|
|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
This excerpt taken from the WBMD DEF 14A filed Nov 5, 2008. Vote and
Quorum Required
On all matters to be considered at the Annual Meeting:
Accordingly, the aggregate voting power of the outstanding
shares of WebMD Common Stock is equal to the 9,602,649 votes
that the 9,602,649 shares of Class A Common Stock are
entitled to cast plus the 240,500,00 votes that the
48,100,000 shares of Class B Common Stock are entitled
to cast, which totals 250,102,649. HLTHs ownership of the
48,100,000 shares of Class B Common Stock represents
approximately 96.2% of the combined voting power of the two
classes of Common Stock. As a result, HLTH is able, acting
alone, to cause the approval of all proposals submitted for a
vote at the Annual Meeting. HLTH has indicated that it intends
to vote in favor of the election of each the nominees for
director listed in Proposal 1 and in favor of each of
Proposals 2 and 3.
The presence, in person or by properly executed proxy, of the
holders of a majority of the voting power of the outstanding
shares entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting is necessary to
constitute a quorum at the meeting. Abstentions will be counted
as shares that are present and entitled to vote for purposes of
determining whether a quorum is present. Shares held by nominees
for beneficial owners will also be counted for purposes of
determining whether a quorum is present if the nominee has the
discretion to vote on at least one of the matters presented and
even though the nominee may not exercise discretionary voting
power with respect to other matters and voting instructions have
not been received from the beneficial owner (sometimes referred
to as a broker non-vote). If a quorum is not present, the Annual
Meeting may be adjourned from time to time until a quorum is
obtained.
Proposal 1 (Election of
Directors). Election of directors is by a
plurality of the votes cast at the Annual Meeting with respect
to such election. Accordingly, the two nominees receiving the
greatest number of votes for their election to Class III
will be elected as Class III directors. Abstentions and
instructions on the accompanying proxy card to withhold
authority to vote with respect to a nominee will result in that
nominee receiving fewer votes for election.
Proposal 2 (Amendment to 2005 Plan) and Proposal 3
(Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm). The affirmative vote of the
holders of a majority of the voting power of the outstanding
shares present or represented at the meeting and entitled to
vote on the matter is required to ratify and approve the
amendment to WebMDs Amended and Restated 2005 Long-Term
Incentive Plan to increase the number of shares of WebMD Common
Stock issuable under that Plan by 5,500,000 shares, to a
total of 14,500,000 shares described in Proposal 2 and
to ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the
independent registered public accounting firm to serve as
WebMDs independent auditor described in Proposal 3.
Abstentions with respect to Proposal 2 or Proposal 3
will be treated as shares that are present or represented at the
meeting, but will not be counted in favor of the respective
proposal. Accordingly, an abstention from voting on
Proposal 2 or Proposal 3 will have the same effect as
a vote AGAINST the respective proposal. Because
brokers do not have discretionary authority to vote on
Proposal 2, broker non-votes with respect to
Proposal 2 will not be considered as entitled to vote at
the meeting for purposes of that proposal and, accordingly, will
have no impact on the outcome of the vote with respect to that
proposal.
As of October 24, 2008, which is the record date for the
WebMD Annual Meeting, the directors and executive officers of
WebMD held and are entitled to vote, in the aggregate, shares of
WebMD Class A Common Stock representing approximately 0.3%
of the aggregate voting power of the outstanding shares of WebMD
Common Stock.
Table of Contents
This excerpt taken from the WBMD DEF 14A filed Aug 14, 2007. Vote and
Quorum Required
On all matters to be considered at the Annual Meeting:
Accordingly, the aggregate voting power of the outstanding
shares of our Common Stock is equal to the 9,052,951 votes
that the 9,052,951 shares of Class A Common Stock are
entitled to cast plus the 240,500,000 votes that the
48,100,000 shares of Class B Common Stock are entitled
to cast, which totals 249,552,951. HLTHs ownership of the
48,100,000 shares of Class B Common Stock represents
approximately 96% of the combined voting power of the two
classes of Common Stock. As a result, HLTH is able, acting
alone, to cause the approval of all proposals submitted for a
vote at the Annual Meeting. HLTH has indicated that it intends
to vote in favor of the election of each the nominees for
director listed in Proposal 1 and in favor of each of
Proposals 2 and 3.
The presence, in person or by properly executed proxy, of the
holders of a majority of the voting power of the outstanding
shares entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting is necessary to
constitute a quorum at the
Table of Contents
meeting. Abstentions will be counted as shares that are present
and entitled to vote for purposes of determining whether a
quorum is present. Shares held by nominees for beneficial owners
will also be counted for purposes of determining whether a
quorum is present if the nominee has the discretion to vote on
at least one of the matters presented and even though the
nominee may not exercise discretionary voting power with respect
to other matters and voting instructions have not been received
from the beneficial owner (sometimes referred to as a broker
non-vote). If a quorum is not present, the Annual Meeting may be
adjourned from time to time until a quorum is obtained.
Proposal 1 (Election of
Directors). Election of directors is by a
plurality of the votes cast at the Annual Meeting with respect
to such election. Accordingly, the three nominees receiving the
greatest number of votes for their election to Class I will
be elected as Class I directors, the three nominees
receiving the greatest number of votes for their election to
Class II will be elected as Class II directors, and
the two nominees receiving the greatest number of votes for
their election to Class III will be elected as
Class III directors. Abstentions, broker non-votes and
instructions on the accompanying proxy card to withhold
authority to vote with respect to a nominee will result in that
nominee receiving fewer votes for election.
Proposal 2 (Proposal for Plan
Amendment). The affirmative vote of the holders
of a majority of the voting power of the outstanding shares
present or represented at the meeting and entitled to vote on
the matter is required to ratify and approve the amendment to
the 2005 Plan described in Proposal 2. Abstentions with
respect to Proposal 2 will be treated as shares that are
present or represented at the meeting, but will not be counted
in favor of that proposal. Accordingly, an abstention from
voting on Proposal 2 will have the same effect as a vote
against that proposal. Broker non-votes with respect to
Proposal 2 will not be considered as present or represented
at the meeting for purposes of that Proposal and, accordingly,
will have no impact on the outcome of the vote with respect to
Proposal 2.
Proposal 3 (Ratification of Appointment of Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm). The
affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding
shares present or represented at the meeting and entitled to
vote on the matter is required to ratify the appointment of
Ernst & Young LLP as the independent registered public
accounting firm to serve as WebMDs independent auditor
described in Proposal 3. Abstentions with respect to
Proposal 3 will be treated as shares that are present or
represented at the meeting, but will not be counted in favor of
that proposal. Accordingly, an abstention from voting on
Proposal 3 will have the same effect as a vote against that
proposal. Broker non-votes with respect to Proposal 3 will
not be considered as present or represented at the meeting for
purposes of that Proposal and, accordingly, will have no impact
on the outcome of the vote with respect to Proposal 3.
| EXCERPTS ON THIS PAGE:
RELATED TOPICS for WBMD: |
| |||||||