close
Edit Metric
Company
Value
Source
Source URL
Notes
Cancel
 
close
Edit  |  History
Details
Company:
Value :
Source:
Source URL:
Notes:
 
Feedback  |  FAQ
Get involved

With net sales of $4.7B in 2006[1]Jones Apparel Group, Inc. (NYSE: JNY) is a major clothing manufacturer. The company owns several mid-range department store brands that cater to young professional men and women, including Jones New York, Anne Klein, and Nine West. In addition to these working wardrobe basics, the company sells children's clothing through its Energie, GLO Girl, and l.e.i. brands.

Department stores' share of the the retail clothing market has been shrinking for years, and since the majority of Jones' revenue (around 75% between 2004 and 2006[2]) comes from selling its clothing wholesale to mid-market department stores, the company's revenue has declined over the past three years as a result of department store consolidation .

Contents

[edit] Company Overview

[edit] Breakdown of Holdings

Jones Apparel Group, Inc. Revenue by Business Segment, 2004-2006
Jones Apparel Group, Inc. Revenue by Business Segment, 2004-2006[3]

One of the clearest trends in recent years for Jones is the decrease in its wholesale business and a corresponding increase in its retail segment. Jones' wholesale business has steadily decreased in recent years, largely due to the consolidation in the department store industry. Department stores have closed stores and reduced orders of traditional brands in favor of cheaper private labels.

However this industry-wide trend fails to account for all of the decrease in the company's ratio of wholesale-to-retail holdings. 2006 wholesale revenues were particularly low due to a $279M loss that Jones took as part of a one-time sale of its Polo Jeans Company business. Jones sold the business back to Polo Ralph Lauren as part of a litigation settlement in February of that year.[4]

By contrast, retail revenues almost doubled between 2004 and 2006(from $780M to $1.478B respectively). While the increase was partially a result of new store openings and a rise in same-store sales, it was also driven by the company's $400M purchase of the luxury department store Barneys New York, which it has since sold for $948M.[5]

[edit] Recent Earnings

Jones Apparel Group, Inc. Revenue and Operating Income, 2002-2006
Jones Apparel Group, Inc. Revenue and Operating Income, 2002-2006[6][7]

In 2006, Jones saw a sharp drop in its net operating income. The company went from a $497M gain in 2005 to a loss of $144M in the following year. These losses were largely due to the sale of its Polo Jeans Company business, as well a $491 as a result of goodwill and trademark impairments. While the loss from the Polo sale was a one time event, the goodwill impairment shows that the company foresees a significant decrease in revenue across several of its moderately-priced apparel brands in the coming years.[8]

[edit] Trends and Forces

[edit] Dependency on Department Stores

Department stores in the United States have undergone significant changes in recent years. In response to declining margins, stores have implemented tighter inventory controls and have scaled back the quantities of merchandise that they purchase from wholesalers. As three-quarters of Jones’ business comes from its wholesale relationships, Jones appears especially vulnerable to such changes. Bond rating firms Moody's and S&P hit Jones' bonds with a downgrade to "junk" status in September of 2007, citing negative industry-wide trends for department stores, the core of Jones' customer base.[9] The company’s ten biggest clients accounted for almost half of Jones’ total revenue in 2006[10], and the loss of any of those clients would come with a significant loss in wholesale revenue.

In addition to competing with other major brands for department store business, Jones has to contend with the rise of private label merchandise as well. As private labels become an increasing part of department store sales[11], big companies may scale back on the traditional brands they order from companies like Jones. Department stores have a strong incentive to prefer private labels wherever possible because they can be sold at higher margins than outside brands.

In addition, a series of mergers and acquisitions in the industry (e.g. Federated Department Stores' 2005 takeover of Marshall Field's) give the businesses that remain potentially greater power to negotiate lower prices with Jones, thereby lowering profits.

