WDC » Topics » Competition

These excerpts taken from the WDC 10-K filed Aug 20, 2008.
Competition
 
We compete primarily with manufacturers of hard drives for use in desktop, notebook, enterprise, CE and external storage products. Our competitors in the hard drive market include ExcelStor Technology, Fujitsu Limited, Hitachi Global Storage Technologies, Samsung Electronics Incorporated, Seagate Technology and Toshiba Corporation.
 
The hard drive industry is intensely competitive, with hard drive suppliers competing for sales to a limited number of major customers. Hard drives manufactured by different competitors are highly substitutable due to the industry mandate of technical form, fit and function standards. Hard drive manufacturers compete on the basis of product quality and reliability, storage capacity, unit price, product performance, production volume capabilities, delivery capability, leadership in time-to-market, time-to-volume and time-to-quality, service and support and ease of doing business. The relative importance of these factors varies by customer and market. We believe that we are generally competitive in all of these factors.
 
We believe that there are no substantial barriers for existing competitors to offer competing products. Therefore, we believe that we cannot differentiate WD® hard drive products solely on attributes such as storage capacity, buffer size or time-to-market. Accordingly, we differentiate WD by focusing on operational excellence, high product quality and reliability, and designing and incorporating into our hard drives desirable product performance attributes. Such performance attributes include seek times, data transfer rates, intelligent caching, failure prediction, remote diagnostics, acoustics, error recovery, low operating temperature, low power consumption and optimized streaming capabilities.
 
In addition, we differentiate WD by emphasizing non-product related attributes, including rapid response to our customers. Rapid response requires accelerated design cycles, customer delivery, production flexibility and timely service and support, which contribute to customer satisfaction. We also rely on the strength of the WD brand name with value-added resellers, retailers and solution providers to whom we sell our hard drive products directly and indirectly. We believe that trust in a manufacturer’s reputation, its execution track record and the establishment of strategic relationships have become important factors in the selection of a hard drive, particularly in a rapidly changing technology environment.
 
Advances in magnetic, optical or other data storage technologies could result in competitive products with better performance or lower cost per unit of capacity than our products. We monitor the advantages, disadvantages and advances of the full array of storage technologies on an ongoing basis.
 
High-speed semiconductor memory competes with hard drive products in some applications, such as consumer handheld devices and portable external storage. Semiconductor memory is much faster in some applications than magnetic hard drives, but currently is not competitive in most applications using 3.5-inch and 2.5-inch form factor hard drives from a cost standpoint. Flash memory, a non-volatile semiconductor memory, is currently much more costly and, while it has


12


Table of Contents

higher “read” performance attributes than hard drives, it has lower “write” performance attributes. Flash memory could become more competitive in the near future for additional applications requiring less storage capacity than that provided by hard drives. However, we believe that the traditional high-volume computing markets will remain the domain of 3.5-inch and 2.5-inch hard drives based on the hard drive industry’s attributes of reliability, availability and cost.
 
For an additional discussion of risks related to competition, see Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
 
Competition


 



We compete primarily with manufacturers of hard drives for use
in desktop, notebook, enterprise, CE and external storage
products. Our competitors in the hard drive market include
ExcelStor Technology, Fujitsu Limited, Hitachi Global Storage
Technologies, Samsung Electronics Incorporated, Seagate
Technology and Toshiba Corporation.


 



The hard drive industry is intensely competitive, with hard
drive suppliers competing for sales to a limited number of major
customers. Hard drives manufactured by different competitors are
highly substitutable due to the industry mandate of technical
form, fit and function standards. Hard drive manufacturers
compete on the basis of product quality and reliability, storage
capacity, unit price, product performance, production volume
capabilities, delivery capability, leadership in time-to-market,
time-to-volume and time-to-quality, service and support and ease
of doing business. The relative importance of these factors
varies by customer and market. We believe that we are generally
competitive in all of these factors.


