Annual Reports

 
Quarterly Reports

 
8-K

 
Other

  • Form 4 (Oct 11, 2017)
  • Form 4 (Oct 4, 2017)
  • Form 3 (Sep 22, 2017)
  • SC 13G (Sep 11, 2017)
  • Form 4 (Aug 3, 2017)
  • Form 4 (Jul 28, 2017)
Webster Financial DEF 14A 2013

Documents found in this filing:

  1. Def 14A
  2. Graphic
  3. Graphic
  4. Graphic
Notice and Proxy Statement

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

(RULE 14A-101)

INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT

SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No.     )

Filed by the Registrant ¨

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant ¨

Check the appropriate box:

 

¨      Preliminary Proxy Statement

 

¨  Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

 

x 

Definitive Proxy Statement

¨ 

Definitive Additional Materials

¨ 

Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12

Webster Financial Corporation

 

 

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

 

 

 

 

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

 

þ 

No fee required

 

¨ 

Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.

 

  (1) 

Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

 

  

 

  (2) 

Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

 

  

 

  (3) 

Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

 

  

 

  (4) 

Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

 

  

 

  (5) 

Total fee paid:

 

  

 

 

¨ 

Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

 

¨ 

Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

 

  (1) 

Amount Previously Paid:

 

  

 

  (2) 

Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

 

  

 

  (3) 

Filing Party:

 

  

 

  (4) 

Date Filed:

 

  

 


 

LOGO

March 15, 2013

To the Shareholders of

Webster Financial Corporation:

You are cordially invited to attend the Webster Financial Corporation Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on Thursday, April 25, 2013 at 4:00 p.m., Eastern Time, at the Courtyard by Marriott, 63 Grand Street, Waterbury, Connecticut 06702.

At the Annual Meeting, you will be asked: (i) to elect seven directors to serve for one-year terms; (ii) to approve, on a non-binding, advisory basis, the compensation of the named executive officers of Webster; (iii) to approve the Qualified Performance-Based Compensation Plan for an additional five-year term; (iv) to ratify the appointment of KPMG LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm of Webster for the year ending December 31, 2013; and (v) to transact any other business that properly comes before the Annual Meeting or any adjournments of the meeting.

We encourage you to read the accompanying Proxy Statement, which provides information regarding Webster and the matters to be voted on at the Annual Meeting. Also enclosed is our 2012 Annual Report.

It is important that your shares be represented at the Annual Meeting. Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, you may vote your common shares via a toll-free telephone number or on the Internet or you may complete, date, sign and return the enclosed proxy card in the enclosed postage-paid envelope. If you attend the meeting and prefer to vote in person, you may do so.

 

Sincerely,

LOGO

James C. Smith

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer


WEBSTER FINANCIAL CORPORATION

Webster Plaza

145 Bank Street

Waterbury, Connecticut 06702

800-325-2424

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

TO BE HELD ON APRIL 25, 2013

To the Shareholders of

Webster Financial Corporation:

    NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the annual meeting of shareholders (the “Annual Meeting”) of Webster Financial Corporation (“Webster”) will be held on Thursday, April 25, 2013 at 4:00 p.m., Eastern Time, at the Courtyard by Marriott, 63 Grand Street, Waterbury, Connecticut 06702, for the following purposes:

 

  1.

Election of Directors. To elect seven directors to serve for one-year terms (Proposal 1);

 

  2.

Say on Pay. To approve, on a non-binding, advisory basis, the compensation of the named executive officers of Webster (Proposal 2);

 

  3.

Approval of Qualified Performance-Based Compensation Plan. To approve the Qualified Performance-Based Compensation Plan for an additional five-year term (Proposal 3);

 

  4.

Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. To ratify the appointment by the Board of Directors of KPMG LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm of Webster for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2013 (Proposal 4); and

 

  5.

Other Business. To transact any other business that properly comes before the Annual Meeting or any adjournments thereof, in accordance with the determination of a majority of Webster’s Board of Directors.

    The Board of Directors has fixed the close of business on February 25, 2013 as the record date for the determination of shareholders entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting. Only shareholders of record at the close of business on that date will be entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting or any adjournments thereof.

 

By order of the Board of Directors,

LOGO

James C. Smith

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Waterbury, Connecticut

March 15, 2013

IT IS IMPORTANT THAT YOU VOTE PROMPTLY. THEREFORE, WHETHER OR NOT YOU PLAN TO ATTEND THE ANNUAL MEETING, PLEASE VOTE YOUR COMMON SHARES VIA THE TOLL-FREE TELEPHONE NUMBER LISTED ON THE PROXY CARD, THE INTERNET OR BY MAIL.

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting to Be Held on April 25, 2013: This proxy statement, along with our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012 and our 2012 Annual Report, are available free of charge on the Investor Relations section of our website (www.wbst.com).


WEBSTER FINANCIAL CORPORATION

Webster Plaza

145 Bank Street

Waterbury, Connecticut 06702

800-325-2424

PROXY STATEMENT FOR ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

TO BE HELD ON APRIL 25, 2013

Solicitation, Voting and Revocability of Proxies

This Proxy Statement (the “Proxy Statement”) is being furnished to the shareholders of Webster Financial Corporation, a Delaware corporation (“Webster” or the “Company”), as part of the solicitation of proxies by its Board of Directors from holders of its outstanding shares of Common Stock, par value $.01 per share (the “Common Stock”), for use at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Webster to be held on Thursday, April 25, 2013 at 4:00 p.m., Eastern Time, at the Courtyard by Marriott, 63 Grand Street, Waterbury, Connecticut 06702 (the “Annual Meeting”) and at any adjournments thereof. The Proxy Statement, together with the enclosed proxy card, is being mailed to shareholders of Webster on or about March 15, 2013.

The Annual Meeting has been called for the following purposes:

1. To elect seven directors to serve for one-year terms (Proposal 1);

2. To approve, on a non-binding, advisory basis, the compensation of the named executive officers of Webster (Proposal 2);

3. To approve the Qualified Performance-Based Compensation Plan for an additional five-year term (Proposal 3);

4. To ratify the appointment by the Board of Directors of the firm of KPMG LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm of Webster for the year ending December 31, 2013 (Proposal 4); and

5. To transact any other business that properly comes before the Annual Meeting or any adjournments thereof.

If you vote using the enclosed proxy card, your shares will be voted in accordance with the instructions indicated. Executed but unmarked proxies will be voted:

1. FOR the election of the Board’s nominees as directors;

2. FOR the approval, on a non-binding, advisory basis, of the compensation of the named executive officers of Webster;

3. FOR the approval of the Qualified Performance-Based Compensation Plan for an additional five-year term; and

4. FOR the ratification of the appointment of Webster’s independent registered public accounting firm.

Except for procedural matters incident to the conduct of the Annual Meeting, the Board of Directors does not know of any matters other than those described in the Notice of Annual Meeting that are to come before the Annual Meeting. If any other matters are properly brought before the Annual Meeting, the persons named in the proxy will vote the shares represented by such proxy on such matters as determined by a majority of the Board of Directors. The proxies confer discretionary authority to vote on any matter of which Webster did not have notice at least 30 days prior to the date of the Annual Meeting.

 

1


The presence of a shareholder at the Annual Meeting will not automatically revoke that shareholder’s proxy. A shareholder may, however, revoke a proxy at any time before it is voted: (i) by delivering either a written notice of revocation of the proxy or a duly executed proxy bearing a later date to Mark S. Lyon, Assistant Secretary, Webster Financial Corporation, 145 Bank Street, Waterbury, Connecticut 06702; (ii) by re-voting by telephone or on the Internet; or (iii) by attending the Annual Meeting and voting in person.

The cost of soliciting proxies for the Annual Meeting will be borne by Webster. In addition to use of the mails, proxies may be solicited personally or by telephone or telecopy by directors, officers and employees, who will not be specially compensated for such activities. Webster also will request persons, firms and companies holding shares in their names or in the name of their nominees, which are beneficially owned by others, to send proxy materials to and obtain proxies from those beneficial owners and will reimburse those holders for their reasonable expenses incurred in that connection. Webster also has retained Morrow & Co., LLC, a proxy soliciting firm, to assist in the solicitation of proxies at a fee of $7,500, plus reimbursement of certain out-of-pocket expenses.

Who Can Vote. The securities which can be voted at the Annual Meeting consist of shares of Common Stock of Webster with each share entitling its owner to one vote on all matters properly presented at the Annual Meeting. There is no cumulative voting of shares. The Board of Directors has fixed the close of business on February 25, 2013 as the record date for the determination of shareholders of Webster entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting. On the record date, there were 7,772 holders of record of the 85,340,707 shares of Common Stock then outstanding and eligible to be voted at the Annual Meeting.

Voting. If your Common Stock is held by a broker, bank or other nominee (i.e., in “street name”), you should receive instructions from that person or entity that you must follow in order to have your shares of Common Stock voted. If you hold your Common Stock in your own name and not through a broker or another nominee, you may vote your shares of Common Stock:

 

   

by using the toll-free telephone number listed on the proxy card,

   

by using the Internet website listed on the proxy card,

   

by signing, dating and mailing the proxy card in the enclosed postage-paid envelope, or

   

by attending the Annual Meeting and voting in person.

Whichever of these methods you select to transmit your instructions, the proxy holders will vote your Common Stock in accordance with your instructions. If you give a proxy without specific voting instructions, your proxy will be voted by the proxy holders as recommended by the Board of Directors.

Vote by Telephone. If you hold your Common Stock in your own name and not through your broker or another nominee, you can vote your shares of Common Stock by telephone by dialing the toll-free telephone number printed on your proxy card. Telephone voting is available 24 hours a day until 11:59 p.m., Eastern Time, on April 24, 2013. Easy-to-follow voice prompts allow you to vote your shares of Common Stock and confirm that your instructions have been properly recorded. If you vote by telephone, you do not need to return your proxy card.

Vote by Internet. If you hold your Common Stock in your own name and not through your broker or another nominee, you can vote via the Internet. The website for Internet voting is printed on your proxy card. Internet voting is available 24 hours a day until 11:59 p.m., Eastern Time, on April 24, 2013. As with telephone voting, you will be given the opportunity to confirm that your instructions have been properly recorded. If you vote via the Internet, you do not need to return your proxy card.

Vote by Mail. You can vote by mail by signing, dating and returning the enclosed proxy card in the enclosed postage-paid envelope.

 

2


The presence, in person or by proxy, of at least one-third of the total number of outstanding shares of Common Stock entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting is necessary to constitute a quorum at the Annual Meeting. Assuming the presence of a quorum at the Annual Meeting, directors will be elected by a majority of the votes cast by shares present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote. The affirmative vote of the majority of the votes cast is required to approve the non-binding, advisory vote on the compensation of the named executive officers of Webster and the Qualified Performance-Based Compensation Plan for an additional five-year term, and to ratify the appointment of Webster’s independent registered public accounting firm. Shareholders’ votes will be tabulated by the persons appointed by the Board of Directors to act as inspectors of election for the Annual Meeting.

Under New York Stock Exchange Rule 452, which governs NYSE brokerage members, brokerage firms may not vote on non-routine matters in their discretion on behalf of their clients if such clients have not furnished voting instructions. A “broker non-vote” occurs when a broker’s customer does not provide the broker with voting instructions on non-routine matters for shares owned by the customer but held in the name of the broker. For non-routine matters, the broker cannot vote either FOR or AGAINST a proposal and reports the number of such shares as “non-votes.” Because none of the matters to be voted upon at the Annual Meeting are considered routine matters under Rule 452 except for the ratification of the appointment of the independent registered public accounting firm, there potentially can be broker non-votes at the Annual Meeting. Both abstentions and broker non-votes will be treated as shares present for purposes of determining the presence of a quorum at the Annual Meeting. Abstentions and broker non-votes will not be counted for purposes of determining the number of votes cast on Proposals 1, 2 or 3 and, therefore, will have no effect on the outcome of the votes for those proposals. Abstentions will not be counted for purposes of determining the number of votes cast on Proposal 4 and, therefore, will have no effect on the outcome of the vote for that proposal. Proposal 4 concerns a routine matter and thus brokerage firms may vote, in person or by proxy, on such proposal on behalf of their clients without voting instructions.

Electronic Delivery of Proxy Materials. As a shareholder, you have the option of electing to receive future proxy materials (including annual reports) online over the Internet. This online service provides savings to Webster by eliminating printing, mailing, processing and postage costs associated with hard copy distribution. You may enroll for this service on the Internet after you vote your shares in accordance with the instructions for Internet voting set forth on the enclosed proxy card. You may also enroll for electronic delivery of future Webster proxy materials at any time on the Company’s website at www.wbst.com. Under “Electronic Enrollment,” select the “Click Here To Enroll” link. Then select the box indicating your appropriate form of share ownership, and follow the instructions for electronic delivery enrollment. In the future, you will receive an email message, at the address you provided while enrolling, informing you that the Webster proxy materials are available to be viewed online on the Internet. Follow the instructions to view the materials and vote your shares. Your enrollment in electronic delivery of Webster proxy materials will remain in effect until revoked by you.

Annual Report on Form 10-K. Webster is required to file an annual report on Form 10-K for its 2012 fiscal year with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Shareholders may obtain, free of charge, a copy of the Form 10-K by writing to Mark S. Lyon, Assistant Secretary, Webster Financial Corporation, 145 Bank Street, Waterbury, Connecticut 06702. Our annual report on Form 10-K is available on the Company’s website, www.wbst.com.

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

(Proposal 1)

At the Annual Meeting, seven directors will be elected to serve for one-year terms. Unless otherwise specified on the proxy, it is the intention of the persons named in the proxy to vote the shares represented by each properly executed proxy for the election as directors of the persons named below as nominees. The Board of Directors believes that the nominees will stand for election and will serve if elected as directors. If, however, any

 

3


person nominated by the Board fails to stand for election or is unable to accept election, the proxies will be voted for the election of such other person as the Board of Directors may recommend. Assuming the presence of a quorum at the Annual Meeting, directors will be elected by a majority of the votes cast by shares present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. There are no cumulative voting rights in the election of directors.

