Wendy's International (WEN)

Scope of Authority of the Compensation Committee

The Compensation Committee (“Compensation Committee”) of the Company’s Board of Directors discharges the responsibility of the Board of Directors on compensation matters relating to the Company’s directors and executive officers.

The Compensation Committee has responsibility for reviewing and approving the goals and objectives for compensating the Company’s Chief Executive Officer (the Company’s “CEO”) and for evaluating the performance of the Company’s CEO and determining and approving the compensation level of the Company’s CEO based on such evaluation. The Compensation Committee also reviews and approves the compensation of other executive officers of the Company, considering the performance of such executive officers. The Compensation Committee reviews and approves the overall compensation policy for the Company’s executive officers, including the use of employment agreements, severance plans and arrangements, deferred compensation plans and other executive benefits and perquisites, incentive programs and equity based plans. The Compensation Committee also has the authority to review and approve the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” (which is referred to as the “CD&A”) prepared by management and to determine whether to recommend to the Board of Directors that it be included in the Company’s annual report and proxy statement.

The Compensation Committee also reviews and makes recommendations to the Board of Directors with respect to directors’ compensation and perquisites.

21

The Compensation Committee, as a whole, consists of five directors (Messrs. Schwab (Chairman), Chajet, Levato, Lewis and Wasserman), all of whom the Board of Directors has determined are “independent” for purposes of the New York Stock Exchange rules.

The Compensation Committee has a Performance Compensation Subcommittee (which is referred to as the “Performance Committee”) whose purpose is to administer those Company compensation plans that are intended to meet the requirements of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (which is referred to as the “Code”). The members of the Performance Committee are Messrs. Schwab (Chairman), Chajet, Lewis and Wasserman. Apart from matters within the responsibility of the Performance Committee, the Compensation Committee may not delegate its authority to any other persons.

The Compensation Committee and Performance Committee meet as needed. The meetings are chaired by the Chairman, and the Compensation Committee and Performance Committee, often in consultation with management, set their own meeting agendas. In 2008, the Compensation Committee and the Performance Committee met jointly seven times, and in addition, the Performance Committee met separately three additional times.

Each year, with respect to its administration and implementation of the 1999 Executive Bonus Plan, as discussed further in the CD&A below, the Performance Committee determines those employees that are eligible to receive awards under the plan, evaluates the achievement of the goals and objectives under such plan for the previously completed fiscal year and also establishes the financial goals and objectives for the current year.

Throughout the year the Compensation Committee or Performance Committee (as the case may be) also takes under consideration various compensation related proposals from senior management and takes action with respect to its own initiatives and its responsibilities under various compensation and benefit plans.

The Compensation Committee also makes recommendations to the Board with respect to director compensation, works with senior management to formulate succession plans, and annually reviews and reassesses the adequacy of its charter, proposing changes as necessary to the Board for approval. A current copy of the Joint Charter of the Compensation Committee and of the Performance Compensation Subcommittee is available at the Company’s website ( www.wendysarbys.com). The Compensation Committee is subject to the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines, a current copy of which is also available at the Company’s website.

In the course of its activities, and where appropriate for purposes under Section 162(m) of the Code, the Performance Committee may act with respect to other particular tasks relating to performance based compensation for the Company’s executives.

Scope of Authority of the Compensation Committee

The Compensation Committee discharges the responsibility of the Board of Directors on compensation matters relating to the Company’s directors and executive officers.

It has responsibility for reviewing and approving the goals and objectives for compensating our Chief Executive Officer (our “CEO”) and for evaluating the performance of our CEO and determining and approving the compensation level of the CEO based on such evaluation. The Compensation Committee also has the authority to review and approve the overall compensation policy for the Company’s other executive officers, including the use of employment agreements, severance plans and arrangements, deferred compensation plans and other executive benefits and perquisites, incentive programs and equity based plans. The Compensation Committee also has the authority to review the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” (which we will refer to as the “CD&A”) prepared by management and to determine whether to recommend to the Board that it be included in the Company’s annual report and proxy statement.

