Weyerhaeuser Company 10-K 2009
Documents found in this filing:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
[X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008
[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM TO
COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 1-4825
A WASHINGTON CORPORATION
(IRS EMPLOYER IDENTIFICATION NO.)
FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON 98063-9777 TELEPHONE (253) 924-2345
SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(B) OF THE ACT:
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. [X] Yes [ ] No
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. [ ] Yes [X] No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. [X] Yes [ ] No
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [X]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer.
Large accelerated filer [X] Accelerated filer [ ] Non-accelerated filer [ ] Smaller reporting company [ ]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). [ ] Yes [X] No
As of June 27, 2008, the aggregate market value of the registrants common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant was $10,409,005,150 based on the closing sale price as reported on the New York Stock Exchange Composite Price Transactions.
As of February 2, 2009, 211,227,629 shares of the registrants common stock ($1.25 par value) were outstanding.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the Notice of 2009 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and Proxy Statement for the companys Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held April 16, 2009, are incorporated by reference into Part II and III.
WEYERHAEUSER COMPANY > 2008 ANNUAL REPORT AND FORM 10-K
We are a forest products company that primarily grows and harvests trees, builds homes and makes a range of forest products essential to everyday lives. Our goal is to do this safely, profitably and responsibly.
Our business has offices or operations in 10 countries and has customers worldwide. We manage 22 million acres of forests, and in 2008, we generated $8 billion in net sales from our continuing operations.
This portion of our Annual Report and Form 10-K provides detailed information about who we are, what we do and where we are headed. Unless otherwise specified, current information reported in this Form 10-K is as of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008.
We break out financial information such as revenues, earnings and assets by the business segments that form our company. We also discuss the development of our company and the geographic areas where we do business.
We report our financial results and condition in two groups:
Throughout this Form 10-K, unless specified otherwise, references to we, our, us and the company refer to the consolidated company, including both Weyerhaeuser and Real Estate.
We meet the information-reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 by filing periodic reports, proxy statements and other information with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). These reports and statements information about our companys business, financial results and other matters are available at:
When we file the information electronically with the SEC, it also is added to our Internet site.
OUR BUSINESS SEGMENTS
In the Consolidated Results section of Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, you will find our overall performance results for our business segments:
Detailed financial information about our business segments and our geographic locations is in Note 2: Business Segments and Note 25: Geographic Areas in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, as well as in this section and in the Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
We started out as Weyerhaeuser Timber Company, incorporated in the state of Washington in January 1900 when Frederick Weyerhaeuser and 15 partners bought 900,000 acres of timberland.
Our innovations and accomplishments through the years include:
CURRENT MARKET CONDITIONS
As a company, we are facing extraordinary conditions. The housing market has seen an incredible slowdown, consumer confidence remains at the lowest levels ever since tracking began in 1967 and tight credit poses a significant threat to customers. Against this backdrop, we are uncertain as to how long these challenging market conditions will continue.
For additional information about market risks and the effects of current market conditions on our operations see Risk Factors Risks Related to Our Industries and Business and Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Economic and Market Conditions Affecting our Operations.
COMPETITION IN OUR MARKETS
Our major markets both domestic and foreign are highly competitive, with numerous companies selling similar products. Many of our products also compete against substitutes for wood and wood-fiber products. In real estate development, we compete against numerous regional and national firms. We compete in our markets primarily through price, product quality and service levels.
Our business segments competitive strategies are as follows:
Our Containerboard, Packaging and Recycling segment was sold to International Paper in August 2008. Our Fine Paper segment was divested in a transaction with Domtar Inc. in March 2007.
SALES OUTSIDE THE U.S.
In 2008, $2.5 billion 22 percent of our total consolidated sales and revenues, including sales from discontinued operations, were to customers outside the U.S. The table below shows sales outside the U.S. for the last three years.
We have approximately 19,850 employees. This number includes:
Of these employees, approximately 4,100 are members of unions covered by multiyear collective-bargaining agreements.
COMPARABILITY OF DATA
Over the last five years, we have made an acquisition to complement our key operations and have exited businesses that did not fit our long-term strategic direction. As you review our results for the past five years, it may be helpful to keep in mind the following acquisition and divestitures and the segments affected.
Summary of Recent Divestitures and Acquisition
Additional information related to our discontinued operations can be found in Note 3: Discontinued Operations and Assets Held for Sale in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. Additional information related to our acquisition can be found in Note 24: Acquisitions in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
In addition to the divestitures and acquisition above, segment comparability is affected by the following:
Effective July 2008, there were changes in senior management responsibility for Weyerhaeusers international operations outside of North America, which consist primarily of timberlands and related converting operations in South America. As a result, these operations, which previously were reported as part of the Corporate and Other segment, are now reported as part of the Timberlands segment.
Allocation of Pension and Postretirement Credits (Costs)
Effective with the first quarter of 2008, our recurring pension credits (costs) are no longer being allocated to Weyerhaeuser operating segments. Effective with the third quarter of 2008, our recurring postretirement credits (costs) are no longer being allocated to Weyerhaeuser operating segments. These Weyerhaeuser pension and postretirement credits (costs) are reported in the Corporate and Other segment with the exception of certain union-negotiated postretirement benefits that are reflected in the Cellulose Fibers segment. Pension and postretirement credits (costs) related to real estate operations are reported in the Real Estate segment.
WHAT WE DO
This section provides information about how we:
For each of our business segments, we provide details about what we do, where we do it, how much we sell and where we are headed.
Our Timberlands business segment manages 6.7 million acres of private commercial forestland worldwide. We own 6 million of those acres and lease the other 700,000 acres. In addition, we have renewable, long-term licenses on 15.2 million acres of forestland located in four Canadian provinces. The tables presented in this section include data from this segments business units as of the end of 2008.
Due to changes in senior management responsibility during 2008, we now report our international operations outside of North America which consist primarily of timberlands and related converting operations in South America as part of our Timberlands business segment. We previously reported these operations as part of our Corporate and Other business segment. We have reclassified business segment results for prior periods to be consistent with the current presentation.
WHAT WE DO
Our Timberlands business segment is recognized as a leading forest manager. We:
Our goal is to achieve maximum returns by selling logs and stumpage to internal and external customers. We focus on solid wood and use intensive silviculture to improve forest productivity and returns while managing the forests on a sustainable basis to meet both customer and public expectations.
