EOG Resources Inc. (NYSE: EOG) is one of the largest independent natural gas producers in the United States. EOG’s reserves are primarily located in major basins within the United States, but the firm also has international operations in Canada, Trinidad, the United Kingdom, and the North Sea. [1]
With approximately 85% of its production in natural gas, EOG has responded to the depletion of conventional sources of this commodity by shifting its focus to unconventional deposits such as the Barnett Shale near Fort Worth, Texas. The difficult process of extracting gas from unconventional resources has only become economically feasible in recent years, and EOG has become highly efficient in these operations. In the Barnett Shale, it has reduced costs by cutting the time it takes to drill a well in half, and it plans to apply lessons learned at this unconventional field to other shale-based resources in the next two years.[2]
The Barnett Shale has become one of North America's "hot spots" for natural gas and EOG owns about 610,000 acres of this area. In general, EOG avoids pricey acquisitions and relies on its ability to develop existing operations in order to keep costs low. Although EOG’s competitors have generated more impressive production growth, EOG maintains one of the industry’s lowest-cost asset bases. The firm has also outlined plans to build its own gathering, processing, and transportation infrastructure for its resources in Texas and North Dakota, which will create vertical efficiencies and maximize margins in the long term.
[edit] Company Overview
Traditional oil and natural gas deposits are being depleted and the importance of developing new technologies and discovering new basins is at the core of EOG’s ability to sustain economic growth since they do not rely on expensive acquisitions to grow. EOG’s decision to avoid acquisitions has kept the company from enjoying impressive production growth but allowed it maintain efficient operating margins. In comparison with some of its leading competitors such as XTO Energy and Devon Energy, EOG has not grown as rapidly which might lead some investors to think the company's success has been congruent with its growth. However, EOG’s low cost mentality in its holdings in some of the most productive and promising areas for natural gas (the Barnett Shale) has allowed it to generate better margins and returns than other companies with properties in the same regions.
As of 2007, EOG’s estimated net proved natural gas reserves were 6,095 Bcf and estimated net proved crude oil, condensate and natural gas liquids reserves were 118 million barrels. Approximately 60 percent of EOG’s reserves on a natural gas equivalent basis were located in the United States, 20 percent in Canada, 20 percent in Trinidad and less than 1 percent in the United Kingdom North Sea.[3]
[4]
[5]
[edit] Trends and Forces
- The Company Prefers to Avoid Acquisitions- Historically, EOG's business model has shunned acquisitions and preferred to find and develop resource basins on its own. By avoiding pricey acquisitions EOG has kept its operating expenses and capital costs in check. EOG's low-cost mentality has allowed the company to invest in existing operations in unconventional deposits such as the Barnett Shale which, as of late, has developed into one of the most prolific natural gas producing basins in North America.
- High Natural Gas and Oil Prices Have Doubled EOG's Profits- Coupled with the company's low operation costs, the dramatic increase in gas and oil prices have more than doubled EOG's revenue since 2004. With approximately 88% of the company's proved reserves natural gas, only 12% account for crude oil.[6] Unfortunately, the price of natural gas has not erupted as significantly as oil prices. So although the company has benefited from price increases, it hasn't had the same acceleration of revenue and operating profit as more oil-focused competitors.
- OPEC's Role- OPEC plays an important role in regulating the high market prices that have benefited EOG. Artificially high oil and gas prices are important to the company's profitability because these resources are commodity goods, making their markets subject to volatile price cycles and harsh price competition.
- Emerging Markets in Hybrid and Alternative Energy Technology Might Compete with EOG in the Long Term - Rising oil prices have led both consumers and companies to seek out alternative sources of energy and invest in renewable energy such as nuclear, solar, wind, biofuels, and ethanol. As the global consumer demand shifts toward renewable energy sources due to recent environmental concerns over climate change, this change in consumer consciousness may adversely affect the oil and gas industry. With the advent of hybrid and fuel cell vehicles and the cost of gasoline becoming dangerously close to $4 per gallon, consumers have become less inclined to purchase gas guzzling SUV’s opposed to more fuel-efficient cars. As a result oil and gas companies stand to lose if the industry encounters a sudden decrease in demand.
[edit] Competition
EOG has established itself as one of the most efficient companies within the oil and gas industry due to its low-cost approach and its high-producing acquisitions. With one of the best operating margins and an industry high gross developed acreage, EOG remains competitive by drilling effectively. The company's impressive developed acreage means that EOG is making the most of what it owns and getting more out of its properties than competing companies. Instead of looking for new acquisitions, EOG re-invests capital into developing what it already owns.
