close
Edit Metric
Company
Value
Source
Source URL
Notes
Cancel
 
close
Edit  |  History
Details
Company:
Value :
Source:
Source URL:
Notes:
 
Feedback  |  FAQ
Get involved

Sugar Prices

Concept

Around 160K metric tons of sugar are produced every year,[1] with the largest producers in the United States, the European Union, Brazil and India.[1] The primary driver of sugar prices is government regulation. Many governments heavily subsidize their sugar manufacturers, to "dump" cheaply-priced sugar in the market, while the United States government has tried to elevate prices within its borders by imposing import restrictions.[2] Since sugar is a good source for ethanol production, oil prices and the demand for ethanol are also impact the international price of sugar; for example, in the first half of 2008, sugar prices increased by more than 20% in response to rising gasoline prices.[3]

Contents

[edit] Price

World Sugar (No. 11) futures prices for March, 2009 delivery. Price is in US Dollars per 100 pounds

[edit] Production and Usage

Sugar is commercially produced from sugar beets and sugar canes.[4] Sugar beets are grown year-round and account for 60% of US total production, while sugar canes are grown perennially and account for 40% of US total production.[5] Both production processes yield the same sugar product.[5] Sugar production in the United States generates $10B in economic activity annually, and the sugar/corn sweetener industries generate $21.1B in economic activity.[4]

Sugar is used in food products to sweeten and add texture and color.[4] On average, each American consumes 45 pounds of sugar, 45 pounds of high fructose corn syrup (HFCS) and 2 pounds of honey/syrup yearly.[4] In total, Americans consume 10,000 tons of sugar every year.[4] Sugar end products are raw cane sugar, wholesale and retail refined sugar, cereal, candy, baed goods, and ethanol.[4]

[edit] Pricing and Volume Trends

From 1994 to 2004, sugar prices dropped significantly as a result of increasing supply. While supply depleted from 2004 to 2006, it has resurged since then, which is reflected in the general drop in prices.[6] Within the past year, however, concerns regarding high fuel prices (see below) have pushed prices higher.[6]


The US is the second largest net sugar importer.[4] Other key players in the world sugar market are the European Union (EU), Brazil and India.[1] The EU, like the US, has implemented policies that artificially inflate sugar prices.[2] Brazil, on the other hand, heavily subsidizes its sugar farmers to support its sugar-ethanol program.[5]

World Sugar Production (1000 metric tons)[1]
Year 2008 2007 2006
US 7,362 7,614 7,663
EU 16,814 17,740 17,757
Brazil 33,700 32,100 31,450
India 24,830 28,930 30,780
World 161,712 165,384 164,183

[edit] Impact on Companies

[edit] Who Hurts

  • Sugar is also an ingredient for a variety of bakery products, syrups, and food preservatives. This broadens the impact of sugar prices to a diverse range of food companies, such as Kraft Foods (KFT) (i.e. mayonnaise production) and Nestle (NSRGY) (i.e. chocolate powder production).

Many of these companies buy sugar through long-term (5-6 years) contracts that dampen the effect of price hikes, and sometimes pass on price increases to consumers.[4] In addition to harming bottom-line earnings, rising sugar prices have empirically caused lowered employment in US food businesses, the relocation of such businesses to Canada and Mexico, and growing imports of sugar-based food products.[4]


  • Rising sugar prices also impact ethanol producers (see above). However, most ethanol producers that use sugar as a raw material are based in based in countries such as Brazil that heavily subsidize their domestic sugar industries. In the United States, less than 3% of total ethanol production come from sugar.

[edit] Who Wins

  • Sugar refiners also benefit from higher prices, which increase their margins. In the United States, these include Domino Sugar Corporation and US Sugar Corporation. Foreign refiners include Savannah Sugar Estates (based in Mauritius) and Colonial Sugar Refining (based in Australia).
  • Companies that are involved in the production and sale of high-fructose corn syrup, a substitute for sugar, benefit from rising sugar prices.[7] These companies include Archer-Daniels-Midland (ADM) and Corn Products International (CPO). Furthermore, many companies that depend on sugar for their products (see above) also use corn syrup. This is especially true for beverage companies.
  • A large number of foreign companies also benefit from rising sugar prices in the United States. Many foreign governments force sugar producers in their countries to sell sugar at prices similar to those within the United States. Rising US sugar prices consequently raise their margins in the short run. However, since many of these companies are regulated by their governments to sell sugar at prices lower than the costs of production, rising prices mainly help in decreasing their losses. Furthermore, lower US sugar prices potentially help foreign companies in the long-term because they flatten the margins of their US competitors (see pump and dump). These companies include Illovo Sugar and Rajshree Sugars.

[edit] Price Drivers

[edit] Government policies artificially inflate prices

Around the world, sugar is one of the most heavily-subsidized commodities. 80% of foreign sugar market prices are subsidized by their respective governments to match the price of sugar in the United States, a value that is lower than production costs for sugar in those countries.[4] This practice, called dumping, enables foreign manufacturers to eliminate sugar surpluses and gain market share. In response to price dumping, Congress has enacted legislation (the Farm Bill in 2002) that imposes foreign import restrictions on sugar.[6] Such legislation helps US sugar farmers compete with foreign producers, but hurts the consumer and US food companies since they have kept domestic sugar prices more than twice as high as world prices.[1] Therefore, the various political influences on the federal government, such as lobbying by sugar farmers, are a key determinant of sugar prices in the United States.