Wholly owned subsidiaries or joint ventures for which we are the managing partner run our international operations in this business segment. Our international assets consist principally of forest plantations, forest licenses and converting assets in South America. Weyerhaeuser is also the managing partner in Fujian Yong Hui Forestry Co. Ltd, a joint venture in China established in 2007. The joint venture is owned 51 percent by Weyerhaeuser and 49 percent by Fujian YongAn Forestry Company. As of December 31, 2008, the joint venture managed 2,233 acres of timberlands with 56,000 seedlings planted in 2008.
Sustainable Forestry Practices
We are committed to responsible environmental stewardship wherever we operate, managing forests not only for wood production but also for the ecosystem services they provide. Most of the forests we manage include places with unique environmental, cultural, historical or recreational value. We manage these areas under regulatory requirements and voluntary standards to protect their unique qualities. Protecting forests with exceptional conservation value is part of implementing the Sustainable Forestry Initiative®(SFI) standard. All of the forests we own or manage in the United States have been independently certified as meeting the SFI standard. In addition, our forestlands in Uruguay are the model for the developing Uruguayan national forest certification standard, designed to be endorsed by the Program for the Endorsement of Forest Certification (PEFC).
Canadian Forestry Operations
In Canada, we are licensed to operate forestlands that provide the volume for our manufacturing units in various provinces. When the volume is harvested, we pay the provinces at stumpage rates that are set by the government and generally based on prevailing market prices. The economic benefit of growing the timber accrues to the provincial government. We do not generate any profit in the Timberlands segment from the harvest of timber from the licensed acres in Canada.
Other Values From Our Timberlands
We use our geologic databases to identify and market opportunities for commercial mineral and geothermal development on our lands with a focus on the Pacific Northwest and southern United States. Revenue is primarily derived from:
HOW WE MEASURE OUR PRODUCT
Beginning this year, we have started to report Timberlands data in cubic meters. Cubic meters is a measure of the total volume of wood fiber in a tree or log that can be sold. Cubic meter volume is determined from the large- and small-end diameters and length and provides a more consistent and comparative measure of timber and log volume among operating regions, species, size and seasons of the year than other units of measure.
Previously, we recorded the measurable amount of fiber we can sell from a log in cunits, a similar volumetric measure where 1 cunit equals 100 cubic feet of solid wood. We changed the measurement because cubic meters is an internationally recognized measure of solid wood volume. One cunit is equal to 2.83 cubic meters.
We also use two other units of measure when transacting business including:
Both of these measures are accurate for the regional purposes for which they are used, but they do not provide a meaningful basis for volumetric comparisons or comparisons between the regions.
The conversion rate for MBF to cubic meters varies based on several factors including diameter, length and taper of the timber being measured. The average conversion rate for MBF to cubic meters is approximately 6.7 cubic meters per MBF.
The conversion rate from green tons to cubic meters also varies based on the season harvested and the specific gravity of the wood for the region from which the timber is produced. An average conversion rate for green tons to cubic meters is approximately 0.825 cubic meters per green ton.
WHERE WE DO IT
Our balanced portfolio of timberlands assets are located primarily in North America. In the U.S. we own and manage sustainable forests for use in wood products and pulp and paper manufacturing in nine states. We own or lease:
Our international operations are located primarily in Uruguay and China where, as of December 31, 2008, we own a total of 321,000 acres and have long-term leases on another 28,000 acres.
In addition, we have renewable, long-term licenses on 15.2 million acres of forestland that is owned by the provincial government of four Canadian provinces.
Our total timber inventoryincluding timber on owned and leased land in our U.S. and international operationsis approximately 319 million cubic meters. The timber inventory on licensed lands in Canada is approximately 382 million cubic meters. The amount of timber inventory does not translate into an amount of lumber or panel products because the quantity of end products:
The relative value of our timberlands is affected by the species, size and grade of the trees.
Summary of 2008 Timber Inventory and Timberland Locations
Our Western timberlands are composed primarily of Douglas fir, a species highly valued for its structural strength. We also have large volumes of western hemlock along the coastal areas to serve the whitewood markets. Our Southern timberlands are predominantly southern yellow pine, which provide grade logs to wood products facilities and chips and fiber logs to pulp and paper operations. Both regions have minor volumes of various hardwood species.
Our forestlands in Uruguay are composed of approximately 70 percent loblolly pine and 30 percent eucalyptus. The average age class of the timber in Uruguay is in the first third of its rotation age. It is entering into that part of the growth rotation when we will see increased volume accretion. Only 50 percent of the area to be planted has been afforested to date. The afforestation program is planned to be completed within the next four years.
Canada Licensed Timberlands
We lease and license forestland in Canada to secure the volume for our manufacturing units in the various provinces. We transfer logs from our harvest operations to our manufacturing facilities at cost. Any profit from the conversion of these logs is recognized in the Wood Products or Cellulose Fibers operating segment responsible for that activity.
All licenses managed in Canada have been independently certified using the Canadian Standards Association (CSA) standard.
Five-Year Summary of Timberlands Production
Our Timberlands annual fee depletion represents the harvest of the timber assets we own. Depletion is a method of expensing the cost of establishing the fee timber asset base over the harvest or timber sales volume. The decline in fee depletion from 2004 through 2006 reflects the disposition of our B.C. Coastal operations in May 2005. The increase in volume in the West in 2008 reflects increased volume from salvage efforts following a December 2007 windstorm.
HOW MUCH WE SELL
Our net sales to unaffiliated customers over the last two years were:
Our intersegment sales over the last two years were:
Five-Year Summary of Net Sales for Timberlands
Five-Year Trend for Total Net Sales in Timberlands
Percentage of 2008 Sales to Unaffiliated Customers
Log Sales Volumes
Logs sold to unaffiliated customers in 2008 increased approximately 1.5 million cubic meters 17 percent from 2007.
We have three primary grades of log sales domestic grade, domestic fiber and export. Factors that may affect log sales in each of these categories include:
All our domestic and export logs are sold to unaffiliated customers or transferred at market prices to our internal mills by the sales and marketing staff within our Timberlands business units.
Five-Year Summary of Log Sales Volumes to Unaffiliated Customers for Timberlands
The majority of our log sales to unaffiliated customers are sales to the export market and to other domestic sawmills in the Pacific Northwest. Following is a five-year summary of selected export log prices.
Five-Year Summary of Selected Export Log Prices
(#2 Sawlog Bark On $/MBF)
Our log prices are affected by the supply of and demand for grade and fiber logs and are influenced by the same factors that affect log sales. Export log prices are particularly affected by the Japanese housing market.
Average 2008 log realizations in the West decreased from 2007 primarily due to lower domestic log prices and an increased mix of lower-value whitewood in both our export and domestic volumes resulting from the salvage logging efforts following the December 2007 windstorm. These were slightly offset by increased log realizations in the South compared to 2007.