As required by Webster’s Bylaws, directors must be elected by a majority of the votes cast with respect to such director in uncontested elections (number of shares voted “for” a director must exceed the number of votes cast “against” that director). In a contested election (a situation in which the number of nominees exceeds the number of directors to be elected), the standard for election of directors will be a plurality of the shares represented in person or by proxy at any such meeting and entitled to vote on the election of directors. In addition, under Webster’s Bylaws, incumbent directors nominated for reelection are required, as a condition to such nomination, to submit a conditional letter of resignation. In the event an incumbent nominee for director fails to receive a majority of the votes cast at an annual meeting, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider the resignation and make a recommendation to the Board whether to accept or reject the resignation, or whether other action should be taken. The Board will act on the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s recommendation and publicly disclose its decision and the rationale behind it within 90 days from the date the election results are certified. The director who failed to receive a majority of the votes cast will not participate in the Board’s decision.

The Board of Directors currently consists of ten members. In 2012, the shareholders of Webster adopted a proposal pursuant to which the Board of Directors was declassified, and elected three directors to serve for one-year terms expiring at the Annual Meeting. At the Annual Meeting, seven directors will be elected to serve for one-year terms. The current terms of the directors who were elected at the 2011 Annual Meeting were not affected by the adoption of the declassification proposal and those directors will continue to hold their offices until their terms expire in 2014, at which time it is expected that all directors, or their successors, will stand for reelection for one-year terms.

Information as to Nominees and Other Directors

The following table sets forth the names of the Board of Directors’ nominees for election as directors and the current directors of Webster. Also set forth in the table is certain other information with respect to each such person’s age at December 31, 2012, the periods during which such person has served as a director of Webster and positions currently held with Webster and its wholly owned subsidiary, Webster Bank, National Association (“Webster Bank”).

 

4


Following the table are biographies of each of the nominees and continuing directors which contain information regarding each such person’s business experience, director positions held currently or at any time during the last five years, information regarding involvement in certain legal or administrative proceedings, if applicable, and the experiences, qualifications, attributes or skills that caused the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the Board of Directors to determine that such person should serve as a director as of the time of filing of this Proxy Statement. Each director brings a strong and unique background and set of skills to the Board, giving the Board as a whole competence and experience in a wide variety of areas, including corporate governance, board service, executive management, business, finance and marketing. The process undertaken by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee in recommending qualified candidates is described beginning on page 13 under “Corporate Governance—Director Qualifications and Nominations.”

 

Director Nominees:

   Age at
12/31/2012
     Director
Since
  Expiration
of Term
  Positions
Held with
Webster and
Webster Bank
  Committee
Membership

Joel S. Becker

     64       1986   2013   Director   Nominating and
Corporate Governance;
Risk

David A. Coulter

     65       2009   2013   Director   Compensation; Risk

Robert A. Finkenzeller

     62       1986   2013   Director   Audit; Nominating and
Corporate Governance

Laurence C. Morse

     61       2004   2013   Director   Executive; Audit; Risk
(Chair)

Mark Pettie

     56       2009   2013   Director   Audit; Compensation

Charles W. Shivery

     67       2009   2013   Director   Executive;
Compensation (Chair)

James C. Smith

     63       1986   2013   Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer;
Director
  Executive (Chair)

Directors:

           

John J. Crawford

     68       1996   2014   Lead Director   Executive; Audit;
Nominating and
Corporate Governance
(Chair)

C. Michael Jacobi

     70       1993   2014   Director   Compensation; Risk

Karen R. Osar

     63       2006   2014   Director   Executive; Audit
(Chair); Risk

 

 

Joel S. Becker is Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Torrington Supply Co., Inc., a Waterbury, Connecticut based wholesale distributor of plumbing, heating and industrial pipe valve and fitting supplies to contractors and industry. Mr. Becker is a member of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the Risk Committee.

Mr. Becker’s experience as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of a local business in Webster’s market area combined with more than twenty-five years of experience on Webster’s Board gives him unique insight into Webster’s challenges, opportunities and operations. He also has extensive experience in public company executive compensation as a result of his over nine years of service as the Chairman of the Compensation Committee.

 

5


David A. Coulter is Vice Chairman at Warburg Pincus LLC, a global private equity firm headquartered in New York, New York. He previously held the position of Managing Director and Senior Advisor. From January 2001 to September 2005, he was Vice Chairman of JPMorgan Chase & Co. He is a director of MBIA, Inc. (NYSE:MBI), a publicly held financial guarantor insurance company headquartered in Armonk, New York, Sterling Financial Corporation (NASDAQ:STSA), a publicly held financial services company headquartered in Spokane, Washington, and Strayer Education, Inc. (NASDAQ:STRA), a publicly held education services company headquartered in Arlington, Virginia. Mr. Coulter is a member of the Compensation Committee and the Risk Committee.

Mr. Coulter’s experiences as both a former Vice Chairman and Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of publicly traded financial services corporations, JP Morgan Chase and Bank of America, respectively, and his experience as a director of public and private companies, provides the Board with extensive executive experience with regard to matters of interest to financial institutions, including risk, compensation and corporate governance matters.

John J. Crawford is President of Strategem LLC, a New Haven, Connecticut based company which provides consulting services to the business and not-for-profit community on business and financial strategies. Mr. Crawford served as President, Chief Executive Officer and a director of Aristotle Corporation, a New Haven, Connecticut based education training company from October 1992 through December 2002. Mr. Crawford continued to serve on the Board of Directors of Aristotle Corporation until August 31, 2005. From 1994 until December 2000, he served as President and Chief Executive Officer of the South Central Connecticut Regional Water Authority, New Haven, Connecticut. Mr. Crawford is Lead Director, Chair of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, and a member of the Audit Committee and the Executive Committee.

Mr. Crawford’s extensive executive and corporate governance experience as a former Chief Executive Officer of three companies, including a financial institution, and his fifteen plus years of service on Webster’s Board, including ten years as the Lead Director, provides him with a seasoned view of Webster’s operations and challenges.

Robert A. Finkenzeller is President of Eyelet Crafters, Inc., a Waterbury, Connecticut based company that manufactures deep drawn metal parts for the cosmetics, writing instrument and drapery hardware fields. Mr. Finkenzeller has held this position since 1990. Mr. Finkenzeller is a member of the Audit Committee and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.

Mr. Finkenzeller brings meaningful corporate governance experience to the Board having served as a member of the Audit, Compensation, Nominating and Corporate Governance and Risk Committees. Mr. Finkenzeller is an executive of a business based in Webster’s market area and has over twenty-five years of experience on Webster’s Board.

C. Michael Jacobi is President of Stable House 1, LLC, a Middlebury, Connecticut based company engaged in real estate development. Mr. Jacobi served from June 2001 to May 2005 as President, Chief Executive Officer and a director of Katy Industries, Inc., a publicly held company headquartered in Middlebury, Connecticut engaged in the design, manufacture and distribution of maintenance and electrical products. Mr. Jacobi is a certified public accountant. He is a director of Corrections Corporation of America (NYSE:CXW), a publicly held company headquartered in Nashville, Tennessee engaged in the ownership and management of prisons for federal, state and local governments, a director and chairman of the board of Sturm Ruger & Co., Inc. (NYSE:RGR), a publicly held company headquartered in Southport, Connecticut engaged in manufacturing and distribution of consumer products, a director of Kohlberg Capital Corporation (NASDAQ:KCAP), a publicly held company headquartered in New York, New York specializing in equity and debt investments in middle market companies, and a director of Bauer Performance Sports Ltd. (TSX:BAU), a publicly held company headquartered in Exeter, New Hampshire engaged in the design and manufacture of sports equipment. Mr. Jacobi is a member of the Compensation Committee and the Risk Committee.

 

6


Mr. Jacobi provides the Board with extensive experience and expertise in corporate finance and accounting as a Certified Public Accountant, having served as Chairman of the Audit Committee of Webster for many years. His former service as the Chief Executive Officer of a public company also brings strong executive experience to the Board.

Laurence C. Morse is the co-founder and Chief Executive Officer of Fairview Capital Partners, Inc. in West Hartford, Connecticut, an investment management firm established in 1994 that oversees venture capital funds, some of which invest capital in venture capital partnerships and similar investment vehicles that provide capital primarily to minority-controlled companies. Mr. Morse is a director of the Institute of International Education, and is a former director of Princeton University Investment Company and a former director and chairman of the National Association of Investment Companies, a private, not-for-profit trade association that represents 52 private equity and specialty finance investment firms. Mr. Morse is Chair of the Risk Committee, and is a member of the Audit Committee and the Executive Committee.

Mr. Morse’s entire career has been spent in the investment management field, including as the co-founder and Chief Executive Officer of an investment management firm, which provides the Board with extensive knowledge of the capital markets and accounting issues. His experience has made him adept at performing rigorous risk assessments of managers and management teams, and assessing new technologies, products and services, business strategies, markets and industries.

Karen R. Osar was Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Chemtura Corporation (NYSE:CHMT), a specialty chemicals company headquartered in Middlebury, Connecticut from 2004 until her retirement in March 2007. From 1999 to April 2003, Ms. Osar served as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Westvaco Corporation and Mead Westvaco Corporation. She is a director and audit committee chair of Innophos Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ:IPHS), a publicly held specialty chemicals company headquartered in Cranbury, New Jersey, a director and audit committee member of Sappi Limited (NYSE:SPP), a publicly held company engaged in the production of coated fine paper and chemical cellulose, headquartered in Johannesburg, South Africa, and from 1999 through 2006 she served as a director and audit and finance committee chair of Allergan, Inc., a publicly held multi-specialty health care company focused on developing and commercializing pharmaceuticals. Ms. Osar is Chair of the Audit Committee and a member of the Executive Committee and the Risk Committee.

Ms. Osar’s experience as the former Chief Financial Officer of a public company, her previous corporate finance experience at JPMorgan Chase & Co. and her service as Chair of the Audit Committee for Webster and as the chair of the audit committee of another public company, provides the Board with strong corporate finance and accounting experience. Her board committee service also provides corporate governance and executive compensation expertise.

Mark Pettie is President of Blackthorne, LLC, a Woodcliff Lake, New Jersey based company which provides consulting services to firms investing in a wide range of consumer oriented businesses. Mr. Pettie served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Prestige Brands Holdings, Inc. (NYSE:PBH), a publicly held company headquartered in Irvington, New York which develops, sells, distributes and markets over-the-counter drugs, household cleaning products and personal care items, from January 2007 until September 2009. He was President of the Dairy Foods Group with ConAgra from 2005 to 2006. From 1981 to 2004, Mr. Pettie held various positions of increasing responsibility in marketing and finance at Kraft Foods and was named Executive Vice President and General Manager of Kraft Food’s Coffee Division in 2002. He is a member of the Audit Committee and the Compensation Committee.

Mr. Pettie’s experience as Chief Executive Officer of a public company brings strong executive experience to the Board, along with his expertise in finance and marketing. He also has extensive business and corporate governance experience as a director for both public and private companies.

 

7


Charles W. Shivery is non-executive Chairman of the Board of Northeast Utilities (NYSE: NU). He joined Northeast Utilities in 2002 and was Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer from March 29, 2004 until April 10, 2012, upon the completion of the merger with NSTAR. He previously held posts with the company including interim president, president-Competitive Group of Northeast Utilities, and president and chief executive officer of NU Enterprises, Inc., the unregulated subsidiary of the Northeast Utilities system. Prior to that, he was co-president of the Constellation Energy Group, the parent company of Baltimore Gas & Electric and other energy related businesses. He is Chair of the Compensation Committee and a member of the Executive Committee.

Mr. Shivery’s role as President and Chief Executive Officer of an energy company provides extensive experience managing a sizable, highly regulated business. Northeast Utilities conducts business in a large part of the region serviced by Webster, so certain variables impact both businesses similarly. Mr. Shivery also provides the Webster Board with corporate governance and executive compensation knowledge.

James C. Smith is Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and a director of Webster and Webster Bank, having been appointed Chief Executive Officer in 1987 and Chairman in 1995. Mr. Smith joined Webster Bank in 1975. He was appointed President, Chief Operating Officer and a director of Webster Bank in 1982 and of Webster at its inception in 1986. Mr. Smith served as President of Webster and Webster Bank until 2000, and again from 2008 through 2011. Mr. Smith is a member of the board of directors of the Financial Services Roundtable based in Washington, D.C. He is also co-chairman of the American Bankers Council (American Bankers Association Mid-Cap Banks) and is actively engaged in the Midsize Banks Coalition of America. He served on the executive committee of the Connecticut Bankers Association until year end 2012. He is a past member of the Federal Advisory Council, which advises the deliberations of the Federal Reserve Board of Governors, and served as a member of the board of directors of the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston for a three year term ending December 2010. He is a past member of the board of directors of the American Bankers Association and of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston. He is a director of Saint Mary’s Health System and the Palace Theater, both of Waterbury, Connecticut, and was a director of MacDermid, Incorporated (NYSE:MRD) until its acquisition in June 2007. Mr. Smith is Chair of the Executive Committee.

Mr. Smith’s position as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Webster and his day to day leadership of the Company provides him with thorough knowledge of Webster’s opportunities, challenges and operations. He also has extensive experience in banking.

The Board of Directors recommends that shareholders vote FOR the election of all of its director nominees.

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

General

The business and affairs of Webster are managed under the direction of the Board of Directors (the “Board”). Members of the Board are kept informed of Webster’s business through discussions with the Chairman of the Board and Webster’s other executive officers, by reviewing materials provided to them and by participating in meetings and strategic planning sessions of the Board and its committees. The Board is also kept apprised by the Chairman of the Board and management of continuing educational programs on corporate governance and fiduciary duties and responsibilities. In addition, new directors of Webster participate in an orientation program, which is designed to familiarize them with Webster’s business and operations and with their duties as directors under applicable laws and regulations. Each member of the Board also serves as a director of Webster Bank.

