertainties and, even if such claims are without merit, could result in the expenditure of financial and managerial resources. While unfavorable outcomes are possible, based on available information, the Company generally does not believe the resolution of these matters will result in a material adverse effect on the business, consolidated financial condition, or results of operations.
- 22 -
This excerpt taken from the VLKAY 6-K filed Nov 17, 2009.
Keegan Ghana Ltd. was named jointly with the Ghana Minerals Commission as a co-defendant in a legal suit by the company that had originally optioned the Esaase gold property to the Company. The Plaintiff is alleging certain irregularities in connection with the closing of the option resulting in Keegan Ghanas acquisition of the Esaase gold property and the issuing of the requisite regulatory approvals under Ghanaian Law. Keegan Ghana has refuted the allegations on grounds that it had at all material times acted legally and in good faith and has therefore filed a defense and counter-claim against the Plaintiff. The Company is of the view after discussion with Ghanaian Counsel that the allegations are totally without legal merit and will be vigorously defended. The Ghana Minerals Commission has also denied the allegations and filed a defense to the suit. The Companys potential liability for damages, if any, is currently not determinable.
EXCERPTS ON THIS PAGE:
RELATED TOPICS for VLKAY: