
|
|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |


Election 2008 |

Suggest other news sources for this topic

The two main candidates, Barack Obama (Democrat) and John McCain (Republican), differ greatly in their approach to the economy. On points ranging from how deal with rising energy prices to whether or not to continue the war in Iraq, the variations between their plans to solve America's problems will have macroeconomic and industry-specific effects.
In general, Obama's platform revolves around government intervention and aid of failing or emerging markets, and renewable energy companies will be given an extra R&D boost in the form of billions of dollars of government investment. McCain, on the other hand, believes in a free-market, hands-off approach. His positions on the war and on energy independence mean that the defense and oil industries will benefit.
Companies that Benefit from an Obama AdministrationRenewable energy companies will benefit from Obama's energy policy mandating a transition away from carbon-based fossil fuels; he plans on spending $15 billion a year for ten years on clean energy infrastructure development. [1] These include:
Housing and home improvement demand could fall even further if Obama's tax increases curb investment on the consumer and industrial side, as well as reduce marginal incomes of high income earners. This could be especially painful for higher end home builers like Toll Brothers
High-speed telecommunications infrastructure companies like Alcatel-Lucent, Tellabs, Motorola, Finisar, Corning, and Emcore as well as railroad companies like CSX and Burlington Northern Santa Fe will reap the returns of government contracts stemming from Obama's infrastructure spending plan.
Companies that Benefit from a McCain AdministrationOil exploration and production companies will benefit from McCain's relaxation of the federal offshore drilling ban. These include
The defense industry benefits from McCain's proactive position on American defense spending and the Iraq War.
Companies invested in Brazilian sugar ethanol like Goldman Sachs and BP will benefit from McCain's desire to eliminate ethanol import tariffs.
Tax Plan ComparisonObama's proposes to tax the rich heavily while cutting taxes middle class earners. McCain will cut taxes across the board, most significantly for the rich.[2]
| [2] | MCCAIN | OBAMA |
| Income | Change in avg. tax bill | Change in avg. tax bill |
| Over $2.9M | (-$269,364) | +$701,885 |
| $603K and up | (-$45,361) | +$115,974 |
| $227K-$603K | (-$7,871) | +$12 |
| $161K-$227K | (-$4,380) | (-$2,789) |
| $112K-$161K | (-$2,614) | (-$2,204) |
| $66K-$112K | (-$1,009) | (-$1,290) |
| $38K-$66K | (-$319) | (-$1,042) |
| $19K-$38K | (-$113) | (-$892) |
| Under $19K | (-$19) | (-$567) |
Barack Obama's PlatformOn Energy and the Environment
On the Macroeconomy
John McCain's PlatformOn Energy and the Environment
On the Macroeconomy
Notes 


| |||||||