 

8


Webster believes in the importance of sound and effective corporate governance. Over the years, Webster has forged an explicit link between its corporate culture and corporate governance by identifying its core values, communicating them and living them every day. With uncompromising commitment to its core principles, Webster continues to add value for its customers, shareholders, employees and the communities it serves. The Board has adopted corporate governance practices and policies which the Board and senior management believe promote this philosophy. Certain of such practices and policies are listed in the chart below and certain of those listed are discussed in greater detail elsewhere in this Proxy Statement.

 

Board and Governance Information        2012     

Size of Board

   10

Number of Independent Directors

   9

Annual Election of All Directors

   Yes

Majority Voting for Directors

   Yes

Lead Independent Director

   Yes

Independent Directors Meet Without Management Present

   Yes

Annual Equity Grant to Non Employee Directors

   Yes

Board Orientation / Education Program

   Yes

Code of Business Conduct & Ethics for Directors

   Yes

Stock Ownership Guidelines for Directors

   Yes

No Poison Pill

   Yes

Policy Prohibiting Hedging / Pledging of Company Stock

   Yes

Annual Board & Committee Evaluations

   Yes

Board Leadership

At Webster, the roles of Chairman of the Board and principal executive officer are combined, both held by Mr. Smith. In addition, there is a lead independent director who is appointed in accordance with Webster’s Corporate Governance Policy, which provides that the Board shall appoint an independent director to serve as the Lead Director of the Board for a one-year term, or until a successor is appointed. The lead independent director presides over the executive sessions of independent directors and assists and advises the Chairman of the Board. During fiscal year 2012, Mr. Crawford served as the lead independent director. The Board believes that having a combined Chairman and principal executive officer, coupled with a lead independent director, is the most appropriate leadership structure for Webster, especially given Mr. Smith’s long service as Chief Executive Officer and his extensive knowledge of the Company and its governance. This structure allows Board discussions regarding performance and strategic matters to be led by the person who oversees Webster’s strategy and operations and establishes a single voice to speak on behalf of Webster, while the lead independent director component of the structure provides independent leadership that mitigates any real or perceived conflicts of interest.

Director Independence

Pursuant to the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) listing standards, Webster is required to have a majority of “independent directors” on its Board. In addition, the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee must be composed solely of independent directors. The NYSE listing standards define specific relationships that would disqualify a director from being independent and further require that for a director to qualify as “independent,” the board of directors must affirmatively determine that the director has no material relationship with the Company.

The Board, with the assistance of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, conducted an evaluation of director independence, based primarily on a review of the responses of the directors and executive officers to questions regarding employment and compensation history, affiliations and family and other

 

9


commercial, industrial, banking consulting, legal, accounting, charitable and legal relationships with Webster, including those relationships described under “Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation” and “Certain Relationships” on page 45 of this Proxy Statement, and on discussions with the Board.

As a result of this evaluation, the Board affirmatively determined that each of Messrs. Becker, Coulter, Crawford, Finkenzeller, Jacobi, Morse, Pettie, Shivery and Ms. Osar is an “independent director” for purposes of Section 303A of the Listed Company Manual of the NYSE and applicable SEC rules and regulations. In connection with this evaluation, the Board considered that in addition to Webster providing lending and other financial services to directors, their immediate family members, and their affiliated organizations in the ordinary course of business and without preferential terms or rates, some directors and their affiliated entities provide services to Webster in the ordinary course of business. In particular, the Board considered the following relationships:

 

   

David A. Coulter was elected to the Board as a representative of Warburg Pincus Private Equity X, L.P. (“Warburg Pincus”), a significant shareholder, in connection with its investment in Webster. Mr. Coulter also serves as the Vice Chairman of Warburg Pincus. Warburg Pincus’ ownership of Webster stock does not cause Mr. Coulter to fail to meet the independence standards contained in the NYSE rules and the Board determined that, because Mr. Coulter’s interests are generally aligned with those of other Webster shareholders, his service on the Board as a representative of Warburg Pincus and his employment as Vice Chairman of Warburg Pincus do not impair his independence.

 

   

John J. Crawford is Chairman of the Board of a nonprofit organization to which Webster Bank made a charitable contribution in 2012. The Board determined that the amount contributed by Webster Bank was not material and would not impair Mr. Crawford’s independence.

 

   

C. Michael Jacobi’s son, Gregory Jacobi, was employed by Webster Bank in 2012 as a Senior Vice President. Mr. Jacobi’s son’s employment position with Webster Bank does not violate the independence standards contained in the NYSE rules and the Board determined that this relationship is not material and would not impair Mr. Jacobi’s independence, in part because Mr. Jacobi’s son is not an executive officer of Webster and his compensation and benefits were established in accordance with the compensation policies and practices applicable to Webster employees in comparable positions.

Mr. Smith is not considered independent because he is an executive officer of Webster and Webster Bank.

Executive Sessions of Independent Directors

In keeping with Webster’s Corporate Governance Policy, in 2012 the Board held two meetings that were limited to independent directors. The lead independent director presides over the executive sessions of independent directors.

Risk Oversight

The Board administers its risk oversight function primarily through the Risk Committee, which is described in more detail below. The Risk Committee meets frequently throughout the year and reports its findings to the full Board on an ongoing basis. In addition, the Compensation Committee and the Risk Committee review and assess risks as related to Webster’s compensation programs. Webster also has a Chief Risk Officer, Daniel H. Bley, who reports in that capacity to the Risk Committee, as well as two senior risk officers who report to the Chief Risk Officer.

 

10


Board and Committee Meetings

During 2012, Webster held 12 meetings of its Board. Each incumbent director attended at least 75 percent of the aggregate of (i) the total number of meetings held by the Board during the period that the individual served and (ii) the total number of meetings held by all committees of the Board on which the individual served during the period that the individual served.

Committees of the Board; Code of Business Conduct and Ethics and Corporate Governance Guidelines

The Board has established five standing committees. The standing committees are the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, the Executive Committee and the Risk Committee. The Board has adopted a charter for each of these committees, as well as corporate governance guidelines that address the make-up and functioning of the Board and qualification guidelines for board members. The Board has also adopted a code of business conduct and ethics (the “Code of Conduct”) that applies to all employees, officers and directors. Each employee, officer and director participates in an annual training session that focuses on topics covered by our Code of Conduct. The training reinforces our core values and our commitment to full compliance with applicable laws and regulations. You can find links to these materials on the Company’s website at: www.wbst.com.

You can also obtain a printed copy of any of the materials referred to above, without charge, by contacting us at the following address:

Webster Financial Corporation

145 Bank Street

Waterbury, Connecticut 06702

Attn: Harriet Munrett Wolfe, Esq.

Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary

The Board has determined that all of the Directors who serve on the Audit, Compensation, and Nominating and Corporate Governance committees are “independent” for purposes of Section 303A of the Listed Company Manual of the NYSE. In addition, all of the Directors who serve on the Risk Committee are “independent.”

Audit Committee

The Board has appointed an Audit Committee that oversees the Company’s financial reporting process, the system of internal financial and accounting controls, the audit process, and compliance with applicable laws and regulations. The Audit Committee reviews the Company’s annual financial statements, including management’s discussion and analysis, and regulatory examination findings. The Audit Committee recommends the appointment of an independent registered public accounting firm and is responsible for the oversight of such firm. A copy of the Audit Committee’s charter is available on the Company’s website at: www.wbst.com. During 2012, the Audit Committee held five meetings. The members of the Audit Committee currently are Ms. Osar (Chair) and Messrs. Crawford, Finkenzeller, Morse and Pettie. Each of the members of the Audit Committee meets the independence requirements of the rules of the NYSE and applicable rules and regulations of the SEC. The Board has determined that each of the members of the Audit Committee is financially literate and that Ms. Osar and Mr. Crawford each qualify as an “audit committee financial expert,” as that term is defined in Item 407(d)(5) of Regulation S-K.

Compensation Committee

The Board has appointed a Compensation Committee. During 2012, the Compensation Committee held five meetings. Compensation Committee meetings are attended by Webster’s Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Chief Operating Officer (“COO”), other than while their compensation and benefits are discussed. For a

 

11


description of the role of Webster’s CEO in determining or recommending the amount of compensation paid to our named executive officers during 2012, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis.” The members of the Compensation Committee currently are Messrs. Shivery (Chair), Coulter, Jacobi and Pettie. Each of the members of the Compensation Committee meets the independence requirements of the rules of the NYSE, and also serves as the Compensation Committee of the Company’s subsidiary, Webster Bank. A copy of the Compensation Committee’s charter is available on the Company’s website at: www.wbst.com. The Compensation Committee may delegate to its chairperson or any other Compensation Committee member such power and authority as the Compensation Committee deems appropriate, except such powers and authorities required by law to be exercised by the whole Compensation Committee or subcommittee thereof.

Pursuant to the Compensation Committee’s charter, among other responsibilities, the Committee is charged with annually reviewing and approving annual bonus arrangements and long term incentive compensation paid to the CEO and COO. The Committee reviews and makes recommendations to the Board with respect to the annual base salary, and severance and/or change in control or similar agreements/provisions, if any, for the CEO and COO; annually determining such compensation and benefits for the members of the Company’s Executive Management Committee other than the CEO and COO; annually recommending to the Board the content of the annual performance evaluation for the CEO and COO and reviewing performance evaluations for all members of the Executive Management Committee; administering and implementing the Company’s performance-based incentive plans; reviewing the talent management and succession planning processes to ensure that there is a pool of qualified candidates to fill future Executive Management Committee positions; and reviewing and approving on a periodic basis the Company’s employee stock ownership guidelines. The Committee also reviews and makes recommendations to the Board with respect to director compensation.

For information on the role of compensation consultants determining or recommending the amount or form of executive or directors compensation, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis – Role of Compensation Consultant.”

Executive Committee

The Board has appointed an Executive Committee that has responsibility for serving as an exploratory committee for mergers and acquisitions and to serve as an ad hoc committee as needed. The Executive Committee did not meet during 2012. The members of the Executive Committee are Messrs. Smith (Chair), Crawford, Morse, Shivery and Ms. Osar.

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

The Board has appointed a Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee that has overall responsibility for recommending corporate governance process and board operations for the Company. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee identifies director candidates, reviews the qualifications and experience of each person considered as a nominee for election or reelection as a director, and recommends director nominees to fill vacancies on the Board and for approval by the Board and the shareholders. A copy of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s charter is available on the Company’s website at: www.wbst.com. During 2012, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee held two meetings. The members of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee are Messrs. Crawford (Chair), Becker and Finkenzeller. Each member of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee meets the independence requirements of the rules of the NYSE.

Risk Committee

The Board has appointed a Risk Committee whose primary function is to assist the Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities regarding the Company’s enterprise risk management, receiving information regarding the Company’s policies, procedures and practices relating to risk, and discussing material regulatory issues,

 

12


compliance matters, and emerging risks to the Company. The Risk Committee also has responsibility for overseeing management’s monitoring of security issues. During 2012, the Risk Committee held six meetings. The members of the Risk Committee are Messrs. Morse (Chair), Becker, Coulter, Jacobi and Ms. Osar.

Director Qualifications and Nominations

The Board believes that it should be composed of directors with diverse experience in business and in areas that are relevant to the Company, and that directors should, at a minimum, possess the highest personal and professional ethics, integrity and values, and be committed to representing the long-term interests of the shareholders. Directors should also have an objective perspective and practical wisdom, and should be willing and able to devote the required amount of time to Webster’s business. These attributes are embodied in Webster’s Qualification Guidelines for Board Members, which specifies that diversity is one of the factors to be considered in deciding on nominations for directors.

When considering candidates for the Board, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee takes into account a number of factors, including the following:

 

   

independence from management;

   

judgment, skill, integrity and reputation;

   

relevant specific industry experience;

   

age, gender and ethnic background;

   

current position with another business or entity;

   

potential conflicts of interests with other pursuits; and

   

existing ties to the Company’s and Bank’s markets.

When seeking candidates for director, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee may solicit suggestions from incumbent directors, management or others, including third party search firms. The Committee will review the qualifications and experience of each candidate. If the Committee believes a candidate would be a valuable addition to the Board, it will recommend to the full Board that candidate’s election. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee reviews and assesses the effectiveness of the Qualification Guidelines for Board Members periodically.

Webster’s Bylaws also permit shareholders eligible to vote at the Annual Meeting to make nominations for directors, but only if such nominations are made pursuant to timely notice in writing to the Secretary of Webster. To be timely, notice must be delivered to, or mailed to and received at, the principal executive offices of Webster not less than 30 days nor more than 90 days prior to the date of the meeting, provided that at least 45 days’ notice or prior public disclosure of the date of the Annual Meeting is given or made to shareholders. If less than 45 days’ notice or prior public disclosure of the date of the Annual Meeting is given or made to shareholders, notice by the shareholder to be timely must be received by Webster not later than the close of business on the 15th day following the day on which such notice of the date of the Annual Meeting was mailed or such public disclosure was made. Public disclosure of the date of the Annual Meeting was made by the issuance of a press release on February 14, 2013 and by filing a Current Report on Form 8-K under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 14, 2013. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider candidates for director suggested by shareholders applying the criteria for candidates described above and considering the additional information required by Article III, Section 13 of Webster’s Bylaws, which must be set forth in a shareholder’s notice of nomination. Section 13 of Webster’s Bylaws requires that the notice include: (a) as to each person whom the shareholder proposes to nominate for election or reelection as a director, (i) the name, age, business address and residence address of such person, (ii) the principal occupation or employment of such person, (iii) the class and number of shares of Webster which are beneficially owned by such person, and (iv) any other information relating to such person that is required to be disclosed in solicitations or proxies for election of directors, or is otherwise required, in each case pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (including without limitation such person’s written consent to being named in the proxy statement as a nominee and to serving as

 

13


a director if elected); and (b) as to the shareholder giving notice, (i) the name and address, as they appear on Webster’s books, of such shareholder, and (ii) the class and number of shares of Webster which are beneficially owned by such shareholder. In considering any nominees for directors recommended by a shareholder, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considers, among other things, the same factors set forth above.

Compensation of Directors

The following table summarizes the compensation paid to Webster’s non-employee directors during 2012. Employee directors of Webster receive no additional compensation for serving as directors or committee members of Webster or its subsidiaries. Beyond these and other standard arrangements described below, no other compensation was paid to any such director.

