Annual Reports

 
Quarterly Reports

 
8-K

 
Other

  • Form 4 (Oct 11, 2017)
  • Form 4 (Oct 4, 2017)
  • Form 3 (Sep 22, 2017)
  • SC 13G (Sep 11, 2017)
  • Form 4 (Aug 3, 2017)
  • Form 4 (Jul 28, 2017)
Webster Financial DEF 14A 2017

Documents found in this filing:

  1. Def 14A
  2. Graphic
  3. Graphic
  4. Graphic
  5. Graphic
  6. Graphic
DEF 14A

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

(RULE 14A-101)

INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT

SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No.     )

Filed by the Registrant ☑

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant ☐

Check the appropriate box:

 

☐       Preliminary Proxy Statement

 

☐  Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

 

☒ 

Definitive Proxy Statement

☐ 

Definitive Additional Materials

☐ 

Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12

Webster Financial Corporation

 

 

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

 

 

 

 

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

 

☑ 

No fee required

 

☐ 

Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.

 

  (1) 

Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

 

  

 

  (2) 

Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

 

  

 

  (3) 

Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

 

  

 

  (4) 

Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

 

  

 

  (5) 

Total fee paid:

 

  

 

 

☐ 

Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

 

☐ 

Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

 

  (1) 

Amount Previously Paid:

 

  

 

  (2) 

Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

 

  

 

  (3) 

Filing Party:

 

  

 

  (4) 

Date Filed:

 

  

 


LOGO

March 17, 2017

To the Shareholders of

Webster Financial Corporation:

You are cordially invited to attend the Webster Financial Corporation Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on Thursday, April 27, 2017 at 4:00 p.m., Eastern Time, at the New Britain Museum of American Art, 56 Lexington Street, New Britain, CT 06052.

At the Annual Meeting, you will be asked: (i) to elect ten directors to serve for one-year terms; (ii) to approve, on a non-binding, advisory basis, the compensation of the named executive officers of Webster; (iii) to ratify the appointment of KPMG LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm of Webster for the year ending December 31, 2017; (iv) to vote, on a non-binding, advisory basis, on the frequency of an advisory vote on the compensation of the named executive officers of Webster; and (v) to transact any other business that properly comes before the Annual Meeting or any adjournments of the meeting.

We encourage you to read the accompanying Proxy Statement, which provides information regarding Webster and the matters to be voted on at the Annual Meeting. Also enclosed is our 2016 Annual Report.

It is important that your shares be represented at the Annual Meeting. Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, you may vote your common shares via a toll-free telephone number or on the Internet or you may complete, date, sign and return the enclosed proxy card in the enclosed postage-paid envelope. If you attend the meeting and prefer to vote in person, you may do so.

 

Sincerely,

LOGO

James C. Smith

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer


WEBSTER FINANCIAL CORPORATION

Webster Plaza

145 Bank Street

Waterbury, Connecticut 06702

800-325-2424

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

TO BE HELD ON APRIL 27, 2017

To the Shareholders of

Webster Financial Corporation:

    NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the annual meeting of shareholders (the “Annual Meeting”) of Webster Financial Corporation (“Webster”) will be held on Thursday, April 27, 2017 at 4:00 p.m., Eastern Time, at the New Britain Museum of American Art, 56 Lexington Street, New Britain, CT 06052, for the following purposes:

 

  1.

Election of Directors - To elect ten directors to serve for one-year terms (Proposal 1);

 

  2.

Say on Pay - To approve, on a non-binding, advisory basis, the compensation of the named executive officers of Webster (Proposal 2);

 

  3.

Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm - To ratify the appointment by the Board of Directors of KPMG LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm of Webster for the year ending December 31, 2017 (Proposal 3);

 

  4.

Frequency of Say on Pay Vote - To vote, on a non-binding, advisory basis, on the frequency of an advisory vote on the compensation of the named executive officers of Webster (Proposal 4); and

 

  5.

Other Business - To transact any other business that properly comes before the Annual Meeting or any adjournments thereof, in accordance with the determination of a majority of Webster’s Board of Directors.

    The Board of Directors has fixed the close of business on February 27, 2017 as the record date for the determination of shareholders entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting. Only shareholders of record at the close of business on that date will be entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting or any adjournments thereof.

 

By order of the Board of Directors,

LOGO

James C. Smith

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Waterbury, Connecticut

March 17, 2017

IT IS IMPORTANT THAT YOU VOTE PROMPTLY. THEREFORE, WHETHER OR NOT YOU PLAN TO ATTEND THE ANNUAL MEETING, PLEASE VOTE YOUR COMMON SHARES VIA THE TOLL- FREE TELEPHONE NUMBER LISTED ON THE PROXY CARD, THE INTERNET OR BY MAIL.

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting to Be Held on April 27, 2017: This Proxy Statement, along with our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 and our 2016 Annual Report, are available free of charge on the Investor Relations section of our website (www.wbst.com).


WEBSTER FINANCIAL CORPORATION

Webster Plaza

145 Bank Street

Waterbury, Connecticut 06702

800-325-2424

PROXY STATEMENT FOR ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

TO BE HELD ON APRIL 27, 2017

Solicitation, Voting and Revocability of Proxies

This Proxy Statement (the “Proxy Statement”) is being furnished to the shareholders of Webster Financial Corporation, a Delaware corporation (“Webster” or the “Company” or the “Corporation”), as part of the solicitation of proxies by its Board of Directors from holders of its outstanding shares of Common Stock, par value $.01 per share (the “Common Stock”), for use at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Webster to be held on Thursday, April 27, 2017 at 4:00 p.m., Eastern Time, at the New Britain Museum of American Art, 56 Lexington Street, New Britain, CT 06052 (the “Annual Meeting”) and at any adjournments thereof. The Proxy Statement, together with the enclosed proxy card, is being mailed to shareholders of Webster on or about March 17, 2017.

The Annual Meeting has been called for the following purposes:

1. To elect ten directors to serve for one-year terms (Proposal 1);

2. To approve, on a non-binding, advisory basis, the compensation of the named executive officers of Webster (Proposal 2);

3. To ratify the appointment by the Board of Directors of the firm of KPMG LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm of Webster for the year ending December 31, 2017 (Proposal 3);

4. To vote, on a non-binding, advisory basis, on the frequency of an advisory vote on the compensation of the named executive officers of Webster (Proposal 4); and

5. To transact any other business that properly comes before the Annual Meeting or any adjournments thereof.

If you vote using the enclosed proxy card, your shares will be voted in accordance with the instructions indicated. Executed but unmarked proxies will be voted:

1.   FOR the election of the Board’s nominees as directors;

2.  FOR the approval, on a non-binding, advisory basis, of the compensation of the named executive officers of Webster;

3. FOR the ratification of the appointment of Webster’s independent registered public accounting firm; and

4.  FOR the holding of an advisory vote on the compensation of the named executive officers of Webster every year.

Except for procedural matters incident to the conduct of the Annual Meeting, the Board of Directors does not know of any matters other than those described in the Notice of Annual Meeting that are to come before the Annual Meeting. If any other matters are properly brought before the Annual Meeting, the persons named in the proxy will vote the shares represented by such proxy on such matters as determined by a majority of the Board of Directors. The proxies confer discretionary authority to vote on any matter of which Webster did not have notice at least 30 days prior to the date of the Annual Meeting.


The presence of a shareholder at the Annual Meeting will not automatically revoke that shareholder’s proxy. A shareholder may, however, revoke a proxy at any time before it is voted: (i) by delivering either a written notice of revocation of the proxy or a duly executed proxy bearing a later date to John H. Beers, Assistant Secretary, Webster Financial Corporation, 145 Bank Street, Waterbury, Connecticut 06702; (ii) by re-voting by telephone or on the Internet; or (iii) by attending the Annual Meeting and voting in person. The cost of soliciting proxies for the Annual Meeting will be borne by Webster. In addition to use of the mails, proxies may be solicited personally or by telephone or telecopy by directors, officers and employees, who will not be specially compensated for such activities. Webster also will request persons, firms and companies holding shares in their names or in the name of their nominees, which are beneficially owned by others, to send proxy materials to and obtain proxies from those beneficial owners and will reimburse those holders for their reasonable expenses incurred in that connection. Webster also has retained Morrow Sodali LLC, a proxy soliciting firm, to assist in the solicitation of proxies at a fee of $7,500 plus reimbursement of certain out-of-pocket expenses.

Who Can Vote - The securities which can be voted at the Annual Meeting consist of shares of Common Stock of Webster with each share entitling its owner to one vote on all matters properly presented at the Annual Meeting. There is no cumulative voting of shares. The Board of Directors has fixed the close of business on February 27, 2017 as the record date for the determination of shareholders of Webster entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting. On the record date, there were 6,017 holders of record of the 92,018,876 shares of Common Stock then outstanding and eligible to be voted at the Annual Meeting.

Voting - If your Common Stock is held by a broker, bank or other nominee (i.e., in “street name”), you should receive instructions from that person or entity that you must follow in order to have your shares of Common Stock voted. If you hold your Common Stock in your own name and not through a broker or another nominee, you may vote your shares of Common Stock:

 

   

by using the toll-free telephone number listed on the proxy card,

   

by using the Internet website listed on the proxy card,

   

by signing, dating and mailing the proxy card in the enclosed postage-paid envelope, or

   

by attending the Annual Meeting and voting in person.

Whichever of these methods you select to transmit your instructions, the proxy holders will vote your Common Stock in accordance with your instructions. If you give a proxy without specific voting instructions, your proxy will be voted by the proxy holders as recommended by the Board of Directors.

Vote by Telephone - If you hold your Common Stock in your own name and not through your broker or another nominee, you can vote your shares of Common Stock by telephone by dialing the toll-free telephone number printed on your proxy card. Telephone voting is available 24 hours a day until 11:59 p.m., Eastern Time, on April 26, 2017. Easy-to-follow voice prompts allow you to vote your shares of Common Stock and confirm that your instructions have been properly recorded. If you vote by telephone, you do not need to return your proxy card.

Vote by Internet - If you hold your Common Stock in your own name and not through your broker or another nominee, you can vote via the Internet. The website for Internet voting is printed on your proxy card. Internet voting is available 24 hours a day until 11:59 p.m., Eastern Time, on April 26, 2017. As with telephone voting, you will be given the opportunity to confirm that your instructions have been properly recorded. If you vote via the Internet, you do not need to return your proxy card.

Vote by Mail - You can vote by mail by signing, dating and returning the enclosed proxy card in the enclosed postage-paid envelope.

The presence, in person or by proxy, of at least one-third of the total number of outstanding shares of Common Stock entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting is necessary to constitute a quorum at the Annual

 

2


Meeting. Assuming the presence of a quorum at the Annual Meeting, directors will be elected by a majority of the votes cast by shares present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote. The affirmative vote of the majority of the votes cast is required to approve the non-binding, advisory vote on the compensation of the named executive officers of Webster, to approve the non-binding advisory vote on the frequency of voting on the compensation of the named executive officers of Webster, and to ratify the appointment of Webster’s independent registered public accounting firm. Shareholders’ votes will be tabulated by the persons appointed by the Board of Directors to act as inspectors of election for the Annual Meeting.

Under New York Stock Exchange Rule 452, which governs NYSE brokerage members, brokerage firms may not vote on non-routine matters in their discretion on behalf of their clients if such clients have not furnished voting instructions. A “broker non-vote” occurs when a broker’s customer does not provide the broker with voting instructions on non-routine matters for shares owned by the customer but held in the name of the broker. Proposal 3 concerns a routine matter and thus brokerage firms may vote, in person or by proxy, on such proposal on behalf of their clients without voting instructions. Because none of the other matters to be voted upon at the Annual Meeting are considered routine matters under Rule 452, there potentially can be broker non-votes at the Annual Meeting. Both abstentions and broker non-votes will be treated as shares present for purposes of determining the presence of a quorum at the Annual Meeting. Abstentions and broker non-votes will not be counted for purposes of determining the number of votes cast on Proposals 1, 2, or 4 and, therefore, will have no effect on the outcome of the votes for those proposals. Abstentions will not be counted for purposes of determining the number of votes cast on Proposal 3 and, therefore, will have no effect on the outcome of the vote for that proposal.

Electronic Delivery of Proxy Materials - As a shareholder, you have the option of electing to receive future proxy materials (including annual reports) online over the Internet. This online service provides savings to Webster by eliminating printing, mailing, processing and postage costs associated with hard copy distribution. You may enroll for this service on the Internet after you vote your shares in accordance with the instructions for Internet voting set forth on the enclosed proxy card. You may also enroll for electronic delivery of future Webster proxy materials at any time on the Company’s website at www.wbst.com. Under “Electronic Enrollment,” select the “Click Here To Enroll” link. Then select the box indicating your appropriate form of share ownership, and follow the instructions for electronic delivery enrollment. In the future, you will receive an email message, at the address you provided while enrolling, informing you that the Webster proxy materials are available to be viewed online on the Internet. Follow the instructions to view the materials and vote your shares. Your enrollment in electronic delivery of Webster proxy materials will remain in effect until revoked by you.

Annual Report on Form 10-K - Webster is required to file an annual report on Form 10-K for its 2016 fiscal year with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Shareholders may obtain, free of charge, a copy of the Form 10-K by writing to John H. Beers, Assistant Secretary, Webster Financial Corporation, 145 Bank Street, Waterbury, Connecticut 06702. Our annual report on Form 10-K is available on the Company’s website, www.wbst.com.

 

3


ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

(Proposal 1)

At the Annual Meeting, ten directors will be elected to serve for one-year terms. Unless otherwise specified on the proxy, it is the intention of the persons named in the proxy to vote the shares represented by each properly executed proxy for the election as directors of the persons named below as nominees. The Board of Directors believes that the nominees will stand for election and will serve if elected as directors. If, however, any person nominated by the Board fails to stand for election or is unable to accept election, the proxies will be voted for the election of such other person as the Board of Directors may recommend. Assuming the presence of a quorum at the Annual Meeting, directors will be elected by a majority of the votes cast by shares present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. There are no cumulative voting rights in the election of directors.

As required by Webster’s Bylaws, directors must be elected by a majority of the votes cast with respect to such director in uncontested elections (number of shares voted “for” a director must exceed the number of votes cast “against” that director). In a contested election (a situation in which the number of nominees exceeds the number of directors to be elected), the standard for election of directors will be a plurality of the shares represented in person or by proxy at any such meeting and entitled to vote on the election of directors. In addition, under Webster’s Bylaws, incumbent directors nominated for reelection are required, as a condition to such nomination, to submit a conditional letter of resignation. In the event an incumbent nominee for director fails to receive a majority of the votes cast at an annual meeting, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider the resignation and make a recommendation to the Board whether to accept or reject the resignation, or whether other action should be taken. The Board will act on the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s recommendation and publicly disclose its decision and the rationale behind it within 90 days from the date the election results are certified. The director who failed to receive a majority of the votes cast will not participate in the Board’s decision.

Information as to Nominees

The following table sets forth the names of the Board of Directors’ nominees for election as directors, all of whom are current directors of Webster. Also set forth in the table is certain other information with respect to each such person’s age at December 31, 2016, the periods during which such person has served as a director of Webster and positions currently held with Webster and its wholly owned subsidiary, Webster Bank, National Association (“Webster Bank”).

In keeping with Webster’s Qualification Guidelines for Board Members, Mr. Jacobi will be retiring from the Board effective with the 2017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, as he will have reached the retirement age of 75. He has served on the Board since 1993. The Board of Directors greatly appreciates Mr. Jacobi’s deep commitment and extraordinary contributions to Webster’s growth and progress.

 

4


Following the table are biographies of each of the nominees which contain information regarding each such person’s business experience, director positions held currently or at any time during the last five years, information regarding involvement in certain legal or administrative proceedings, if applicable, and the experiences, qualifications, attributes or skills that caused the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the Board of Directors to determine that such person should serve as a director as of the time of filing of this Proxy Statement. Each director brings a strong and unique background and set of skills to the Board, giving the Board as a whole competence and experience in a wide variety of areas, including corporate governance, board service, executive management, business, finance and marketing. The process undertaken by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee in recommending qualified candidates is described beginning on page 13 under “Corporate Governance - Director Qualifications and Nominations.”

 

Director Nominees:

   Age at
12/31/2016
     Director
Since
   Expiration
of Term
   Positions
Held with
Webster and
Webster Bank
   Committee
Membership

William L. Atwell

     66      2014    2017    Director    Compensation; Risk

Joel S. Becker

     68      1986    2017    Director    Compensation; Risk

John J. Crawford

     72      1996    2017    Lead Director    Audit; Executive; &
Nominating &
Corporate Governance
(Chair)

Elizabeth E. Flynn

     56      2014    2017    Director    Audit; Nominating &
Corporate Governance

Laurence C. Morse

     65      2004    2017    Director    Compensation;
Nominating &
Corporate Governance

Karen R. Osar

     67      2006    2017    Director    Audit (Chair);
Executive; Risk

Mark Pettie

     60      2009    2017    Director    Audit; Executive;
Risk (Chair)

Charles W. Shivery

     71      2009    2017    Director    Compensation (Chair);
Executive;

Nominating and

Corporate Governance

James C. Smith

     67      1986    2017    Chairman and
Chief Executive
Officer; Director
   Executive (Chair)

Lauren C. States

     60      2016    2017    Director    Audit

William L. Atwell is managing director of Atwell Partners, LLC, a Darien, Connecticut based company which provides consulting services and market insights to the financial services industry. Mr. Atwell was President of CIGNA International at CIGNA Corporation from 2008 to 2012. Earlier in his career, Mr. Atwell held various senior positions with The Charles Schwab Corporation, including President, Individual Investor Enterprise and Schwab Bank. Mr. Atwell began his career at Citibank where he held various senior executive roles. He is Chairman of the Board of Blucora, Inc. (NASDAQ:BCOR), a provider of technology-enabled financial solutions headquartered in Bellevue, Washington. Mr. Atwell serves as an independent trustee of AQR Mutual Funds (AQR Capital Management LLC) and chairs its nominating and governance committee and is a member of its audit committee. Mr. Atwell serves as a trustee and is the former Chairman (2012-2015) of the Fairfield University board of trustees. Mr. Atwell is a member of the Compensation Committee and the Risk Committee.

 

5


Mr. Atwell’s role as a former President of CIGNA International and 35 years of executive experience in the retail financial services industry, including banking, brokerage and insurance, provides insight regarding Webster’s opportunities and challenges.

Joel S. Becker is Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Torrco, a Waterbury, Connecticut based wholesale distributor of plumbing, heating and industrial pipe valve and fitting supplies to contractors and industry. Mr. Becker is a member of the Compensation Committee and the Risk Committee.

Mr. Becker’s experience as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of a local business in Webster’s market area combined with more than 25 years of experience on Webster’s Board gives him unique insight into Webster’s challenges, opportunities and operations. He also has extensive experience in public company executive compensation as a result of his over nine years of service as Chair of the Compensation Committee.

John J. Crawford is President of Strategem LLC, a New Haven, Connecticut based company which provides consulting services to the business and not-for-profit community on business and financial strategies. Mr. Crawford served as President, Chief Executive Officer and a director of Aristotle Corporation, a New Haven, Connecticut based education training company from October 1992 through December 2002. Mr. Crawford continued to serve on the Board of Directors of Aristotle Corporation until August 31, 2005. From 1994 until December 2000, he served as President and Chief Executive Officer of the South Central Connecticut Regional Water Authority, New Haven, Connecticut. Mr. Crawford is Lead Director, Chair of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and a member of the Audit Committee and the Executive Committee.

Mr. Crawford’s extensive executive and corporate governance experience as a former Chief Executive Officer of three companies, including a financial institution, and his 20 years of service on Webster’s Board, including fourteen years as the Lead Director, provides him with a seasoned view of Webster’s operations and challenges.

Elizabeth E. Flynn was Vice Chairman of Marsh, LLC in New York, New York, a global leader in insurance broking and risk management until her retirement on December 31, 2015. Ms. Flynn was President of Marsh’s Insurance Services Group from September 2012 to May 2013, and CEO and President of Marsh U.S. Consumer from October 2011 to September 2012. From June 2010 to October 2011, she served as Global Chief Operating Officer at Guy Carpenter & Company, LLC. Earlier in her career, Ms. Flynn was Senior Vice President, Restructuring Office/Divestitures, at American International Group, and worked more than 20 years at JP Morgan Chase & Company in various senior executive roles. Ms. Flynn is a member of the Audit Committee and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.

Ms. Flynn’s former role as Vice Chairman of Marsh, LLC and extensive operational and transformational leadership in numerous financial services organizations, including retail banking units while at JP Morgan Chase, brings meaningful and relevant experience to Webster.

Laurence C. Morse is the Managing Partner of Fairview Capital Partners, Inc., a West Hartford, Connecticut based investment management firm established in 1994 that oversees venture capital funds, some of which invest capital in venture capital partnerships and similar investment vehicles that provide capital primarily to minority-controlled companies. Mr. Morse is a director of the Institute of International Education, a member of the Board of Trustees of Harris Associates Investment Trust (which oversees the Oakmark Family of Mutual Funds), a member of the Board of Trustees of Howard University, and is a director of Princeton University Investment Company and a former director and chairman of the National Association of Investment Companies, a private, not-for-profit trade association that represents 52 private equity and specialty finance investment firms. Mr. Morse is a member of the Compensation Committee and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.

 

6


Mr. Morse’s entire career has been spent in the investment management field, including as the co- founder and Managing Partner of an investment management firm, which provides the Board with extensive knowledge of the capital markets and accounting issues. His experience has made him adept at performing rigorous risk assessments of managers and management teams, and assessing new technologies, products and services, business strategies, markets and industries.

Karen R. Osar was Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Chemtura Corporation (NYSE:CHMT), a specialty chemicals company headquartered in Middlebury, Connecticut from 2004 until her retirement in March 2007. From 1999 to April 2003, Ms. Osar served as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Westvaco Corporation and Mead Westvaco Corporation. She is a director and audit committee member of Innophos Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ:IPHS), a publicly held specialty chemicals company headquartered in Cranbury, New Jersey, a director and audit committee member of Sappi Limited (JSE:SAP), a publicly held company and one of the largest global producers of coated paper and chemical cellulose, headquartered in Johannesburg, South Africa, and from 1999 through 2006 she served as a director and audit and finance committee chair of Allergan, Inc., a publicly held multi-specialty health care company focused on developing and commercializing pharmaceuticals. Ms. Osar is Chair of the Audit Committee and a member of the Risk Committee and the Executive Committee.

Ms. Osar’s experience as the former Chief Financial Officer of a public company, her previous corporate finance experience at JPMorgan Chase & Company, and her service as Chair of the Audit Committee for Webster and as the former chair of the audit committee of another public company, provides the Board with strong corporate finance and accounting experience. Her board committee service also provides corporate governance and executive compensation expertise.

Mark Pettie is President of Blackthorne Associates, LLC, a Woodcliff Lake, New Jersey based company which provides consulting services to firms investing in a wide range of consumer oriented businesses. Mr. Pettie served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Prestige Brands Holdings, Inc. (NYSE:PBH), a publicly held company headquartered in Irvington, New York which develops, sells, distributes and markets over-the-counter drugs, household cleaning products and personal care items, from January 2007 until September 2009. He was President of the Dairy Foods Group with ConAgra from 2005 to 2006. From 1981 to 2004, Mr. Pettie held various positions of increasing responsibility in general management, marketing and finance at Kraft Foods and was named Executive Vice President and General Manager of Kraft Food’s Coffee Division in 2002. He is Chair of the Risk Committee and a member of the Audit Committee and the Executive Committee.

Mr. Pettie’s former experience as Chief Executive Officer of a public company brings strong executive experience to the Board, along with his expertise in finance and marketing. He also has extensive business and corporate governance experience as a director for both public and private companies.

Charles W. Shivery is former non-executive Chairman of the Board of Northeast Utilities (NYSE:NU) (now known as Eversource Energy). He joined Northeast Utilities in 2002 and was Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer from March 2004 until April 2012, upon the completion of the merger with NSTAR, and then served as non-executive Chairman of the Board until October 2013. He previously held posts with the company including interim President, President-Competitive Group of Northeast Utilities, and President and Chief Executive Officer of NU Enterprises, Inc., the unregulated subsidiary of the Northeast Utilities system. Prior to that, he was co-president of the Constellation Energy Group, the parent company of Baltimore Gas & Electric and other energy related businesses. Mr. Shivery is a director and audit committee member of Portland General Electric Company (NYSE:POR), an electrical utility company headquartered in Portland, Oregon. He is Chair of the Compensation Committee, and a member of the Executive Committee and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.

 

7


Mr. Shivery’s former service as the President and Chief Executive Officer of an energy company provides extensive experience managing a sizable, highly regulated business. Northeast Utilities (now known as Eversource Energy), conducts business in a large part of the region serviced by Webster, so certain variables impact both businesses similarly. Mr. Shivery also provides the Webster Board with corporate governance and executive compensation knowledge.

Lauren C. States is an Executive-in-Residence at Northeastern University’s D’Amore-McKim School of Business. Ms. States retired in 2014 from the IBM Corporation (NYSE: IBM), a publicly held company headquartered in Armonk, New York, after a career of more than thirty six years. Prior to her retirement, she served as Vice President, Strategy and Transformation for IBM’s Software Group and was a member of the Growth and Transformation senior leadership team. From 2008 to 2013, she was a leader in the company’s transformation to cloud computing and served as Chief Technology Officer in the corporate strategy function. Over her career, she has served in a broad variety of roles including technology, transformation, and sales and talent development. She is a director of Clean Harbors, Inc. (NYSE:CLH), a publicly held company headquartered in Norwell, Massachusetts, and is a member of the board of ScriptEd. She also serves as a Trustee for International House, New York. Ms. States is a member of the Audit Committee.

Ms. States’ experience as former Chief Technology Officer of a public company, and her broad background in technology, strategy and transformation, provides Webster with strong executive and technology experience.

James C. Smith is Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Webster and Webster Bank. Mr. Smith joined Webster Bank in 1975 and was appointed CEO of the bank and the holding company in 1987 and Chairman in 1995. He was elected President, Chief Operating Officer and a director of Webster Bank in 1982 and of the holding company at its inception in 1986. He served as President of Webster and Webster Bank until 2000, and again from 2008 through 2011. Mr. Smith serves as Vice Chairman of the Midsize Banks Coalition of America. He is a past member of the board of directors of the American Bankers Association and served as co-chairman of the ABA’s American Bankers Council for midsize banks. He is a past member of the board of directors of the Financial Services Roundtable. Mr. Smith served as a member of the Federal Advisory Council, which advises the deliberations of the Federal Reserve Board of Governors, and served on the board of directors of the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston. He served on the board of directors of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston. He served on the executive committee of the Connecticut Bankers Association. Mr. Smith is actively engaged in community service and supports numerous civic organizations including serving as General Chairman of the Hartford Bishops’ Foundation; serving on the Trinity Health-New England Strategic Planning Committee; and serving until very recently as a member of the board of Saint Mary’s Health System in Waterbury, Connecticut. Mr. Smith is Chair of the Executive Committee.

Mr. Smith’s position and extensive experience as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Webster and his day to day leadership of the Company provide him with thorough knowledge of Webster’s opportunities, challenges and operations.

The Board of Directors recommends that shareholders vote FOR the election of all of its director nominees.

 

8


CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

General

The business and affairs of Webster are managed under the direction of the Board of Directors (the “Board”). Members of the Board are kept informed of Webster’s business through discussions with the Chairman of the Board and Webster’s other executive officers, by reviewing materials provided to them and by participating in meetings and strategic planning sessions of the Board and its committees. The Board is also kept apprised by the Chairman of the Board and management of continuing educational programs on corporate governance and fiduciary duties and responsibilities. In addition, new directors of Webster participate in an orientation program, which is designed to familiarize them with Webster’s business and operations and with their duties as directors under applicable laws and regulations. Each member of the Board also serves as a director of Webster Bank.

Webster believes in the importance of sound and effective corporate governance. Over the years, Webster has forged an explicit link between its corporate culture and corporate governance by identifying its core values, communicating them and living them every day. With uncompromising commitment to its core principles, Webster continues to add value for its customers, shareholders, employees and the communities it serves. The Board has adopted corporate governance practices and policies which the Board and senior management believe promote this philosophy. Certain of such practices and policies are listed in the chart below and certain of those listed are discussed in greater detail elsewhere in this Proxy Statement.

 

Board and Governance Information         2016    

Size of Board

   11

Number of Independent Directors

   10

Annual Election of All Directors

   Yes

Majority Voting for Directors

   Yes

Lead Independent Director

   Yes

Independent Directors Meet Without Management Present

   Yes

Annual Equity Grant to Non-Employee Directors

   Yes

Board Orientation / Education Program

   Yes

Code of Business Conduct & Ethics for Directors

   Yes

Stock Ownership Guidelines for Directors

   Yes

No Poison Pill

   Yes

Policy Prohibiting Hedging / Pledging of Company Stock

   Yes

Annual Board & Committee Evaluations

   Yes

Board Leadership

At Webster, the roles of Chairman of the Board and principal executive officer are combined, both held by Mr. Smith. In addition, there is a lead independent director who is appointed in accordance with Webster’s Corporate Governance Policy, which provides that the Board shall appoint an independent director to serve as the Lead Director of the Board for a one-year term, or until a successor is appointed. The lead independent director presides over the executive sessions of independent directors and assists and advises the Chairman of the Board. During fiscal year 2016, Mr. Crawford served as the lead independent director. The Board believes that having a combined Chairman and principal executive officer, coupled with a lead independent director, is the most appropriate leadership structure for Webster, especially given Mr. Smith’s

 

9


long service as Chief Executive Officer and his extensive knowledge of the Company and its governance. This structure allows Board discussions regarding performance and strategic matters to be led by the person who oversees Webster’s strategy and operations and establishes a single voice to speak on behalf of Webster, while the lead independent director component of the structure provides independent leadership that mitigates any real or perceived conflicts of interest.

Director Independence

Pursuant to the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) listing standards, Webster is required to have a majority of “independent directors” on its Board. In addition, the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee must be composed solely of independent directors. The NYSE listing standards define specific relationships that would disqualify a director from being independent and further require that for a director to qualify as “independent,” the board of directors must affirmatively determine that the director has no material relationship with the Company.

The Board, with the assistance of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, conducted an evaluation of director independence, based primarily on a review of the responses of the directors and executive officers to questions regarding employment and compensation history, affiliations and family and other commercial, industrial, banking consulting, legal, accounting, charitable and legal relationships with Webster, including those relationships described under “Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation” and “Certain Relationships” on page 47 of this Proxy Statement, and on discussions with the Board.

As a result of this evaluation, the Board affirmatively determined that each of Messrs. Atwell, Becker, Crawford, Jacobi, Morse, Pettie, Shivery and Mses. Flynn, Osar and States is an “independent director” for purposes of Section 303A of the Listed Company Manual of the NYSE and applicable SEC rules and regulations. In connection with this evaluation, the Board considered that Webster provides lending and other financial services to directors, their immediate family members, and their affiliated organizations in the ordinary course of business and without preferential terms or rates. The Board also considered that C. Michael Jacobi’s son, Gregory Jacobi, was employed by Webster Bank in 2016 as a Senior Vice President. Mr. Jacobi’s son’s employment position with Webster Bank does not violate the independence standards contained in the NYSE rules and the Board determined that this relationship is not material and would not impair Mr. Jacobi’s independence, in part because Mr. Jacobi’s son is not an executive officer of Webster and his compensation and benefits were established in accordance with the compensation policies and practices applicable to Webster employees in comparable positions.

Mr. Smith is not considered independent because he is an executive officer of Webster and Webster Bank.

Executive Sessions of Independent Directors

In keeping with Webster’s Corporate Governance Policy, in 2016 the Board held 4 meetings that were limited to independent directors. The lead independent director presides over the executive sessions of independent directors.

Risk Oversight

The Board administers its risk oversight function primarily through the Risk Committee, which is described in more detail below. The Risk Committee meets frequently throughout the year and reports its findings to the full Board on an ongoing basis. In addition, the Compensation Committee and the Risk Committee review and assess risks as related to Webster’s compensation programs. Webster also has a Chief Risk Officer, Daniel H. Bley, who reports in that capacity to the Risk Committee, as well as two senior risk officers who report to the Chief Risk Officer.

 

10


Board and Committee Meetings

During 2016, Webster held 9 meetings of its Board. Each incumbent director attended at least 75 percent of the aggregate of (i) the total number of meetings held by the Board during the period that the individual served and (ii) the total number of meetings held by all committees of the Board on which the individual served during the period that the individual served.

Committees of the Board; Code of Business Conduct and Ethics and Corporate Governance Guidelines

The Board has established five standing committees. The standing committees are the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, the Executive Committee and the Risk Committee. The Board has adopted a charter for each of these committees, as well as corporate governance guidelines that address the make-up and functioning of the Board and qualification guidelines for board members. The Board has also adopted a code of business conduct and ethics (the “Code of Conduct”) that applies to all employees, officers and directors. Each employee, officer and director participates in an annual training session that focuses on topics covered by Webster’s Code of Conduct. The training reinforces Webster’s core values and Webster’s commitment to full compliance with applicable laws and regulations. You can find links to these materials on the Company’s website at: www.wbst.com.

You can also obtain a printed copy of any of the materials referred to above, without charge, by contacting us at the following address:

Webster Financial Corporation

145 Bank Street

Waterbury, Connecticut 06702

Attn: Harriet Munrett Wolfe, Esq.

Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary

The Board has determined that all of the Directors who serve on the Audit, Compensation, and Nominating and Corporate Governance committees are “independent” for purposes of Section 303A of the Listed Company Manual of the NYSE. In addition, all of the Directors who serve on the Risk Committee are “independent.”

Audit Committee

The Board has appointed an Audit Committee that oversees the Company’s financial reporting process, the system of internal financial and accounting controls, the audit process, and compliance with applicable laws and regulations. The Audit Committee reviews the Company’s annual financial statements, including management’s discussion and analysis, and regulatory examination findings. The Audit Committee recommends the appointment of an independent registered public accounting firm and is responsible for the oversight of such firm. A copy of the Audit Committee’s charter is available on the Company’s website at: www.wbst.com. During 2016, the Audit Committee held 5 meetings. The members of the Audit Committee currently are Ms. Osar (Chair) and Messrs. Crawford, Pettie, and Mses. Flynn, and States. Each of the members of the Audit Committee meets the independence requirements of the rules of the NYSE and applicable rules and regulations of the SEC. The Board has determined that each of the members of the Audit Committee is financially literate and that Ms. Osar and Mr. Crawford qualify as “audit committee financial experts,” as that term is defined in Item 407(d)(5) of Regulation S-K.

Compensation Committee

The Board has appointed a Compensation Committee. During 2016, the Compensation Committee held 4 meetings. Compensation Committee meetings are attended by Webster’s Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and President, other than while their compensation and benefits are discussed. For a description of the

 

11


role of Webster’s CEO in determining or recommending the amount of compensation paid to our named executive officers during 2016, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis.” The members of the Compensation Committee currently are Messrs. Shivery (Chair), Atwell, Becker and Morse. Each of the members of the Compensation Committee meets the independence requirements of the rules of the NYSE, and also serves as the Compensation Committee of the Company’s subsidiary, Webster Bank. A copy of the Compensation Committee’s charter is available on the Company’s website at: www.wbst.com. The Compensation Committee may delegate to its chairperson or any other Compensation Committee member such power and authority as the Compensation Committee deems appropriate, except such powers and authorities required by law to be exercised by the whole Compensation Committee or subcommittee thereof.

Pursuant to the Compensation Committee’s charter, among other responsibilities, the Committee is charged with annually reviewing and approving annual bonus arrangements and long term incentive compensation paid to the CEO. The Committee reviews and makes recommendations to the Board with respect to the annual base salary, and severance and/or change in control or similar agreements/provisions, if any, for the CEO; annually determining such compensation and benefits for the members of the Company’s Executive Management Committee other than the CEO; annually recommending to the Board the content of the annual performance evaluation for the CEO and reviewing performance evaluations for all members of the Executive Management Committee; administering and implementing the Company’s performance based incentive plans; reviewing the talent management and succession planning processes to ensure that there is a pool of qualified candidates to fill future Executive Management Committee positions; and reviewing and approving on a periodic basis the Company’s employee stock ownership guidelines. The Committee also reviews and makes recommendations to the Board with respect to director compensation.

For information on the role of compensation consultants determining or recommending the amount or form of executive or director compensation, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis – Compensation Consultant.”

Executive Committee

The Board has appointed an Executive Committee that has responsibility for serving as an exploratory committee for mergers and acquisitions and to serve as an ad hoc committee as needed. The Executive Committee did not meet during 2016. The members of the Executive Committee are Messrs. Smith (Chair), Crawford, Pettie, Shivery and Ms. Osar.

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

The Board has appointed a Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee that has overall responsibility for recommending corporate governance process and board operations for the Company. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee identifies director candidates, reviews the qualifications and experience of each person considered as a nominee for election or reelection as a director, and recommends director nominees to fill vacancies on the Board and for approval by the Board and the shareholders. A copy of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s charter is available on the Company’s website at: www.wbst.com. During 2016, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee held 3 meetings. The members of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee are Messrs. Crawford (Chair), Morse, Shivery and Ms. Flynn. Each member of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee meets the independence requirements of the rules of the NYSE.

Risk Committee

The Board has appointed a Risk Committee whose primary function is to assist the Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities regarding the Company’s enterprise risk management, receiving information regarding the Company’s policies, procedures and practices relating to risk, and discussing material regulatory

 

12


issues, compliance matters, and emerging risks to the Company. The Risk Committee also has responsibility for overseeing management’s monitoring of security issues. During 2016, the Risk Committee held 5 meetings. The members of the Risk Committee are Messrs. Pettie (Chair), Atwell, Becker, Jacobi, and Ms. Osar.

Director Qualifications and Nominations

Each year, the Board undergoes a self-assessment process to evaluate performance of the Board and Committees. As part of the self-assessment process, the Board considers which attributes and skill sets are important to ensure optimal performance of the Board. The information learned through this process is utilized when considering outside director candidates.

The Board believes that it should be composed of directors with diverse experience in business and in areas that are relevant to the Company, and that directors should possess the highest personal and professional ethics, integrity and values, and be committed to representing the long term interests of the shareholders. Directors should also have an objective perspective and practical wisdom, and should be willing and able to devote the required amount of time to Webster’s business. In addition to depth and breadth of business and civic experience in leadership positons, a potential director’s ties to Webster’s markets are considered in order to ensure diversity and broad geographic and demographic representation reflective of the markets served. These attributes are embodied in Webster’s Qualification Guidelines for Board Members. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee reviews and assesses the effectiveness of the Guidelines periodically.

The Board is committed to sustaining a board that achieves balance between depth of experience in the oversight of Webster and fresh approaches to oversight and strategic deliberations, particularly as Webster’s business and best practices of corporate governance evolve. Consistent with this commitment to constructive refreshment, Webster has added three new directors since 2014 and has had one director retire, with a second director retiring effective with the 2017 Annual Meeting. One result of the refreshment is a reduction in the median tenure of independent directors following the 2017 Annual Meeting to eight years.

When considering candidates for the Board, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee takes into account a number of factors in addition to the foregoing competencies, including the following:

 

   

independence from management;

   

judgment, skill, integrity and reputation;

   

relevant specific industry experience;

   

age, gender and ethnic background;

   

current position with another business or entity;

   

potential conflicts of interests with other pursuits; and

   

existing ties to the Company’s and Bank’s markets.

When seeking candidates for director, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee may solicit suggestions from incumbent directors, management or others, including third party search firms. The Committee will review the qualifications and experience of each candidate. If the Committee believes a candidate would be a valuable addition to the Board, it will recommend to the full Board that candidate’s election.

