




|
Topic
Top news source/blog that we're missing
Why do you recommend this news source?
|
||

WIKI ANALYSIS
|
Coca-Cola Enterprises (NYSE: CCE) is the world’s largest bottler of non-alcoholic beverages by volume. CCE produces, sells, and markets beverages using concentrated syrups bought from concentrate manufacturers, utilizing an extensive distribution network to deliver the finished product to consumers. CCE serves as the largest bottler for the Coca-Cola Company (NYSE:KO), producing 20% of all Coca-Cola products worldwide. 85% of CCE’s beverages are classified as carbonated soft drinks, or CSD, with non-carbonated soft drinks forming the other 15%.
CCE’s concentration in North America and Western Europe are a significant challenge for the company. Both markets have recently shown declining growth rates as changing consumer tastes and heightened health concerns prompt a shift away from CSD to healthier, non-carbonated alternatives. The longer-term shift toward healthier drinks is being compounded in the short run by a consumer-led recession in the U.S. which is hurting typically recession proof drink sales. At the same time, prices for the raw materials necessary for CCE’s bottling operations have become more expensive, increasing CCE’s per-unit production costs.
Despite these challenges, CCE has remained profitable in recent years. Its Coca-Cola beverages are among the most popular in the world, giving CCE the benefit of outstanding global brand recognition. Also, CCE has been cutting expenses by reducing its number of employees and working to use its assets more efficiently. In addition, CCE’s strategic significance to KO provides an added level of security. Although recently both companies have wrangled over lackluster sales in North America[1]
Company OverviewOriginally a division of the Coca-Cola Company (abbreviated as KO), Coca-Cola Enterprises (abbreviated as CCE) was spun off as an independent company in 1986 by means of an initial public offering, or IPO. The purpose of this spin-off was to separate KO’s high-margin concentrate business, responsible for manufacturing the syrups and concentrates used to produce final products, from CCE’s lower-margin, capital-intensive bottling business. KO still maintains a 35% stake in CCE, however, ensuring that the two companies continue their interdependent business relationship.[2]
Coca-Cola Enterprises bottles, markets, and distributes beverages for drink manufacturers, primarily the Coca-Cola Company. In 2008, CCE sold an estimated 42 billion bottles and cans, single-handedly accounting for 13% of all non-alcoholic beverages sold in North America and 9% of all non-alcoholic beverages sold in Europe.[3] CCE is heavily focused on the U.S. market, with 70% of its $21.8 billion[4] in 2008 revenues coming from domestic sales and the other 30% coming from sales in Europe.
KO is responsible for the manufacture of concentrated syrups for each of its drinks, which it then sells to bottlers. CCE, like other bottlers in the larger Coca-Cola system, uses these concentrates to produce, package, and distribute the finished products to wholesalers and retailers. CCE is Coca-Cola’s largest bottler, accounting for 16% of KO’s worldwide volume and 80% of its domestic can and bottle volumes. In turn, brands licensed by KO or its affiliates comprised 93% of CCE’s total sales volume in 2008, highlighting each company’s significance to the other’s performance. [5]
| Annual income data, in millions | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net Sales | $16,058 | $17,330 | $18,190 | $18,743 | $19,804 | $20,936 | $21,807 | |
| Gross Profit | $6,600 | $7,165 | $7,387 | $7,521 | $7,818 | $7,981 | $8,044 | |
| Operating Income | $1,364 | $1,577 | $1,436 | $1,431 | ($1,495) | $1,470 | ($6,299) | |
| Operating Margin | 8.49% | 9.1% | 7.89% | 7.63% | (7.55%) | 7.02% | (28.89%)[6][7] | |
Note: In 2009, CCE announced that an impairment charge of $7.6 billion would be included in the 2008 results, which explains the negative operating income for the year. This is an accounting charge related to the fact that the company's intangible assets, specifically its brands' trademarks, were not worth as much as the company had originally assumed. No actual money was lost. Similarly, a $2.6 billion impairment charge occurred in 2006.[8]
Quarterly Earnings1Q2009 In the first quarter of 2009, Coca-Cola Enterprises posted revenues of $5.05 billion, a 3% increase from year prior 1Q revenues; net income increased to $61 million from $8 million in 2008.[9] Although Coca-Cola Enterprises was negatively affected by the strengthening of the dollar against the euro and British pound, the company benefited from an 8% increase in pricing across its entire product line.[10]
2Q2009 In the second quarter of 2009, Coca-Cola Enterprises posted revenues of $5.9 billion, a 0.5% decrease from year prior 2Q revenues; net income increased to $313 million from a $3 billion loss in 2008.[11] Coca-Cola Enterprises faced a difficult quarter in the US, where volumes declined by 3.5% as the recession dampened buying. This decrease in volume was offset by an 8.5% increase in net pricing. The company's European segment, on the other hand, benefited from 6.5% volume growth, driven primarily by the trademark Coca-Cola and Coca-Cola Zero brands. Revenues, however, were adversely affected by a 7% adverse foreign currency exchange loss. Net income figures from 2008 were affected by two large nonrecurring items: a $5.2 billion charge related to an impairment of the company's franchise, and a $1.7 billion income tax benefit. Ignoring these items, net income would've been $276 million. Therefore, on a comparable basis, 2009 net income increased 13% from 2008. This increase is mostly due to the fact that the company's net overall pricing increases of 8% were matched by only a 6% increase in input costs. Coca-Cola Enterprises kept the rest of its costs virtually constant, leading to the increase in net income.[11]
ProductsAs a bottling company, Coca-Cola Enterprises’s product line is determined by the offerings of its concentrate manufacturers. Currently, CCE’s portfolio is composed primarily of the Coca-Cola Company’s products, though it does produce and bottle beverages for other companies. Although CCE’s products vary somewhat by region, many of its brands are similar across markets.