 

Name

   Fees Earned or
Paid in Cash
($) (1)
   Stock
Awards
($) (2)
   Option
Awards
($) (3)
   All Other
Compensation
($) (4)
   Total
($)
 

Joel S. Becker

   53,400    63,387    —      1,926.50      118,714   

David A. Coulter

   48,400    63,387    —      1,926.50      113,714   

John J. Crawford

   83,200    63,387    —      1,926.50      148,514   

Robert A. Finkenzeller

   50,900    63,387    —      1,926.50      116,214   

C. Michael Jacobi

   53,800    63,387    —      1,926.50      119,114   

Laurence C. Morse

   63,000    63,387    —      1,926.50      128,314   

Karen R. Osar

   70,200    63,387    —      1,926.50      135,514   

Mark Pettie

   55,400    63,387    —      1,926.50      120,714   

Charles W. Shivery

   58,000    63,387    —      1,926.50      123,314   

 

(1)

Includes meeting fees, fees paid to Mr. Crawford as Lead Director and committee chair, to Messrs. Morse, Shivery and Ms. Osar as committee chairs and the $32,000 annual retainer fee.

 

(2)

The amounts in this column represent the aggregate grant date fair value computed in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 718. The grant date fair value of the restricted shares awarded to Ms. Osar and Messrs. Becker, Coulter, Crawford, Finkenzeller, Jacobi, Morse, Pettie and Shivery in 2012 was $22.76 per share. The assumptions used to calculate the amount recognized for these stock awards are set forth in footnote 20 to Webster’s audited financial statements contained in Webster’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012. As of December 31, 2012, Ms. Osar and Messrs. Becker, Coulter, Crawford, Finkenzeller, Jacobi, Morse, Pettie and Shivery had 5,629 unvested restricted shares from the annual equity grants of 2010, 2011 and 2012.

 

(3)

No stock options were granted to non-employee directors in 2012. As of December 31, 2012, each director had the following number of options outstanding, all of which are currently exercisable: Mr. Becker, 58,528; Mr. Coulter, 12,000; Mr. Crawford, 58,528; Mr. Finkenzeller, 58,528; Mr. Jacobi, 58,528; Mr. Morse, 54,528; Ms. Osar, 46,528; Mr. Pettie, 25,423; and Mr. Shivery, 13,274.

 

(4)

Reflects the dollar amount of dividends paid on unvested restricted stock for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012.

Webster uses a combination of cash and restricted stock to attract and retain qualified candidates to serve on the Board. Webster targets director compensation to be at the median for its peer group (as described in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” below), with the opportunity to earn significantly more based on Webster’s total shareholder return. Stock ownership guidelines have also been established for directors to closely align directors’ interests with those of Webster’s shareholders.

 

14


During 2012, each non-employee director of Webster received an annual retainer of $32,000. In addition, non-employee directors of Webster received 2,785 shares of restricted stock, which vest incrementally over three years.

In addition, except as set forth below, each non-employee director received $1,200 for each Webster or Webster Bank Board meeting attended, $1,200 for each committee meeting attended, and $600 for each telephonic Webster or Webster Bank Board and committee meeting called by either Webster or Webster Bank. Each non-employee director of both Webster and Webster Bank received a total of $2,000 for separate board meetings of Webster and Webster Bank that were held on the same day. Non-employee directors receive $1,000 for a committee meeting if it is held on the same day as a Board meeting and $1,000 for a second committee meeting if more than one committee meeting is held on the same day. Webster also reimburses directors for reasonable travel expenses incurred in connection with attending off-site Board meetings (including the travel expenses of spouses if they are specifically invited to attend).

In 2012, the Lead Director received an additional annual retainer of $22,500. The Chair of the Audit Committee received an annual additional retainer of $15,000, the Chair of the Compensation Committee and the Chair of the Risk Committee received additional annual retainers of $10,000 and the Chair of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee received an additional annual retainer of $7,500.

Our stock ownership guidelines require non-employee directors to own Webster Common Stock with a market value equal to at least $100,000. Non-employee directors who do not meet the guidelines agree to hold all long-term incentives, which include vested restricted stock and exercised stock options (net of exercise price and taxes), until they achieve the required ownership threshold of Webster Common Stock.

Communications with Directors

The Company’s shareholders and other interested persons who want to communicate with the Board of Directors, any individual Director, the Lead Director, the non-management directors as a group or any other group of directors, can write to:

[Name of Director or Directors]

c/o Lead Director of the Board of Directors

Webster Financial Corporation

P.O. Box 1074

754 Chapel Street

New Haven, Connecticut 06510

All communications received (except for communications that are primarily commercial in nature or relate to an improper or irrelevant topic) will be forwarded to the intended recipient(s) or the full Board, as appropriate.

Director Attendance at Annual Meetings

Webster typically schedules a meeting of the Board of Directors in conjunction with the annual meeting and expects that the Board of Directors will attend the annual meeting, absent a valid reason, such as a previously scheduled conflict. Last year all of the individuals then serving as directors attended the annual meeting.

 

15


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION AND OTHER INFORMATION

Named Executive Officers of Webster Financial Corporation

The following table sets forth information regarding the Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Financial Officer, the three other most highly compensated executive officers who were serving on December 31, 2012, and one former executive officer who would have been one of such other three most highly compensated executive officers but for the fact that he was not serving as an executive officer at the end of 2012 (the “named executive officers” or “NEOs”).

 

Name

   Age as of
December 31, 2012
  

Positions with Webster and Webster Bank

James C. Smith

   63    Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Director

Gerald P. Plush

   54    President, Chief Operating Officer and Director of Webster Bank

Glenn I. MacInnes

   51    Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Joseph J. Savage

   60    Executive Vice President, Commercial Banking

Anne M. Slattery (1)

   65    Former Executive Vice President, Retail Banking

Jeffrey N. Brown (2)

   55    Former Executive Vice President, Human Resources, Marketing and Communications

 

1

Anne M. Slattery retired from Webster and relinquished all offices and positions held with Webster effective December 31, 2012.

 

2

Jeffrey N. Brown resigned from Webster and relinquished all offices and positions held with Webster effective August 31, 2012.

Provided below is biographical information for each of Webster’s NEOs, other than Mr. Smith. For information regarding Mr. Smith, see “Election of Directors-Information as to Nominees and Other Directors.”

Gerald P. Plush is President and Chief Operating Officer of Webster and Webster Bank and a director of Webster Bank. Mr. Plush joined Webster in July 2006 as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and was promoted to Senior Executive Vice President in July 2007. He was appointed Chief Risk Officer in July 2008 and served in this role until August 2010. Mr. Plush was promoted to Vice Chairman and Chief Operating Officer on January 5, 2011, and to President and elected to the board of directors of Webster Bank on December 15, 2011. Prior to joining Webster, Mr. Plush was employed at MBNA America in Wilmington, Delaware, from 1995 to 2006 in a number of senior executive positions. Mr. Plush serves as chairman of the board of directors of Junior Achievement of Southwest New England, Inc., on the board of trustees of the Connecticut Public Broadcasting Network, and on the executive committee of the Connecticut Bankers Association.

Glenn I. MacInnes is Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Webster and Webster Bank. He joined Webster in 2011. Prior to that, Mr. MacInnes was Chief Financial Officer at New Alliance Bancshares in New Haven, Connecticut for two years and was employed for 11 years at Citigroup in a series of positions, including deputy chief financial officer for Citibank North America and chief financial officer of Citibank (West) FSB. Mr. MacInnes serves on the Board of Directors of the International Festival of Arts & Ideas.

Joseph J. Savage is Executive Vice President of Webster and Executive Vice President, Commercial Banking for Webster Bank. He joined Webster in April 2002. Prior to joining Webster, Mr. Savage was Executive Vice President of the Communications and Energy Banking Group for CoBank in Denver, Colorado from 1996 to April 2002. Mr. Savage serves as a director of the Hartford Metro Alliance, the Connecticut Technology Council and the Travelers Championship Committee.

 

16


Anne M. Slattery served as Executive Vice President, Retail Banking of Webster and Webster Bank until December 31, 2012. Ms. Slattery was appointed to this position in October 2009. She was a consultant for Webster from May 2009 until October 2009. Prior to joining Webster, Ms. Slattery headed her own manufacturing company, Carlon Products Co. in Connecticut, from March 2002 until February 2009. Earlier in her career, she was President of Marymount College in Tarrytown, New York and held senior positions at Fleet Bank and Citibank.

Jeffrey N. Brown served as Executive Vice President, Human Resources, Marketing and Communications of Webster and Webster Bank until August 31, 2012. Mr. Brown was appointed to this position in December 2011. Mr. Brown joined Webster in 1996 as Executive Vice President of Marketing and Communications for Webster Bank and assumed responsibility for strategic planning in 1997 until January 2010. He was appointed Executive Vice President of Marketing and Communications for the Company in March 2004. In July 2007, he was appointed Chief Administrative Officer of both Webster and Webster Bank. Mr. Brown serves on the board of directors of the Bushnell Center for the Performing Arts and the Wadsworth Atheneum, both in Hartford, Connecticut. He serves as a trustee of the World Affairs Council of Connecticut and as a member of the board of directors for the Eastern Connecticut State University Foundation.

Compensation Committee Report

The Compensation Committee met with management to review and discuss the Compensation Discussion and Analysis disclosures that follow. Based on such review and discussion, the Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement and incorporated by reference in the Company’s Form 10-K for its 2012 fiscal year, and the Board has approved the recommendation.

Compensation Committee

Charles W. Shivery (Chair)

David A. Coulter

C. Michael Jacobi

Mark Pettie

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

The Compensation Discussion and Analysis (“CD&A”) discusses in detail the 2012 compensation program for the Company’s named executive officers (“NEOs”). The Compensation Committee (“Committee”) recommends the base salary for the CEO and COO to the Board of Directors, approves the annual and long term incentives for the CEO and COO, and sets the compensation for Webster’s other NEOs. Non-NEO members of the Executive Management Committee are also compensated under this program.

At the annual meeting of shareholders held on April 26, 2012, Webster held an advisory vote on executive compensation. Although the vote was non-binding, the Committee has considered and will continue to consider the outcome of the vote when determining compensation policies and setting NEO compensation. Approximately 93% of the shares of Webster Common Stock that were voted on the proposal were voted for the approval of the compensation of the NEOs as discussed in Webster’s 2012 Proxy Statement. The Committee believes that the results of this advisory vote show strong support for Webster’s compensation policies and procedures, and decided no changes in the overall structure of the programs were needed at this time.

Objectives of Compensation Program

Webster’s executive compensation program is designed to attract, retain and motivate qualified executives and to reward actions and results that the Committee and Board of Directors believe will increase Economic Profits1 and maximize shareholder return. Special attention is given to ensuring that compensation plans do not encourage NEOs and other executive officers to take unnecessary or excessive risks.

 

17


Webster’s compensation program closely aligns total compensation with achievement of Webster’s strategic and financial goals. A meaningful portion of total compensation is tied to future shareholder return thereby rewarding NEOs for pursuing strategies that increase Economic Profits over time.

1 Economic Profits is a non-GAAP measure and is calculated at both the consolidated and business unit level. Economic Profits is defined as the net income earned over the cost of capital.

The compensation program has three primary objectives:

 

   

Equity-Based—A substantial portion of the total compensation opportunity is equity-based and is highly dependent on the Company’s return on equity and total shareholder return (“TSR”) over a three-year period.

 

   

Performance-Based—A majority of total compensation is intended to be variable based on the Company’s success in achieving predetermined strategic and financial goals and its performance relative to its Compensation Peer Group (“Peer Group”).

 

   

Competitive—Total compensation opportunities should be competitive, thus enabling Webster to attract and retain highly qualified NEOs who will be motivated to achieve Webster’s strategic and financial goals.

Setting 2012 Compensation

In April 2012 the Committee reviewed all elements of compensation for NEOs and approved the compensation structure as consistent with the objectives outlined above. The design comprises base salary, annual incentive and long term incentive (“LTI”). The annual incentive rewards current year performance, while the long term equity-based incentive grant aligns the NEOs’ interests with the long term goals and performance of the Company. The long term incentive grant, made in February each year, comprises a 60/40 mix of performance-based shares and stock options. The grant is based in part on NEOs’ prior year performance. Performance shares have a three-year cliff vesting and stock options have a three-year vesting of one-third on each anniversary.

For 2012, the Committee approved total compensation for NEOs that is generally higher than compensation for 2011, given the continuing improvement in financial and credit-related results, measurable progress toward achieving strategic goals, and improved financial performance relative to Webster’s Peer Group. The Committee noted that Webster exceeded strategic goals for revenue growth, non-interest income, and employee engagement.

The Committee intends that total compensation should be commensurate with that at like institutions with similar performance. Given 2012 financial performance that was approximately at the peer median, the Committee intended that total direct compensation (the total of base salary, the annual incentive and long-term incentives) be reasonably commensurate with median peer group total direct compensation.

Compensation Consultant

In carrying out its responsibilities, the Committee engages McLagan, an independent compensation consultant, to offer market perspectives on annual pay, current executive compensation trends and compensation programs currently in place at Webster. The consultant also provides insight into regulatory issues affecting compensation. The Committee has the authority to hire and terminate the consultant and determine the nature and scope of the consultant’s assignments. The Committee has engaged McLagan since June 2010. The Committee reviewed the work performed by McLagan and, under SEC and NYSE regulations, determined that the work did not create a conflict of interest.

 

18


McLagan provided the Committee ongoing insights relating to trends in executive compensation in the banking sector. At the direction of the Committee, McLagan reviewed all elements of compensation for the NEOs and made recommendations with regard to plan design. McLagan reviewed management’s proposals to the Committee regarding 2012 executive compensation and also presented an analysis of Webster’s 2012 performance relative to the Peer Group as an additional point of reference. McLagan attended all Committee meetings and in each one of those meetings had the opportunity to meet with the Committee in executive session. The Committee weighs the consultant’s perspective as part of its decision making process. The Committee communicates compensation decisions directly to management. McLagan did not determine the amount or form of compensation paid to Webster’s executive officers or directors during 2012.

Compensation Peer Group

The Committee regularly uses proxy information for the Peer Group to review annually the compensation of Webster’s NEOs relative to comparable positions. This review is supplemented by available market survey data. The Committee may also use comparisons to the Peer Group to consider other market practices relevant to the scope of the NEOs’ responsibilities. This may include, for example, change in control provisions and stock ownership guidelines.

In 2012, the Committee considered actual and, where available, target compensation data from the Peer Group. This data was presented by McLagan and contributed to an assessment of the competitiveness of actual and target pay for Webster NEOs.

The Committee reviews the composition of the Peer Group annually with the assistance of McLagan with the objective of maintaining a group of peer banks that individually and collectively represent suitable comparators for compensation-related analyses. Suitability is defined using a number of factors, including size, scope, business mix and geographic focus. Scope measures include total assets, net revenue, market capitalization and number of employees. Business mix is reflected by an analysis of loan composition (consumer, real estate, commercial and construction) and revenue composition (sources and proportion of net interest income and non-interest income). Banks with a geographic focus outside the continental United States are excluded regardless of the appropriateness of their scope and business mix. In 2012, McLagan, at the request of the Compensation Committee, prepared an evaluation of our peer group. McLagan recommended to the Committee to remove Synovus Financial Corp. from our peer group due to recent performance, and recommended that the Committee replace Synovus with Hancock Holding Company which is more comparable in size and other selection criteria. The Committee approved the recommendation. The Committee identified the 13 companies listed below as the Peer Group for 2012:

 

PEER GROUP

Associated Banc-Corp

  

Fulton Financial Corporation

BancorpSouth, Inc.

  

Hancock Holding Company

BOK Financial Corporation

  

People’s United Financial, Inc.

City National Corporation

  

Susquehanna Bankshares, Inc.

Commerce Bancshares, Inc.

  

TCF Financial Corporation

Cullen/Frost Bankers, Inc.

  

Valley National Bancorp

First Niagara Financial Group, Inc.

    

Elements of 2012 Compensation

Webster’s compensation program has three basic elements: a fixed base salary, a variable annual cash incentive and a variable equity-based long term incentive. All elements of compensation are reviewed annually, both separately and in aggregate by the Committee, to ensure that the total amount of compensation is within

 

19


appropriate competitive parameters based on data from independent sources and based on the performance of the Company and NEOs. The program is intended to provide NEOs with a compensation opportunity commensurate with persons with similar duties and responsibilities at other financial institutions with comparable performance. In determining levels of NEOs’ overall compensation, the Committee also considers the qualifications and experience of the respective officer, Webster’s size and complexity of operations and, to a certain extent, the compensation paid to other persons employed by the Company. The Committee uses external data as input for the Committee’s analysis and to obtain a general understanding of current compensation practices rather than strict rules for establishing compensation. A large portion of pay is tied to strategic and financial performance and other goals believed to be related to increasing shareholder value over the long term. Consequently, actual compensation received will vary from targeted compensation.

In early 2012, the Committee engaged McLagan to provide an analysis of Webster’s total compensation as well as the individual components compared to the Peer Group and McLagan’s 2011 Top Management Survey. This data contributed to an assessment of the competitiveness of actual and target pay for Webster’s NEOs. Based on the findings, the Committee set the components of pay and the weight of each component creating a structure that reflects Webster’s objectives for compensation outlined above while allowing individual variations based on job scope, tenure, retention risk, and other factors relevant to the Committee.

The chart below breaks down total compensation by element as well as the weight and target of each component by NEO for the program approved in February 2012.

 

Components of Total Direct Compensation at Target   
           
      Salary     Annual
Incentive Target
    Total Cash
Compensation at
Target
   

Long Term Incentive

(60% Performance Shares
40% Stock Options)

      Total Direct Compensation
Target
 
                     
James C. Smith, Chairman and CEO    $ 879,800         26%      $ 879,800         26%      $ 1,759,600         52%      $ 1,627,630         48%      $ 3,387,230         100%   
                     
Gerald P. Plush, President and COO    $ 535,000         35%      $ 374,500         25%      $ 909,500         60%      $ 615,250         40%      $ 1,524,750         100%   
                     
Glenn I. MacInnes, EVP and CFO    $ 400,000         40%      $ 250,000         25%      $ 650,000         65%      $ 350,000         35%      $ 1,000,000         100%   
                     
Joseph J. Savage, EVP, Commercial Banking    $ 330,500         40%      $ 214,825         26%      $ 545,325         66%      $ 280,925         34%      $ 826,250         100%   
                     
Anne M. Slattery, Former EVP, Retail Banking    $ 310,000         40%      $ 201,500         26%      $ 511,500         66%      $ 263,500         34%      $ 775,000         100%   
                     
Jeffrey N. Brown, Former EVP, HR, Marketing and Communications    $ 324,000         41%      $ 210,600         27%      $ 534,600         67%      $ 259,200         33%      $ 793,800         100%   

Salary

Annual salary is the only fixed component of Webster’s executive compensation program. In setting salary, the Committee looks at current pay practices, Peer Group comparisons and general market analysis in consultation with its compensation consultant, McLagan. The Committee then establishes salaries that are competitive to the Peer Group for similar positions. The salaries are reviewed on an annual basis by the Committee.

In the case of a change in role, an officer’s new responsibilities, external pay practices, internal equity, past performance and experience are all considered in determining whether a change in salary is warranted.

As part of the Committee’s annual salary review, salaries were determined to be competitive when compared with the actual proxy data of the Peer Group and benchmark survey information. In 2012, none of the NEOs received a merit increase or adjustment to base salary as a result of this review.

 

20


Annual Incentive Compensation – Plan Overview

Annual incentive compensation is variable based on performance and ties a significant portion of the NEOs’ compensation to achievement of the Company’s annual strategic and financial goals. Measurements for the plan are approved annually by the Committee. For 2012, target incentives were set for each of the NEOs between 25% and 27% of total compensation. The plan is designed so that the weighted average performance for the financial measures must exceed a predetermined threshold before a payout can be made.

The plan is structured to include three Primary Components: the Corporate Component, the Individual Component and the Line of Business Component. Measures for each of these three components vary in weight based on each officer’s responsibilities.

The Corporate Component has three elements: Financial Performance, Strategic Assessment, and Performance Relative to Peer Group. Financial Performance is determined by scoring performance against five pre-established financial measures. Each measure is weighted based on relative importance and then the measures are totaled to determine a weighted score. Adjustments to this score may then be made based on the Committee’s assessment of the measurable progress against the Company’s stated strategic objectives (the Strategic Assessment) and its performance against key metrics relative to its Peer Group (Performance Relative to Peer Group).

The Individual Component is determined based on an assessment of each NEO’s individual performance measured against specific performance objectives.

The Line of Business Component is determined based on the financial and operating results of the line of business against its goals for the year and an assessment of results against strategic objectives. The program dictates that the Line of Business Component is not scored or paid out unless the Corporate Component is scored at or above its threshold payout level. Mr. Savage, Webster’s Executive Vice President, Commercial Banking, and Ms. Slattery, Webster’s Former Executive Vice President, Retail Banking, are the only line of business heads among the NEOs.

The three Primary Components are weighted based on each NEO’s responsibilities. The CEO and other corporate officers’ incentives are weighted 80% on the Corporate Component and 20% on the Individual Component. As line of business heads, both Mr. Savage’s and Ms. Slattery’s incentives were weighted 40% on the Corporate Component, 20% on the Individual Component and 40% on the Line of Business Component. The weighting of the Primary Components is shown in the chart below:

 

Weight of Primary Components   
       
      Corporate     Individual     Line of Business  
       

James C. Smith, Chairman and CEO

     80     20     0
       

Gerald P. Plush, President and COO

     80     20     0
       

Glenn I. MacInnes, EVP and CFO

     80     20     0
       

Joseph J. Savage, EVP, Commercial Banking

     40     20     40
       

Anne M. Slattery, Former EVP, Retail Banking

     40     20     40
       

Jeffrey N. Brown, Former EVP, HR, Marketing and Communications

     80     20     0

 

21


Annual Incentive Scoring

Corporate Component. The Corporate Component is determined first by calculating a weighted performance score against five pre-established financial measures (Financial Performance). The resulting score may then be modified up or down at the Committee’s discretion by up to 30% of target based on performance relative to stated strategic goals (Strategic Assessment) and by 30% of target based on performance relative to Webster’s Peer Group (Performance Relative to Peer Group). The Committee has discretion to make adjustments for extraordinary, unusual or non-recurring items. Scores below 50% on an individual measure are reduced to zero and a total weighted score below 50% on the five goals in the aggregate earns no payout.

The Corporate Component rating generates a potential payout of 0% to 200% of target. A score of 100% would pay out at target. On average, each 3% increment of a measure above 100% increases the payout score by 10% with a maximum payout of 200% of target. On average, each 5% increment below 100% reduces the score by 10%. There is a threshold score of approximately 70%, which generates a payout of 50% of target, below which no incentive is earned.

Financial Performance. Webster achieved 2012 results above target on each of its five financial goals. From 2011 to 2012, Pre-Tax Pre-Provision income improved from $224.1M to $271.4M, Return on Average Equity improved from 8.20% to 8.65%, Return on Average Assets improved from 0.84% to 0.87%, the Efficiency Ratio improved from 65.45% to 62.78% and Classified Assets to Tier 1 Capital plus Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses (“ALLL”) improved from 44.82% to 35.71%. These results reflect adjustments for non-recurring items. The adjustments had the effect of reducing the GAAP score from 120% to 117%. The chart below shows the adjusted Financial Performance.

 

 

2012 Annual Incentive Corporate Component - Financial Performance

 
           
Financial Metric    Target      Actual     Score      Weight      Payout  
           

Pre-Tax Pre-Provision Income

   $ 257.00       $ 271.40        120.00%         35%         42.00%   
           

Return on Average Equity

     8.29%         8.65%        113.58%         30%         34.07%   
           

Efficiency Ratio

     63.43%         62.78% 1       108.50%         15%         16.28%   
           

Return on Average Assets

     0.81%         0.87%        124.00%         10%         12.40%   
           

Classified Assets/Tier 1 Capital + ALLL

     38.57%         35.71%        126.36%         10%         12.64%   
           

TOTAL

                               100%         117%   

 

1 

The Efficiency Ratio excludes one time items.

Strategic Assessment. The Committee has discretion to adjust the weighted Financial Performance score within the Corporate Component by plus or minus 30% of target based on Webster’s strategic performance against the objectives set forth in the strategic plan. In conducting its review, the Committee noted Webster’s strong growth in business/commercial loans, progress in growing transaction balances and expedited problem asset resolution as having contributed to revenue growth ahead of plan. The Committee noted non-interest income is ahead of plan due primarily to strong growth in mortgage banking and treasury services. Banker engagement exceeded target by 1% and retention of high value bankers fell short of target by 1%. Based on its review, the Committee did not apply a strategic adjustment to the weighted rating. The 2012 strategic measurements are summarized in the chart below.

 

22


2012 Annual Incentive Plan - Strategic Assessment  
Strategy    Target     Actual  

Revenue Growth (excluding Economic Loss)

        

Middle Market

   $ 9.2      $ 19.9   

Consumer Finance

   $ 5.7      $ 16.4   

Small Business

   ($ 1.6   ($ 2.8

Private Banking

   $ 5.1      $ 1.8   
    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total Revenue Growth

   $ 18.4      $ 35.3   

% Revenue Growth

     5.9     11.30

Generate higher non-interest income from existing lines of business:

        

Non Interest Income

   $ 180.7      $ 189.4   

Foster a strong culture that values employees, encourages development and rewards performance:

        

Banker engagement two points higher than industry benchmark survey

     2     3

Retention of high value bankers

     95     94

Performance Relative to Peer Group. The Committee also has discretion to adjust the weighted score within the Corporate Component by plus or minus 30% of target based on Webster’s performance relative to its Peer Group. The Committee assesses Webster’s performance relative to its Peer Group against a set of five predetermined measures. Webster outperformed the peer group in the return on average equity and return on average assets categories and maintained its position at the 62nd percentile in both categories as compared to 2011. Webster underperformed against the pre-tax, pre-provision income to average assets metric but improved from the 31st percentile in 2011 to the 38th percentile in 2012, underperformed against the efficiency ratio metric but improved from the 23rd percentile in 2011 to the 46th percentile in 2012, and underperformed in the non-performing loans to total loans metric and lost ground from the 54th percentile in 2011 to the 31st percentile in 2012.

 

23


Applying the same weightings to these metrics as the Committee applies to the similar metrics in the Financial Performance component, Webster’s weighted average financial performance improved relative to the peer group by 4% from 44.2% in 2011 to 48.1% in 2012 to the 48th percentile overall. The Committee noted that, while improved over the prior year, performance still slightly trailed the Peer Group. Therefore, the Committee determined that a downward adjustment of 4% was appropriate. The table below shows Webster’s performance relative to the Peer Group:

 

2012 Annual Incentive - Performance Relative to Peer Group   
Measure    Webster
2012
Results
   

Webster
2011

% Rank

    Webster
2012 %
Rank
    2012     2011  
         Weight     Weighted
Score
    Weight     Weighted
Score
 

Pre-tax Pre-Provision Income/Avg. Assets

     1.39     31     38     35     13.30     35     10.75

Return on Average Equity

     8.92     62     62     30     18.60     30     18.45

Efficiency Ratio

     62.97 %1      23     46     15     6.90     15     3.45

Return on Average Assets

     0.90     62     62     10     6.20     10     6.15

Non-Performing Loans/Loans

     1.61     54     31     10     3.10     10     5.40

Weighted Score:

                             48.10%        44.20%   

 

1 

The Efficiency Ratio for Peer Group comparison, as calculated by SNL, includes $1.5 million in one time severance related expenses.

Final Corporate Component. The Corporate Component is then calculated by taking the Financial Performance score of 117% and applying the Strategic Assessment adjustment of 0% and the Performance Relative to Peer Group adjustment of (4%) for a total score of 113% of target.

 

2012 Annual Incentive - Financial Performance & Adjustments
Financial Performance    Strategic
Adjustment
  Peer Group
Adjustment
  Total Adjusted
Payout

117%

   0%   (4%)   113%

Individual Component. The Individual Component score accounts for 20% of the total target bonus for each NEO. The Individual Component is determined through the annual review process as part of the Company-wide performance management process. Each NEO is evaluated based on achievement of individual performance objectives. The Committee evaluates the CEO, and the CEO evaluates the other NEOs in consultation with the Committee. As part of the evaluation, the Committee and the CEO, in consultation with the Chief Risk Officer, consider potential adjustments to scores based on each NEO’s record of identifying, managing and mitigating risk, including an assessment of outcomes in the areas of compliance, operating risk, credit issues, audit findings or regulatory citing, or other contributions that should be taken into account. There were no such adjustments for NEOs in 2012.

 

24


Individual Component scores were generally above target based on strong contributions by the NEOs. The chart below lists the individual component scores for each NEO and summarizes each NEO’s performance:

 

Name and

Principal Position

 

STI

Individual

Component

Score

  Performance Summary

James C. Smith

Chairman and Chief

Executive Officer

  150%   Mr. Smith led a year of solid improvement in financial results and strategic progress, both of which exceeded plan. Results included higher net income and EPS, strengthened capital position, record loan originations, revenue growth, positive operating leverage, and strong loan growth. Also notable are improved credit quality, enhanced risk management, meaningful progress in expense reduction, and continued strong employee engagement. Webster’s return on average equity improved and exceeded the median for its compensation Peer Group. Mr. Smith effectively guided the formulation and implementation of Webster’s strategic plan. He actively communicated Webster’s commitment to operating as a community-focused, values driven organization for which Webster was widely recognized in 2012.

Gerald P. Plush

President and Chief

Operating Officer

  150%   Mr. Plush performed his responsibilities well in his second year as Chief Operating Officer. Overall, he formulated and implemented the plans that drove significant improvement in asset quality, efficiency, and profitability. He worked with the CEO, CFO, and other executives to achieve the 2012 Financial Plan. He provided strong ongoing leadership throughout Webster’s Pathway to 60% Efficiency Initiative, which resulted in Webster achieving this target in Q4. He led the effort to configure the organization to achieve the highest Economic Profit growth, by working with other executives to accelerate the build out of high potential Economic Profit business lines, and generate higher non-interest income from new and existing lines. He led efforts to establish the Personal Bank, and successfully negotiated the rights to be the official bank of UConn athletics, alumni and students.

Glenn I. MacInnes

Executive Vice

President and Chief

Financial Officer

  150%   Mr. MacInnes led all areas of accounting, financial planning & reporting, tax accounting, treasury and procurement. He streamlined and accelerated reporting of financial performance, and oversaw the ongoing development of customer and product profitability. Mr. MacInnes actively and effectively communicated with analysts and investors, and made enhancements to the annual and three-year financial plan process. He also provided leadership and guidance to ensure the achievement of Webster’s Pathway to 60% Efficiency Initiative, and was instrumental in leading several opportunistic financing and capital actions.

Joseph J. Savage

Executive Vice

President, Commercial

Banking

  175%   Mr. Savage led the Commercial Banking segment to a very strong year in which it achieved double digit revenue growth and strong year-to-year performance in several key categories. These categories include Economic Profit, Middle Market loan originations, total loan originations, and DDAs. Under his leadership, Mr. Savage also led the formulation and successful execution of the most critical objectives for the Commercial Bank in 2012, including Middle Market expansion, Commercial Real Estate multi-family and reinvigorating Sales and Structuring. He recruited a quality executive to lead Treasury Services, and oversaw the reorganization and expansion of this area. He also led an effort that resulted in Commercial Banking exceeding its efficiency targets.

Anne M. Slattery

Former Executive Vice

President, Retail

Banking

  100%   Ms. Slattery, prior to her retirement, led the Retail Banking segment in achieving its goals. She was paid a target bonus per her separation agreement.

Jeffrey N. Brown

Former Executive Vice

President, Human

Resources, Marketing

and Communications

  N/A   Mr. Brown was paid a target bonus per his separation agreement, prorated through his resignation date of August 31, 2012.

 

25


Line of Business Component. Given Mr. Savage’s responsibilities as head of Webster’s Commercial Bank business segment, 40% of his target bonus is payable based on the financial and operating results of his line of business and on results relative to strategic initiatives. Similarly, given her former status as head of Webster’s Retail Bank, 40% of Ms. Slattery’s target bonus would have been payable based on the financial and operating results of her line of business and on results relative to strategic initiatives. The results of the Commercial Bank and Retail Bank are noted below:

The Commercial Bank registered record financial and operating performance delivering $69 million in Net Income and a 15.3% Return on Allocated Capital. Fueled by strong loan fundings of $1.7 billion, the commercial loan portfolio grew $748 million (+17.4%) to $5 billion. Strategic areas of focus including Middle Market banking and Commercial Real Estate led growth at $419 million (+24.0%) and $268 million (+16.7%), respectively. Regarding deposits, strategic focus on core operating relationships drove DDA growth of $191 million (+25.7%). Commercial Banking built out its Treasury and Payment Solutions Group and continued to enhance its capabilities to help clients manage cash flow, while driving higher Non Interest Income. Credit quality improved materially with non-performing loans and charge-offs declining by 64% and 43%, respectively. As testament to its focus on service quality, for the year 2012, Webster has won three Greenwich Excellence awards for client satisfaction. Mr. Savage led the Commercial Banking segment to a very strong year in which it achieved double digit revenue growth and strong year-to-year performance in several key categories resulting in a line of business score of 138.75%.

The Retail Bank registered solid financial and operating performance in 2012 while upgrading its electronic infrastructure. Branch managers completed Webster’s Business Banking certification program early in 2012 and partnered with our dedicated Business Bankers to produce record loan originations and year over year loan growth of 12%. Transaction deposits grew by 13% year over year and finished ahead of plan due to higher customer balances per account. Webster Investment Services’ fee revenues set a record for the full year on the strength of increased branch referral activity. Strategic progress was driven by an increased focus on the customer experience, product enhancements and an expanded sales force. Initiatives to upgrade our mobile and on-line banking capabilities, install Image Capture ATM’s and introduce a new “eChecking product” were all completed during 2012. The “Universal Banker” pilot program was launched in several branches in the fourth quarter.

Total 2012 Short Term Incentive Compensation. Upon completing scoring for the Primary Components (Corporate, Individual and Line of Business), the scores for each NEO were added together to determine the Total Score. The Total Score was then multiplied by each NEO’s target annual incentive to determine each NEO’s annual incentive. The Committee retains discretion to adjust the CEO’s annual incentive and, in consultation with the CEO, the annual incentives for the other NEOs. There were no such adjustments for 2012. The final tabulations for incentive compensation are set forth below.

 

Annual Incentive Compensation
    

Annual
  Incentive  
Target

$

 

Corporate
Component

@ 113%

Weighted Score  

 

Line of
Business Score

(if applicable)  

  

Individual
Score

(incl.
risk adj.

if applicable)  

 

Total  

Score  

 

    Annual    

Incentive

Earned

James C. Smith

  $879,800   90.4%        30.0%   120%     $1,059,279

Gerald P. Plush

  $374,500   90.4%        30.0%   120%     $450,898

Glenn I. MacInnes

  $250,000   90.4%        30.0%   120%     $301,000

Joseph J. Savage

  $214,825   45.2%   55.5%    35.0%   136%     $291,518

Anne M. Slattery

  $201,500   45.2%   40.0%    20.0%   105%     $211,978

Jeffrey N. Brown

  $210,600                    $190,938

 

26


Long Term Incentive Grants

Webster grants long term equity awards to reward performance that increases Economic Profits and maximizes shareholder value over time. LTI grants made in February 2013 were based in part on NEOs’ 2012 performance. In accordance with the plan structure, LTI grants are made to the CEO and the COO based on their respective target LTI and for the other NEOs from a pool that is determined by the sum of the NEOs’ collective target LTI. The LTI targets are listed in the “Components of Total Direct Compensation at Target” table on page 20. The Committee may increase or decrease the CEO’s or the COO’s LTI or the NEOs’ pool based on a variety of factors including the Company’s prior year performance against strategic and financial goals. The Committee determines the recommended grant for the CEO and considers the CEO’s recommendation for the other officers. The February 2013 LTI grants were made in the form of 60% performance shares and 40% stock options and were awarded in a range of 110% to 120% of the NEOs’ targets. The grants are shown in a non-required table on page 28 for the purpose of setting forth clearly the compensation earned for 2012 performance.

In 2013, the Committee approved grants at 110% of target for Mr. Smith and, based on Mr. Smith’s recommendation, at 110% of target for Mr. Plush and Mr. MacInnes, and at 120% of target for Mr. Savage. The LTI grants at 110% of target for Messrs. Smith, Plush and MacInnes were driven by their individual and collective contributions to Webster’s financial and strategic performance and by their strong performance in their respective roles as CEO, COO and CFO as summarized in the Performance Summaries in the Individual Component section of this report. The LTI grant at 120% of target for Mr. Savage was driven by the strong financial performance and the strategic progress recorded by the Commercial Banking business segment, as well as Mr. Savage’s individual contributions. The chart below reflects the 2013 LTI grants awarded for 2012 performance:

 

 
2013 Long Term Incentive (based on 2012 performance)  
      Long Term
Incentive Target
     LTI Grant as %
of Target
     Incentive Earned   

James C. Smith

     $1,627,630         110%         $1,790,393   

Gerald P. Plush

     $615,250         110%         $676,775   

Glenn I. MacInnes

     $350,000         110%         $385,000   

Joseph J. Savage

     $280,925         120%         $337,110   

Anne M. Slattery

     $263,500         Not eligible         —     

Jeffrey N. Brown

     $259,200         Not eligible         —     

 

27


The non-required chart below shows total direct compensation approved by the Committee for 2012 and 2011 performance. LTI grants made in February 2013 based on 2012 performance are reflected in the 2012 Total Direct Compensation. LTI grants made in February 2012 based on 2011 performance are reflected in 2011 Total Direct Compensation. Although the 2013 grants will be discussed in next year’s compensation report, we have determined to voluntarily disclose the grants in the table set forth below under 2012 Total Direct Compensation. Both years’ grants were paid in performance shares and stock options as described above.

 

      Year    Salary      Stock
Salary
     Total
Salary
     Bonus      2012 LTI Awards for
2011 Performance and
2013 LTI Awards for
2012 Performance
     Total Direct
Compensation
Received for
Performance
 
               

James C. Smith

   2012    $ 879,800       $ —        $ 879,800       $ 1,059,279       $ 1,790,393       $ 3,729,472   
   2011    $ 879,800       $ 291,485       $ 1,171,285       $ 896,245       $ 1,627,630       $ 3,695,160   
               

Gerald P. Plush

   2012    $ 535,000       $ —        $ 535,000       $ 450,898       $ 676,775       $ 1,662,673   
   2011    $ 535,000       $ 96,510       $ 631,510       $ 420,300       $ 676,775       $ 1,728,585   
               

Glenn I. MacInnes

   2012    $ 400,000       $ —        $ 400,000       $ 301,000       $ 385,000       $ 1,086,000   
   2011    $ 218,462       $ —        $ 218,462       $ 275,000       $ 350,000       $ 843,462   
               

Joseph J. Savage

   2012    $ 330,500       $ —        $ 330,500       $ 291,518       $ 337,100       $ 959,118   
   2011    $ 330,500       $ 48,275       $ 378,775       $ 226,164       $ 309,018       $ 913,957   
               

Anne M. Slattery

   2012    $ 310,000       $ —        $ 310,000       $ 211,978       $ —        $ 521,978   
   2011    $ 310,000       $ 48,722       $ 358,722       $ 182,005       $ 263,500       $ 804,227   
               

Jeffrey N. Brown

   2012    $ 257,000       $ —        $ 257,000       $ 190,398       $ —        $ 447,398   
   2011    $ 324,000       $ 49,238       $ 373,238       $ 226,648       $ 259,200       $ 859,086   

2012 Long Term Incentive Grants Based on 2011 Performance

Similarly, LTI grants made in February 2012 were based in part on each NEOs’ 2011 performance and did not consider 2012 performance. The 2012 LTI grants were made in accordance with the same structure approved in April 2011 and described in detail above. The Committee approved grants at 100% of target for Mr. Smith and, based on Mr. Smith’s recommendation, at 110% of target for Mr. Plush and Mr. Savage, and at 100% of target for Mr. MacInnes, Mr. Brown and Ms. Slattery. The individual performance of each NEO on which the February 2012 grants were based is described in detail beginning on page 29 and is included as 2012 compensation in the required 2012 summary compensation table on page 33.

 

 
2012 Long Term Incentive (based on 2011 performance)
        Long Term
Incentive Target
   LTI Grant as % of
Target
  Incentive Earned
       

James C. Smith

     $1,627,630    100%   $1,627,630
       

Gerald P. Plush

     $615,250    110%   $676,775
       

Glenn I. MacInnes

     $350,000    100%   $350,000
       

Joseph J. Savage

     $280,925    110%   $309,018
       

Anne M. Slattery

     $263,500    100%   $263,500
       

Jeffrey N. Brown

     $259,200    100%   $259,200

 

28


NEO 2011 Performance as previously reported:

 

Name and

Principal Position

  LTI 2012
Grants
Awarded as a
% of target
(Based on 2011
Performance)
  2011 Performance Summary

James C. Smith

Chairman and Chief

    Executive Officer

  100%   In 2011, Mr. Smith led a year of solid improvement in financial results and strategic progress, both of which exceeded plan. Results included higher net income and EPS, capital strength, revenue growth, loan growth due to significantly higher loan originations, strong credit quality performance, positive operating leverage, enhanced risk management, meaningful progress in expense reduction and continuing strong employee engagement. Webster’s return on average equity improved to exceed the median for its Compensation Peer Group. Mr. Smith effectively guided the formulation and implementation of Webster’s strategic plan, including the allocation of capital and other resources. The CEO excelled at communicating Webster’s commitment to operating as a community-focused, values driven organization for which Webster was widely recognized in 2011.

