|
|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
This excerpt taken from the WSII 10-Q filed Apr 24, 2008. Trend
Information
Seasonality
We expect the results of our Canadian operations to vary
seasonally, with revenue typically lowest in the first quarter
of the year, higher in the second and third quarters, and lower
in the fourth quarter than in the third quarter. The seasonality
is attributable to a number of factors. First, less solid waste
is generated during the late fall, winter and early spring
because of decreased construction and demolition activity.
Second, certain operating costs are higher in the winter months
because winter weather conditions slow waste collection
activities, resulting in higher labor costs, and rain and snow
increase the weight of collected waste, resulting in higher
disposal costs, which are calculated on a per ton basis. Also,
during the summer months, there are more tourists and part-time
residents in some of our service areas, resulting in more
residential and commercial collection. Consequently, we expect
operating income to be generally lower during the winter. The
effect of seasonality on our results of operations from our
U.S. operations, which are located in warmer climates than
our Canadian operations, is less significant than that of our
Canadian operations.
Table of Contents
New
Accounting Pronouncements
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157,
Fair Value Measurements (SFAS 157),
which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring
fair value in GAAP, and expands disclosures about fair value
measurements. SFAS 157 does not require any new fair value
measurements, but provides guidance on how to measure fair value
by providing a fair value hierarchy used to classify the source
of the information. In February 2008, the FASB deferred the
effective date of SFAS 157 by one year for certain
non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities, except those
that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial
statements on a recurring basis (at least annually). On
January 1, 2008, we adopted the provisions of Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 157
Fair Value Measurements (SFAS 157),
except as it applies to those nonfinancial assets and
nonfinancial liabilities for which the effective date has been
delayed by one year. The adoption of SFAS 157 did not have
a material effect on our financial position or results of
operations. The book values of cash and cash equivalents,
accounts receivable and accounts payable approximate their
respective fair values due to the short-term nature of these
instruments. The fair value of the term loan facility under our
Senior Secured Credit Facilities and our
91/2% Senior
Subordinated Notes at March 31, 2008 is estimated at
$216.4 million and $152.0 million, respectively, based
on quoted market prices.
On January 1, 2008, we adopted the provisions of
SFAS No. 159 The Fair Value Option for Financial
Assets and Financial Liabilities including an
amendment of FASB Statement No. 115
(SFAS 159). SFAS 159 provides companies
with an option to report selected financial assets and financial
liabilities at fair value. Unrealized gains and losses on items
for which the fair value option has been elected are reported in
earnings at each subsequent reporting date. The fair value
option: (i) may be applied instrument by instrument, with a
few exceptions, such as investments accounted for by the equity
method; (ii) is irrevocable (unless a new election date
occurs); and (iii) is applied only to entire instruments
and not to portions of instruments. We did not elect to report
any additional assets or liabilities at fair value and
accordingly, the adoption of SFAS 159 did not have a
material effect on our financial position or results of
operations.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141
(revised 2007), Business Combinations
(SFAS 141(R)). SFAS 141(R) establishes the
principles and requirements for how an acquirer:
(i) recognizes and measures in its financial statements the
identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed and any
noncontrolling interest in the acquiree; (ii) recognizes
and measures the goodwill acquired in the business combination
or a gain from a bargain purchase; and (iii) determines
what information to disclose to enable users of the financial
statements to evaluate the nature and financial effects of the
business combination. SFAS 141(R) is to be applied
prospectively to business combinations consummated on or after
the beginning of the first annual reporting period on or after
December 15, 2008, with early adoption prohibited. We are
currently evaluating the impact SFAS 141(R) will have upon
adoption on our accounting for acquisitions. Previously any
changes in valuation allowances, as a result of income from
acquisitions, for certain deferred tax assets would serve to
reduce goodwill whereas under the new standard any changes in
the valuation allowance related to income from acquisitions
currently or in prior periods will serve to reduce income taxes
in the period in which the reserve is reversed. Additionally,
under SFAS 141(R) transaction related expenses, which were
previously capitalized as deal costs, will be
expensed as incurred.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160,
Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial
Statements an amendment of ARB No. 51
(SFAS 160). SFAS 160 establishes
accounting and reporting standards that require
(i) noncontrolling interests to be reported as a component
of equity, (ii) changes in a parents ownership
interest while the parent retains its controlling interest to be
accounted for as equity transactions, and (iii) any
retained noncontrolling equity investment upon the
deconsolidation of a subsidiary to be initially measured at fair
value. SFAS 160 is effective for fiscal years and interim
periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after
December 15, 2008, with early adoption prohibited. We do
not expect the adoption of SFAS 160 to have a material
effect on our financial position or results of operations.
Table of Contents
This excerpt taken from the WSII 10-Q filed Jul 26, 2007. Trend
Information
Seasonality
We expect the results of our Canadian operations to vary
seasonally, with revenue typically lowest in the first quarter
of the year, higher in the second and third quarters, and lower
in the fourth quarter than in the third quarter. The seasonality
is attributable to a number of factors. First, less solid waste
is generated during the late fall, winter and early spring
because of decreased construction and demolition activity.
Second, certain operating costs are higher in the winter months
because winter weather conditions slow waste collection
activities, resulting in higher labor costs, and rain and snow
increase the weight of collected waste, resulting in higher
disposal costs, which are calculated on a per ton basis. Also,
during the summer months, there are more tourists and part-time
residents in some of our service areas, resulting in more
residential and commercial collection. Consequently, we expect
operating income to be generally lower during the winter. The
effect of seasonality on our results of operations from our
U.S. operations, which are located in warmer climates than
our Canadian operations, is less significant than that of our
Canadian operations.
New
Accounting Pronouncements
In July 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)
issued FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for
Uncertainty in Income Taxes an interpretation of
FASB Statement No. 109 (FIN 48).
FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for income taxes by
prescribing the minimum recognition threshold a tax position is
required to meet before being recognized in the financial
statements. FIN 48 is effective for fiscal years beginning
after December 15, 2006. The adoption of FIN 48 has
not had a material effect on our consolidated results of
operations, cash flows or financial position.
| EXCERPTS ON THIS PAGE:
RELATED TOPICS for WSII: |
| |||||||