WHERE WERE HEADED
Our competitive strategies include:
In addition, we believe we will generate additional revenues from new products and services, such as wetland mitigation banking and conservation easements, and from participating in emerging carbon markets.
We are one of the largest manufacturers and distributors of wood products in North America.
WHAT WE DO
Our wood products segment:
WHERE WE DO IT
We operate manufacturing facilities in the U.S. and Canada. We distribute through a combination of Weyerhaeuser and third-party locations. Information about the locations, capacities and actual production of our manufacturing facilities is included below.
Principal Manufacturing Locations
Locations of our principal manufacturing facilities as of December 31, 2008, by major product group were:
Subsequent to year-end and through the date of this filing, we announced the permanent closures of one lumber mill and one veneer mill in Aberdeen, Washington, and the indefinite closures of one lumber mill and one veneer mill in Pine Hill, Alabama.
Summary of 2008 Wood Products Capacities
Five-Year Summary of Wood Products Production
HOW MUCH WE SELL
Revenues of our Wood Products business segment come from sales to wood products dealers, do-it-yourself retailers, builders and industrial users. We provide products and services to the residential construction market under the iLevel®brand. In 2008, our net sales were $3.8 billion compared with $5.7 billion in 2007.
Five-Year Summary of Net Sales for Wood Products
Five-Year Trend for Total Net Sales in Wood Products
Percentage of 2008 Net Sales in Wood Products
Wood Products Volume
The volume of wood products sold in 2008 declined from 2007 primarily due to a significant decline in market demand, resulting from the downturn of the homebuilding and repair and remodel markets. In response to these market conditions in 2007 and 2008, we sold or closed a number of facilities and curtailed production at several other mills. The sales and closures include:
Five-Year Summary of Sales Volume for Wood Products
Wood Products Prices
Prices for wood products in 2008 declined from 2007.
In general, the following factors influence prices for wood products:
Demand for home construction fell dramatically from 2006 through 2008, with a corresponding drop in demand for the products that we produce and sell. The ongoing oversupply of products has put significant and prolonged downward pressure on prices. This is evident in the following graphs.
Five-Year Summary of Selected Published Lumber Prices $/MBF
Five-Year Summary of Selected Published Oriented Strand Board Prices $/MSF
Five-Year Summary of Selected Published Plywood Prices ( 1/2 CDX) $/MSF
WHERE WERE HEADED
Our competitive strategies include:
Our cellulose fibers (pulp) products are distributed through a global direct sales network, and our liquid packaging products are sold directly to carton and food product packaging converters in North America and Asia. We also have a 50 percent interest in North Pacific Paper Corporation (NORPAC) a joint venture with Nippon Paper Industries that produces newsprint and high-brightness publication papers.
WHAT WE DO
As one of the worlds largest softwood market pulp producers, we:
Cellulose Fibers Products
WHERE WE DO IT
We have four pulp mills in the southern part of the U.S. and one pulp mill in Canada. We also have a converting facility for modified fibers in Mississippi. Our liquid packaging mill is located in Washington state.
Principal Manufacturing Locations
Locations of our principal manufacturing facilities by major product group are:
Summary of 2008 Cellulose Fibers Capacities
Five-Year Summary of Cellulose Fibers Production
HOW MUCH WE SELL
Revenues of our Cellulose Fibers segment come from sales to customers who use the products for further manufacturing or distribution and for direct use. Our net sales were approximately $1.8 billion in 2008 and 2007.
Five-Year Summary of Net Sales for Cellulose Fibers
Five-Year Trend for Total Net Sales in Cellulose Fibers
Percentage of 2008 Net Sales in Cellulose Fibers
Our sales volume of cellulose fiber products in 2008 was 1.7 million tons a decrease of 18 percent compared with 2007. This reduction in volume was primarily due to the divestiture of five production facilities in the 2007 Domtar Transaction. Following the divestiture, we entered into a brokerage agreement with Domtar under which we bought and resold pulp for the remainder of 2007. This activity did not continue in 2008 further reducing our sales volumes.
Other factors that affect sales volumes for cellulose fiber products include:
Five-Year Summary of Sales Volume for Cellulose Fibers
Our average pulp prices in 2008 increased compared with 2007 due to:
Five-Year Summary of Selected Published Pulp Prices $/TON
WHERE WERE HEADED
Our competitive strategies include:
Our Real Estate business segment includes our wholly owned subsidiary Weyerhaeuser Real Estate Company (WRECO) and its subsidiaries. WRECOs operations are concentrated in projected long-term, high-growth metropolitan areas in the United States.
WHAT WE DO
The Real Estate segment is focused on:
Real Estate Products and Activities
WHERE WE DO IT
Our operations are concentrated in select metropolitan areas:
HOW MUCH WE SELL
We are one of the top 20 homebuilding companies in the U.S. as measured by annual single-family home closings.
Our revenues decreased to $1.4 billion in 2008 40 percent from $2.4 billion in 2007, primarily due to a 28 percent decline in single-family closings. The decline in home closings is the result of weak financial markets, tight lending standards and the collapse of consumer confidence, which continues to put downward pressure on pricing.
The following factors affect revenues in our Real Estate business segment:
Five-Year Summary of Revenue for Real Estate
Five-Year Trend for Total Net Sales in Real Estate
Percentage Breakdown of 2008 Net Sales in Real Estate
Five-Year Summary of Single-Family Unit Statistics
WHERE WERE HEADED
Our competitive strategies include:
On March 7, 2007, our fine paper operations and related assets were divested in the Domtar Transaction. As a result, the year ended December 30, 2007, includes nine weeks of fine paper operations. Subsequent to the first quarter of 2007, we no longer have results of operations for the Fine Paper segment.
Five-Year Summary of Net Sales for Fine Paper
Five-Year Summary of Sales Volume for Fine Paper
Five-Year Summary of Fine Paper Production
CONTAINERBOARD, PACKAGING AND RECYCLING
On August 4, 2008, our Containerboard, Packaging and Recycling business was sold to International Paper Company. As a result, the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, includes 31 weeks of Containerboard, Packaging and Recycling operations.
Five-year Summary of Containerboard, Packaging and Recycling Production
Five-Year Summary of Net Sales for Containerboard, Packaging and Recycling
Five-Year Summary of Sales Volume for Containerboard, Packaging and Recycling
WHAT WE DO
Our Corporate and Other segment includes:
We also record certain gains or charges in the Corporate and Other segment related to dispositions or events that generally are not related to an individual operating segment.
The following changes were made to the Corporate and Other segment during 2008:
Ongoing operations outside of North America, which previously were reported as part of the Corporate and Other segment, are reported as part of the Timberlands segment. Segment results for prior periods have been recast to present information consistent with the current presentation.
Pension and Postretirement Credits (Costs)
Allocation of credits (costs) to the forest products operating segments ceased as of the beginning of 2008 for pension and as of the beginning of the third quarter for postretirement. Prior periods were not recast to reflect the change in allocation methodology. Except as listed below, pension and postretirement credits (costs) are now held in the Corporate and Other segment.
WHERE WE DO IT
Our transportation operations include our marine operations, which provide shipping between North America and Asia, and our railroad operations, which are located in the western and southern U.S.
As part of our strategic restructuring of our international holdings, we:
See Note 7: Equity Affiliates in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for more information related to our joint ventures.
HOW MUCH WE SELL
Sales and revenues for our Corporate and Other segment are primarily related to our marine transportation and discontinued international operations. In 2008, our net sales were $392 million compared with $432 million in 2007. The decline in revenues is primarily due to the sale of the Australian operations in July 2008.
Factors that affect revenues in our transportation operations include:
Five-Year Summary of Revenue for Corporate and Other
Five-Year Trend for Total Net Sales in Corporate and Other
NATURAL RESOURCE AND ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS
Many social values are expressed in the laws and regulations that pertain to growing and harvesting timber. We participate in voluntary certification of our timberlands to assure that we sustain their values including the protection of wildlife and water. Changes in law and regulation can significantly affect local or regional timber harvest levels and market values of timber-based raw materials.
ENDANGERED SPECIES PROTECTIONS
In the U.S., a number of fish and wildlife species that inhabit geographic areas near or within our timberlands have been listed as threatened or endangered under the federal Endangered Species Act (ESA) or similar state laws. Some of these listed species include the northern spotted owl, the marbled murrelet, a number of salmon species, bull trout and steelhead trout in the Pacific Northwest and the red-cockaded woodpecker, gopher tortoise and American burying beetle in the Southeast. Additional species or populations may be listed as threatened or endangered as a result of pending or future citizen petitions or petitions initiated by federal or state agencies.
Federal and state requirements to protect habitat for threatened and endangered species have resulted in restrictions on timber harvest on some timberlands, including some of our timberlands. Additional listings of fish and wildlife species as endangered, threatened or sensitive under the ESA or similar state laws as well as regulatory actions taken by federal or state agencies to protect habitat for these species may, in the future, result in additional restrictions on our timber harvests and other forest management practices. They also could increase our operating costs and affect timber supply and prices in general.
In Canada, the federal Species at Risk Act (SARA) was enacted in 2002. SARA enacted protective measures for species identified as being at risk and for critical habitat. To date, SARA has not had a significant effect on our operations; however, it is anticipated that SARA will, over time, result in some additional restrictions on timber harvests and other forest management practices and increase some operating costs for operators of forestlands in Canada. For these reasons, SARA is expected to affect timber supply and prices in the future.
REGULATIONS AFFECTING FORESTRY PRACTICES
In the U.S., regulations established by federal, state and local governments or agencies to protect water quality and wetlands could affect future harvests and forest management practices on some of our timberlands. Forest practice acts in some states in the U.S. increasingly affect present or future harvest and forest management activities. For example, in some states, these acts limit the size of clearcuts, require some timber to be left unharvested to protect water quality and fish and wildlife habitat, regulate construction and maintenance of forest roads, require reforestation following timber harvest and contain procedures for state agencies to review and approve proposed forest practice activities. Some states and local governments regulate certain forest practices through various permit programs. Each state in which we own timberlands has developed best management practices to reduce the effects of forest practices on water quality and aquatic habitats. Additional and more stringent regulations may be adopted by various state and local governments to achieve water-quality standards under the federal Clean Water Act, protect fish and wildlife habitats, or achieve other public policy objectives.
Our forest operations in Canada are carried out on public forestlands under forest licenses. All forest operations are subject to forest practices and environmental regulations, and operations under licenses also are subject to contractual requirements between us and the relevant province designed to protect environmental and other social values.
FOREST CERTIFICATION STANDARDS
We operate in the U.S. under the Sustainable Forestry Initiative®. This is a certification standard designed to supplement government regulatory programs with voluntary landowner initiatives to further protect certain public resources and values. The Sustainable Forestry Initiative® is an independent standard, overseen by a governing board consisting of conservation organizations, academia, the forest industry and large and small forest landowners. Compliance with the Sustainable Forestry Initiative® may result in some increases in our operating costs and curtailment of our timber harvests in some areas. In Canada, we participate in the Canadian Standards Association Sustainable Forest Management System standard, a voluntary certification system that further protects certain public resources and values. Compliance with this standard will result in some increases in our operating costs and curtailment of our timber harvests in some areas in Canada.
WHAT THESE REGULATIONS AND CERTIFICATION PROGRAMS MEAN TO US
The regulatory and nonregulatory forest management programs described above have increased our operating costs, resulted in changes in the value of timber and logs from our timberlands, and contributed to increases in the prices paid for wood products and wood chips during periods of high demand. These kinds of programs also can make it more difficult for us to respond to rapid changes in markets, extreme weather or other unexpected circumstances. One additional effect may be further reductions in the usage of, or substitution of other products for,
lumber and plywood. We believe that these kinds of programs have not had, and in 2009 will not have, a significant effect on the total harvest of timber in the U.S. or Canada. However, these kinds of programs may have such an effect in the future. We expect we will not be disproportionately affected by these programs as compared with typical owners of comparable timberlands. We also expect that these programs will not significantly disrupt our planned operations over large areas or for extended periods.
CANADIAN ABORIGINAL RIGHTS
Many of the Canadian forestlands also are subject to the constitutionally protected treaty or common-law rights of the aboriginal peoples of Canada. Most of British Columbia (B.C.) is not covered by treaties, and as a result the claims of B.C.s aboriginal peoples relating to forest resources are largely unresolved, although many aboriginal groups are actively engaged in treaty discussions with the governments of B.C. and Canada. Final or interim resolution of claims brought by aboriginal groups is expected to result in additional restrictions on the sale or harvest of timber and may increase operating costs and affect timber supply and prices in Canada. We believe that such claims will not have a significant effect on our total harvest of timber or production of forest products in 2009, although they may have such an effect in the future. In 2008, the Forest Products Association of Canada (FPAC), of which we are a member, signed a Memorandum of Understanding with the Assembly of First Nations, under which the parties agree to work together to strengthen Canadas forest sector through economic-development initiatives and business investments, strong environmental stewardship and the creation of skill-development opportunities particularly targeted to aboriginal youth.