Webster’s Bylaws permit shareholders eligible to vote at the Annual Meeting to make nominations for directors, provided such nominations are made pursuant to timely notice in writing to the Secretary of Webster. To be timely, notice must be delivered to, or mailed to and received at, the principal executive offices of Webster not less than 30 days nor more than 90 days prior to the date of the meeting, provided that at least 45 days’ notice or prior public disclosure of the date of the Annual Meeting is given or made to shareholders. If less than 45 days’ notice or prior public disclosure of the date of the Annual Meeting is given or made to shareholders, notice by the shareholder to be timely must be received by Webster not later than the close of business on the 15th day following the day on

 

13


which such notice of the date of the Annual Meeting was mailed or such public disclosure was made. Public disclosure of the date of the Annual Meeting was made by the issuance of a press release on February 14, 2017 and by filing a Current Report on Form 8-K under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 14, 2017. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider candidates for director suggested by shareholders applying the criteria for candidates described above and considering the additional information required by Article III, Section 13 of Webster’s Bylaws, which must be set forth in a shareholder’s notice of nomination. Section 13 of Webster’s Bylaws requires that the notice include: (a) as to each person whom the shareholder proposes to nominate for election or reelection as a director, (i) the name, age, business address and residence address of such person, (ii) the principal occupation or employment of such person, (iii) the class and number of shares of Webster which are beneficially owned by such person, and (iv) any other information relating to such person that is required to be disclosed in solicitations or proxies for election of directors, or is otherwise required, in each case pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (including without limitation such person’s written consent to being named in the Proxy Statement as a nominee and to serving as a director if elected); and (b) as to the shareholder giving notice, (i) the name and address, as they appear on Webster’s books, of such shareholder, and (ii) the class and number of shares of Webster which are beneficially owned by such shareholder. In considering any nominees for directors recommended by a shareholder, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considers, among other things, the same factors set forth above.

Compensation of Directors

The following table summarizes the compensation paid to Webster’s non-employee directors during 2016. Employee directors of Webster receive no additional compensation for serving as directors or committee members of Webster or its subsidiaries. Beyond these and other standard arrangements described below, no other compensation was paid to any such director.

 

Name

   Fees Earned or
Paid in Cash
($) 1
   Stock
Awards
($) 2
   Option
Awards
($) 3
   All Other
Compensation
($) 4
     Total
($)
 

William L. Atwell

   48,950    62,877    —        3,235        115,062  

Joel S. Becker

   48,950    62,877    —        3,490        115,317  

John J. Crawford

   72,525    77,217    —        3,782        153,524  

Elizabeth E. Flynn

   52,275    62,877    —        3,158        118,310  

C. Michael Jacobi

   43,250    62,877    —        3,288        109,415  

Laurence C. Morse

   48,025    62,877    —        3,490        114,392  

Karen R. Osar

   63,450    62,877    —        3,490        129,817  

Mark Pettie

   62,700    62,877    —        3,490        129,067  

Charles W. Shivery

   54,325    62,877    —        3,490        120,692  

Lauren C. States

   20,500    41,980    —        278        62,758  

 

1 

Includes meeting fees, paid January through April, and board and committee retainers paid May through December, prorated on a quarterly basis. Ms. States joined the board on September 19, 2016.

 

2 

The amounts in this column represent the aggregate grant date fair value computed in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 718. The grant date fair value of the restricted shares awarded to Mses. Flynn and Osar and Messrs. Atwell, Becker, Crawford, Jacobi, Morse, Pettie and Shivery in 2016 was $36.77 per share, and $37.82 per share for Ms. States. The assumptions used to calculate the amount recognized for these stock awards are set forth in footnote 18 to Webster’s audited financial statements contained in Webster’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016. As of December 31, 2016, Ms. Osar and Messrs.

 

14


 

Becker, Jacobi, Morse, Pettie and Shivery had 3,473 unvested restricted shares from the annual equity grants in 2014, 2015 and 2016, and Messrs. Atwell and Crawford and Mses. Flynn and States had 3,325, 3,863, 3,207, 1,110 unvested restricted shares, respectively.

 

3 

No stock options were granted to non-employee directors in 2016. As of December 31, 2016, each director had the following number of options outstanding, all of which are currently exercisable: Mr. Atwell 0; Mr. Becker, 41,910; Mr. Crawford, 36,910; Ms. Flynn, 0; Mr. Jacobi, 41,910; Mr. Morse, 41,910; Ms. Osar, 29,410; Mr. Pettie, 19,798; and Mr. Shivery, 13,274; and Ms. States, 0.

 

4 

Reflects the dollar amount of dividends paid on unvested restricted stock for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016.

Webster uses a combination of cash and restricted stock to attract and retain qualified candidates to serve on the Board. Webster targets director compensation to be at the median for its peer group (as described in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” below), with the opportunity to earn significantly more based on Webster’s total shareholder return. Stock Ownership Guidelines have also been established for directors to closely align directors’ interests with those of Webster’s shareholders.

During 2016, the methodology for non-employee director compensation was changed from paying an annual retainer and fees for each board and committee meeting attended, to paying an annual board retainer and annual committee retainers. In addition, non-employee directors received 1,710 shares of restricted stock, with the exception of Ms. States, who became a director on September 19, 2016, and received 1,110 shares. The Lead Director received 2,100 shares of restricted stock. All restricted stock vests after one year and has a two year holding period following the vesting period. Webster continued to reimburse directors for reasonable travel expenses incurred in connection with attending Board meetings.

From January to April 2016, each non-employee director received $1,200 for each Webster or Webster Bank Board meeting attended, $1,200 for each committee meeting attended, and $600 for each telephonic Webster or Webster Bank Board and committee meeting called by either Webster or Webster Bank. Each non-employee director of both Webster and Webster Bank received a total of $2,000 for separate board meetings of Webster and Webster Bank that were held on the same day. Non-employee directors received $1,000 for attending a committee meeting if it was held on the same day as a Board meeting and $1,000 for attending a second committee meeting if more than one committee meeting was held on the same day.

From May to December 2016, the following schedule was in effect:

 

Retainer

  

Amount

 

Annual Board Retainer - Lead Director

   $ 61,500  

Annual Board Retainer - Director

   $ 42,000  

Annual Audit Committee Retainer - Chair

   $ 24,000  

Annual Audit Committee Retainer - Member

   $ 9,000  

Annual Compensation Committee Retainer - Chair

   $ 16,000  

Annual Compensation Committee Retainer - Member

   $ 6,000  

Annual Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee Retainer - Chair

   $ 12,000  

Annual Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee Retainer - Member

   $ 4,500  

Annual Risk Committee Retainer - Chair

   $ 20,000  

Annual Risk Committee Retainer - Member

   $ 6,000  

 

15


Webster stock ownership guidelines require non-employee directors to own Webster Common Stock with a market value equal to at least $300,000. Non-employee directors who do not meet the guidelines agree to hold all long term incentives, which include vested restricted stock and exercised stock options (net of exercise price and taxes), until they achieve the required ownership threshold of Webster Common Stock.

Communications with Directors

The Company’s shareholders and other interested persons who want to communicate with the Board of Directors, any individual Director, the Lead Director, the non-management directors as a group or any other group of directors, can write to:

[Name of Director or Directors]

c/o Lead Director of the Board of Directors

Webster Financial Corporation

P.O. Box 1074

754 Chapel Street

New Haven, Connecticut 06510

All communications received (except for communications that are primarily commercial in nature or relate to an improper or irrelevant topic) will be forwarded to the intended recipient(s) or the full Board, as appropriate.

Director Attendance at Annual Meetings

Webster typically schedules a meeting of the Board of Directors in conjunction with the annual meeting and expects that the Board of Directors will attend the annual meeting, absent a valid reason, such as a previously scheduled conflict. Last year all of the individuals then serving as directors attended the annual meeting.

 

16


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION AND OTHER INFORMATION

Named Executive Officers of Webster Financial Corporation

The following table sets forth information regarding the Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Financial Officer, and the three other most highly compensated executive officers who were serving on December 31, 2016 (the “named executive officers” or “NEOs”).

 

Name

   Age as of
December 31, 2016
  

Positions with Webster and Webster Bank

James C. Smith

   67    Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Director

John R. Ciulla

   51    President and Director of Webster Bank

Glenn I. MacInnes

   55    Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Nitin J. Mhatre

   46    Executive Vice President, Community Banking

Daniel Bley

   48    Executive Vice President and Chief Risk Officer

Provided below is biographical information for each of Webster’s NEOs, other than Mr. Smith. For information regarding Mr. Smith, see “Election of Directors-Information as to Nominees.”

John R. Ciulla is President of Webster and Webster Bank. Mr. Ciulla joined Webster in 2004 and has served in a variety of management positions at the Company, including Chief Credit Risk Officer and Senior Vice President, Commercial Banking, where he was responsible for several business units. He was promoted from Executive Vice President and Head of Middle Market Banking to lead Commercial Banking in January 2014 and President in October 2015. Prior to joining Webster, Mr. Ciulla was managing director of The Bank of New York, where he worked from 1997 to 2004. He is the Chairman of the board of the Connecticut Business & Industry Association and serves on the board of the Business Council of Fairfield County.

Glenn I. MacInnes is Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Webster and Webster Bank. He joined Webster in 2011. Prior to that, Mr. MacInnes was Chief Financial Officer at New Alliance Bancshares for two years and was employed for 11 years at Citigroup in a series of positions, including deputy CFO for Citibank North America and CFO of Citibank (West) FSB. Mr. MacInnes serves on the board of Wellmore Behavioral Health, Inc.

Nitin J. Mhatre is Executive Vice President, Head of Community Banking of Webster and Webster Bank. He joined Webster in October 2008 as Executive Vice President, Consumer Lending of Webster Bank and was appointed Executive Vice President, Consumer Finance in January 2009. He was promoted to his current position in August of 2013. Prior to joining Webster, Mr. Mhatre worked at Citigroup across multiple geographies including St. Louis, Missouri, Stamford, Connecticut, Guam, USA and India, in various capacities. In his most recent position, he was the Managing Director for the Home Equity Retail business for CitiMortgage based in Stamford, Connecticut. Mr. Mhatre is a board member of Consumer Bankers Association headquartered in Washington, D.C., and also serves on the board of Junior Achievement of Southwest New England.

Daniel H. Bley is Executive Vice President and Chief Risk Officer of Webster and Webster Bank since August of 2010. Prior to joining Webster, Mr. Bley worked at ABN AMRO and Royal Bank of Scotland from 1990 to 2010, having served as Managing Director of Financial Institutions Credit Risk and Group Senior Vice President, Head of Financial Institutions and Trading Credit Risk Management. Mr. Bley currently serves on the board of Junior Achievement of Western Connecticut.

Compensation Committee Report

The Compensation Committee met with management to review and discuss the Compensation Discussion and Analysis disclosures that follow. Based on such review and discussion, the Committee

 

17


recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement and incorporated by reference in the Company’s Form 10-K for its 2016 fiscal year, and the Board has approved the recommendation.

Compensation Committee

Charles W. Shivery (Chair)

William L. Atwell

Joel S. Becker

Laurence C. Morse

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

The Compensation Discussion and Analysis (“CD&A”) discusses in detail the 2016 executive compensation program for the Company’s NEOs. The Compensation Committee (“Committee”) recommends the base salary for the CEO to the Board of Directors, approves the annual cash incentive and long-term equity-based incentives (“LTI”) for the CEO, and approves the compensation for Webster’s other NEOs. Non-NEO members of the Executive Management Committee are also compensated under the same compensation program.

At the annual meeting of shareholders held on April 28, 2016, Webster held an advisory vote on executive compensation. Approximately 98% of the shares of Webster Common Stock that were voted on the proposal were voted for the approval of the compensation of the NEOs as discussed in Webster’s 2016 Proxy Statement. The Committee considers the outcome of the vote when determining compensation policies and setting NEO compensation and believes that the results show strong support for Webster’s compensation policies and procedures. No changes in the overall structure of the programs were made in 2016.

Executive Summary

 

Based on 2016 performance, the Committee approved total compensation for NEOs, which is moderately higher than compensation for 2015, given the continued improvement in financial and credit-related results, considerable progress toward setting and achieving strategic goals and financial performance that exceeded the Peer Group’s performance. The Committee intended that total direct compensation (including the February 2017 LTI grants based on 2016 performance) be moderately higher than median Peer Group compensation.

Highlights of 2016 Operating Performance

Webster reported record net income driven by higher revenue, disciplined expense management and further improvement in asset quality. Strong loan demand boosted core revenue. Webster purposefully invested in strategies that are expected to increase Economic Profit1 over time.

Highlights Summary (results versus prior year)

 

   

Record net income of $207.1 million, up 1.17%

 

   

Record net income applicable to common shareholders of $198.4 million, up 1.57%

 

   

Record pre-provision net revenue of $359.8 million, up 3.7%

 

1 

Economic Profit is a non-GAAP measure and is calculated at the consolidated and business unit level. Economic Profit is defined as net income less the imputed cost of equity capital which we estimate at 9.5%.

