|
|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| |||||||||
WYN » Topics » Flexibility to offer competitive compensation arrangements, of which severance agreements are an important part, is an essential competitive tool for attracting and retaining executive talentThis excerpt taken from the WYN DEF 14A filed Apr 2, 2009. Flexibility to
offer competitive compensation arrangements, of which severance
agreements are an important part, is an essential competitive
tool for attracting and retaining executive talent
We operate in a highly competitive recruiting environment for
senior executives where a limited pool of qualified individuals
is targeted by a large number of companies. In order to attract
and retain the most qualified and talented executives in our
industry, the Board believes that our executive compensation
program should offer contractual agreements that provide
competitive severance benefits. This decision to offer severance
benefits has been made within the context of the prevailing
competitive marketplace for executive talent and after careful
consideration and review of many factors (see Compensation
Discussion and Analysis 2008 Executive Compensation
Elements and Decisions Severance Arrangements). The
Board believes that it is in the best interests of all
shareholders for us to have the ability to attract
highly-qualified and experienced executives.
The Board, unlike the proponent, does not believe that it is
practicable for us to enter into severance arrangements subject
to future shareholder approval. We would be unable to assure a
potential senior executive that the agreement would be approved
or ratified. Outstanding candidates would be unlikely to leave
their current employment to join us if the terms of their
employment with us were contingent on obtaining shareholder
approval. This uncertainty would make our offer less valuable
than those provided by other companies whose arrangements are
not subject to shareholder approval. This would put us at a
disadvantage to other companies with which we compete for
executive talent and would create delay and uncertainty in the
recruitment of senior executives. Our offer of employment under
these circumstances could also require the premature public
disclosure of confidential employment negotiations, which would
again negatively impact the value of our offer when compared to
a similar offer by one of our competitors. Therefore, the Board
believes that, this proposal would increase the likelihood of
losing talented executive candidates which is not in our best
interests or the best interests of our shareholders.
|
| |||||||