Gerald P. Plush

President and Chief

    Operating Officer

  110%   In 2011, Mr. Plush was promoted to Chief Operating Officer. In his new role, Mr. Plush formulated and implemented the plans that drove the significant improvement in asset quality. He led the continued strengthening of Webster’s risk management infrastructure, including introducing a new risk framework to define, classify and mitigate risk in all business areas. He led the strategic planning process, assisted the CEO in setting strategy for the Company and participated in a leadership role in the allocation of capital and other resources. He led the reconfiguration of support services at Webster and provided strong leadership in Webster’s Pathway to 60% Efficiency Ratio initiative.

Glenn I. MacInnes

Executive Vice

    President and Chief

    Financial Officer

  100%   Mr. MacInnes joined Webster in May 2011 as the CFO and assumed responsibility for all areas of accounting, financial planning & reporting, tax accounting, treasury and procurement. Mr. MacInnes streamlined and standardized reporting of financial performance, implemented guidance for expense and revenue items as part of the Pathway to 60% Efficiency Ratio initiative and oversaw the development of the annual and three-year financial plan.

Joseph J. Savage

Executive Vice

    President, Commercial

    Banking

  110%   In 2011, Mr. Savage’s business unit, Commercial Banking, registered meaningful improvement in financial and operating performance fueled by growth in the loan portfolio of 5%, $1.5 billion in new loan originations, strong pricing discipline, increased fee revenue and significant improvement in credit quality. Revenue grew 13% and loan spreads increased 11% year over year, non-performing loans declined by 49%, and charge-offs declined by 22%. Strategic contributions included: growth of middle market banking activity, strong growth in transaction account balances for across the Commercial Bank including government / institutional customers, and better cash management product offerings.

Anne M. Slattery

Former Executive Vice

    President, Retail

    Banking

  100%   In 2011, Ms. Slattery’s business unit, Retail Banking, improved the customer experience by aligning Webster’s delivery channels with customer’s shifting preference to utilize electronic and mobile channels to transact more of their business. Free checking was eliminated in favor of relationship products which reward customers for having more banking and financial relationships with Webster. A sales team was developed in the Customer Care Center to speed up the mortgage application process while lowering costs.

 

29


Name and

Principal Position

  LTI 2012
Grants
Awarded as a
% of target
(Based on 2011
Performance)
  2011 Performance Summary

Jeffrey N. Brown

Former Executive Vice

    President, Human

    Resources, Marketing

    and Communications

  100%   In 2011, Mr. Brown led the Shared Services organization in the advancement of over 75 major projects. He implemented critical metrics management, including detailed reporting standards for productivity, production and service delivery across the Shared Services organization, including information technology, bank operations, corporate real estate, public affairs, cash management services and human resources. He assisted the CEO and the Compensation Committee in restructuring the Company’s compensation programs to better reward the performances required to achieve Webster’s strategic and financial goals.

Retirement Plans

Pension Plan. Webster Bank maintains a frozen defined benefit pension plan. Webster stopped benefit accruals under the plan for all employees, including the NEOs, after December 31, 2007. The Pension Benefits section of this Proxy Statement details pension benefits for the NEOs.

401(k) Plan. Webster Bank maintains a defined contribution 401(k) plan for eligible employees, including the NEOs. All participants in the plan, including each of the NEOs, are eligible to make pre-tax contributions from 1% to 25% of their pay, up to Internal Revenue Code (“IRC”) limits ($17,000 in 2012). Webster Bank matches the employee’s contributions on a dollar for dollar basis for the first 2% of pay the employee contributes and then 50 cents on the dollar for up to the next 6% of pay the employee contributes. In addition, Webster provides transition credits ranging from 1% to 6% of pay for those employees, including NEOs, who were hired before January 1, 2007 and had reached age 35 or older on January 1, 2008. The purpose of transition credits is to help offset the impact of freezing the pension plan. A two-year vesting schedule applies to all Webster contributions. Under IRC limits, annual compensation in excess of $250,000 in 2012 may not be taken into account for determining benefits or contributions under the qualified plan. Employees who are age 50 or older by the last day of the year may contribute an additional $5,500 to the plan. Effective as of February 1, 2012, the rate of matching contributions was changed from matching employee contributions dollar for dollar on 5% to matching employee contributions dollar for dollar on the first 2% and 50 cents on the dollar for the next 6%.

Supplemental Defined Benefit Plan. Webster Bank maintains a frozen non-qualified supplemental defined benefit plan for certain executives, including NEOs who were participants in the pension plan. The purpose of the plan was to provide these individuals with supplemental pension benefits in excess of IRC limits for tax qualified pension plans. The plan was frozen as of December 31, 2007. Thus, service and compensation after this date are not used in calculating an NEO’s benefit from the plan.

Supplemental Defined Contribution Plan. Webster Bank maintains a non-qualified supplemental defined contribution plan for certain executives, including the NEOs. This plan provides each NEO with an allocation to their supplemental 401(k) account equal to the additional match and transition credit contributions that the NEO would have received in the qualified 401(k) plan if there were no IRC compensation or deferral limits. In addition, Mr. Smith and Mr. Plush receive an additional supplemental transition credit allocation equal to 25.5% and 10.0% of base salary plus bonus, respectively. The purpose of the additional supplemental allocation is to help offset the impact of freezing the supplemental defined benefit plan.

Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan. The executive officers, including each of the NEOs, were eligible to participate in a voluntary non-qualified deferred compensation plan. The plan allowed employees at the senior vice president level and above to defer a portion of their compensation because of the statutory limits under the qualified plan. All deferrals under this plan ceased as of January 1, 2012.

 

30


Employment Agreements

The NEOs do not have employment agreements; however, Messrs. Smith, Plush, MacInnes, Savage are subject to change in control and non-competition agreements.

Other Executive Benefits

Webster offers a limited number of benefits to the NEOs and other executives in addition to the broad-based employee benefits program. Each benefit supports a specific objective, but falls within the overall purpose of recognizing leadership responsibility and contributions to the Company’s goals. Management reviews the benefits with the Committee for consistency with Webster’s organizational culture and market practices. These benefits are described in footnote [6] to the Summary Compensation Table.

Post-Termination Arrangements

Webster’s change in control practices are designed to retain the NEOs during rumored and actual change in control activity. During these times, continuity is a key factor in preserving the value of the business. Webster also provided other termination benefits designed to facilitate changes in key executives as needed. The amounts payable, triggering events and other terms of Webster’s change in control and other termination arrangements are set at the time of hiring by the Committee generally based on Company policy and competitive market information. Webster reviews the provisions of the change in control agreements annually. In 2012, Webster amended all of the change in control agreements for the NEOs, removing the gross-up provisions and modifying the severance formula so that the bonus component is based on target bonus rather than the highest bonus in the prior three years. Webster also amended the Stock Option Plan to provide for accelerated vesting of equity awards if a change in control occurs and the eligible individual is terminated without cause or resigns for Good Reason within two years following the change in control.

Executive Stock Ownership

Webster believes stock ownership by management is beneficial in aligning the interests of management and shareholders. Executive Stock Ownership Guidelines are established to enhance shareholder value and focus each executive’s attention on the long-term success of the Company. Webster has adopted formal stock ownership guidelines for all of the executive officers, including the NEOs.

Stock Ownership Guidelines

 

        

Multiple of Base

Cash Salary

  

Value of Multiple

  

Target Ownership Status

 

James C. Smith

   6X    $5,278,800    Met
 

Gerald P. Plush

   4X    $2,140,000    Met
 

Glenn I. MacInnes

   3X    $1,200,000    Did Not Meet
 

Joseph J. Savage

   3X    $991,500    Met
 

Anne M. Slattery

   3X    $930,000    Did Not Meet
 

Jeffrey N. Brown

   3X    $972,000    Met

Once achieved, ownership of the guideline amount must be maintained for as long as the executive is subject to the stock ownership guidelines. Even if stock ownership guidelines have been achieved, NEOs are required to continue to hold all net vested restricted stock and performance shares and net shares of Common Stock delivered after exercising stock options for a minimum of one year. NEOs who do not meet the guidelines further agree to hold Common Stock received through LTI awards until they achieve their respective ownership thresholds. In January 2012, the ownership guidelines for Mr. Smith and Mr. Plush were increased to six times and four times salary, respectively. As of December 31, 2012, Messrs. Smith, Plush and Savage met the stock

 

31


ownership guidelines. As of December 31, 2012, Ms. Slattery had not yet met the ownership guidelines. Mr. MacInnes was hired as the CFO on May 31, 2011 and was not eligible for LTI awards until February 2012. The Committee believes Mr. MacInnes is making satisfactory progress toward the ownership goal.

Directors, officers and employees of Webster are prohibited from hedging their ownership of Webster securities, including through the use of options, puts, calls, short sales, futures contracts, equity swaps, collars or other derivative instruments relating to Webster securities, regardless of whether such directors, officers and employees have material nonpublic information about Webster.

Policy on Internal Revenue Code Section 162(m)

The Internal Revenue Code Section 162(m) limits the deduction available for compensation paid to the chief executive officer and the four most highly compensated executive officers other than the chief financial officer to the extent the compensation paid to any such person exceeds $1,000,000, unless such compensation was based on performance goals. In 2012, Webster had non-deductible compensation arising from amounts paid to its President and COO resulting from a compensation structure in place for part of 2011 that was designed for Webster to comply with U.S. Treasury’s guidance while participating in the Treasury’s Capital Purchase Program.

Webster’s compensation programs are structured to comply with IRC Section 162(m). Section 162(m) of the IRC limits the deduction available to Webster for compensation paid to the chief executive officer and, based on IRS interpretive guidance, the four most highly compensated executive officers other than the chief financial officer to the extent the compensation paid to any such person exceeds $1,000,000, unless such compensation was based on performance goals determined by a compensation committee consisting solely of two or more non-employee directors and the performance goals are approved by the shareholders prior to payment. Where applicable, Webster will endeavor to structure compensation as exempt performance-based compensation. Webster does, however, reserve the right to determine to pay compensation to the executive officers, including the CEO, which may not be deductible under Section 162(m) of the IRC.

COMPENSATION OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

The following tables contain certain compensation information for the Chief Executive Officer, the President, the Chief Financial Officer, and the other NEOs.

 

32


Summary Compensation Table

Salary, bonus, incentive payments and other compensation amounts to Webster’s NEOs are summarized in the following table. Some of the amounts below represent the opportunity to earn future compensation under performance-based compensation incentives that may be forfeited based on future performance vesting. As a result of mixing compensation paid and contingent compensation, the total shown in the Summary Compensation Table includes amounts that the named executives may never receive.

 

Name and

Principal Position

  Year     Salary     Bonus     Stock
Awards
    Option
Awards
    Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
   

Change in
Pension Value
and Non-

qualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings

    All Other
Compensation
     Total  
 

 

    ($)1     ($)2     ($)3     ($)4     ($)5     ($)6     ($)7      ($)  

James C. Smith

    2012        879,800        —         943,914        629,278       1,059,279        699,100        757,685         4,969,056   

Chairman and Chief

    2011        1,171,285        —         1,030,052        —         896,245        1,192,400        702,450         4,992,432   

Executive Officer

    2010        1,721,800        —         —          —         —         606,700        660,029         2,988,529   
   

Gerald P. Plush

    2012        535,000        —         392,493        261,654       450,898        5,300        227,964         1,873,309   

President and Chief

    2011        631,510        —         1,125,987 8     —         420,300        9,500        192,446         2,379,743   

Operating Officer

    2010        778,769        —         —          —         —         4,000        167,194         949,963   
   

Glenn I. MacInnes

    2012        400,000        —         202,966        135,318       301,000        —         20,091         1,059,375   

EVP and Chief

    2011        218,462        275,000        76,160        —         —         —         6,554         576,176   

Financial Officer

    2010        —         —         —          —         —         —         —          —    
   

Joseph J. Savage

    2012        330,500        —         179,200        119,476       291,518        40,400        91,289         1,052,383   

EVP, Commercial

    2011        378,775        —         231,618        —         226,164        68,300        62,582         967,439   

Banking

    2010        469,885        —         —          —         —         33,800        69,040         572,725   
   

Anne M. Slattery9

    2012        310,000        —         152,813        101,875       211,978        —         50,476         827,142   

Former EVP, Retail

Banking

    2011        358,722        —         —         —         182,005        —         39,096         579,823   
      2010        450,667        —         —         —         —         —         20,801         471,468   
   

Jeffrey N. Brown10

    2012        257,372        50,000       198,643        100,212       140,398        54,900        158,140         959,665   

Former EVP, Human

Resources,

    2011        373,238        —         221,972        —         226,648        127,600        59,521         1,008,979   

Marketing and

Communications

    2010        466,154        —         —         —         —         62,800        65,354         594,308   

 

1 

Amounts shown for 2010 and 2011 include a stock salary. Webster’s stock for salary program was discontinued in 2011.

    

For 2011, a cash salary and a stock salary were paid to the NEOs as follows: Mr. Smith: $879,800 and $291,485, respectively; Mr. Plush: $535,000 and $96,510, respectively; Mr. Savage: $330,500 and $48,275, respectively; Ms. Slattery: $310,000 and $48,722, respectively; and Mr. Brown: $324,000 and $49,238, respectively. Mr. MacInnes commenced his employment on May 31, 2011 and was paid solely in cash.

    

For 2010, a cash salary and a stock salary were paid to the NEOs as follows: Mr. Smith: $879,800 and $842,000, respectively; Mr. Plush: $500,000 and $278,769, respectively; Mr. Savage: $330,500 and $139,385, respectively; Ms. Slattery: $310,000 and $140,667, respectively; and Mr. Brown: $324,000 and $142,154, respectively.

2 

For 2012, Mr. Brown received a payment of $50,000 in accordance with the terms of his separation agreement.

3 

Amounts shown in this column are based on the grant date value related to restricted stock awards made in 2011 and 2012, in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 (formerly FAS 123R). Webster uses three-year cliff vesting for most annual restricted stock grants awarded since 2005. No grants were made in 2010. Grants that would normally be made in December 2010 were made in February 2011. For more information, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” herein.