 

18


   

Continued improvement in asset quality;

 

 

Annualized non-performing loans as a percentage of loans 0.79%, down from 0.89% in 2015

 

 

Annualized net charge-offs as a percentage of average loans and leases of 0.23%, flat compared to 2015

 

   

Overall loan growth of 8.6% with growth in commercial and commercial real estate loans of 13.2%

 

   

Deposit growth of 7.5% and HSA deposit growth of 14.7%

 

   

Return on Average Tangible Common Shareholders’ Equity of 11.36% versus 11.96% in 2015

 

   

Return on Average Common Shareholders’ Equity of 8.44% versus 8.70% in 2015

 

   

Return on Average Assets of 0.82% versus 0.87% in 2015

Objectives of Compensation Program

Webster’s executive compensation program is designed to attract, engage and retain qualified executives and to reward actions and results that the Committee and Board of Directors believe will increase Economic Profits and maximize shareholder return. Special attention is given to ensuring that compensation plans do not encourage NEOs or other executives to take excessive risks.

Webster’s executive compensation program is highly performance based and closely aligns total compensation with achievement of Webster’s financial and strategic goals. A meaningful portion of total compensation is variable and tied to future shareholder return, thereby rewarding NEOs and other executives for pursuing strategies that are expected to increase Economic Profits over time.

The compensation program has four primary objectives:

 

   

Performance Based - A majority of total compensation is intended to be variable based on: the Company’s success in achieving pre-established financial and strategic goals, with particular emphasis on return on equity; and, its performance relative to the Peer Group; and, absolute and relative total shareholder return (“TSR”).

 

   

Equity Based - A meaningful portion of the total compensation opportunity is equity-based and is highly dependent on: return on equity (“ROE”) over a three year period; and TSR over a three-year period including as compared to the Peer Group.

 

   

Competitive - Total compensation opportunities should be competitive, thus enabling Webster to attract, engage and retain highly qualified NEOs and other executive officers who will be motivated to achieve Webster’s financial and strategic goals.

 

   

Safety and Soundness - Webster’s incentive compensation programs reward individual actions and behaviors that support Webster’s mission, business strategies and performance-based culture and do not encourage excessive risk taking.

 

19


Compensation Best Practices

The Committee annually reviews best practices in executive compensation and governance and continues to enhance our policies and practices, which include the following:

2016 Compensation and Governance Best Practices

 

We Do    We Do Not

A substantial portion of each NEO’s total compensation opportunity is variable, such that actual compensation is closely tied to financial performance and business results

  

No employment agreements

Stock ownership guidelines that are reviewed annually and include a one-year post vesting holding period that remains in effect if the executive terminates from the Company

  

No stock option repricing

The value of LTI granted in February each year is determined based in part on the NEO’s performance in the prior year

  

Perquisites available to NEOs and other executive officers have been limited and reviewed annually by the Compensation Committee

Long-Term equity program is 75% performance based driving a pay for performance culture

  

No excise tax gross-up provisions in any agreements with our NEOs

Review Proxy Peer Group annually

  

No dividends paid on unvested performance shares

Independent Compensation Consultant to the Compensation Committee

  

No hedging or pledging of shares

Setting 2016 Compensation

In February 2016, the Committee reviewed all elements of compensation for NEOs and approved the compensation structure. The program is intended to provide NEOs with a compensation opportunity commensurate with persons with similar duties and responsibilities at other financial institutions. In determining levels of NEOs’ overall compensation, the Committee also considers the qualifications and experience of the respective officer, Webster’s size and complexity of operations and, to a certain extent, the compensation paid to other persons employed by the Company. The Committee uses external data as input for the Committee’s analysis and to obtain a general understanding of current market compensation practices, rather than as strict rules for establishing compensation. A meaningful portion of pay is tied to financial and strategic performance. Consequently, actual compensation received will vary from targeted compensation.

Compensation Consultant

In carrying out its responsibilities, the Committee engages McLagan, an independent compensation consultant, to offer market perspectives on annual pay, current executive compensation trends and compensation programs currently in place at Webster. The consultant also provides insight into regulatory issues affecting compensation. The Committee has the authority to hire and terminate the consultant and determine the nature and scope of the consultant’s assignments. The Committee has engaged McLagan since June 2010. The Committee reviewed the work performed by McLagan and, under SEC and NYSE regulations, determined that the work did not create a conflict of interest.

 

20


McLagan provided the Committee ongoing insights relating to trends in executive compensation in the banking sector. At the direction of the Committee, McLagan reviewed all elements of compensation for the NEOs and other executive officers and made recommendations with regard to plan design. McLagan also reviewed an analysis of Webster’s 2016 performance relative to peers and opined on management’s proposals to the Committee regarding 2016 executive compensation. McLagan attended all Committee meetings and in each one of those meetings had the opportunity to meet with the Committee in executive session. The Committee weighs the consultant’s perspective as part of its decision-making process. The Committee communicates compensation decisions directly to management. The Committee utilized market context and recommendations from McLagan when determining the amount and form of compensation paid to Webster’s executive officers and directors during 2016.

Compensation Peer Group

The Committee uses proxy information for the Peer Group to review annually the compensation of Webster’s NEOs relative to comparable positions. This review is supplemented by available market survey data. The Committee may also use comparisons to the Peer Group to consider other market practices relevant to the scope of the NEOs’ responsibilities. This may include, for example, change in control provisions and stock ownership guidelines.

In 2016, the Committee considered actual and, where available, target compensation data from the Peer Group. This data was presented by McLagan and contributed to an assessment of the competitiveness of actual and target pay for Webster’s NEOs.

 

21


The Committee reviews the composition of the Peer Group annually with the assistance of McLagan with the objective of maintaining a group of peer banks that individually and collectively represent suitable comparators for compensation-related analyses. Suitability is defined using a number of factors, including size, scope, business mix and geographic focus. Scope measures include total assets, net revenue, market capitalization and number of employees. Business mix is reflected by an analysis of loan composition (consumer, real estate, commercial and construction) and revenue composition (sources and proportion of net interest income and non-interest income). Banks with a geographic focus outside the continental United States are excluded regardless of the appropriateness of their scope and business mix. In late 2015, at the request of the Committee, McLagan prepared an evaluation of our Peer Group for use in 2016. As a result of the evaluation, a recommendation was made to add two companies to the Peer Group for 2016 - FNB Corporation and Synovus Financial Corporation. Three companies were removed from the Peer Group due to those companies being acquired - Susquehanna Bancshares (acquired by BB&T), City National Corporation (acquired by Royal Bank of Canada) and First Niagara Financial Group (acquired by KeyCorp). The Committee approved the recommendation and identified the 12 companies listed below as the Peer Group for 2016:

 

2016 Compensation Peer Group1  

Company

 

  

Total Assets (in millions)

 

 
   

Associated Banc-Corp

   $  27,712  
   

BancorpSouth, Inc.

   $ 13,799  
   

BOK Financial Corporation

   $ 31,476  
   

Commerce Bancshares, Inc.

   $ 24,605  
   

Cullen/Frost Bankers, Inc.

   $ 28,566  
   

FNB Corporation

   $ 17,558  
   

Fulton Financial Corporation

   $ 17,915  
   

Hancock Holding Company

   $ 22,834  
   

People’s United Financial, Inc.

   $ 38,877  
   

Synovus Financial Corporation

   $ 28,793  
   

TCF Financial Corporation

   $ 20,690  
   

Valley National Bancorp

   $ 21,613  
  
   

75th Percentile

   $ 28,624  
   

Median

   $ 23,722  
   

25th Percentile

   $ 19,997  
   

Webster

   $ 24,678  
   

Webster Percent Rank

     55%  

 

1 

Data as of 12/31/2015 and is provided by Equilar Insight

Elements of 2016 Compensation

Webster’s compensation program has three basic elements: base salary, annual cash incentive and LTI. The annual cash incentive rewards current year performance, while the LTI aligns the NEOs’ interests with the long-term goals and performance of the Company. LTI grants consist of a 75%/25% mix of performance based shares and time-based restricted stock. Performance shares have a three-year performance period with cliff vesting, and time-based restricted stock has a three-year vesting schedule of one-third on each anniversary date of the grant.

 

22


The Committee reviews all elements of compensation annually, separately and in aggregate, to ensure that the total amount of compensation is within appropriate competitive parameters based on data from independent sources and based on the performance of the Company and NEOs.

In early 2016, the Committee engaged McLagan to provide an analysis of Webster’s total compensation as well as the individual components compared to the Peer Group and McLagan’s 2015 Top Management Survey. This data contributed to an assessment of the competitiveness of actual and target pay for Webster’s NEOs. Based on the findings, the Committee set the components of pay and the weight of each component creating a structure that reflects Webster’s objectives for compensation while allowing individual variations based on job scope, tenure, retention risk and other factors relevant to the Committee. See earlier section titled Objectives of Compensation Program for details.

The chart below breaks down target total direct compensation by component, including target and pay mix of each component by NEO for the program approved in February 2016. For purposes of this table, “pay mix” represents the percentage of total direct compensation for each component.

 

2016 Components of Total Direct Compensation at Target  
           
Name and Principal
Position
   Salary     Annual Cash
Incentive
    Total Cash
Compensation
    Long-Term Incentive     Total Direct
Compensation
 
   Year-End
2016
    Pay
Mix
    Target     Pay
Mix
    Target     Pay
Mix
    Target     Pay
Mix
    Target     Pay
Mix
 

 

James C. Smith Chairman and CEO

  

 

$

 

950,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

26

 

 

 

$

 

950,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

26

 

 

 

$

 

1,900,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

52

 

 

 

$

 

1,757,500

 

 

 

 

 

 

48

 

 

 

$

 

3,657,500

 

 

 

 

 

 

100

 

                     
John R. Ciulla President    $ 480,000       35   $ 360,000       26   $ 840,000       61   $ 528,000       39   $ 1,368,000       100

 

Glenn I. MacInnes EVP and CFO

  

 

$

 

475,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

35

 

 

 

$

 

356,250

 

 

 

 

 

 

26

 

 

 

$

 

831,250

 

 

 

 

 

 

61

 

 

 

$

 

522,500

 

 

 

 

 

 

39

 

 

 

$

 

1,353,750

 

 

 

 

 

 

100

 

                     

Nitin J. Mhatre

EVP, Community Banking

   $ 375,000       39   $ 262,500       27   $ 637,500       67   $ 318,750       33   $ 956,250       100

 

Daniel H. Bley

EVP and Chief Risk Officer

  

 

$

 

390,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

43

 

 

 

$

 

234,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

26

 

 

 

$

 

624,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

68

 

 

 

$

 

292,500

 

 

 

 

 

 

32

 

 

 

$

 

916,500

 

 

 

 

 

 

100

 

Salary

Annual salary is the only fixed component of Webster’s executive compensation program. In setting salary, the Committee looks at current pay practices, Peer Group comparisons and general market analysis in consultation with its compensation consultant, McLagan. The Committee then establishes salaries that are competitive to the Peer Group for similar positions. The Committee reviews the salaries on an annual basis.

In the case of a change in role, an officer’s new responsibilities, external pay practices, internal equity, past performance and experience are all considered in determining whether a change in salary is warranted.

As part of the Committee’s annual salary review, salaries were determined to be reasonably competitive when compared with the actual proxy data of the Peer Group and benchmark survey information. In 2016, all of the NEOs received an adjustment to base salary as a result of this review.

Annual Cash Incentive Compensation - Plan Overview

Annual cash incentive compensation is variable based on performance and ties a significant portion of the NEOs’ compensation to achievement of the Company’s annual financial plan and also considers financial performance relative to the Peer Group. The Committee approves measurements for the plan annually. For

 

23


2016, target incentives were set for each of the NEOs between 26% and 27% of total compensation. The plan is designed so that the weighted average performance for the financial measures must exceed a predetermined threshold before a payout can be made.

The plan is structured to calculate incentives based on two Primary Components:

 

  1.

Corporate Component - This component has two elements: Financial Performance relative to plan and Performance Relative to Peer Group. Financial Performance is determined by scoring performance against four pre-established financial measures tied to the annual financial plan. Each measure is weighted based on relative importance, and then the measures are totaled to determine a weighted score. Adjustments to this score may then be made, by as much as 20 percentage points, based on the Committee’s assessment of the Company’s performance against financial performance goals and their degree of difficulty and the Committee’s assessment of performance against the four pre-established financial measures relative to the Company’s Peer Group.

 

  2.

Line of Business Component - The Line of Business Component is determined based on the financial performance of the line of business against its pre-established financial goals for the year. Adjustments may then be made based on the CEO’s and the Committee’s assessment of results against strategic objectives, the competitive environment and the degree of difficulty of the goals. The program dictates that the Line of Business Component is not scored or paid out unless the Corporate Component is scored at or above its threshold payout level. Mr. Mhatre, EVP of Community Banking, is the only line of business head among the NEOs.

The Corporate Component rating generates a potential funding of 0% to 150% of target. A score of 100% would pay out at target. There is an aggregate threshold score of approximately 70%, which generates a payout of 50% of target, below which no payout is earned. Scores below 50% on an individual measure are reduced to zero and a total weighted score below 50% on the four goals in the aggregate earns no payout.

The two Primary Components are weighted based on each NEO’s responsibilities. The weighting of the Primary Components is shown in the chart below:

 

2016 Weight of Primary Components  
     
Name   

Corporate

Performance

    

Line of Business

Performance

 
     

James C. Smith

     100      0
     

John R. Ciulla

     100      0
     

Glenn I. MacInnes

     100      0
     

Nitin J. Mhatre

     40      60
     

Daniel H. Bley

     100      0

 

24


Annual Cash Incentive Scoring - Results

Corporate Financial Performance - Webster’s 2016 results compared to plan are set forth in the table below. The Committee has discretion to make adjustments for extraordinary, unusual or non-recurring items. For 2016, adjustments were made for three non-recurring items resulting in an adjustment of 2.5%.

