I find this article to be more pessimistic than neutral. There is no ref...

Suggestion by Tim Plaehn on 2008-02-28 15:41:33

I find this article to be more pessimistic than neutral. There is no reference to the fact that all facts to this time still show the company growing revenue and profits. The market has discounted the stock for recession, subprime crisis, competition, shrinking margins and New Coke. I have a bit of a problem with the assertion that during a recession consumers quickly decrease spending on luxury items. First, no recession has yet been declared. Second, those that buy luxury goods will still be able to if there is a recession. Third, modern consumers buy what they want, when they want, expecially on items that are not big ticket purchases. I think this article gives a good overview. I just believe it has been a bit tainted by the current negativity in market news reporting.

Add comments or discussion related to this suggestion here.

Wikinvest © 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012. Use of this site is subject to express Terms of Service, Privacy Policy, and Disclaimer. By continuing past this page, you agree to abide by these terms. Any information provided by Wikinvest, including but not limited to company data, competitors, business analysis, market share, sales revenues and other operating metrics, earnings call analysis, conference call transcripts, industry information, or price targets should not be construed as research, trading tips or recommendations, or investment advice and is provided with no warrants as to its accuracy. Stock market data, including US and International equity symbols, stock quotes, share prices, earnings ratios, and other fundamental data is provided by data partners. Stock market quotes delayed at least 15 minutes for NASDAQ, 20 mins for NYSE and AMEX. Market data by Xignite. See data providers for more details. Company names, products, services and branding cited herein may be trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective owners. The use of trademarks or service marks of another is not a representation that the other is affiliated with, sponsors, is sponsored by, endorses, or is endorsed by Wikinvest.
Powered by MediaWiki