The drinks produced by CCE fall into one of three general categories: carbonated soft drinks (CSD), non-carbonated soft drinks (non-CSD), and water.
Carbonated Soft DrinksCarbonated soft drinks are the most common of Coca-Cola Enterprises’s offerings, accounting for 82% of the company’s total sales in 2008.[12] The majority of these beverages are Coca-Cola Company (KO) trademarked beverages, but they also include sparkling beverages as well as energy drinks. CCE bottles some of the world’s most popular brands of CSD, including:
Non-carbonated Soft DrinksNon-carbonated soft drinks include all beverages, excluding water, produced without carbonation, such as juices, tea, and coffee and dairy drinks. Sales for all non-CSD drinks totaled 10.5% of Coca-Cola Enterprises’s revenues in 2008.[12] Some of CCE’s prominent non-CSD offerings are:
WaterThough technically non-carbonated, water is often considered to be its own category due to the obvious differences between it and Coca-Cola Enterprises’s other products. In 2008, sales of bottled waters accounted for 7.5% of CCE's total revenues.[12] CCE produces three different brands of water:
Hansen's Monster Energy DrinksIn 2009, Coca-Cola Enterprises signed a distribution agreement with Hansen Natural (HANS) to distribute its Monster line of energy drinks. In the second quarter of 2009 alone, CCE's sales of energy drinks increased by 25%.[11] The line includes many different beverages which appeal to the rapidly growing energy drink market.
Relationship with Coca-Cola CompanyAs the name implies, Coca-Cola Enterprises and the Coca-Cola Company have a close professional relationship. Even though they separated in 1986, KO still owns 35% of CCE’s stocks, just below the level that would require consolidation. In addition, two of CCE’s thirteen board seats are held by KO executives. Unlike rival Pepsico (PEP), Coca-Cola Company will likely not make a bid to purchase CCE because a consolidated company would not offer the same cost cutting synergies as it does for Pepsico (PEP).[13] Since Coca-Cola realizes a smaller percentage of total sales in the US than does Pepsico (PEP), it has much less to gain from a consolidated company.
This intimate relationship with KO has both positive and negative implications for CCE.
Master AgreementCoca-Cola Enterprises and the Coca-Cola Company have a master agreement that stipulates the conditions of their business arrangement. In this agreement, KO guarantees CCE exclusive rights to produce, market, and sell Coca-Cola products in certain geographic regions. In return, CCE agrees to buy all its concentrates from KO. KO sets the price for these concentrates at its own discretion, with no negotiation beforehand. Once KO sets a new price, CCE has 30 days in which to reject the price change. If CCE rejects the new price, the master agreement is terminated 90 days after the date of rejection.
Change of Control ProvisionThe master agreement also includes a provision that discourages any individual or company from obtaining a significant percentage of CCE’s stock. If one entity comes to own 10% or more of CCE’s shares, KO can cancel the master agreement. This clause effectively prevents hostile takeover attempts, but it also helps ensure CCE’s continued dependence on KO.
Benefits
Drawbacks
Trends & Forces
Consumer Slowdown in U.S. Threatens Sales Soaring food and energy prices[14], the housing slump[15] and a weakening job market[16] are putting the breaks on consumer spending in North America. Although the carbonated soda market is typically considered to be fairly recession proof, CCE has seen chronic weakness in North American sales over the course of fiscal 2008.[17] A potential collapse in consumer spending in the U.S. bodes ill for Coca-Cola Enterprises. Unlike KO which derives over 80% of operating income overseas, CCE is heavily concentrated in the United States and the United Kingdom which is also faces a serious threat of recession[18].
Falling Commodity Prices Will Improve CCE's Operating MarginsSome commodities that have a particularly significant impact on CCE's production costs are:
US/European Market SaturationThe United States and Western European non-alcoholic beverage markets have seen low growth rates and high levels of competition in recent years. These markets are more or less saturated with Coca-Cola products, and there isn't much room for future growth. Although CCE is heavily concentrated in these markets, the company has been slow to venture into other, emerging markets. These emerging markets are relatively risky, but they can be very lucrative and offer high consumption growth rates.
New Aversion to Soda Threatens Main BusinessAn 85% majority of Coca-Cola Enterprises’s products are classified as carbonated soft drinks, making it particularly sensitive to changes in demand for these CSD. Recently, consumer demand for CSD has been negatively affected by health concerns over obesity, diabetes, etc. This is true across most of CCE’s markets. There has been an increase in the number of regulations regarding CSD in the United States in response to the heightened concern over health risks. Many public schools now ban the sale of soft drinks on their campuses. The Center for Science and Public Interest proposed that a warning label be placed on all beverages containing more than 13g of sugar per 12-oz serving. This proposal would affect all non-diet, full-calorie drinks produced by Coca-Cola Enterprises. These factors have driven a shift in consumption away from CSD to healthier alternatives, such as tea, juices, and water. Within the CSD segment, consumers have been moving away from the sugared drinks, opting instead for diet beverages, which do not generally contain any sugar or calories. Though this trend has been in motion since 2000, sugared drinks still account for 72% of CCE’s total CSD sales.
CompetitorsAs a bottler, CCE has somewhat limited control over its competitiveness, due to the fact that KO offerings essentially determine the CCE product line. CCE can and does, however, compete with other bottlers in terms of distribution efficiency, managing price fluctuations of production inputs, and marketing its products.
References



| ||||||