Our operations also are subject to federal, state, provincial and local pollution controls with regard to air, water and land; solid and hazardous waste management; and disposal and remediation laws and regulations in all areas in which we have operations. We also are subject to market demands with respect to chemical content of some of our products. Compliance with these laws, regulations and demands usually involves capital expenditures as well as additional operating costs. We cannot easily quantify the future amounts of capital expenditures we might have to make to comply with these laws, regulations and demands or the effects on our operating costs because in some instances compliance standards have not been developed or have not become final or definitive. In addition, when we make changes in operations to comply with regulatory standards, we frequently are making changes for other purposes as well. These purposes might include the extension of facility life, an increase in capacity, changes in raw material requirements, or an increase in the economic value of assets or products.
It is difficult to isolate the environmental component of most manufacturing capital projects, but we estimate that our capital expenditures for environmental compliance were approximately $16 million in 2008 (approximately 4 percent of total capital expenditures, excluding acquisitions and Real Estate). Based on our understanding of current regulatory requirements in the U.S. and Canada, we expect that capital expenditures for environmental compliance will be approximately $5 million in 2009 (approximately 2 percent of expected total capital expenditures, excluding acquisitions and Real Estate).
We are involved in the environmental investigation or remediation of numerous sites we presently own or formerly owned. Of these sites, we may have the sole obligation to remediate or may share that obligation with one or more parties. In some instances, several parties have joint and several obligations to remediate. Some sites are Superfund sites where we have been named as a potentially responsible party. Our liability with respect to these various sites ranges from insignificant to substantial. The amount of liability depends on the quantity, toxicity and nature of materials at the site and depends on the number and economic viability of the other responsible parties.
We spent approximately $9 million in 2008 and expect to spend approximately $7 million in 2009 on environmental remediation of these sites. It is our policy to accrue for environmental-remediation costs when we determine it is probable that such an obligation exists and can reasonably estimate the amount of the obligation. We currently believe it is reasonably possible that our costs to remediate all the identified sites may exceed our current accruals of $37 million. The excess amounts required may be insignificant or could range, in the aggregate, up to approximately $36 million over several years. This estimate of the upper end of the range of reasonably possible additional costs is much less certain than the estimates we currently are using to determine how much to accrue. The estimate of the upper range also uses assumptions less favorable to us among the range of reasonably possible outcomes.
REGULATION OF AIR EMISSIONS IN THE U.S.
The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has promulgated regulations for air emissions from pulp and paper manufacturing facilities, wood products facilities and industrial boilers. These regulations cover hazardous air pollutants that require use of maximum achievable control technology (MACT) and controls for pollutants that contribute to smog and haze. In recent D.C. Circuit Court decisions, the MACT standards for air
emissions from industrial boilers and process heaters were vacated and the standards for plywood and composite wood products were remanded to the EPA. The EPA must promulgate supplemental MACT standards for plywood and composite products and new MACT standards for boilers. Pending final action by the EPA, some states may implement MACT requirements for boilers on a case-by-case basis. We anticipate that we might spend as much as $30 million to $100 million over the next few years to comply with the MACT standards after they have been determined by the EPA and the states. We cannot currently quantify the amount of capital we will need in the future to comply with new regulations being developed by the EPA or Canadian environmental agencies because final rules have not been promulgated. However, at this time we anticipate that compliance with the new regulations will not result in capital expenditures in any year that is material in relation to our annual capital expenditures.
In 2006, we adopted a goal of reducing greenhouse gas emissions by 40 percent by 2020 compared with our emissions in 2000, assuming a comparable portfolio and regulations. We intend to achieve this goal by increasing energy efficiency and using more greenhouse gas-neutral, biomass fuels instead of fossil fuels. During 2007, we divested our Fine Paper operations and related assets and during 2008 we completed the sale of our Containerboard, Packaging and Recycling business. These transactions removed several high greenhouse gas-emitting operations from our manufacturing portfolio. In accord with generally accepted, voluntary greenhouse gas accounting standards, we will adjust our baseline year 2000 values and subsequent year greenhouse gas inventory values to reflect these changes.
In 2007, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that greenhouse gases are pollutants that can be subject to regulation under the Clean Air Act. As a result of this ruling, the EPA may regulate greenhouse gas emissions. Some state governments also have released policy proposals that indicate they may regulate greenhouse gas emissions in the future. In addition, we anticipate Congress will consider and adopt new legislation regulating greenhouse gas emissions within the next few years. It is not yet known when and to what extent these federal and state policy activities may come into force or how any future federal and state greenhouse gas regulatory programs may relate to each other. A multistate and federal greenhouse gas emissions reduction trading system may be put in place in the future with potentially significant implications for all U.S. businesses. We believe these measures have not had, and in 2009 will not have, a significant effect on Weyerhaeusers operations, although they may have such an effect in the future. We expect we will not be disproportionately affected by these measures as compared with typical owners of comparable operations. We also expect that these measures will not significantly disrupt our planned operations.
REGULATION OF AIR EMISSIONS IN CANADA
We actively participate in negotiations between the FPAC and Natural Resources Canada to define industry obligations for complying with Canadas national plan for reducing greenhouse gas emissions over the next several years. FPAC continues to work with international, national and regional policy makers in their efforts to develop technically sound and economically viable policies, practices and procedures for measuring, reporting and managing greenhouse gas emissions.
In 2007, the Canadian federal government proposed a regulatory framework for air emissions that adopts some aspects of the Kyoto Protocol. The federal framework calls for mandatory reductions in greenhouse gas emissions for heavy industrial emissions producers, among other measures, to be put in place by 2010. Canadian provincial governments also are working on emissions-reduction strategies. For example, the province of Alberta has adopted rules requiring mandatory reporting and reduction of greenhouse gas emissions by large emitters. One of the companys pulp mills is subject to these rules, but we believe the mill will be able to comply with the rules as a result of productivity and energy systems currently in place. It is not yet known what final requirements will come into force or how any provincial and federal plans that may be put into place will relate to each other. A Canadian emissions trading system may be put in place in the future with potentially significant implications for Canadian businesses. We believe these measures have not had, and in 2009 will not have, a significant effect on Weyerhaeusers operations, although they may have such an effect in the future. We expect we will not be disproportionately affected by these measures as compared with typical owners of comparable operations. We also expect that these measures will not significantly disrupt our planned operations.
