|
|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
This excerpt taken from the WDC DEF 14A filed Sep 24, 2007. Compensation
Benchmarks
To assist the Compensation Committee in assessing the
competitiveness of compensation levels and the appropriate mix
of compensation elements to our executive officers, Mercer
provides comparative market data on compensation practices and
programs as well as guidance on industry best practices. In
general, the market data is collected from independent published
surveys for similarly-sized companies and from public filings of
a group of peer companies in the high-technology industry.
The Compensation Committee, with guidance from Mercer,
determines the composition of our peer group and reevaluates
this group on an annual basis. For fiscal 2007, our peer group
consisted of 19
U.S.-based
technology companies of comparable size and performance to us.
Most of the companies included in our peer group are also
included in the Dow Jones U.S. Technology, Hardware and
Equipment Index. Below is a list of the companies in our peer
group in fiscal 2007:
On at least an annual basis, Mercer surveys market data as well
as compensation data from our peer group companies and
benchmarks the compensation paid to our executive officers. This
benchmarking information is used by the Compensation Committee
to help determine the level and appropriate mix of total annual
cash compensation and long-term incentive compensation to our
executive officers. Mercer also periodically advises the
Compensation Committee on industry and best practices involving
post-employment compensation as well as perquisites and other
benefits to our executive officers.
As stated above, the Compensation Committee does not use a
specific formula to set compensation for our executive officers.
However, the intent of the Compensation Committee is to provide
a total direct compensation opportunity for executive officers
that is at or above median, but with an above-average amount of
the total direct compensation opportunity at risk and dependent
upon our performance. As a result, total annual cash
compensation and the grant value of long-term incentive
compensation, when combined, are generally targeted at or above
the median of the total direct compensation levels for
comparable jobs in the marketplace based on survey and peer
group data. Individual executives may vary from this positioning
based on their experience, expertise, importance of the role at
our company relative to other companies, and potential for
future performance, among other factors. In addition, depending
upon the executives individual and business group
performance as measured against financial
and/or
non-financial goals established by the Compensation Committee,
amounts paid under our equity and non-equity incentive
compensation programs may lead to total direct compensation
levels that are lower or higher than the targeted total direct
compensation levels for comparable jobs.
On a cumulative basis, the total direct compensation to our
executive officers in fiscal 2007 was generally consistent with
our intended pay strategy.
Table of Contents
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||