 

 

2016 Annual Cash Incentive - Corporate Financial Performance

 
               
Financial Metric   Threshold     Target     Maximum     Actual     Score     Weight     Weighted
Score
 

Pre-Tax Pre-Provision Income

  $ 314.5     $ 374.5     $ 434.6     $ 359.8       87.7%       35%       30.7%  
         

Return on Average Equity

    6.98%       8.44%       9.89%       8.35%       96.9%       30%       29.1%
         

Efficiency Ratio

    63.50%       60.79%       59.77%       62.01%       77.5%       20%       15.5%
         

Credit:

                     
         

NPL’s / Average Loans1

    1.30%       1.05%       0.80%       0.82%       147.3%       7.5%       11.0%
         

NCO’s / Average Loans1

    0.29%       0.24%       0.18%       0.23%       108.9%       7.5%       8.2%
     
Total             100%       94.5%  
   
Discretionary Adjustment             2.5%  

 

1 

NPL is an abbreviation for non-performing loans and NCO is an abbreviation for net charge-offs

Performance Relative to Peer Group – As previously described, the Committee has discretion to adjust the Corporate Component Score by plus or minus 20 percentage points based on Webster’s performance against pre-established financial measures or performance relative to its Peer Group. The table below shows Webster’s performance relative to the twelve companies in the Peer Group.

 

25


The Committee recognized Webster’s continued strong and improving performance relative to the Peer Group, as Webster’s weighted score reached the 67th percentile up from 62nd the prior year, and determined that a positive adjustment of 3.0% was appropriate.

 

 

2016 Annual Cash Incentive - Performance Relative to Peer Group

 
     
Financial Metric1   2016     20152  
  Results     % Rank     Weight     Weighted
Score
    % Rank     Weight     Weighted
Score
 
         
Pre-Tax Pre-Provision Income/Avg. Assets     1.43%       75%     35%       26.25%     67%       35%       23.31%  
         

Return on Average Equity

    8.35%     67%     30%       19.98%     67%       30%       19.98%  
         

Efficiency Ratio

    62.36%     67%       20%       13.34%       83%       20%       16.68%  
         

Credit:

                     
         

NPL’s / Average Loans3

    0.81%     50%     7.5%       3.75%     8%       7.5%       0.63%  
               

NCO’s / Average Loans3

    0.22%     50%     7.5%       3.75%     17%       7.5%       1.25%  
   
    Weighted Score       67.07%       Weighted Score       61.85%  
 
   
Discretionary
Adjustment
 
 
    3.0%      

 

1 

Data as reported by SNL Securities for comparability.

 

2 

2015 has been adjusted to reflect the companies in the 2016 Peer Group.

 

3 

NPL is an abbreviation for non-performing loans and NCO is an abbreviation for net charge-offs.

Final Corporate Component - The final Corporate Component was determined by taking the Financial Performance score of 94.5% and adding the Committee’s adjustments for non-recurring items of 2.5% and Performance Relative to Peer Group of 3.0% which resulted in a final score equal to 100.0% of target.

 

2016 Annual Cash Incentive - Financial Performance and Adjustments
Financial Performance  

Non-Recurring Items

Adjustment

 

Peer Group

Adjustment

  Final Corporate
Component

94.5%

  2.5%   3.0%   100.0%

Line of Business Component - Given Mr. Mhatre’s responsibilities as Head of the Community Banking line of business, 60% of his target annual incentive is payable based on the results of that line of business.

Mr. Mhatre continued to lead Community Banking along its Transformational Strategic Roadmap to deliver pre-tax, pre-provision net revenue of over $110 million in 2016 – resulting in a line of business financial score of 112%. Community Banking continued to optimize its business model focused on delivering automated, electronic, mobile services that meet rapidly changing preferences of consumers and businesses while maximizing high value customer share and customer satisfaction. Balances grew in each category with loans, deposits and investment assets under administration growing year over year, with particular strong growth in business loans and business deposits. 2016 was a record year for business loan originations. Banking Centers’

 

26


sales productivity grew year over year by 19 percent. Investments in electronic infrastructure continued to drive self-service as reflected in 16 percent growth in mobile banking customers. Nearly 70 percent of all balance changing transactions were conducted through self-service channels. Efficiency improvement initiatives such as ‘Fast-Track’ business loans significantly reduced loan turn times, while improving corresponding customer demand. The most significant franchise-building initiative in 2016 was expansion in Boston where Community Banking opened 17 new Banking Centers to deliver all of Webster’s products and services to this high-growth, high-potential market. The Boston expansion delivered approximately $200 million and $113 million in new deposits and loans in 2016, falling short of goal, though long-term prospects remain intact. Community Banking continued to maintain its ‘best-in-class’ customer satisfaction and net promoter scores.

 

27


2016 Annual Cash Incentive Compensation Awarded in February 2017

Individual NEO Performance - Individual performance is determined through the annual review process as part of the Company-wide performance management process. Each NEO is evaluated based on achievement of individual performance objectives which include strategic goals, personal behavior, risk management, regulatory compliance and people leadership. The Committee evaluates the CEO, and the CEO evaluates the other NEOs in consultation with the Committee.

 

NEO’s Performance Summaries for 2016
Name    Performance Summary

James C. Smith

  

Mr. Smith led Webster’s record performance for 2016. Notable achievements were increased core revenue for the seventh straight year, record net income, top quartile shareholder return among our midsize bank peers, improved credit quality and strong risk management. He guided Webster’s strategic choices including the allocation of capital and other resources to strategies that create value for customers and maximize shareholder return. Webster missed plan for pre-provision net revenue despite strong loan originations, primarily due to lower than anticipated interest rates, and missed its efficiency ratio plan due to the combination of the challenging rate environment and the accelerated investment in HSA Bank. Mr. Smith sponsored an intensive review of Webster’s strategies led by Mr. Ciulla.

John R. Ciulla

  

Mr. Ciulla was elected President in October 2015 and assumed overall responsibility for Community Banking, Private Banking and Marketing in addition to his ongoing responsibilities as head of Commercial Banking. Commercial Banking and Community Banking, the largest business units, outperformed their financial targets. Commercial Banking had a record year measured by originations, revenue and economic profit. Mr. Ciulla led an intensive review of Webster’s strategies which resulted in a restacking of strategic priorities including increased and accelerated investment in HSA Bank and increased investment in Commercial Banking strategies.

Glenn I. MacInnes

  

Mr. MacInnes continued to lead Webster’s Finance organization and in 2016 assumed management responsibility for Operations and Technology. He developed initiatives and provided guidance enabling Webster to improve year-over-year financial performance and achieve the Company’s financial objectives. He further optimized the balance sheet in anticipation of a higher interest rate environment and effectively managed interest rate and liquidity risk. Mr. MacInnes successfully led the regulatory stress test process for the organization. He further enhanced the internal and external financial reporting process.

Nitin J. Mhatre

  

Mr. Mhatre continued to lead Community Banking and its Transformational Strategic Roadmap to deliver pre-tax, pre-provision net revenue of over $110 million in 2016 – resulting in a line of business financial score of 112%. The Community Banking group led the expansion of Webster’s footprint in Boston by opening 17 new Banking Centers through lease transfer from Citibank. This expansion delivered approximately $200 million and $113 million in new deposits and loans in 2016, falling short of goal, though long-term prospects remain intact. Business Banking had a record year for loan originations and Banking Centers’ sales productivity grew year-over-year by 19 percent. Digital Banking programs drove growth in mobile banking customers by 16 percent and nearly 70 percent of all balance changing transactions were conducted through self-service channels in the year. Community Banking continued to maintain its ‘best-in-class’ customer satisfaction and net promoter scores.

Daniel H. Bley

  

Mr. Bley developed and supported the execution of the bank’s risk management strategy in alignment with the strategic plan, which included enhancements to organization, policy and process across key risk management disciplines. He provided successful stewardship of the credit portfolio, supporting strong growth in Commercial Lending activities and expansion in residential and consumer lending, coupled with improvements in key asset quality metrics. Through his leadership, Webster sustained and enhanced its strong risk management culture with effective enterprise risk programs including enhancements in operational risk and compliance activities. He vigilantly monitored current and emerging risks and recommended changes in risk appetite in close consultation with the Risk Committee of the Board. He led the risk assessment of the strategic review led by Mr. Ciulla.

 

28


2016 Annual Cash Incentive Compensation - Upon completing the scoring of the two Primary Components (Corporate and Line of Business), the scores are applied to the CEO’s and each NEO’s annual cash incentive target based on the weightings in the Weight of Primary Component Table to calculate the cash incentive awards. The Committee retains discretion to adjust the CEO’s calculated annual cash incentive award. The CEO retains discretion, in consultation with the Committee, to adjust the NEOs’ calculated annual cash incentive awards.

Discretionary Adjustment for Individual Performance - Based on the CEO’s assessment of each NEO’s individual performance measured against specific performance objectives and overall, the CEO may use discretion to determine a positive or negative adjustment to the calculated annual cash incentive award. Additionally, the CEO in consultation with the Chief Risk Officer and the Chief Human Resources Officer considers potential adjustments (referred to as meaningful consequences) based on each NEOs record of identifying, managing and mitigating risk, including an assessment of outcomes in the areas of compliance, operating risk, credit, audit findings or regulatory citings, or other contributions that should be taken into account.

The Committee considers potential adjustments for the CEO based on his performance against performance objectives and his leadership of the Company. In addition, the Committee considers meaningful consequences adjustments to the CEO based on his record of managing and mitigating risk.

A thorough review of risk management in the areas of regulatory, internal audit, operating and credit compliance and Sarbanes-Oxley (SOX) took place. As a result of the review, downward adjustments were made to the annual cash incentive payments of Messrs. MacInnes and Bley at the recommendation of the CEO and approval by the Committee and to Mr. Smith by the Committee, totaling $81,700. In addition, due to a correction of prior period performance related to the Company’s HSA Bank segment for 2015 and the first quarter of 2016, downward adjustments to all NEOs’ incentives were made to fully reflect the negative impact this correction had on 2015 Corporate STI results. This total adjustment was $32,125 for the NEOs and was deducted from their 2016 incentive payments. Finally, a positive adjustment of $40,000 was made to Mr. Ciulla’s incentive payment in recognition of his important strategic and leadership contributions in his expanded role as President.

2016 Final Payment Determination - The Committee determines and approves the short-term incentive award for the CEO and reviews and approves the short-term incentive awards that are recommended by the CEO for the other NEOs. The final tabulations for annual cash incentive compensation are set forth below:

 

2016 Annual Cash Incentive Compensation
Name  

Annual
  Incentive  

Target

  Corporate
Component
  Line of
Business
Component
  Calculated
Award
  Individual
Discretionary
Adjustment
  Total
Cash
Incentive
Award
  Award
as a
Percent
of
Target

 

James C. Smith

 

 

$950,000

 

 

100%

 

 

Not
Applicable

 

 

$950,000

 

 

-$46,075

 

 

$903,925

 

 

95.2%

 

John R. Ciulla

 

 

$360,000

 

 

100%

 

 

Not
Applicable

 

 

$360,000

 

 

$37,452

 

 

$397,452

 

 

110.4%

 

Glenn I. MacInnes

 

 

$356,250

 

 

100%

 

 

Not
Applicable

 

 

$356,250

 

 

-$37,864

 

 

$318,386

 

 

89.4%

 

Nitin J. Mhatre

 

 

$262,500

 

 

100%

 

 

112.1%

 

 

$281,700

 

 

-$2,571

 

 

$279,129

 

 

106.3%

 

Daniel H. Bley

 

 

$234,000

 

 

100%

 

 

Not
Applicable

 

 

 

$234,000

 

 

-$24,767

 

 

$209,233

 

 

89.4%

 

29


Long-Term Incentive Compensation - Plan Overview

Long Term Incentive Vehicles: Webster awards two forms of LTI grants, performance shares and restricted stock as displayed in the table below:

 

Long Term Incentive Vehicles
Vehicle   Vesting   Rationale   Vehicle Mix

Performance Shares

  Vests at the conclusion of three-year performance period   To align LTI to the achievement of return on equity goals and to absolute and relative total shareholder return   75%

Time-Vested Restricted Stock

  One third vests per year   To provide LTI and retention value to the NEOs and other executives   25%

Performance Shares: Performance Shares vest at the conclusion of the three-year performance period and the Committee certifies the results based 50% on Company three-year total shareholder return relative to Webster’s Peer Group and 50% on the three-year average return on equity compared to plan. Performance must meet threshold levels or the shares are forfeited.

 

   

Three-year Total Shareholder Return reflects the rate of return including price appreciation plus reinvestment of dividends calculated as follows: (ending stock price – beginning price + dividends paid per share) / beginning stock price. Peer Group reflects Webster’s Compensation Peer Group listed in the Compensation Peer Group section.

 

   

Average Return on Equity is calculated as the ratio of adjusted net income to adjusted average equity. The average return on equity targets are set annually during the performance period by the Committee giving consideration to the Board approved financial plan set at the end of the prior year. The score is calculated each year and then averaged over three years.

