|
|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| |||||||||
This excerpt taken from the ZOOM 10-K filed Mar 12, 2009. Competition The communications network access industry is intensely competitive and characterized by aggressive pricing practices, continually changing customer demand patterns, and rapid technological advances, and emerging industry standards. These characteristics result in frequent introductions of new products with added capabilities and
7 features, and continuous improvements in the relative functionality and price of modems and other PC communications products. Our operating results and our ability to compete could be adversely affected if we are unable to: · successfully and accurately anticipate customer demand; · manage our product transitions, inventory levels, and manufacturing processes efficiently; · distribute or introduce our products quickly in response to customer demand and technological advances; · differentiate our products from those of our competitors; or · otherwise compete successfully in the markets for our products. Some of our primary competitors by product group include the following: · DSL modem competitors: 2Wire, 3Com, Actiontec, Airties, Asus, Aztech, Best Data, Cisco Systems (Linksys division), D-Link, Huawei, Netgear, Netopia, Sagem, Siemens (formerly Efficient Networks), Thomson, US Robotics, Westell, Xavi, and ZyXEL Communications. · Dial-up modem competitors: Best Data, Creative Labs, Lite-On, Sitecom, and US Robotics. · Cable modem competitors: Arris Systems, Cisco Systems (Linksys and Scientific Atlanta divisions), D-Link, Hon Hai Network Systems (formerly Ambit Microsystems), Motorola, Netgear, SMC Networks, Terrayon, and Thomson · VoIP hardware competitors: AudioCodes, Cisco Systems (Linksys division), Digium, D-Link, Draytek, Grandstream, Mediatrix, Micro-ATA, MultiTech, Patton, Snom, Zyxel, and 8x8. · Bluetooth competitors: Anycom, Belkin, D-Link, IOGear, Jabra, Kensington, Linksys, Logitech, Sitecom, SMC, Targus, Trendnet, and Trust. Many of our competitors and potential competitors have more extensive financial, engineering, product development, manufacturing, and marketing resources than we do. The principal competitive factors in our industry include the following: · product performance, features, reliability and quality of service; · price; · brand image; · product availability and lead times; · size and stability of operations; · breadth of product line and shelf space; · sales and distribution capability; · technical support and service; · product documentation and product warranties; · relationships with providers of broadband access services; and · compliance with industry standards. We believe we are able to provide a competitive mix of the above factors for our products, particularly when they are sold through retailers, computer product distributors, and small to medium sized Internet service providers, and system integrators. We are less successful in selling directly to large telephone companies and other large providers of broadband access services. DSL and cable modems transmit data at significantly faster speeds than dial-up modems. DSL and cable, however, typically require a more expensive Internet access service. In addition, the use of DSL and cable modems is currently impeded by a number of technical and infrastructure limitations. We began shipping both cable and DSL modems in the year 2000. We have had some success in selling to smaller phone companies and to Internet service
8 providers, but we have not sold significant quantities to large phone companies or to large cable service providers. We believe a small fraction of new US cable modem and DSL placements in 2008 were sold at retail, and that a low percentage were sold through retailers in most other countries. Some European countries, however, sell significant volumes of DSL modems through retailers. In the U.K., for instance, this has resulted in Zoom placing DSL modem models into retailer Dixons Store Group. Successfully penetrating the broadband modem market presents a number of challenges, including: · The current limited retail market for broadband modems; · The relatively small number of cable, telecommunications and Internet service providers that make up the majority of the market for broadband modems; · The significant bargaining power of these large volume purchasers; · The time-consuming, expensive and uncertain approval processes of the various cable and DSL service providers; and · The strong relationships with service providers enjoyed by some incumbent equipment providers, including Motorola and Cisco Systems for cable modems. The use of the Internet to provide voice communications services is a relatively recent market development. A substantial number of companies have emerged to provide VoIP products and services, and many of these companies have more extensive financial, engineering, product development, and marketing resources than we do. The principal competitive factors in the VoIP market include: price, brand recognition, service and support, features, distribution, and reliability. Competitors for our current VoIP hardware products are listed above. Competitors for our Skype VoIP products include a large number of companies worldwide, including Actiontec, Cisco Systems (Linksys division), D-Link, Motorola, Sennheiser, TeleVoIP, and U.S. Robotics. Competitors for our VoIP service include AT&T, iConnectHere, Net2Phone, Voicepulse, Vonage and 8x8, as well as incumbent telephone carriers and other providers of traditional telephone service. Many of our competitors have greater name recognition and resources than we have and may be better positioned to more aggressively develop, promote and sell their products, including by offering more attractive pricing policies and bundled service arrangements. In addition, if telecommunications rates continue to decrease, any competitive pricing advantage of our services may be diminished or eliminated. We cannot assure that we will be able to compete effectively. |
| |||||||