POTENTIAL CHANGES IN POLLUTION REGULATION
The EPA has repealed the regulations promulgated in 2000 that would have required states to develop total maximum daily load (TMDL) allocations for pollutants in water bodies determined to be water-quality-impaired. However, states continue to promulgate TMDL requirements. State TMDL requirements may set limits on pollutants that may be discharged to a body of water or set additional requirements, such as best management practices for nonpoint sources, including timberland operations, to reduce the amounts of pollutants. It is not possible to estimate the capital expenditures that may be required for us to meet pollution allocations across the various proposed state TMDL programs until a specific TMDL is promulgated.
This report contains statements concerning our future results and performance that are forward-looking statements according to the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements:
Factors listed in this section as well as other factors not included may cause our actual results to differ from our forward-looking statements. There is no guarantee that any of the events anticipated by our forward-looking statements will occur. If any of the events occur, there is no guarantee what effect it will have on our operations or financial condition.
We will not update our forward-looking statements after the date of this report.
Some forward-looking statements discuss our plans, strategies and intentions. They use words such as expects, may, will, believes, should, approximately, anticipates, estimates and plans. In addition, these words may use the positive or negative or a variation of those terms.
We make forward-looking statements of our expectations regarding the first quarter of 2009, including:
In addition, we base our forward-looking statements on the expected effect of:
RISKS, UNCERTAINTIES AND ASSUMPTIONS
Major risks and uncertainties and assumptions that we make that affect our business include, but are not limited to:
We are a large exporter, affected by changes in:
We are subject to certain risks and events that, if one or more of them occur, could adversely affect our business, our financial condition, our results of operations and the trading price of our common stock.
You should consider the following risk factors, in addition to the other information presented in this report and the matters described in Forward-Looking Statements, as well as the other reports and registration statements we file from time to time with the SEC, in evaluating us, our business and an investment in our securities.
The risks below are not the only risks we face. Additional risks not currently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial also may adversely affect our business.
The industries in which we operate are sensitive to macroeconomic conditions and consequently highly cyclical.
The overall levels of demand for the products we manufacture and distribute and consequently our sales and profitability reflect fluctuations in levels of end-user demand, which depend in part on general macroeconomic conditions in North America and worldwide as well as on local economic conditions. The current significant recession in the United States and the global economic downturn, combined with the dislocation in the financial markets and decreased availability of credit, has resulted in a significant downturn for the homebuilding industry (including the companys Real Estate businesses), increased inventories of available new homes, significant declines in home prices, loss of home-equity values and loss of consumer confidence and demand. Our Wood Products segment is highly dependent on the strength of the homebuilding industry and the downturn in that industry has resulted in significant decreases in the prices of and demand for wood products and building materials. This has been further reflected in declining prices and demand for logs and reduced harvests in our Timberland segment. The global economic downturn also has adversely affected demand for consumer products generally, including products containing pulp, resulting in significant decreases in the price of pulp. The length and magnitude of industry cycles have varied over time and by product but generally reflect changes in macroeconomic conditions. Consumer demand could continue to decline as a result of the current economic conditions, further adversely affecting our businesses.
Many of our products are commodities that are widely available from other producers.
Because commodity products have few distinguishing properties from producer to producer, competition for these products is based primarily on price, which is determined by supply relative to demand and competition from substitute products. Prices for our products are affected by many factors outside of our control, and we have little influence over the timing and extent of price changes, which often are volatile. Our profitability with respect to these products depends, in part, on managing our costs, particularly raw material and energy costs, which represent significant components of our operating costs and can fluctuate based upon factors beyond our control. Prices of and demand for many of our products have declined significantly in recent quarters, while many of our raw material or energy costs have increased. This has adversely affected both our sales and profitability.
Excess supply of products may adversely affect prices and margins.
Industry supply of logs, wood products and pulp is subject to changing macroeconomic and industry conditions that may cause producers to idle or permanently close individual machines or entire mills or to decrease harvest levels. To avoid substantial cash costs in connection with idling or closing a mill, some producers choose to continue to operate at a loss, which could prolong weak prices due to oversupply. Oversupply of products also may result from producers introducing new capacity or increasing harvest levels in response to favorable short-term pricing trends. Industry supplies of pulp also are influenced by overseas production capacity, which has grown in recent years and is expected to continue to grow. While the weakness of the U.S. dollar in recent years has improved the companys competitive position and mitigated the levels of imports, the recent strengthening of the U.S. dollar and decreases in demand for consumer products in emerging markets may result in increased imports of pulp from overseas,
resulting in lower prices. Continuation of these factors could materially and adversely affect sales volumes and margins of our operations.
The homebuilding industry is in the midst of a significant downturn and a continuing decline in demand coupled with an increase in the inventory of available homes could continue to adversely affect our sales volume, pricing and margins and result in further impairments.
Demand for homes is sensitive to changes in economic conditions such as the level of employment, consumer confidence, consumer income, the availability of financing and interest rate levels. During 2007 and 2008, the mortgage industry experienced significant instability and increasing default rates, particularly with regard to subprime and other nonconforming loans, causing many lenders to tighten credit requirements and reduce the number of mortgage loans available for financing home purchases. The turmoil in the financial and credit markets increased significantly during the fourth quarter of 2008, including the failure or sale of various financial institutions and an unprecedented level of intervention from the U. S. government. The significant increase in unemployment during 2008, coupled with accelerating foreclosure rates and distress sales of houses, increasing inventories of unsold homes, significant declines in home values and a collapse of consumer confidence has resulted in significant declines in demand for new homes and increasing cancellation rates in all of our markets, as homebuyers sometimes find it more advantageous to forfeit a deposit than to complete the purchase of the home. These factors have resulted in reduced margins and prices and a higher level of sales incentives in many of our markets.
The company has traditionally carried a larger supply of land for development than many of our competitors. Some of the land was purchased during the last few years. Land prices have fallen in these markets and may continue to fall. We also hold options to purchase land at prices that no longer are attractive or in areas that may not be attractive for development in the near future. As new housing demand in our markets has fallen significantly, we have elected to sell some of our land and lots at a loss or declined to exercise high price options, even though that required us to forfeit deposits and write off preacquisition land-development costs. We also have changed our competitive strategies in some markets and elected to discontinue or postpone development in other markets in response to the downturn. As a result, we have been required to take substantial write-downs of the carrying value of our land inventory.
Recent deterioration in economic conditions and the credit markets could adversely affect our access to capital.