 



We believe that there are no substantial barriers for existing
competitors to offer competing products. Therefore, we believe
that we cannot differentiate
WD®
hard drive products solely on attributes such as storage
capacity, buffer size or time-to-market. Accordingly, we
differentiate WD by focusing on operational excellence, high
product quality and reliability, and designing and incorporating
into our hard drives desirable product performance attributes.
Such performance attributes include seek times, data transfer
rates, intelligent caching, failure prediction, remote
diagnostics, acoustics, error recovery, low operating
temperature, low power consumption and optimized streaming
capabilities.


 



In addition, we differentiate WD by emphasizing non-product
related attributes, including rapid response to our customers.
Rapid response requires accelerated design cycles, customer
delivery, production flexibility and timely service and support,
which contribute to customer satisfaction. We also rely on the
strength of the WD brand name with value-added resellers,
retailers and solution providers to whom we sell our hard drive
products directly and indirectly. We believe that trust in a
manufacturer’s reputation, its execution track record and
the establishment of strategic relationships have become
important factors in the selection of a hard drive, particularly
in a rapidly changing technology environment.


 



Advances in magnetic, optical or other data storage technologies
could result in competitive products with better performance or
lower cost per unit of capacity than our products. We monitor
the advantages, disadvantages and advances of the full array of
storage technologies on an ongoing basis.


 



High-speed semiconductor memory competes with hard drive
products in some applications, such as consumer handheld devices
and portable external storage. Semiconductor memory is much
faster in some applications than magnetic hard drives, but
currently is not competitive in most applications using 3.5-inch
and 2.5-inch form factor hard drives from a cost standpoint.
Flash memory, a non-volatile semiconductor memory, is currently
much more costly and, while it has





12





Table of Contents






higher “read” performance attributes than hard drives,
it has lower “write” performance attributes. Flash
memory could become more competitive in the near future for
additional applications requiring less storage capacity than
that provided by hard drives. However, we believe that the
traditional high-volume computing markets will remain the domain
of 3.5-inch and 2.5-inch hard drives based on the hard drive
industry’s attributes of reliability, availability and cost.


 



For an additional discussion of risks related to competition,
see Item 1A of this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.


 




This excerpt taken from the WDC 10-K filed Aug 28, 2007.
Competition
 
We compete primarily with manufacturers of hard drives for use in desktop, notebook, enterprise, CE and external storage products. Our competitors in the hard drive market include ExcelStor Technology, Fujitsu Limited, Hitachi Global Storage Technologies, Samsung Electronics Incorporated, Seagate Technology and Toshiba Corporation. In 2006, Seagate completed the acquisition of Maxtor Corporation which, at the time of the acquisition, was one of the hard drive industry’s four largest suppliers.
 
The hard drive industry is intensely competitive, with hard drive suppliers competing for sales to a limited number of major customers. Hard drives manufactured by different competitors are highly substitutable due to the industry mandate of technical form, fit and function standards. Hard drive manufacturers compete on the basis of product quality and reliability, storage capacity, unit price, product performance, production volume capabilities, delivery capability, leadership in time-to-market, time-to-volume and time-to-quality, service and support, and ease of doing business. The relative importance of these factors varies by customer and market. We believe that we are generally competitive in all of these factors.
 
We believe that there are no substantial barriers for existing competitors to offer competing products. Therefore, we believe that we cannot differentiate WD hard drive products solely on attributes such as storage capacity, buffer size or time-to-market. Accordingly, we differentiate WD by focusing on operational excellence, high product quality and reliability, and designing and incorporating into our hard drives desirable product performance attributes. Such performance attributes include seek times, data transfer rates, intelligent caching, failure prediction, remote diagnostics, acoustics, error recovery, low operating temperature, low power consumption and optimized streaming capabilities. In addition, we emphasize non-product related attributes, including rapid response to our customers. Rapid response requires accelerated design cycles, customer delivery, production flexibility and timely service and support, which contribute to customer satisfaction. We also rely on the strength of the WD brand name with value-added resellers, retailers and solution providers to whom we sell our hard drive products directly and indirectly. We believe that trust in a manufacturer’s reputation, its execution track record and the establishment of strategic relationships have become important factors in the selection of a hard drive, particularly in a rapidly changing technology environment.
 