As noted above, a current copy of the Compensation Committee’s charter is available to stockholders at the Company’s website ( www.triarc.com).

The Compensation Committee also reviews and makes recommendations to our Board of Directors with respect to directors’ compensation and perquisites.

The Compensation Committee as a whole consists of four directors (Messrs. Schwab (Chairman), Chajet, Levato and Wasserman), all of whom the Board has determined are “independent” for purposes of the New York Stock Exchange rules.

The Compensation Committee has a subcommittee (the Performance Committee) that was established in August 1997 to assume certain functions that were previously the responsibility of the Compensation Committee, and whose purpose is to administer those Company compensation plans that are intended to meet the requirements of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (which we will refer to as the “Code”). The members of the Performance Committee are Messrs. Schwab (Chairman), Chajet and Wasserman. Apart from matters within the responsibility of the Performance Committee, the Compensation Committee may not delegate its authority to any other persons.

The Compensation Committee and Performance Committee meet as needed. The meetings are chaired by the Chairman, and the Compensation Committee and Performance Committee, often in consultation with management, set their own meeting agendas. The Compensation Committee met 11 times in 2006, and the Performance Committee met 10 times in 2006.

Each year, with respect to its administration and implementation of the 1999 Executive Bonus Plan, as discussed further in the CD&A below, the Performance Committee determines those employees that are eligible to receive performance goal bonus awards under Part II of the plan, evaluates the achievement of the goals and objectives under such plan for the previously completed fiscal year and also establishes the financial goals and objectives for the current year. In addition, the Compensation Committee also considers recommendations from senior management as to discretionary bonuses for certain other Company executives who have not been designated as eligible to receive awards under the 1999 Executive Bonus Plan. This activity takes place in the first quarter of each year.

17

Throughout the year the Compensation Committee or Performance Committee (as the case may be) also takes under consideration various compensation related proposals from senior management and takes action with respect to its own initiatives and its responsibilities under various compensation and benefit plans. For example, in 2006 this included approving adjustments to outstanding options as a result of the Special Dividend (which is discussed below), recommending to the Board the approval of an amendment to the Amended and Restated 2002 Equity Participation Plan (involving the reduction of the number of shares of Class A Common Stock and a corresponding increase in the number of shares of Class B Common Stock available for grant), the review and approval of a severance agreement for Mr. McCarron, modifications relating to the exercise and tax withholding features of options and year-end tax planning to mitigate possible change of control payments to Messrs. Schorr and McCarron. The Compensation Committee also makes recommendations to the Board with respect to director compensation, works with senior management to formulate succession plans, and annually reviews and reassesses the adequacy of its charter, proposing changes as necessary to the Board for approval.

In connection with consideration by the Company of a possible corporate restructuring, the Compensation Committee (along with the Special Committee of the Board) has over time reviewed the existing employment arrangements of Messrs. Peltz and May. In April 2007, as it appeared that corporate restructuring efforts would lead to a definitive agreement for the sale by the Company of its asset management subsidiary (D&C) and the transition of the Company into a “pure play” restaurant company, the Compensation Committee (along with the Special Committee) undertook a further review of the options available to the Company regarding these employment arrangements in light of the advantages to the Company of ultimately consolidating its corporate and headquarters operations with its Arby’s operations in Atlanta. The Compensation Committee and Special Committee met together on numerous occasions regarding these matters and ultimately the Compensation Committee recommended and the Special Committee approved contractual settlements with Messrs. Peltz and May (which included negotiated contract settlement payments) providing for the termination of their employment agreements and their resignations as executive officers of the Company as of June 29, 2007. (See the CD&A below for a description of the arrangements reached with Messrs. Peltz and May).*

In the course of its activities, and where appropriate for purposes under Section 162(m) of the Code, the Performance Committee may act with respect to other particular tasks relating to performance based compensation for the Company’s executives.