[edit] Volatility of Fashion Trends

As fashion trends fluctuate in unpredictable ways, apparel companies must be careful to not fall behind from season to season. However, Jones appears to be better situated that some competitors in that several of the company's large core brands are comprised of basic wardrobe staples (e.g. Jones New York suits, Anne Klein blouses) that are not particularly vulnerable to the swings in the high-end fashion world. In addition, the company’s recent sale of Barney’s New York (which sells luxury brands like Marc Jacobs, Fendi, and Prada) marked its exit from the more expensive end of the designer label market and a return to its mid-market core brands.

[edit] Competition

Jones faces competition from a variety of sources. Its Jones New York and Anne Klein sportswear and suits compete with brands like Liz Claiborne, Ann Taylor, and Banana Republic. Jones’ l.e.i. and GLO Girls brands compete for the younger consumer’s business with Aeropostale and The Gap.


Operational Metrics, 2006[12] Liz Claiborne Jones Apparel Group Phillips-Van Heusen
Same-Store Sales Growth 2.1%[13] 4.8%[14] 8%
Revenue 4.99B 4.74B 2.09B
Gross Margin 47.8% 36.36% 49.26%
Operating Margin 10.43% 8.7% 12.19%
Net Income 254.68M -146.00M 155.23M


  1. Jones Apparel Group, Inc. 2006 10-K(filed February 26, 2007), p. 36
  2. Jones Apparel Group, Inc. 2006 10-K(filed February 26, 2007), p. 35
  3. Graph data from Jones Apparel Group, Inc. 2006 10-K (filed February 26, 2007)
  4. Jones Apparel Group, Inc. 2006 10-K (filed February 26, 2007), p. 36
  5. Jones Apparel Group, Inc. 2007 Q3 10-Q (filed November 5, 2007), p. 9
  6. Graph data from Jones Apparel Group, Inc. 2006 10-K (filed February 26, 2007)
  7. Amounts are in millions.
  8. Jones Apparel Group, Inc. 2006 10-K (filed February 26, 2007), pp. 33-34
  9. "Jones Net Up, But Revenue Weakens" (WSJ.com: published October 31, 2007)
  10. Jones Apparel Group, Inc. 2006 10-K (filed February 26, 2007), p. 13
  11. "Stores boost sales with own labels" (San Francisco Chronicle, May 5, 2006)
  12. Unless otherwise noted, the figures in the table below come from Yahoo! Finance and/or Phillips-Van Heusen's 2006 10-K (filed April 5, 2007).
  13. From Polo Ralph Lauren Wikinvest article
  14. From Polo Ralph Lauren Wikinvest article



The Shelf
Contributions
Help make Wikinvest better! Learn how to get involved. And create an account to build your reputation.
Did you know…?
Bookmarks
Worried about pump and dump?
We review changes
for stock spam
Want to make Wikinvest better?
We need your help,
contribute today
Do you write software?
We are recruiting
the best engineers
Like Wikinvest?
Spread the word —
Tell your friends!
Wikinvest © 2006, 2007, 2008. Use of this site is subject to express Terms of Service, Privacy Policy, and Disclaimer. By continuing past this page, you agree to abide by these terms. Any information provided by Wikinvest, including but not limited to company data, competitors, business analysis, market share, sales revenues and other operating metrics, earnings call analysis, conference call transcripts, industry information, or price targets should not be construed as research, trading tips or recommendations, or investment advice and is provided with no warrants as to its accuracy. Stock market data, including US and International equity symbols, stock quotes, share prices, earnings ratios, and other fundamental data is provided by data partners. Stock market quotes delayed at least 15 minutes for NASDAQ, 20 mins for NYSE and AMEX. See data providers for more details. Company names, products, services and branding cited herein may be trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective owners. The use of trademarks or service marks of another is not a representation that the other is affiliated with, sponsors, is sponsored by, endorses, or is endorsed by Wikinvest.
Powered by MediaWiki