Advances in magnetic, optical or other data storage technologies could result in competitive products with better performance or lower cost per unit of capacity than our products. High-speed semiconductor memory could compete with our hard drive products in the future. Semiconductor memory is much faster in some applications than magnetic hard drives, but currently is not competitive from a cost standpoint. Flash memory, a non-volatile semiconductor memory, is currently much more costly and, while it has higher “read” performance attributes than hard drives, it has lower “write” performance attributes. Flash memory could become competitive in the near future for applications requiring less storage capacity than that provided by hard drives. We believe that the traditional high-volume computing markets will remain the domain of 3.5-inch and 2.5-inch hard drives based on the HDD industry’s attributes of reliability, availability and cost.
 
For an additional discussion of risks related to competition, see Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
 
This excerpt taken from the WDC 10-K filed Nov 20, 2006.
Competition
 
We compete primarily with manufacturers of hard drives for desktop, mobile, enterprise and CE products. Our competitors in the hard drive market include Fujitsu Limited, Hitachi Global Storage Technologies, Samsung Electronics Incorporated, Seagate Technology and Toshiba Corporation. In 2006, Seagate completed the acquisition of Maxtor Corporation which, at the time of the acquisition, was one of the hard drive industry’s four largest suppliers.
 
The hard drive industry is intensely competitive, with hard drive suppliers competing for sales to a limited number of major customers. Hard drives manufactured by different competitors are highly substitutable due to the industry mandate of technical form, fit and function standards. Hard drive manufacturers compete on the basis of product quality


10


Table of Contents

and reliability, storage capacity, unit price, product performance, production volume capabilities, delivery capability, leadership in time-to-market, time-to-volume and time-to-quality, service and support, and ease of doing business. The relative importance of these factors varies between customer and market segments. We believe that we are generally competitive in all of these factors.
 
We believe that there are no substantial barriers for existing competitors to offer competing products. Therefore, we believe that we cannot differentiate WD hard drive products solely on attributes such as storage capacity, buffer size or time-to-market. Accordingly, we differentiate WD by focusing on operational excellence, high product quality and reliability, and designing and incorporating into our hard drives desirable product performance attributes. Such performance attributes include seek times, data transfer rates, intelligent caching, failure prediction, remote diagnostics, acoustics and data recovery. In addition, we emphasize non-product related attributes, including rapid response to our customers. Rapid response requires accelerated design cycles, customer delivery, production flexibility and timely service and support, which contribute to customer satisfaction. We also rely on the strength of the WD brand name with value-added resellers and solution providers to whom we sell our hard drive products directly and indirectly. We believe that trust in a manufacturer’s reputation, its execution track record and the establishment of strategic relationships have become important factors in the selection of a hard drive, particularly in a rapidly changing technology environment.
 
Advances in magnetic, optical or other data storage technologies could result in competitive products with better performance or lower cost per unit of capacity than our products. High-speed semiconductor memory could compete with our hard drive products in the future. Semiconductor memory is much faster than magnetic hard drives, but currently is not competitive from a cost standpoint. Flash memory, a non-volatile semiconductor memory, is currently much more costly and, while it has higher “read” performance attributes than hard drives, it has lower “write” performance attributes. Flash memory could become competitive in the near future for applications requiring less storage capacity than that provided by hard drives.
 
For an additional discussion of risks related to competition, see Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
 
Wikinvest © 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012. Use of this site is subject to express Terms of Service, Privacy Policy, and Disclaimer. By continuing past this page, you agree to abide by these terms. Any information provided by Wikinvest, including but not limited to company data, competitors, business analysis, market share, sales revenues and other operating metrics, earnings call analysis, conference call transcripts, industry information, or price targets should not be construed as research, trading tips or recommendations, or investment advice and is provided with no warrants as to its accuracy. Stock market data, including US and International equity symbols, stock quotes, share prices, earnings ratios, and other fundamental data is provided by data partners. Stock market quotes delayed at least 15 minutes for NASDAQ, 20 mins for NYSE and AMEX. Market data by Xignite. See data providers for more details. Company names, products, services and branding cited herein may be trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective owners. The use of trademarks or service marks of another is not a representation that the other is affiliated with, sponsors, is sponsored by, endorses, or is endorsed by Wikinvest.
Powered by MediaWiki