 

Payout Determination for Performance Shares Granted in February 2016 Based on 2016-2018
Performance
 
Payout Metric  

Below

Threshold
Payout

    Threshold
Payout
    Target
Payout
    Maximum
Payout
 

Peer-relative three-year Total Shareholder Return

    0     62     100     150

Average Return on Equity over three-year period

    0     10     100     150

The Company does not vest performance based restricted stock for performance below threshold. A threshold level of performance must be met for each metric in order for payment to be earned. Once threshold performance is achieved, actual awards will be interpolated between threshold and 150% of target.

The Committee may increase or decrease the CEO’s LTI or the other NEOs’ LTI based on a variety of factors including the Company’s prior year performance against financial and strategic goals. The Committee determines the recommended grant for the CEO and reviews and approves the CEO’s recommendation for the other NEOs.

Long Term Incentive Compensation Awarded in February 2017

This table is not required but we included it because our 2017 grants are based in part on 2016 performance.

 

30


2017 Long Term Incentive Grant - The February 2017 LTI grants were made in the form of 75% Performance Shares and 25% time-vested restricted stock, as described above, based in part on each NEO’s 2016 performance and granted based on the NEOs’ 2016 base pay and LTI target percent. The Committee approved grants at 100% of target for Mr. Smith and, based on Mr. Smith’s recommendation at 100% of target for Messrs. MacInnes, Ciulla, Mhatre and Bley. The individual performance of each NEO on which the February 2017 grants were based is described in the NEO’s Performance Summary for 2016 table.

 

 
2017 Long-Term Annual Incentive Compensation (for 2016 Performance)  
Name    Long-Term
Incentive Target
     Grant as a
Percent of 2016
Target
   Long-Term
Incentive Grant
 

James C. Smith

   $ 1,757,500      100%    $ 1,757,500  

John R. Ciulla

   $ 528,000      100%    $ 528,000  

Glenn I. MacInnes

   $ 522,500      100%    $ 522,500  

Nitin J. Mhatre

   $ 318,750      100%    $ 318,750  

Daniel H. Bley

   $ 292,500      100%    $ 292,500  

Two-year Supplemental Summary Compensation Table

This table is not required but we included it because our 2017 grants are based in part on 2016 performance.

The table below shows total direct compensation approved by the Committee for 2015 and 2016 performance. LTI grants made in February 2016 are based in part on 2015 performance and are reflected in the 2015 Total Direct Compensation. LTI grants made in February 2017 are based in part on 2016 performance and are reflected in 2016 Total Direct Compensation. Although the 2017 grants will be discussed in next year’s CD&A, we have voluntarily disclosed the grants in the table set forth below. The 2016 and 2017 grants were in Performance Shares and time-vested restricted stock as described above.

 

31


 

Two-year Supplemental Summary Compensation Table (reflects 2017 Long-Term Incentive Grants for 2016 Performance and 2016 Long-Term Incentive Grants for 2015 Performance)

                        2017 Long-Term
Incentive  Grants for
2016 Performance1
   

Total Direct
Compensation

Received Based
on Each Year’s
Performance

 

 

 
Name   Performance
Year
  Year-End
Salary
    Annual
Cash
Incentive
   

2016 Long-Term
Incentive Grants for
2015 Performance2

   
           

James C. Smith

  2016   $ 950,000     $ 903,925     $ 1,757,500     $ 3,611,425  
  2015   $ 925,000     $ 878,750     $ 1,711,250     $ 3,515,000  
           

John R. Ciulla

  2016   $ 480,000     $ 397,452     $ 528,000     $ 1,405,452  
  2015   $ 480,000     $ 303,849     $ 341,300     $ 1,125,149  
           

Glenn I. MacInnes

  2016   $ 475,000     $ 318,386     $ 522,500     $ 1,315,886  
  2015   $ 454,704     $ 277,994     $ 432,000     $ 1,164,698  
           

Nitin J. Mhatre

  2016   $ 375,000     $ 279,129     $ 318,750     $ 972,879  
  2015   $ 360,004     $ 283,303     $ 306,000     $ 949,307  
           

Daniel H. Bley

  2016   $ 390,000     $ 209,233     $ 292,500     $ 891,733  
  2015   $ 381,400     $ 214,657     $ 267,000     $ 863,057  

 

1 

2017 LTI Performance Share grants for 2016 performance are based on the following valuation: for the portion based on ROE, Webster used the closing price of February 23, 2017; for the portion based on TSR, Webster used the Monte Carlo valuation.

 

2 

2016 LTI Performance Share grants for 2015 performance are based on the following valuation: for the portion based on ROE, Webster used the closing price of February 24, 2016; for the portion based on TSR, Webster used the Monte Carlo valuation.

Long Term Incentive Compensation Awarded in February 2016

2016 Long Term Incentive Grant - LTI grants made in February 2016 were based in part on each NEO’s 2015 performance and granted based on the NEOs’ 2015 base pay and LTI target percent. The Committee approved grants as shown in the chart below. The individual performance of each NEO on which the February 2016 grants were based is shown in the NEO’s 2015 Performance Summaries.

 

 
2016 Long-Term Annual Incentive Compensation (for 2015 Performance)  
Name   Long-Term
Incentive Target
    Grant as a
Percent of 2015
Target
  Long-Term
Incentive Grant
 

James C. Smith

  $ 1,711,250     100%   $ 1,711,250  

John R. Ciulla

  $ 341,250     100%   $ 341,300  

Glenn I. MacInnes

  $ 431,969     100%   $ 432,000  

Nitin J. Mhatre

  $ 306,003     100%   $ 306,000  

Daniel H. Bley

  $ 266,980     100%   $ 267,000  

 

32


   
Name    2015 Performance Summary

James C. Smith

  

Mr. Smith led Webster’s strong financial performance year-over-year and as compared to Webster’s Peer Group. He effectively guided Webster’s strategic choices including the allocation of capital and other resources to strategies that create value for customers and maximize Economic Profits over time. Notable achievements were record core revenue for the sixth straight year, record net income, another full year with efficiency ratio less than 60%, 92% percentile rank against its Peer Group, improved credit quality and strong risk management. Webster missed plan for pre-provision net revenue as strong loan growth and disciplined expense control were offset by spread pressure from lower than anticipated interest rates. Webster’s value-based culture is strong as measured by continuing strong banker engagement survey results.

 

John R. Ciulla

  

Effective October 28, 2015, in recognition of his contributions and leadership, Mr. Ciulla was promoted to President of Webster and Webster Bank, and appointed to the Board of Directors of Webster Bank. Mr. Ciulla led the Commercial Bank segment to a record year in which it achieved strong revenue growth and high performance in several key categories, including record loan originations, growth in operating balances and increased Economic Profit. Four of the five Commercial Banking business units generated Economic Profit in 2015. Webster was again recognized by Greenwich Associates for excellence in middle market customer satisfaction in the northeast and nationally.

 

Glenn I. MacInnes

  

Mr. MacInnes developed initiatives and provided guidance enabling Webster to improve year-over-year financial performance and achieve the Company’s financial goals. He further optimized the balance sheet in anticipation of the changing interest rate environment. He led Webster’s successful regulatory stress test submission and played an important role in corporate development initiatives, including the acquisition of the JP Morgan Chase HSA portfolio as well as 17 prominently located banking centers in a turn-key de novo transaction in Greater Boston. He further enhanced the financial planning process and internal and external financial reporting.

 

Nitin J. Mhatre

  

2015 was the second year of the transformation of Community Banking and all critical components of the Transformational Strategic Roadmap (TSR) were executed well by the Community Banking team led by Mr. Mhatre. The Community Banking Financial Scorecard delivered a composite score of 103%. The year saw the highest ever year-over-year growth in deposits and loan balances, while Banking Center productivity improved by 15 percent year-over-year. Multiple key initiatives were executed during the year. Net Promoter Score for Mass Affluent segment improved further to 62 percent.

 

Daniel H. Bley

  

Mr. Bley led the execution of the bank’s risk management strategy. Through effective enterprise risk, operational risk, and compliance activities, Webster sustained and enhanced its strong risk management culture. Mr. Bley provided successful stewardship of the credit portfolio, supporting growth in Commercial Lending activities and improvements in key asset quality metrics.

 

 

33


Retirement Plans

Pension Plan - Webster Bank maintains a frozen defined benefit pension plan. Webster stopped benefit accruals under the plan for all employees, including the NEOs, after December 31, 2007. The Pension Benefits section of this Proxy Statement details pension benefits for the NEOs.

401(k) Plan - Webster Bank maintains a defined contribution 401(k) plan for eligible employees, including the NEOs. All participants in the plan, including each of the NEOs, are eligible to make pre-tax contributions from 1% to 25% of their pay, up to Internal Revenue Code (“IRC”) limits ($18,000 in 2016). Webster Bank matches the employee’s contributions on a dollar for dollar basis for the first 2% of pay the employee contributes and then 50 cents on the dollar for up to the next 6% of pay the employee contributes. In addition, Webster provides transition credits ranging from 1% to 6% of pay for those employees, including NEOs, who were hired before January 1, 2007 and had reached age 35 or older on January 1, 2008. The purpose of transition credits is to help offset the impact of freezing the pension plan. A two-year vesting schedule applies to all Webster contributions. Under IRC limits, annual compensation in excess of $265,000 in 2016 may not be taken into account for determining benefits or contributions under the qualified plan. Employees who are age 50 or older by the last day of the year may contribute an additional $6,000 to the plan.

Supplemental Defined Benefit Plan - Webster Bank maintains a frozen non-qualified supplemental defined benefit plan for certain executives, including NEOs, who were participants in the pension plan. The purpose of the plan was to provide these individuals with supplemental pension benefits in excess of IRC limits for tax qualified pension plans. The plan was frozen as of December 31, 2007. Thus, service and compensation after this date are not used in calculating an NEO’s benefit from the plan.

Supplemental Defined Contribution Plan - Webster Bank maintains a non-qualified supplemental defined contribution plan for certain executives, including the NEOs. This plan provides each NEO with an allocation to their supplemental 401(k) account equal to the additional match and transition credit contributions that the NEO would have received in the qualified 401(k) plan if there were no IRC compensation or deferral limits.

Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan - The executive officers, including each of the NEOs, were eligible to participate in a voluntary non-qualified deferred compensation plan. The plan allowed employees at the senior vice president level and above to defer a portion of their compensation because of the statutory limits under the qualified plan. All deferrals under this plan ceased as of January 1, 2012.

Employment Agreements

The NEOs do not have employment agreements; however, all NEO’s are subject to change in control and non-competition agreements.

Other Executive Benefits

Webster offers a limited number of benefits to the NEOs and other executives in addition to the broad-based employee benefits program. Each benefit supports a specific objective, but falls within the overall purpose of recognizing leadership responsibility and contributions to the Company’s goals. Management reviews the benefits with the Committee for consistency with Webster’s organizational culture and market practices. These benefits are described in a footnote to the Summary Compensation Table.

Post-Termination Arrangements

Webster’s change in control practices are designed to retain the NEOs during rumored and actual change in control activity. During these times, continuity is a key factor in preserving the value of the business.

 

34


Webster also provides other termination benefits designed to facilitate changes in key executives as needed. The amounts payable, triggering events and other terms of Webster’s change in control and other termination arrangements are set by the Committee based on Company policy and competitive market information. Webster reviews the provisions of the change in control agreements annually.

Executive Stock Ownership

Webster believes stock ownership by management is beneficial in aligning the interests of management and shareholders. Executive Stock Ownership Guidelines are established to enhance shareholder value and focus each executive’s attention on the long term success of the Company. Webster has adopted stock ownership guidelines for all of the executive officers, including the NEOs.

2016 Stock Ownership Guidelines

 

    

Name

   Multiple of Base
Salary
     Value of
Multiple
     Target Ownership
Status
 

James C. Smith

     6X      $ 5,700,000      Met
 

John R. Ciulla

     4X      $ 1,920,000      Met
 

Glenn I. MacInnes

     3X      $ 1,425,000      Met
 

Nitin J. Mhatre

     3X      $ 1,125,000      Met
 

Daniel H. Bley

     3X      $ 1,170,000      Met

Once achieved, ownership of the guideline amount must be maintained for as long as the executive is subject to the stock ownership guidelines. Even if stock ownership guidelines have been achieved, NEOs are required to continue to hold all net vested restricted stock and Performance Shares and net shares of Common Stock delivered after exercising stock options for a minimum of one year. This holding period will remain in effect if the NEO terminates from the Company. NEOs who do not meet the guidelines further agree to hold all net Common Stock received through LTI awards until they achieve their respective ownership thresholds. As of December 31, 2016, all NEO’s have met the stock ownership guidelines.

Directors, officers and employees of Webster are prohibited from hedging their ownership of Webster securities, including through the use of options, puts, calls, short sales, futures contracts, equity swaps, collars or other derivative instruments relating to Webster securities, regardless of whether such directors, officers and employees have material non-public information about Webster. Directors and Executive Officers are prohibited from pledging their Webster securities as collateral for a loan.

Policy on Internal Revenue Code Section 162(m)

The Internal Revenue Code Section 162(m) limits the deduction available for compensation paid to the CEO and the three most highly compensated executive officers other than the chief financial officer to the extent the compensation paid to any such person exceeds $1,000,000, unless such compensation was based on performance goals determined by a Committee consisting solely of two or more non-employee directors and the performance goals are approved by the shareholders prior to payment.

Webster’s compensation programs are generally structured to comply with IRC Section 162(m). Where applicable, Webster will endeavor to structure compensation as exempt performance based compensation. Webster does, however, reserve the right to determine to pay compensation to the executive officers, including the CEO, which may not be deductible under Section 162(m) of the IRC.