EOG’s comparative success in North America has prompted the company to begin evaluating additional exploration, development and exploitation opportunities in Trinidad, the United Kingdom and other international areas.[7] If EOG can translate its operational efficiencies into potentially more profitable operations abroad, it can offset its absence from the growing deepwater drilling market and continue to build its revenues.
Below is a table comparing several independent oil & gas companies across several metrics.
|
|
|
|
| Proved Reserves
|
|
| Square Footage
|
|
|
| | Revenue TTM ($M) | Operating Margin | Production (MMcfe/Day)[8] | Oil (MMBbls) | Natural Gas (Bcf) | LNG (MMBbls) | Gross developed acreage (in thou) | Gross undeveloped acreage | Gross Total
|
| FST | 934 | 33.2% | 310 | 80.3 | 778 | 112 | 766 | 8416 | 9182
|
| DNR | 811.04 | 39.9% | 220 | 126 | 288 | | 224 | 471 | 695
|
| EOG | 3760 | 48.5% | 1561 | 118 | 6095 | | 3777 | 8279 | 12056
|
| KWK | 514.21 | 42.8% | 167 | 6.3 | 1241 | 48 | 936 | 1610 | 2546
|
| NBL | 2890 | 40.2% | 408 | 296 | 3231 | | 1934 | 10,295 | 12229
|
| NFX | 1810 | 27.3% | 664 | 114 | 1586 | | 1593 | 6006 | 7599
|
| PXD | 1710 | 18.9% | 1617 | | 2927 | 416 | 1874 | 16592 | 18466
|
| PXP | 1020 | 26.9% | 1009 | 333 | 111 | | 149 | 587.5 | 736.5
|
| RRC | 868.35 | 38.0% | 276 | 53.7 | 1436 | 53.7 | 1458 | 1756 | 3214
|
| SM | 862 | 38.4% | 254 | 74.2 | 482.5 | | 992 | 1291 | 2283
|
| STR | 2700 | 30.1% | 355 | 28.4 | 1461 | 28.4 | 2401 | 1825 | 4226
|
| SWN | 1070 | 29.1% | 198 | 7.9 | 979 | | 520 | 1608 | 2128
|
| XEC | 1290 | 33.1% | 449 | 59.8 | 1090 | 59.8 | 1945 | 4445 | 6390
|
| XTO | 5120 | 59.4% | 1527 | 214.4 | 6940 | 53 | 3182 | 808 | 3990
|
|
| [9]
2004 Data 2005 Data 2006 Data 2007 Data 2008 Data Most Recent Data Available
[edit] Footnotes
- ↑ EOG Annual 10-k Report, “Business” pg. 1
- ↑ Naturalgas.org
- ↑ EOG Corporate Website
- ↑ Google Finance
- ↑ EOG 2006 Annual 10-k Report, "Business" pg.1
- ↑ EOG 2006 Annual 10-k Report, "Business" pg.1
- ↑ EOG 2006 Annual 10-k Report, "Business" pg.1
- ↑ MMcfe/day, or millions of natural gas cubic feet equivalent, is a measure of the level of production per day that converts oil into the energy-yielding natural gas equivalent using a ratio of 6 to 1 (natural gas to oil)
- ↑ EOG 2006 Annual 10-k Report
- ↑ APC, 10K for 2006, Item 7, Page 35
- ↑ APC, 10K for 2006, Item 7, Page 34
- ↑ APC, 10K of 2006, Item 8, Page 120
- ↑ APC, 10K of 2006, Item 1, Page 15
- ↑ APC, 10K of 2006, Item 8, Page 65
- ↑ 15.0 15.1 EOG, 10K for 2006, Item 2, Page 18
- ↑ EOG, 10K for 2006, Item 15, F-33
- ↑ EOG, 10K for 2006, Item 2, Page 17
- ↑ EOG, 10K for 2006, Item 6, Page 20
- ↑ 19.0 19.1 NBL, 10k for 2007, Item 8 pg 64
- ↑ NBL, 10k for 2007, Item 2 pg 12
- ↑ NBL, 10k for 2007, pg 110
- ↑ NBL, 10k for 2007, Item 2 pg 13
- ↑ 23.0 23.1 23.2 SWN, 10K for 2006, Item 6, Page 37
- ↑ SWN, 10K for 2006, Item 2, Page 31
- ↑ SWN, 10K for 2006, Item 6, Page 36
- ↑ 26.0 26.1 XTO, 2007 10-K, Item 1 & 2, Page 12
- ↑ XTO, 2006 10-K, Item 1 & 2, Page 8
- ↑ XTO, 2006 10-K, Item 1 & 2, Page 9
- ↑ XTO, 2006 10-K, Item 6, Page 24
|
|
Edit Metric
EOG Resources
Edit
History
Bookmark