4 

Amounts shown in this column are based on the grant date value related to stock option awards made in 2012, in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 (formerly FAS 123R). No stock options were granted in 2010 or 2011.

 

33


5 

Amounts in this column represent cash awards paid under the performance-based annual incentive plan. Mr. Brown received a pro-rated cash award in accordance with the terms of his separation agreement.

6 

The Bank maintains both a frozen tax-qualified pension plan and a frozen non-qualified supplemental defined benefit plan. These are described more fully in the Pension Benefits section of this Proxy Statement. Benefit accruals for service and compensation were frozen after December 31, 2007. The change in pension value in 2012 is primarily due to the decrease in interest rates used to calculate the present value of the benefits and the effect of interest growth resulting from the one-year passage of time. The amounts in this column reflect the increase in the actuarial present value of the NEOs’ benefits under both plans determined using interest rate and mortality assumptions consistent with those used in the Company’s financial statements. Specifically, the assumptions used to value the accumulated benefits at December 31, 2012 consisted of a 3.90% interest rate for the qualified plan versus 4.35% in 2011, a 3.40% interest rate for the non-qualified supplemental plan (3.90% for benefits payable as a lump sum) versus 4.00% in 2011, and the RP00 mortality table projected to 2018, blending mortality rates for employees and annuitants (hereafter, the “RP00 Mortality Table”). The changes in pension value in 2012 under the tax-qualified pension plan and non-qualified pension plan for each of the NEOs were as follows:

 

Name    Change in Qualified
Pension Value ($)
    

Change in

Non-Qualified

Pension Value ($)

     Total ($)  

James C. Smith

     114,400         584,700         699,100   

Gerald P. Plush

     5,300        —          5,300   

Glenn I. MacInnes

     —          —          —     

Joseph J. Savage

     20,700         19,700         40,400   

Anne M. Slattery

     —           —           —     

Jeffrey N. Brown

     43,300         11,600         54,900   

 

7 

All Other Compensation includes amounts contributed or allocated, as the case may be, to the 401(k) plan (excluding the executive officer’s contributions to the qualified 401(k) plan), the non-qualified supplemental defined contribution plan, a car allowance, dividends paid on unvested restricted stock awards, dividends paid on earned performance-based stock awards, a premium on a term life insurance policy and costs for a home security system. The amount for Mr. Brown also includes $90,969 of severance paid in fiscal 2012 in connection with Mr. Brown’s resignation from Webster on August 31, 2012 and in accordance with the terms of the separation agreement and general release entered into by Mr. Brown, Webster and Webster Bank, the details of which are described in “Potential Payments on Termination or Change in Control” below. Mr. Smith also receives a premium on a supplemental Long Term Disability policy. All Other Compensation items in the Summary Compensation Table also include the following amounts:

 

Name   

401(k) Plan

($)

    

Supplemental

Defined Contribution Plan

($)

 

 

 

James C. Smith

     21,416         663,522   

Gerald P. Plush

     19,979         163,258   

Glenn I. MacInnes

     3,673         745   

Joseph J. Savage

     25,816         34,925   

Anne M. Slattery

     11,266         13,292   

Jeffrey N. Brown

     22,960         24,594   

 

8 

Mr. Plush was given an annual award of restricted stock, granted February 22, 2011, of $460,278, and a promotional award, granted April 25, 2011, of $665,709.

 

34


9 

Ms. Slattery retired from Webster and relinquished all offices and positions held with Webster effective December 31, 2012. In connection with Ms. Slattery’s resignation, Ms. Slattery, Webster and Webster Bank entered into a Confidential Separation Agreement and Release, the details of which are described in “Potential Payments on Termination or Change in Control.”

10 

Mr. Brown resigned from Webster and relinquished all offices and positions held with Webster effective August 31, 2012. In connection with Mr. Brown’s resignation, Mr. Brown, Webster and Webster Bank entered into a Separation Agreement and General Release, the details of which are described in “Potential Payments on Termination or Change in Control.”

Grants of Plan-Based Awards

During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012, the following table sets out all non-equity incentive plan and equity incentive plan awards that were made to the NEOs.

 

         

Estimated Possible Payouts Under

Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards

   

Estimated Future Payouts Under

Equity Incentive Plan Awards

    All
Other
Stock
Awards:
Number
of
Shares
of stock
or Units
(#)
    All Other
Option
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Options
(#)
    Exercise or
Base Price
of Option
Awards
($/Sh)
    Closing
Price
on
Grant
Date
($)
    Grant
Date  Fair
Value of
Stock and
Option
Awards
($)3
 

Name

  Grant
Date
    Threshold
($)1
    Target
($)1
    Maximum
($)1
    Threshold
(#)2
    Target
(#)2
    Maximum
(#)2
           

James C. Smith

    2/22/2012        439,900        879,800        1,759,600        21,069        42,139        84,278        —          112,371        23.81        22.40        1,573,191   

Gerald P. Plush

    2/22/2012        187,250        374,500        749,000        8,761        17,522        35,044        —          46,724        23.81        22.40        654,147   

Glenn I. MacInnes

    2/22/2012        125,000        250,000        500,000        4,530        9,061        18,122        —          24,164        23.81        22.40        338,285   

Joseph J. Savage

    2/22/2012        107,413        214,825        429,650        4,000        8,000        16,000        —          21,335        23.81        22.40        298,676   

Anne M. Slattery4

    2/22/2012        100,750        201,500        403,000        3,411        6,822        13,644        —          18,192        23.81        22.40        254,688   

Jeffrey N. Brown5

    2/22/2012        105,300        210,600        421,200        3,355        6,711        13,422        2,157        17,895        23.81        22.40        298,855   

 

1 

These columns represent the potential payouts to each of the named executive officers resulting from the grant of an award pursuant to the annual incentive compensation plan, subject to achievement of pre-established performance goals discussed on page 22 of this Proxy Statement. Actual amounts earned by the executives are set forth under the “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column of the Summary Compensation Table on page 33 of this Proxy Statement.

2

Represents the threshold, target and maximum number of performance shares that may vest if performance targets in respect of the 2012 through 2014 performance period are satisfied. Dividends will be deferred on the unearned performance shares and will be paid out upon conclusion of the performance period to the extent earned.

3

Represents the grant date fair value, computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 (formerly FAS 123R) of all equity awards granted in 2012.

4

Ms. Slattery retired from Webster and relinquished all offices and positions held with Webster effective December 31, 2012. In connection with her resignation, all equity awards granted to her in 2012 were forfeited.

5

Mr. Brown resigned from Webster and relinquished all offices and positions held with Webster effective August 31, 2012. In connection with his resignation, all equity awards granted to him in 2012 were forfeited.

 

35


Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End

The following table sets forth outstanding option awards and unvested stock awards held by Webster’s NEOs as of December 31, 2012.

 

     Option Awards     Stock Awards  
Name  

Number
of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options

(#)
Exercisable

   

Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options

(#)
Unexercisable1

   

Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Unearned
Options

(#)

    Option
Exercise
Price
($)
     Option
Expiration
Date
    Number of
Shares or
Units
That
Have Not
Vested
(#)
    Market
Value of
Shares or
Units That
Have Not
Vested
(#)2
   

Equity
Incentive
Awards:
Number of
Unearned
Shares,
Units
or Other
Rights
That
Have Not
Vested

(#)

   

Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Market or
Payout
Value of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other
Rights
That
Have Not
Vested

($) 2

 

James C. Smith

    65,728                45.55         12/15/2013                   
      60,707                49.62         12/20/2014                   
      47,182                47.40         12/20/2015                   
      64,483                48.88         12/19/2016                   
      106,199                32.03         12/18/2017                   
      213,674                12.85         12/16/2018                   
                           45,277 3      930,442           
              112,371                23.81         2/22/2022                        42,139 6     865,956   

Gerald P. Plush

    10,612                47.81         7/5/2016                   
      17,340                48.88         12/19/2016                   
      28,970                32.03         12/18/2017                   
      69,391                12.85         12/16/2018                   
                           20,232 3      415,768           
                           31,357 4      644,386           
              46,724                23.81         2/22/2022                        17,522 6      360,077   

Glenn I. MacInnes

                         3,651 5     75,028           
              24,164                23.81         2/22/2022                        9,061 6      186,204   

Joseph J. Savage

    11,004                45.55         12/15/2013                   
      10,165                49.02         12/20/2014                   
      8,131                47.40         12/20/2015                   
      10,079                48.88         12/19/2016                   
      16,601                32.03         12/18/2017                   
      34,400                12.85         12/16/2018                   
                           10,181 3      209,220           
              21,335                23.81         2/22/2022                        8,000 6      164,400   

Anne M. Slattery7

                         8,822 3      181,292           
              18,192                23.81         2/22/2022                        6,822 6      140,192   

Jeffrey N. Brown8

    —          —          —          —           —          —          —          —          —     

 

1 

The remaining vesting dates of each option are listed in the table below by expiration date:

 

36


Table of Option Vesting Dates

 

EXPIRATION DATE   VESTING DATE   VESTING DATE   VESTING DATE
2/22/2022   2/22/2013   2/22/2014   2/22/2015

 

2 

Market value calculated by multiplying the closing market price of Webster’s Common Stock on December 31, 2012, or $20.55, by the number of shares of stock.

3 

The restricted stock award will vest and be transferable on February 22, 2014, the third anniversary of the date of grant.

4 

The restricted stock award will vest and be transferable on April 25, 2014, the third anniversary of the date of grant.

5 

The restricted stock award will vest and be transferable on May 31, 2014, the third anniversary of the date of grant.

6 

The performance criteria will be evaluated after the close of the performance period on December 31, 2014.

7 

Ms. Slattery retired from Webster and relinquished all offices and positions held with Webster effective December 31, 2012. All equity awards granted to her in 2012 were forfeited. The award of restricted stock granted in 2011 was pro-rated and accelerated in connection with and following her separation.

8 

Mr. Brown resigned from Webster and relinquished all offices and positions held with Webster effective August 31, 2012. As of December 31, 2012, Mr. Brown had no remaining outstanding equity awards.

Option Exercises and Stock Vested in 2012

The table below sets forth the number of shares of stock acquired in fiscal 2012 upon the exercise of stock options awarded to the NEOs and as a result of the vesting of shares of restricted stock awarded to the NEOs under Webster’s compensatory equity programs.

 

     Option Awards      Stock Awards  

Name

 

  

Number of Shares
Acquired On
Exercise

 

    

Value Realized
on Exercise(1)

 

    

Number of Shares
Acquired
on Vesting

 

   

Value Realized
On Vesting(2)

 

 

James C. Smith

     —           —           180,470  (3)(4)    $  3,790,110   

Gerald P. Plush

     —           —           65,578  (3)      1,377,007   

Glenn I. MacInnes

     —           —           —          —     

Joseph J. Savage

     —           —           35,177  (3)      738,572   

Anne M. Slattery(5)

     —           —           15,757        330,424   

Jeffrey N. Brown(6)

     33,724       $ 385,715         44,225 (3)      938,051   

 

(1) Value realized calculated based on the difference between the market price of Webster’s Common Stock on the date of exercise and the exercise price.
(2) Value realized calculated by multiplying the number of shares vesting by the fair market value of Webster’s Common Stock on the vesting date.
(3) The number of shares acquired for Messrs. Smith, Plush, Savage and Brown include the performance shares earned, which were certified on January 23, 2012 upon achievement of performance metrics.
(4) The number of shares acquired by Mr. Smith include 63,469 restricted stock units that vested but were deferred from distribution with a value of $1,330,944.93, which amount is also reported in the Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation table on page 40 hereof. Mr. Smith will receive distribution at termination. Dividends will not be paid on these units until they are distributed.
(5)

In connection with Ms. Slattery’s resignation from Webster, Ms. Slattery, Webster and Webster Bank entered into a Confidential Separation Agreement and Release, the details of which are described in “Potential Payments on

 

37


 

Termination or Change in Control” below. In accordance with the terms of that agreement and as described below, 15,757 shares of restricted stock granted to Ms. Slattery vested on December 23, 2009 and are shown in the table; 5,391 shares of restricted stock granted to her on February 22, 2011 became vested following her separation at end of business on December 31, 2012.

(6) In connection with Mr. Brown’s resignation from Webster, Mr. Brown, Webster and Webster Bank entered into a Separation Agreement and General Release, the details of which are described in “Potential Payments on Termination or Change in Control” below. In accordance with the terms of that agreement and as described below, Mr. Brown became vested in the identified shares.

Pension Benefits

The following table shows the present value of accumulated benefits payable to each of the NEOs, including the number of years of service credited to each such NEO, under both the frozen pension plan and the frozen supplemental defined benefit plan as of December 31, 2012. The accumulated benefit value is based upon the benefit that is payable at the NEO’s Normal Retirement Age (65).

Pension Benefits

 

Name

 

   Plan Name

 

  Number of Years
Credited Service
(#)

 

    Present
Value of Accumulated
Benefit
($)

 

    Payments During
Last Fiscal Year
($)

 

 

James C. Smith

   Webster Bank Pension Plan     30.0        1,340,200        0   
   Supplemental Defined Benefit
Plan for Executive Officers
    32.3        6,969,800        0   

Gerald P. Plush

   Webster Bank Pension Plan     2.0        43,600        0   
   Supplemental Defined Benefit
Plan for Executive Officers
    —          —          0   

Glenn I. MacInnes1

   Webster Bank Pension Plan     —          —          0   
   Supplemental Defined Benefit
Plan for Executive Officers
    —          —          0   

Joseph J. Savage

   Webster Bank Pension Plan     6.0        210,700        0   
   Supplemental Defined Benefit
Plan for Executive Officers
    6.0        194,100        0   

Anne M. Slattery2

   Webster Bank Pension Plan     —          —          0   
   Supplemental Defined Benefit
Plan for Executive Officers
    —          —          0   

Jeffrey N. Brown3

   Webster Bank Pension Plan     12.0        365,500        0   
   Supplemental Defined Benefit
Plan for Executive Officers