 

35


COMPENSATION OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

The following tables contain certain compensation information for the CEO, President, Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President, Community Banking and Executive Vice President and Chief Risk Officer.

Summary Compensation Table

Salary, bonus, incentive payments and other compensation amounts to Webster’s NEOs are summarized in the following table. Some of the amounts below represent the opportunity to earn future compensation under performance-based compensation incentives that may be forfeited based on future performance vesting. As a result of mixing compensation paid and contingent compensation, the totals shown in the Summary Compensation Table include amounts that the named executives may never receive.

 

 
Summary Compensation Table  

Name and

Principal Position

  Year     Salary
($)
    Bonus
($)
    Stock
Awards
($)1
    Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($)2
    Change in
Pension Value
and Non-
qualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
($)3
    All Other
Compensation
($)4
    Total
($)
 
James C. Smith     2016       950,000       —         1,697,706       903,925       928,800       374,765       4,855,196  
Chairman     2015       925,000       —         1,790,492       878,750       442,200       354,998       4,391,440  
and CEO     2014       882,435       —         1,626,823       861,455       1,543,500       245,273       5,159,486  
   
John R. Ciulla     2016       480,000       —         338,603       397,452     6,800       94,511       1,317,366
President     2015       455,768       —         797,345       303,849       0       78,298       1,635,260  
      2014       363,479       —         280,895       290,000       3,200       52,111       1,009,685  
   
Glenn I. MacInnes     2016       475,000       —         428,566       318,386     —         80,609       1,302,561
EVP and CFO     2015       454,704       —         451,981       277,994       —         63,639       1,248,318  
      2014       453,310       —         399,830       295,600       —         43,298       1,192,037  
   
Nitin J. Mhatre     2016       375,000       —         632,489       279,129       —         66,087       1,352,705  
EVP Community     2015       360,004       —         320,169       283,302       —         44,477       1,007,952  
Banking     2014       358,521       —         266,147       210,600       —         34,615       869,883  
   

Daniel H. Bley

EVP and CRO

 

    2016       390,000       —         593,803       209,233     —         61,714       1,254,750  

 

1 

Amounts shown in this column are based on the grant date fair value related to restricted stock awards at target made in 2014, 2015 and 2016, in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. Mr. Ciulla’s stock award in 2015 was based on his prior role and prior salary as EVP, Commercial Banking. For 2016, Messrs. Mhatre and Bley received special retention restricted stock awards which are included in these amounts.

 

2 

Amounts shown in this column represent cash awards paid under the performance based annual incentive plan.

 

3 

Webster Bank maintains both a frozen tax-qualified pension plan and a frozen non-qualified supplemental defined benefit plan. These are described more fully in the Pension Benefits section of this Proxy Statement. Benefit accruals for service and compensation were frozen after December 31, 2007. The amounts in this column reflect the change in the actuarial present value of the NEOs’ benefits under both plans determined using interest rate and mortality assumptions consistent with those used in the Company’s financial statements. Specifically, the assumptions used to value the accumulated benefits at December 31, 2016 consisted of a 4.01% interest rate for the qualified plan versus 4.20% in 2015, a 3.64% interest rate for the non-qualified supplemental plan (4.01% for benefits payable as a lump sum) versus 3.75% in 2015, and the RP-2014 with MMP-2007 Mortality Table. The change in pension value in 2016 is primarily due to the decrease in interest rates used to calculate the

 

36


 

present value of the benefits and actuarial increases for executives over age 65. The changes in pension value in 2016 under the tax-qualified pension plan and non-qualified pension plan for each NEO were as follows:

 

 
2016 Change in Pension Value and Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Earnings  
Name   Change in Qualified
Pension Value ($)
    Change  in
Non-Qualified
Pension Value ($)
    Total ($)  

James C. Smith

    (7,500     936,300       928,800  

John R. Ciulla

    6,800       —         6,800  

 

4 

All Other Compensation includes amounts contributed or allocated, as the case may be, to the 401(k) plan (excluding the NEOs’ contributions to the qualified 401(k) plan), the non-qualified supplemental defined contribution plan, dividends paid on unvested restricted stock and on earned performance-based stock awards and the premium on a life insurance policy. All Other Compensation items in the Summary Compensation Table include the following amounts:

 

 
2016 All Other Compensation  
 Name  

Company

Contribution to

401(k) Plan

($)

   

Supplemental

Defined Contribution Plan

($)

   

Dividends

($)

   

Premium on

Life Insurance

Policies

($)

 

 James C. Smith

    27,547       173,616       160,189       13,413  

 John R. Ciulla

    16,947       37,923       36,137       3,505  

 Glenn I. MacInnes

    11,647       26,003       40,564       2,395  

 Nitin J. Mhatre

    11,647       21,268       32,107       1,065  

 Daniel H. Bley

    11,647       18,586       29,903       1,578  

Grants of Plan-Based Awards

During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016, the following table displays all non-equity incentive plan and equity incentive plan awards that were made to the NEOs:

 

 
Grants of Plan-Based Awards In 2016  
           

 

Estimated Possible Payouts

Under Non-Equity

Incentive Plan Awards1

   

 

Estimated Future Payouts

Under Equity

Incentive Plan Awards2

    All
Other
Stock
Awards:
Number
of
Shares
or Stock
or Units
(#)
    Closing
Price
on
Grant
Date
($)
    Grant
Date Fair
Value of
Stock
and
Option
Awards3
($)
 
Name   Grant
Date
    Threshold
($)
    Target
($)
    Maximum
($)
    Threshold
($)
    Target
($)
    Maximum
($)
       

James C. Smith

    2/24/2016       475,000       950,000       1,900,000       13,981       38,837       58,256       12,946       32.89       1,697,706  

John R. Ciulla

    2/24/2016       180,000       360,000       720,000       2,789       7,746       11,619       2,582       32.89       338,603  

Glenn I. MacInnes

    2/24/2016       178,125       356,250       712,500       3,529       9,804       14,706       3,268       32.89       428,566  

Nitin J. Mhatre4

    2/24/2016       131,250       262,500       525,000       2,500       6,945       10,418       12,315       32.89       632,489  

Daniel H. Bley4

    2/24/2016       117,000       234,000       468,000       2,182       6,060       9,090       12,020       32.89       593,803  

 

1 

Columns represent the potential payouts to each of the NEOs resulting from an award pursuant to the annual incentive compensation plan, subject to achievement of pre-established performance goals discussed in this Proxy Statement. Actual amounts earned by the NEO’s are set forth under the “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column of the Summary Compensation Table in this Proxy Statement.

 

37


2 

Represents the threshold, target and maximum number of Performance Shares that may vest if performance targets for the 2016 through 2018 performance period are satisfied. Dividends will be deferred on the unearned Performance Shares and will be paid upon conclusion of the performance period to the extent earned.

 

3 

Represents the grant date fair value, computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 of all equity awards granted in 2016.

 

4 

For Messrs. Mhatre and Bley, the number of shares shown in the All Other Stock Awards column includes an additional one-time award of 10,000 shares made to each executive on the grant date of 02/24/2016.

 

38


Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End

The following table sets forth outstanding option awards and unvested stock awards held by Webster’s NEOs as of December 31, 2016.

 

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End 2016  
     Option Awards     Stock Awards  
Name   Grant Date     Number
of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(#)
Exercisable
    Option
Price
($)
    Option
Expiration
Date
    Number of
Shares or
Units
That
Have Not
Vested
(#)
    Market
Value of
Shares or
Units That
Have Not
Vested1
($)
    Equity
Incentive
Awards:
Number of
Unearned
Shares,
Units
or  Other
Rights
that
Have Not
Vested
(#)
    Equity
Incentive
Awards:
Market 
Payout
Value of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other
Rights
That
Have Not
Vested1
($)
 

James C. Smith

    12/18/2007       106,199       32.03       12/19/2017       —         —         —         —    
      12/16/2008       113,674       12.85       12/16/2018       —         —         —         —    
      2/22/2012       112,371       23.81       2/22/2022       —         —         —         —    
      2/20/2013       126,373       23.00       2/20/2023       —         —         —         —    
      2/19/2014       —         —         —         —         —         41,035 2       2,227,380  
      2/25/2015       —         —         —         —         —         37,593 3       2,040,548  
      2/24/2016       —         —         —         12,946 4      702,709       38,837 3      2,108,072  

John R. Ciulla

    9/18/2007       11,579       43.26       9/18/2017       —         —         —         —    
      2/22/2012       13,808       23.81       2/22/2022       —         —         —         —    
      2/20/2013       15,528       23.00       2/20/2023       —         —         —         —    
      2/19/2014       —         —         —         788 5       42,773       7,085 2       384,574  
      2/25/2015       —         —         —         1,648 5       89,453       7,414 3       402,432  
      3/20/2015       —         —         —         12,000 6       651,360       —         —    
      2/24/2016       —         —         —         2,582 5      140,151       7,746 3      420,453  

Glenn I. MacInnes

    2/22/2012       11,567       23.81       2/22/2022       —         —         —         —    
      2/20/2013       22,828       23.00       2/20/2023       —         —         —         —    
      2/19/2014       —         —         —         1,121 5       60,848       10,085 2       547,414  
      2/25/2015       —         —         —         2,109 5       114,477       9,490 3       515,117  
      2/24/2016       —         —         —         3,268 5      177,387       9,804 3      532,161  

Nitin J. Mhatre

    12/16/2008       19,984       12.85       12/16/2018       —         —         —         —    
      2/22/2012       14,239       23.81       2/22/2022       —         —         —         —    
      2/20/2013       16,040       23.00       2/20/2023       —         —         —         —    
      2/19/2014       —         —         —         746 5       40,493       6,713 2       364,382  
      2/25/2015       —         —         —         1,494 5       81,094       6,722 3       364,870  
      2/24/2016       —         —         —         2,315 5       125,658       6,945 3       376,975  
      2/24/2016       —         —         —         10,000 6      542,800       —         —    

Daniel H. Bley

    2/20/2013       10,334       23.00       2/20/2023       —         —         —         —    
      2/19/2014       —         —         —         702 5       38,105       6,318 2       342,941  
      2/25/2015       —         —         —         1,304 5       70,781       5,866 3       318,406  
      2/24/2016       —         —         —         2,020 5       109,646       6,060 3       328,937  
      2/24/2016       —         —         —         10,000 6      542,800       —         —    

 

39


 

1 

Market value calculated by multiplying the closing market price of Webster’s Common Stock on December 31, 2016, which was $54.28, by the number of shares of stock.

 

2 

The performance criteria was met after the close of the performance period on December 31, 2016. The performance value was 123.5% and will be awarded in February 2017.

 

3 

The performance criteria will be evaluated after the December 31st close of the final year of the three year performance period.

 

4 

The restricted stock unit award will vest entirely and be deferred from distribution on the first anniversary of the grant.

 

5 

The restricted stock award will vest and be transferrable one third on the first anniversary of the grant; one third on the second anniversary of the award; and the final third will vest and be transferrable on the third anniversary of the grant.

 

6 

The restricted stock award will vest and be transferrable one fourth on the third anniversary of the grant; one fourth on the fourth anniversary of the grant; and the remaining one half will vest and be transferrable on the fifth anniversary of the grant.

Option Exercises and Stock Vested

The table below sets forth the number of shares of stock acquired in fiscal 2016 upon the exercise of stock options awarded to the NEOs and as a result of the vesting of shares of restricted stock awarded to the NEOs under Webster’s compensatory equity programs.

 

Option Exercises and Stock Vested in 2016  
     Option Awards      Stock Awards  

Name

 

  

Number of Shares
Acquired on
Exercise (#)

 

    

Value Realized on
Exercise1 ($)

 

    

Number of Shares
Acquired

on Vesting
(#)

 

   

Value Realized
on Vesting2
($)

 

 

James C. Smith

     114,483        1,728,288        81,578 3      2,699,672  

John R. Ciulla

     31,521        643,352        10,094       334,217  

Glenn I. MacInnes

     16,944        223,115        17,023       563,719  

Nitin J. Mhatre

     —          —          10,257       339,635  

Daniel H. Bley

     18,707        253,907        9,375       310,438  

 

1 

Value realized calculated based on the difference between the market price of Webster’s Common Stock on the date of exercise and the exercise price.

 

2 

Value realized calculated by multiplying the number of shares vesting by the fair market value of Webster’s Common Stock on the vesting date. Stock awards vested include additional shares received by all NEOs for the 2013 Performance Awards that were earned and distributed in 2016. The performance result was 145.7% resulting in a 45.7% increase in shares distributed over the target grant.

 

3 

The number of shares acquired by Mr. Smith includes 12,531 restricted stock units that vested but were deferred from distribution with a value of $412,145. This amount is also reported in the Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation table. Mr. Smith will receive distribution at termination. Dividends are not paid on these units until they are distributed.

 

40


Pension Benefits

The following table shows the present value of accumulated benefits payable to each of the NEOs, including the number of years of service credited to each such NEO, under both the frozen pension plan and the frozen supplemental defined benefit plan as of December 31, 2016. The pension plan was frozen as of December 31, 2007. The accumulated benefit value is based upon the benefit that is payable at the NEOs’ Normal Retirement Age (65).

 

2016 Pension Benefits1

Name

 

Plan Name

  Number of Years
Credited Service
(#)
  Present
Value