Financial and credit markets have been experiencing a period of turmoil that has included the failure or sale of various financial institutions and an unprecedented level of intervention from the United States government. While it is difficult to predict the ultimate results of these events, they may impair the companys ability to borrow money. Similarly, our customers may be unable to borrow money to fund their operations.
Continued deteriorating or volatile market conditions could:
Changes in credit ratings issued by nationally recognized sta- tistical rating organizations could adversely affect our cost of financing and have an adverse effect on the market price of our securities.
Credit rating agencies rate our debt securities on factors that include our operating results, actions that we take, their view of the general outlook for our industry and their view of the general outlook for the economy. Actions taken by the rating agencies can include maintaining, upgrading or downgrading the current rating or placing the company on a watch list for possible future downgrading. Downgrading the credit rating of our debt securities or placing us on a watch list for possible future downgrading could limit our access to the credit markets, increase our cost of financing, and have an adverse effect on the market price of our securities.
Some of our products are vulnerable to declines in demand due to competing technologies or materials.
Our products may compete with nonfiber-based alternatives or with alternative products in certain market segments. For example, plastic, wood/plastic or composite materials may be used by builders as alternatives to the products produced by our Wood Products businesses such as lumber, veneer, plywood and oriented strand board. Changes in prices for oil,
chemicals and wood-based fiber can change the competitive position of our products relative to available alternatives and could increase substitution of those products for our products. As the use of these alternatives grows, demand for our products may further decline.
Our results of operations and financial condition could be materially adversely affected by changes in product mix or pricing.
Our results may be affected by a change in our sales mix. Our outlook assumes a certain volume and product mix of sales. If actual results vary from this projected volume and product mix of sales, our operations and our results could be negatively affected. Our outlook also assumes we will be successful in implementing previously announced price increases as well as future price increases. Delays in acceptance of price increases could negatively affect our results. Moreover, price discounting, if required to maintain our competitive position, could result in lower than anticipated price realizations.
We face intense competition in our markets, and the failure to compete effectively could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We compete with North American and, for many of our product lines, global producers, some of which may have greater financial resources and lower production costs than we do. The principal basis for competition is selling price. Our ability to maintain satisfactory margins depends in large part on our ability to control our costs. Our industries are also particularly sensitive to other factors including innovation, design, quality and service, with varying emphasis on these factors depending on the product line. To the extent that one or more of our competitors become more successful with respect to any key competitive factor, our ability to attract and retain customers could be materially adversely affected. If we are unable to compete effectively, such failure could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
A material disruption at one of our manufacturing facilities could prevent us from meeting customer demand, reduce our sales or negatively affect our results of operation and financial condition.
Any of our manufacturing facilities, or any of our machines within an otherwise operational facility, could cease operations unexpectedly due to a number of events, including:
Any such downtime or facility damage could prevent us from meeting customer demand for our products and/or require us to make unplanned capital expenditures. If one of these machines or facilities were to incur significant downtime, our ability to meet our production targets and satisfy customer requirements could be impaired, resulting in lower sales and income.
Our operations require substantial capital.
The company has substantial capital requirements for expansion and repair or replacement of existing facilities or equipment. Although we maintain our production equipment with regular scheduled maintenance, key pieces of equipment may need to be repaired or replaced periodically. The costs of repairing or replacing such equipment and the associated downtime of the affected production line could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
We believe our capital resources will be adequate to meet our current projected operating needs, capital expenditures and other cash requirements. If for any reason we are unable to provide for our operating needs, capital expenditures and other cash requirements on economic terms, we could experience a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
We could incur substantial costs as a result of compliance with, violations of or liabilities under applicable environmental laws and regulations.
We are subject to a wide range of general and industry-specific laws and regulations relating to the protection of the environment, including those governing:
In particular, the pulp and paper industry in the U.S. is subject to Cluster Rules and Boiler Maximum Achievable Control Technology Rules that further regulate effluent and air emissions. These laws and regulations will require us to obtain authorizations from and comply with the authorization requirements of the appropriate governmental authorities, which have considerable discretion over the terms and timing of permits.
We have incurred, and we expect to continue to incur, significant capital, operating and other expenditures complying with applicable environmental laws and regulations and as a result of remedial obligations. We also could incur substantial costs, such as civil or criminal fines, sanctions and enforcement actions (including orders limiting our operations or requiring corrective measures, installation of pollution control equipment or other remedial actions), cleanup and closure costs, and third-party claims for property damage and personal injury as a result of violations of, or liabilities under, environmental laws and regulations.
As the owner and operator of real estate, including in our homebuilding business, we may be liable under environmental laws for cleanup, closure and other damages resulting from the presence and release of hazardous substances on or from our properties or operations. The amount and timing of environmental expenditures is difficult to predict, and in some cases, our liability may exceed forecasted amounts or the value of the property itself. The discovery of additional contamination or the imposition of additional cleanup obligations at our sites or third-party sites may result in significant additional costs. Any material liability we incur could adversely affect our financial condition or preclude us from making capital expenditures that otherwise would benefit our business.
We also anticipate public policy developments at the state, federal and international level regarding climate change and energy access, security and competitiveness. We expect these developments to address emission of carbon dioxide, renewable energy and fuel standards, and the monetization of carbon. Compliance with regulations that implement new public policy in these areas might require significant expenditures. Enactment of new environmental laws or regulations or changes in existing laws or regulations, or the interpretation of these laws or regulations, might require significant expenditures.
We will be affected by changes in currency exchange rates.
We have manufacturing operations in Canada, Uruguay and Brazil, and we are also a large exporter and, as a result, are affected by changes in currency exchange rates, particularly the value of the U.S. dollar relative to the euro and the Canadian dollar.
Our business and operations could be materially adversely affected by changes in the cost or availability of raw materials and energy.
We rely heavily on certain raw materials (principally wood fiber and chemicals) and energy sources (principally natural gas, electricity, coal and fuel oil) in our manufacturing processes. Our ability to increase earnings has been, and will continue to be, affected by changes in the costs and availability of such raw materials and energy sources. We may not be able to fully offset the effects of higher raw material or energy costs through hedging arrangements, price increases, productivity improvements or cost-reduction programs.
We depend on third parties for transportation services and increases in costs and the availability of transportation could materially adversely affect our business and operations.
Our business depends on the transportation of a large number of products, both domestically and internationally. We rely primarily on third parties for transportation of the products we manufacture and/or distribute as well as delivery of our raw materials. In particular, a significant portion of the goods we manufacture and raw materials we use are transported by railroad or trucks, which are highly regulated.