US vs World Sugar Prices (cents per pound)[1]
Year 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004
US 53.50 51.80 51.60 43.20 42.60
World 17.92 12.87 18.16 14.81 11.80

[edit] Ethanol commercialization increases the demand for sugar

More than 50% of world ethanol production stems from sugar.[5] Producing ethanol from sugar is more efficient than producing ethanol from corn (the ratio of required input energy is one to two).[5] Brazil is the leader in this production process, using 60% of its sugar canes for ethanol.[5] On the other hand, less than 3% of the ethanol produced in the United States comes from sugar.[5] Commercialization of the sugar-ethanol production process raises the demand for sugar, leading to increases in sugar prices. Whether this commercialization occurs or not depends on oil prices. When oil prices rise, then biofuels become more attractive, elevating the demand for ethanol. For example, in the first half of 2008, sugar prices increased by 22% in response to rising oil prices.[8]

[edit] Producer cooperatives give US farmers more control over prices

Farmers in the United States have formed cooperatives that enable farmers to own their processing facilities and build them near sugar production sites.[5] This process of vertical integration also enable farmers in the US to move closer to economies of scale. While the formation of cooperatives decrease processing and transportation costs, they give US farmers more power over the price of sugar.[5] For example, in 2002, cooperatives controlled 82% of sugar beet production in the United States, giving them significant power over the selling process.[9] Combined with strict government policies, sugar producer cooperatives have kept sugar prices in the United States two to three times prices within other countries. Cooperatives also play an important role in deciding the course of sugar-to-ethanol commercialization since they have control over initial processing stages.[5]

[edit] Perceived health effects of sugar decrease sugar demand

Public health concerns regarding obesity, heart disease and diabetes (see obesity and cardiac disease), particularly in the United States, decrease the demand for sugar-based products. As a result, consumers turn towards sugar-free foods as well as sugar substitutes such as high fructose corn starch. From 2005 to 2008, revenues of the artificial sweetener industry grew by around 8%.[10] The industry is estimated to be worth $3B globally.[11] In comparison, the market size of domestic sugar is around $2.3B ($900M for cane sugar).[12]

[edit] Basic macroeconomic trends also drive sugar supply and demand

Macroeconomic trends that affect the prices of sugar include world-wide income and population growth. When more people are able to afford sugar-based foods, the demand for sugar rises, driving up sugar prices. Important regions of such growth are Asia, North Africa and the Middle East.[8] Sugar consumption in developing countries has grown at around 1.8% per year. [13] The price and availability of substitutes in developing countries also affect sugar prices. Sugar substitutes include high-fructose corn syrup, starch and artificial sweeteners.[8] Many developing countries are consuming more artificial sweeteners in place of sugar as a result of higher prices and health concerns.


[edit] References

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 USDA Economic Research Service "Sugar and Sweeteners: Data Tables"
  2. 2.0 2.1 "Commodity Outlook 2003: US and World Sugar Markets"
  3. Trading Markets "Sugar: A Sweet Market On the Move"
  4. 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.5 4.6 4.7 4.8 4.9
  5. 5.0 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 5.5 5.6 5.7 5.8 5.9
  6. 6.0 6.1 6.2 ABARE "Sugar Outlook to 2009-10"
  7. HFCS Facts "Is HFCS sweeter than sugar?"
  8. 8.0 8.1 8.2 TM "Sugar: A Sweet Market on the Move"
  9. Rocky Mountain Sugar Growers Cooperative "FUTURE EFFECTS OF THE U.S. SUGAR PROGRAM – IMPACT ON PRODUCER COOPERATIVES"
  10. Food USA "Sugar demand rising at expense of sweeteners, claims sugar industry"
  11. Food and Beverage "Controversial Stevia May Be Wild Card in $3 Billion Sweetener Market"
  12. IBISWorld "Sugarcane Farming"
  13. Food and Agriculture Office of the United Nations "Food Outlook"
The Shelf
Contributions
Help make Wikinvest better! Learn how to get involved. And create an account to build your reputation.
Did you know…?
Bookmarks
Worried about pump and dump?
We review changes
for stock spam
Want to make Wikinvest better?
We need your help,
contribute today
Do you write software?
We are recruiting
the best engineers
Like Wikinvest?
Spread the word —
Tell your friends!
Wikinvest © 2006, 2007, 2008. Use of this site is subject to express Terms of Service, Privacy Policy, and Disclaimer. By continuing past this page, you agree to abide by these terms. Any information provided by Wikinvest, including but not limited to company data, competitors, business analysis, market share, sales revenues and other operating metrics, earnings call analysis, conference call transcripts, industry information, or price targets should not be construed as research, trading tips or recommendations, or investment advice and is provided with no warrants as to its accuracy. Stock market data, including US and International equity symbols, stock quotes, share prices, earnings ratios, and other fundamental data is provided by data partners. Stock market quotes delayed at least 15 minutes for NASDAQ, 20 mins for NYSE and AMEX. See data providers for more details. Company names, products, services and branding cited herein may be trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective owners. The use of trademarks or service marks of another is not a representation that the other is affiliated with, sponsors, is sponsored by, endorses, or is endorsed by Wikinvest.
Powered by MediaWiki