If any of our third-party transportation providers were to fail to deliver the goods we manufacture or distribute in a timely manner, we may be unable to sell those products at full value or at all. Similarly, if any of these providers were to fail to deliver raw materials to us in a timely manner, we may be unable to manufacture our products in response to customer demand. In addition, if any of these third parties were to cease operations or cease doing business with us, we may be unable to replace them at reasonable cost.
Any failure of a third-party transportation provider to deliver raw materials or finished products in a timely manner could harm our reputation, negatively affect our customer relationships and have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operation.
In addition, an increase in transportation rates or fuel surcharges could materially adversely affect our sales and profitability.
We are a party to a number of legal proceedings, and adverse judgments in certain legal proceedings could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition.
The costs and other effects of pending litigation against us and related insurance recoveries cannot be determined with certainty. Although the disclosure in Note 16: Legal Proceedings, Commitments and Contingencies of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contains managements current views of the effect such litigation will have on our financial results, there can be no assurance that the outcome of such proceedings will be as expected.
For example, there have been several lawsuits filed against us alleging that we violated U.S. antitrust laws. Several lawsuits have been filed since 2000 in U.S. District Court in Oregon alleging we had monopoly power or attempted to gain monopoly power for alder logs and finished alder lumber in the Pacific Northwest market (the Alder Cases). In 2006, a series of lawsuits against us and other manufacturers of oriented strand board (OSB) were consolidated into one case in the U.S. District Court in Pennsylvania on behalf of purchasers of OSB. The lawsuit alleged that the manufacturers conspired to fix and raise OSB prices and caused the purchasers of OSB to pay artificially inflated prices. In the event liability is found in an antitrust case, the damages proved at trial are trebled. Jury verdicts and damages imposed against us in two of the Alder Cases were vacated as a result of a ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court in our favor in one of the Alder Cases and we have settled three of these cases, but one case is still pending. In the OSB case, the U.S. District Court issued a number of rulings approving class-action status for various classes of direct and indirect purchasers for the period June 2002 through February 2006. We settled with both classes of purchasers in first quarter 2008.
It is possible that there could be adverse judgments against us in some or all major litigation against us and that we could be required to take a charge for all or a portion of any damage award. Any such charge could materially and adversely affect our results of operations for the quarter or year in which we record it.
We may be required to pay significant export taxes or countervailing and anti-dumping duties for exported products.
We may experience reduced revenues and margins on some of our businesses as a result of export taxes or countervailing and anti-dumping duty applications. For example, in 2001, a group of companies filed petitions with the U.S. Department of Commerce and the International Trade Commission claiming that production of softwood lumber in Canada was being subsidized by Canada and that imports into the U.S. from Canada were being sold in U.S. markets at less than their fair value. We have softwood lumber facilities in Canada that export lumber into the U.S. We paid a total of $370 million in deposits for countervailing duty and anti-dumping tariffs from 2002 through 2006 related to those lumber exports. The U.S. and Canadian governments reached a settlement of the dispute in 2006. As a result of the settlement, we received a refund of $344 million in the fourth quarter of 2006. However, our Canadian softwood lumber facilities will have to pay an export tax when the price of lumber is at or below a threshold price. The export tax could be as high as 22.5 percent if a province exceeds its total allotted export share. Similar types of actions have been initiated from time to time against us and other U.S. producers of products such as paper or lumber by countries such as China and Korea. It is possible that countervailing duty and antidumping tariffs, or similar types of tariffs could be imposed on us in the future. We may experience reduced revenues and margins in any business that is subject to such tariffs or to the terms of the settlements of such international disputes. These tariffs or settlement terms could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial results and financial condition, including facility closures or impairments of assets.
Our business and operations could be adversely affected by weather, fire, infestation or natural disasters.
Our timberlands assets may be damaged by adverse weather, severe wind and rainstorms, fires, pest infestation or other natural disasters. Because our manufacturing processes primarily use wood fiber, in many cases from our own timberlands, in the event of material damage to our timberlands, our operations could be disrupted or our production costs could be increased.
The price of our common stock may be volatile.
The market price of our common stock may be influenced by many factors, some of which are beyond our control, including those described above under Risks Related to our Industries and Business and the following:
In addition, there has been significant volatility in the market price and trading volume of securities of companies operating in the forest products industry that often has been unrelated to the operating performance of particular companies.
Some companies that have had volatile market prices for their securities have had securities litigation brought against them. If litigation of this type is brought against us, it could result in substantial costs and would divert managements attention and resources.
UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
There are no unresolved comments that were received from the SEC staff relating to our periodic or current reports under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Details about our facilities, production capacities and locations are found in the Our Business What We Do section of this report.
Production capacities listed represent annual production volume under normal operating conditions and producing a normal product mix for each individual facility. Production capacities do not include any capacity for facilities that were sold or permanently closed as of year-end 2008.
See Note 16: Legal Proceedings, Commitments and Contingencies in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for a summary of legal proceedings.
SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
There were no matters submitted to a vote of security holders during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008.
MARKET FOR REGISTRANTS COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Our common stock trades on the following exchanges under the symbol WY:
As of December 31, 2008, there were approximately 11,088 holders of record of our common shares. Dividend-per-share data and the range of closing market prices for our common stock for each of the four quarters in 2008 and 2007 are included in Note 26 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
On December 19, 2008, we announced a new share-repurchase program. The board of directors authorized the repurchase of up to $250 million of our outstanding common shares. No shares were repurchased during 2008.
INFORMATION ABOUT SECURITIES AUTHORIZED FOR ISSUANCE UNDER OUR EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN
COMPARISON OF FIVE-YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL SHAREHOLDER RETURN
Weyerhaeuser Company, S&P 500 and Performance Peer Group
PERFORMANCE GRAPH ASSUMPTIONS
In 2006, we adopted a new peer group for performance comparisons. Recent consolidation in the forest products industry has decreased the number of our direct peers in the sector, and shareholders measure our performance against a broader set of peers. The compensation committee of the board of directors selected a broader-sized range of basic materials companies that typically have been used by shareholders as benchmarks for our performance. The performance peer group currently includes Alcoa, Air Products & Chemicals, Ball Corp., Celanese AG, Domtar Inc., Dow Chemical, DuPont, Eastman Chemical, Huntsman, International Paper, Louisiana-Pacific, MeadWestvaco, Monsanto, Nucor, Owens-Illinois, Praxair, PPG Industries, Rohm & Haas, Smurfit-Stone and U.S. Steel.
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN MILLIONS, EXCEPT PER-SHARE FIGURES